Faculty Bibliography

This umbrella review synthesizes data on the prevalence of mental disorder symptoms among university students worldwide. A systematic search of seven databases (inception-July 23, 2023) followed PRISMA guidelines. We included meta-analyses assessing the prevalence of mental disorder symptoms, evaluating methodological quality with AMSTAR-2. A random-effects meta-analysis was conducted, along with meta-regression and subgroup analyses for moderators (percentage of females, publication date, healthcare-related degrees, COVID-19 pandemic). We included 1,655 primary studies from 62 meta-analyses, encompassing 8,706,185 participants. AMSTAR-2 ratings classified 35 % of meta-analyses as low quality and 65 % as critically low. Pooled prevalence estimates were: depression-mild (35.41 %, CI=33.9-36.93) and severe (13.42 %, CI=8.03-19.92; k=952; n=2,108,813); anxiety-mild (40.21 %, CI=37.39-43.07) and severe (16.79 %, CI=7.21-29.29; k=433; n=1,579,780); sleep disorders (41.09 %, CI=35.7-46.58); eating disorders (17.94 %, CI=15.79-20.20); gambling disorder (6.59 %, CI=5.52-7.75); post-traumatic stress disorder (25.13 %, CI=20.55-30.02); stress (36.34 %, CI=29.36-43.62); and suicide-related outcomes (ideation past 12 months: 10.76 %, CI=9.53-12.06; lifetime ideation: 20.33 %, CI=16.15-24.86; suicide attempt past 12 months: 1.37 %, CI=0.67-2.29; lifetime attempt: 3.44 %, CI=2.48-4.54). Meta-regression analyses identified statistically significant moderators of prevalence such as healthcare academic degrees and the pandemic in the case of depression and studies with more females in the case of sleep disorders. This is the most comprehensive synthesis on the prevalence of mental disorder symptoms in university students, providing crucial insights for clinicians, policymakers, and stakeholders.

BACKGROUND:) that underlies the vulnerability to both physical and mental conditions could have important implications for our approach to health assessment and treatment. OBJECTIVE:in children and adolescents. METHODS:This Swedish registry-based cross-sectional study included children and adolescents born between 1996 and 2003 with follow-up until 2013. We extracted data on 25 mental and physical health conditions according to the ICD-10 system. To determine the optimal dimensional structure of these conditions, several competing measurement models were tested, including correlated factors, one factor, various bifactor specifications and bifactor exploratory structural equation modelling (ESEM). FINDINGS/RESULTS:=0.423; ECV=0.130) factors also indicated additional significant unique contributions. CONCLUSIONS:underlying both mental and physical conditions, alongside distinct domain-specific factors. These findings have important implications for clinical practice, providing evidence that suggests the need for more integrated approaches to health assessment and treatment that consider the interconnectedness of mental and physical health.

IMPORTANCE/UNASSIGNED:Representation of race and ethnicity in randomized clinical trials (RCTs) is critical for understanding treatment efficacy across populations with different racial and ethnic backgrounds. OBJECTIVE/UNASSIGNED:To examine race and ethnicity representation and reporting across RCTs of pharmacotherapies for mental disorders. DATA SOURCES/UNASSIGNED:PubMed (Medline), Embase (Ovid), APA PsycInfo, and Web of Science were searched until March 1, 2024, to retrieve network meta-analyses including RCTs of pharmacotherapies for International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision mental disorders. STUDY SELECTION/UNASSIGNED:RCTs that recruited people of any age with a diagnosis of a mental disorder and that tested the efficacy of any pharmacologic intervention vs any control arm. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS/UNASSIGNED:Random-effects logit-transformed proportion meta-analyses were used to estimate prevalence rates of race and ethnicity groups and their temporal trends across RCTs and to compare US RCT prevalence rates with US Census data. The Preferred Reporting Items for Overviews of Reviews was used to report our review. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES/UNASSIGNED:Reporting of data and percentages of race and ethnicity. The year of publication, type of RCT, geographic location, age group, and sample size were also included. There were no deviations that occurred from the original protocol. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:Data were obtained from 1683 RCTs (375 120 participants in total). Of these, 1363 (91.7% of participants) included participants aged 18 years or older; 680 RCTs (36.0% of participants) were from the US, 404 (17.1% of participants) were from Europe, and 293 (29.9% of participants) were from multiple geographic locations. Race and ethnicity were reported in 39.2% of RCTs; reporting was the highest in US-based RCTs (58.7%) and lowest in Central and South America (8.7%) and Asia and the Middle East (12.4%). Among participants, 2.7% (95% CI, 2.1%-3.5%) self-reported as Asian, 9.0% (95% CI, 8.1%-10.0%) as Black, 11.0% (95% CI, 9.1%-13.3%) as Hispanic among White, 80.2% (95% CI, 78.8%-81.5%) as White including Hispanic, and 5.8% (95% CI, 5.2%-6.4%) as other race or ethnicity, multiracial, or multiethnic. There was more frequent reporting of race and ethnicity in US RCTs (log odds increased by 0.066 each year) and less frequent reporting in non-US RCTs (log odds increased by 0.023 each year). Studies reporting race and ethnicity did not generally include larger sample sizes (mean sample size, 263.7 [95% CI, 15.0-860.3] participants) compared with those not reporting such data (mean sample size, 196.6 [95% CI, 12.0-601.3] participants), albeit not in all locations. In US RCTs, adults in the other or multiracial and multiethnic category were historically overrepresented, while adults in Asian, Black, Hispanic among White, and White including Hispanic categories were underrepresented; Asian, Black, and Hispanic among White children and adolescents are still currently underrepresented. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE/UNASSIGNED:The findings of this meta-analysis suggest that differences in reporting race and ethnicity across geographic locations and underrepresentation of certain racial and ethnic groups in US-based RCTs highlight the need for international guidelines to ensure equitable recruitment and reporting in clinical trials.

Children presenting comorbid attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and depression symptoms have higher risks of later suicidal ideation and attempt. However, it is unclear to what extent this risk stems from individual differences in the genetic predisposition for ADHD and/or depression. We investigated the unique and combined contribution of genetic predisposition to ADHD and depression to suicidal ideation and attempt by early adulthood. Data were from two longitudinal population-based birth cohorts, the Quebec Longitudinal Study of Child Development and the Quebec Newborn Twin Study (total N = 1207). Genetic predisposition for ADHD and depression were measured using polygenic scores. Suicidal ideation and attempt by age 20 years were self-reported via questionnaires. Across the two cohorts, suicidal ideation and attempt were reported by 99 (8.2%) and 75 (6.1%) individuals, respectively. A higher polygenic score for depression was associated with significantly higher risk of suicidal ideation and attempt, while no significant associations were found for ADHD polygenic score. However, we found an interaction between polygenic scores for depression and ADHD in the association with suicide attempt (P = 0.012), but not suicidal ideation (P = 0.897). The association between polygenic score for depression and suicide attempt was significantly stronger for individuals with a higher polygenic score for ADHD. Individuals scoring ≥ 1-SD above the mean for both polygenic scores were at increased risk for suicide attempt compared to individuals with lower scores (OR 4.03, CI 1.64-9.90), as well as compared to individuals scoring ≥ 1-SD above the mean in only depression (OR 2.92, CI 1.01-8.50) or only ADHD (OR 4.88, CI 1.56-15.26) polygenic scores. Our findings suggest that genetic predisposition for ADHD and depression contributes to increase the risk of suicide attempt in a multiplicative, rather that additive, way. Our results contribute to our understanding of the etiology of suicide risk and may inform screening and risk stratification.

BACKGROUND:Concerns about the cardiovascular safety of medications used for the treatment of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) remain. We aimed to compare the effects of pharmacological treatments for ADHD on haemodynamic values and electrocardiogram (ECG) parameters in children, adolescents, and adults. METHODS:For this systematic review and network meta-analysis, we searched 12 electronic databases, including Cochrane CENTRAL, Embase, PubMed, and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, from database inception to Jan 18, 2024, for published and unpublished randomised controlled trials comparing amphetamines, atomoxetine, bupropion, clonidine, guanfacine, lisdexamfetamine, methylphenidate, modafinil, or viloxazine against each other or placebo. Primary outcomes were change in systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP), measured in mm Hg, and pulse, measured in beats per minute, at timepoints closest to 12 weeks, 26 weeks, and 52 weeks. Summary data were extracted and pooled in random-effects network meta-analyses. Certainty of evidence was assessed with the Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis (CINeMA) framework. This study was registered with PROSPERO, CRD42021295352. Before study initiation, we contacted representatives of a UK-based charity of people with lived experience of ADHD-the ADHD Foundation-regarding the relevance of the topic and the appropriateness of the outcomes chosen. FINDINGS/RESULTS:102 randomised controlled trials with short-term follow-up (median 7 weeks [IQR 5-9]) were included, encompassing 13 315 children and adolescents (aged ≥5 years and <18 years; mean age 11 years [SD 3]; of available data, 9635 [73%] were male and 3646 [27%] were female; of available data, 289 [2%] were Asian, 1719 [15%] were Black, and 8303 [71%] were White) and 9387 adults (≥18 years, mean age 35 years [11]; of available data, 5064 [57%] were male and 3809 [43%] were female; of available data, 488 [6%] were Asian, 457 [6%] were Black, and 6372 [79%] were White). Amphetamines, atomoxetine, lisdexamfetamine, methylphenidate, and viloxazine led to increments in haemodynamic values in children and adolescents, adults, or both. In children and adolescents, mean increase against placebo ranged from 1·07 (95% CI 0·36-1·79; moderate CINeMA confidence) with atomoxetine to 1·81 (1·05-2·57; moderate) with methylphenidate for SBP; from 1·93 (0·74-3·11; high) with amphetamines to 2·42 (1·69-3·15; low) with methylphenidate for DBP; and from 2·79 (1·05-4·53; moderate) with viloxazine to 5·58 (4·67-6·49; high) with atomoxetine for pulse. In adults, mean increase against placebo ranged from 1·66 (95% CI 0·38-2·93; very low) with methylphenidate to 2·3 (0·66-3·94; very low) with amphetamines for SBP; from 1·60 (0·29-2·91; very low) with methylphenidate to 3·07 (0·69-5·45; very low) with lisdexamfetamine for DBP; and from 4·37 (3·16-5·59; very low) with methylphenidate to 5·8 (2·3-9·3; very low) with viloxazine for pulse. Amphetamines, lisdexamfetamine, or methylphenidate were not associated with larger increments in haemodynamic values compared with atomoxetine or viloxazine in either children and adolescents or adults. Guanfacine was associated with decrements in haemodynamic values in children and adolescents (mean decrease against placebo of -2·83 [95% CI -3·8 to -1·85; low CINeMA confidence] in SBP, -2·08 [-3 to -1·17; low] in DBP, and -4·06 [-5·45 -2·68; moderate] in pulse) and adults (mean decrease against placebo of -10·1 [-13·76 to -6·44; very low] in SBP, -7·73 [-11·88 to -3·58; very low] in DBP, and -6·83 [-10·85 to -2·81; very low] in pulse). Only four RCTs informed on effects in the medium term and none on the long term. INTERPRETATION/CONCLUSIONS:Practitioners should monitor blood pressure and pulse in patients with ADHD treated with any pharmacological intervention, and not stimulants only. Given the short duration of available randomised controlled trials, new research providing insights on the causal effects of ADHD medications on cardiovascular parameters in the longer term should be funded. FUNDING/BACKGROUND:National Institute for Health and Care Research.