Faculty Bibliography

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:Chinese Americans are one of the fastest growing racial and ethnic groups and represent the largest subgroup of the Asian American population in the US and in New York City (NYC) where they number 573,528 in 2021. Despite their numbers, current pain perceptions, expectations, and attitudes of Chinese Americans remains poorly understood, especially as related to postoperative pain. OBJECTIVE:A better understanding of pain experience among Chinese American patients is needed to inform strategies on improving pain management satisfaction. METHODS:A total of 27 Chinese American postoperative patients from a NYC health system were recruited for face-to-face surveys and interviews with a trained bilingual and bicultural Community Health Worker. Questions from the Survey on Disparities in Quality of Healthcare and Kleinman's Explanatory Model of Illness were integrated into the survey and topic guide. Topics of discussion included satisfaction with healthcare and pain management during hospital stay and health beliefs and practices. RESULTS:More than half of participants experienced language challenges that made it difficult to communicate with healthcare staff. In general, high levels of satisfaction with pain management were reported; however, participants reported feeling less comfortable asking healthcare teams questions. Common themes across interviews included: (1) pain was an expected outcome of the procedure and was thus perceived as tolerable; (2) the wish to not be a burden to others; (3) concerns about side effects of pain medications; and (4) a cultural and language mismatch between healthcare teams and patients on words being used to elicit pain and discomfort. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Our project findings can inform pain management strategies and tools to serve the Chinese American patient population.

Early childhood is a critical period for overall development and well-being, yet children from low-income and low-resourced families, such as Chinese American immigrant families, often have unmet mental health needs as they face additional barriers like limited English proficiency and health literacy. Cultural and linguistic adaptation is essential for equitable access to resources and care. Despite the need, early childhood mental health among Chinese American families remains significantly understudied. A digital mental health solution may pose greater access and convenience to address the mental health needs of this community. Thus, this study aims to collaboratively develop a web-based app called OurChild, which provides culturally and linguistically adapted early childhood mental health and development resources for Chinese American immigrant families in New York City. Using the Participatory Cultural Adaptation Framework for Implementation Research (PCAFIR), the project involves a multiphased participatory co-design process: 1. understanding community needs through formative research and engagement; 2. building a digital library with evidence-based and culturally tailored content; 3. designing a culturally tailored web-based app using a participatory approach; and 4. refining and validating the design through user testing. Informed by formative data from existing studies and programs; focus groups and interviews with community experts (n = 6) and parents (n = 11); user testing with parents (n = 11), and through an iterative re-design process, the app was designed to be user-friendly, culturally relevant, and evidence-based. This study described the co-design process and highlighted the lessons learned in developing culturally tailored digital health tools to promote digital health equity for underserved communities.

BACKGROUND:Prior studies have found racial and ethnic disparities in cancer screenings, yet smaller minority ethnic groups are often aggregated. METHODS:Data from the 2021-2022 Community Health Resources and Needs Assessment (Cancer CHRNA) and the 2017-2020 NYC Community Health Survey (CHS) examined the prevalence of breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screenings among Eastern European, Afro-Caribbean, Latine, Chinese, Korean, South Asian, and Southwest Asian and North African (SWANA) groups in New York City. Multivariable logistic regression models estimated adjusted relative risks of cancer screening outcomes by group. RESULTS:Up-to-date mammogram screening was low (< 70%) among all groups except Afro-Caribbean in the Cancer CHRNA; and among South Asian, Chinese, and Eastern European groups in the CHS. In logistic regression, South Asian and SWANA groups were less likely to have received an up-to-date mammogram compared to the Afro-Caribbean group in the Cancer CHRNA; no group differences were found in the CHS. Up-to-date Pap screening was low (< 70%) among all groups except Latina in the Cancer CHRNA; and among South Asian and Chinese groups in the CHS. In logistic regression, all other groups were less likely to have received an up-to-date Pap test compared to the Latina group in the Cancer CHRNA; and Chinese and South Asian groups were less likely to have received an up-to-date Pap test compared to the Latina group in the CHS. Up-to-date colonoscopy screening was low (< 70%) among all groups in the Cancer CHRNA; and among SWANA, South Asian, Chinese, and Eastern European groups in the CHS. In logistic regression, all groups except Chinese were less likely to have received an up-to-date colonoscopy compared to the Eastern European group in the Cancer CHRNA; and the Chinese and SWANA groups were less likely to have received an up-to-date colonoscopy compared to the Afro-Caribbean group in the CHS. CONCLUSIONS:Disparities in cancer screenings differed by screening type and survey, with larger disparities found among groups in the Cancer CHRNA. System level efforts are needed to monitor cancer screening disparities by disaggregating diverse groups; culturally tailored strategies should be used to raise awareness to increase screening. CLINICAL TRIAL INFORMATION/BACKGROUND:Not applicable.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:Faith-based organizations (FBOs) have been recognized as a critical partner to reach underserved, marginalized populations in the U.S. for disease prevention and health promotion. FBOs have been successfully engaged to lower risk for leading causes of death, including cancer, but despite the proliferation of FBO cancer intervention research, a comprehensive review is lacking. METHODS:We conducted a PRISMA Scoping Review to ascertain the impact of FBO cancer interventions. Seven bibliographical databases were used to search for articles evaluating cancer interventions reporting quantitative outcomes in which places of worship in the U.S. served as the research location. Study characteristics and results data were extracted by two independent extractors. RESULTS:Thirty-six studies were included. All FBOs were Christian churches with healthy populations. Breast (25%), prostate (22%), and colorectal (17%) were the primary cancers targeted and cancer screening was the primary outcome of 75% of studies. Sixty-nine percent (k = 25) reported significant results in cancer-related outcomes from baseline to post-intervention follow-up, with 100% of studies in Korean American communities (k = 7) reporting significant results. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:FBO interventions can successfully increase preventative screening across numerous cancer types in diverse communities, particularly in Korean Americans. Additional FBO cancer interventions that aim to reduce inequities in other cancers (e.g., lung) that disproportionately affect Korean Americans and have not been targeted are warranted. Expanding current investigations of FBO collaborations with other faiths (besides Christian) to include cancer prevention and control would further realize FBOs' untapped potential.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening uptake in the Veterans Health Administration (VA) has been reported to be higher than the US general population, but CRC remains a prevalent cancer within the VA system. To examine CRC predictors and the extent to which the conventional definition of up-to-date screening applies to the population, we conducted a case-control study using VA data from 2012 to 2018. We classified patients into 5 categories: up-to-date or not up-to-date average-risk patients aged 50 to 75 (Categories 1 and 2), up-to-date or not up-to-date average-risk patients aged <50 or >75 (Categories 3 and 4), and high-risk patients (Category 5). Each CRC case was matched by age, sex, and facility with 4 controls. We performed multivariable conditional logistic regression, adjusting for race and ethnicity, diabetes, obesity, and alcohol use. Among 3714 CRC cases identified, Category 4 (odds ratio [OR] 1.40, 95% CI 1.11-1.78) and Category 5 (OR 6.23, 95% CI 5.06-7.66) patients had a higher risk of CRC compared to Category 1 patients. Compared with White patients, Black patients had a higher risk (OR 1.54, 95% CI 1.37-1.73). Diabetes (OR 1.65, 95% CI 1.51-1.81) and alcohol use disorder (OR 1.53, 95% CI 1.35-1.73) were also associated with CRC. Most CRC cases occurred in individuals aged 50 to 75, but 12.5% occurred in persons who were outside of this age range or had high-risk personal or family history. The conventional measure of CRC screening, focused on average-risk individuals aged 50 to 75, does not reflect screening status in an important minority of CRC patients.

BackgroundCommunity health workers (CHW) can perform unique functions to facilitate the implementation of evidence-based interventions for infection-related cancer prevention and control, and alleviate minoritized and immigration-related disparities.PurposeWe describe the implementation evaluation of three CHW-delivered infection-related cancer programs focused on Asian American (AA) communities in New York City: 1) a H. pylori treatment adherence program for Chinese and Korean Americans; 2) a HPV screening program for Muslim Americans; and 3) a hepatitis B screening, linkage to care, and treatment program for AA and other priority communities.MethodsWe conducted semi-structured key informant interviews with multi-level stakeholders from the programs.ResultsLessons learned include the importance of: 1) sustaining engagement and buy-in from implementation partners; 2) prioritizing recipient- and deliverer-centeredness; 3) fostering program flexibility to accommodate multiple implementation settings and to meet dynamic community resources and priorities; and 4) understanding interoperability between the CHW-delivered intervention and the inner setting for effective program implementation.ConclusionsThese findings can inform other efforts to implement CHW-delivered community-clinical cancer programs for AA and other underserved communities to advance health equity.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:Immigrant older adults are a particularly disadvantaged population due to structural factors including immigration and citizenship status, language and literacy barriers, and underrepresentation in health research, that increase the burden of social isolation and loneliness. This scoping review synthesizes the existing literature on social isolation and loneliness among Asian American older adults in the United States. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS/METHODS:This study searched PubMed, CINAHL, and PsycInfo for relevant literature and followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews. Twenty-nine articles were included. RESULTS:We summarize four topics that emerged on social isolation and loneliness: instruments, prevalence, associated factors, and perceptions. Most articles focused on older Chinese and Korean American adults from the Population Study of Chinese Elderly in Chicago Study and Study of Older Korean Americans, and there was a concentration of studies based in the Midwest and Northeast. One intervention was found. DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS/CONCLUSIONS:This review highlighted significant gaps in understanding experiences of social isolation and loneliness among older Asian American adults, emphasizing the need for more inclusive research and culturally responsive interventions to promote healthy aging in this growing population.

Minoritized communities often experience worse health outcomes on the cancer continuum. Mainstream strategies may have limited reach and utility to populations experiencing inequities in real-world settings. Through the combined use of community-based participatory research (CBPR) and social marketing strategies, which highlight community-centered and culturally adapted processes, we provide an approach to inform future intervention research across various health topics that has been successful in engaging minoritized and understudied communities. We present two case studies that used participatory social marketing principles to culturally adapt evidence-based cancer screening programs for two communities in New York City. The first program is a campaign to increase screening and vaccination for hepatitis B among Korean and Chinese American immigrants. The second is a culturally adapted program to increase breast and cervical cancer screening among a multiracial and ethnic population of Muslim women. These case studies illustrate the benefits of integrating social marketing and CBPR approaches as a key strategy when developing public health campaigns to effectively reach and influence health behaviors in partnership with communities that have been socially marginalized and historically underserved.

Many communities are oftentimes labeled as "hard to reach communities" by health researchers. Instead, what may be a more appropriate framing is that conventional research approaches are a mismatch for recruiting and retaining these understudied communities. This paper describes an inclusive research process with particular attention to engaging multilingual communities in the U.S. that we have developed while implementing a community-level nutrition program. The program, Harvest Share, is an equity-centered, systems-based strategy to improve diet for neighborhood residents in Brooklyn, NY. Our research approach involves three components: participatory mapping, cultural adaptation/transcreation and language justice, and two cross-cutting areas: researcher positionality and research team diversity. The application of these methods in research resulted in our research program being highly accepted by partner organizations and participants. Applying inclusive research practices in addition to centering the community/es of interest will aid in the implementation of solutions that are feasible and culturally and linguistically responsive, ensuring successful recruitment and retention; and in the long run, sustainable, community-engaged solutions that have high acceptability and promote community well-being.