Faculty Bibliography

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:Prostate multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is recommended for prostate cancer detection, staging, and surveillance. Incidental bladder lesions are encountered on these studies but remain under-characterized in the literature. The patient characteristics associated with malignancy for these lesions are not well defined. We evaluated the prevalence, histopathologic outcomes, clinical characteristics, and associations with malignancy for incidental bladder lesions on prostate MRI. MATERIALS AND METHODS/METHODS:A retrospective review included 31,241 patients undergoing prostate MRI examinations from January 2013 to January 2023. Imaging reports and medical records were analyzed for incidental bladder lesions, demographic data, clinical symptoms, urinalysis findings, and histopathologic outcomes. Lesions were categorized based on biopsy results or negative clinical follow-up for bladder tumors in chart review. Logistic regression analysis and receiver operating characteristic analyses were performed. RESULTS:Incidental bladder lesions occurred in 0.74% (230/31,241) of examinations, with biopsy-confirmed bladder cancer in 0.11% of patients (34/31,241) or 14.8% (34/230) of cases with lesions. In multivariable analysis, gross hematuria had the strongest association with biopsy-proven bladder cancer (OR 9.26, 95% CI 4.12-20.79, p<0.001). A logistic regression model incorporating age, smoking status, and gross hematuria yielded area under the curve of 0.762 for bladder cancer. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Incidental bladder lesions on prostate MRI may represent opportunities for early detection of bladder cancer, but also have potential for harms related to unnecessary procedures. Considering the presence of gross hematuria, possibly stated as part of the MRI referral or patient questionnaire, could improve risk stratification of encountered bladder lesions and early cancer detection.

OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:People receiving medications for opioid use disorder often continue to experience opioid withdrawal, creating barriers to improved outcomes. Emerging evidence suggests the existence of distinct opioid withdrawal subtypes characterized by high and low levels of withdrawal severity, highlighting the need for personalized treatment approaches. To inform clinical practice, we identified subgroups of adults based on levels of opioid withdrawal over time during opioid use disorder (OUD) treatment. METHODS:We conducted a secondary analysis of the Clinical Trials Network (CTN-0051) Extended-Release Naltrexone versus Buprenorphine for Opioid Treatment trial using latent class growth analysis to identify subgroups of withdrawal. Four hundred and seventy-four participants in an OUD trial were randomized to receive extended-release naltrexone (XR-NTX) or sublingual buprenorphine-naloxone (BUP-NX). Withdrawal symptoms were measured using the Subjective Opiate Withdrawal Scale (SOWS) at 10 timepoints. We identified classes and compared their predictors of withdrawal and time to return to opioid use. RESULTS:Two distinct trajectories - low and high sustained opioid withdrawal - were identified in each treatment arm. Most participants were in the low withdrawal class (n = 176; 86 % XR-NTX and n = 241; 89 % BUP-NX) with fewer in the high sustained withdrawal class (n = 28; 14 % XR-NTX and n = 29; 11 % BUP-NX). Differences in lifetime history of anxiety and depression and in quality of life domains (mobility, usual activities, and pain/discomfort) were primarily observed among XR-NTX participants, with only one baseline mobility difference emerging between BUP-NX classes. In the XR-NTX arm, time to return to use was significantly shorter in the high sustained withdrawal class compared to the low withdrawal class, whereas BUP-NX classes did not differ on time to return to use. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS/CONCLUSIONS:Our findings demonstrate the existence of distinct high and low opioid withdrawal subtypes among individuals receiving XR-NTX and BUP-NX. These results underscore the importance of personalized withdrawal management strategies and highlight the need to consider individual withdrawal trajectories when optimizing treatments. Future research should focus on identifying predictors of withdrawal severity to improve clinical outcomes.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS/OBJECTIVE:It is unclear if findings from randomized controlled trials (RCT) of medications for opioid use disorder apply to real-world settings. We estimated the effectiveness of buprenorphine-naloxone (BUP-NX) versus extended-release naltrexone (XR-NTX) on treatment interruption in a RCT and an observational study based on real-world data. DESIGN/METHODS:Target trial emulation to harmonize the protocol and statistical analyses of X:BOT (target trial) and the observational study (observational emulation). Baseline was randomization in the target trial and medically managed opioid withdrawal (MMOW) discharge in the observational emulation. SETTINGS/METHODS:X:BOT trial and Massachusetts Public Health Data Warehouse observational data (United States). PARTICIPANTS/METHODS:The target trial included all X:BOT participants. The observational emulation trial included MMOW discharges from January 2014 to May 2016. MEASUREMENTS/METHODS:Treatment strategies were BUP-NX versus XR-NTX initiation within 28 days of baseline. The outcome was treatment interruption (earliest of treatment discontinuation, incarceration, MMOW readmission, death). We estimated the 24-week risk and risk difference. FINDINGS/RESULTS:In the target trial, 94% (269/287) and 66% (187/283) of participants randomized to BUP-NX or XR-NTX initiated their assigned treatment within 28 days, respectively. In the observational emulation, BUP-NX and XR-NTX were initiated within 28 days in 9% (5209/59 076) and 3% (1813/59 076) of MMOW discharges, respectively. The adjusted 24-week treatment interruption risks (95% confidence interval) for BUP-NX and XR-NTX were 68% (60%,77%) and 72% (60%,83%) in the target trial [risk difference, -4 percentage points (pp; -17 pp,11 pp)] and 82% (81%,83%) and 93% (92%,95%) in the observational emulation [risk difference,-11 pp (-13 pp,-10 pp)]. CONCLUSIONS:Buprenorphine-naloxone might be superior to extended-release naltrexone in real-world settings where the majority of people struggle to remain on medications for opioid use disorder. Buprenorphine-naloxone initiators had a lower risk of treatment interruption than extended-release naltrexone initiators in an observational emulation, but similar risks in a randomized controlled trial, although confidence intervals were wide. Trial participation, study size and residual confounding may explain these differences.

BACKGROUND:Individuals involved in the criminal legal system represent one of the most disproportionately affected populations in the opioid overdose crisis. Despite evidence of medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) reducing overdose mortality, illicit opioid use, and recidivism, most correctional facilities do not offer these treatments. Sublocade and Brixadi, two distinct, branded, formulations of extended-release buprenorphine (XR-B), offer a promising approach to improving MOUD treatment adherence and reducing post-release overdose deaths. METHODS:This hybrid pilot study will utilize a partially randomized preference trial (PRPT) design to compare the preliminary effectiveness, feasibility, acceptability and other outcomes between Sublocade and Brixadi initiation. We aim to enroll 60 incarcerated individuals with opioid use disorder who are interested in XR-B and have a scheduled release within 120 days. Participants will choose their preferred injectable treatment or, if ambivalent, be randomly assigned. All participants will receive monthly XR-B injections pre-release and continue for three months post-release, with additional administrative follow-up for another three months. The primary outcome is post-release treatment retention; other outcomes will be assessed using the Proctor taxonomy. Data will be collected using clinical assessments, surveys, and administrative databases. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSIONS:This study explores differences in XR-B formulations during the high-risk time of transition out of prison. It combines a hybrid implementation science and preference trial design-two methodologies that can help address the specific challenges of research in carceral environments. By understanding implementation of XR-B in a prison setting, findings can provide valuable insights to guide other facilities in adopting this life-saving treatment.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:Expanding access to medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD) to people involved in the carceral system is a priority for the New Hampshire Department of Corrections (NHDOC), where more than 40% of residents have an opioid use disorder (OUD). NHDOC participated in the multi-site Justice Community Opioid Innovation Network (JCOIN) clinical trial, "Long-acting buprenorphine vs. naltrexone opioid treatments in criminal justice system-involved adults (EXIT-CJS)". We examine the contributing factors to the expansion of the NHDOC MOUD program from 2021 to 2023, including participation in EXIT-CJS, which occurred from 2019 to 2024. METHODS:Data on quarterly MOUD prescribing and EXIT-CJS enrollments were abstracted from the NHDOC medical records from July 1, 2021- December 31, 2023 as part of a quality improvement initiative. To examine factors influencing expansion of the program, conversations were conducted with NHDOC leadership team and clinical staff. RESULTS:From 2021 to 2023, the quarterly number of patients treated with MOUD at the NHDOC increased by more than 400% from a total of 165 patients in July-September 2021, to 685 patients in October-December 2023. At the policy level, elimination of the federal DATA-Waiver (X-Waiver) Program allowed additional providers to prescribe MOUD. At the organizational level, support from NHDOC leadership, including Medical and Forensics and the Commissioner's Office, encouraged broader engagement in MOUD from providers, multidisciplinary staff, and security. This work was augmented through receipt of State Opioid Response (SOR) dollars with a requirement to continue to advance education for NHDOC staff on the efficacy of MOUD. Resulting discussions between medical providers, experts on addiction treatment, staff and residents supported a culture change in attitudes about MOUD. During this same time window, the NHDOC made significant adjustments in the distribution of MOUD by adjusting the nursing administration process thus reducing the stigma associated with being a patient on MOUD and treating MOUD medication administration like all other medical conditions. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSIONS:Policy-related, organizational, and individual factors contributed to the expansion of the MOUD program at the NHDOC. EXIT-CJS recruitment occurred synergistically with the expansion of the MOUD program. As NHDOC was engaged as a site in EXIT-CJS, study recruitment increased awareness of extended-release treatment options among residents and staff.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:Most Americans now access social media platforms, including YouTube, to obtain health information. However, few studies have evaluated the quality of YouTube content related to opioid use disorder (OUD), including medications for OUD (MOUD; buprenorphine) and harm reduction resources (e.g., naloxone). The purpose of this cross-sectional analysis was to assess the quality, accuracy, and reliability of MOUD and harm reduction-related video content available on YouTube. METHODS:The study team conducted a YouTube search between June 2022 and July 2022 using key words related to MOUD and harm reduction content (e.g., "suboxone," "methadone," "Narcan"). The 5 most viewed videos from each search term were analyzed for quality (i.e., Global Quality Scale; GQS), accuracy (i.e., JAMA Benchmark Criteria), and reliability (i.e., DISCERN). Videos that were non-English, duplicate, or that did not directly mention OUD, MOUD, or harm reduction were excluded from the review (N = 6). RESULTS:YouTube videos (N = 70) were mostly produced by medical professionals (27.1 %), independent nonmedical users (21.4 %; e.g., vloggers, individuals documenting their experiences), medical organizations (17.1 %; e.g., hospitals, treatment programs), and/or media (14.3 %; e.g., news agencies). The target audience was primarily the general public (65.7 %), people who use opioids (20.0 %), and healthcare providers (10.0 %). Videos containing MOUD content (N = 64, 61.4 %) mostly focused on suboxone (25.0 %), methadone (23.4 %), Sublocade (14.1 %), and subutex/buprenorphine (14.1 %). The median quality score was 2 based on the GQS with 3 videos receiving the highest quality rating (5). Two videos were highly rated for accuracy per all three JAMA Benchmark criteria. Videos produced by nonmedical educational channels had the highest overall reliability scores on the DISCERN criteria (median 4), followed by medical professionals (median 3), and medical organizations (median 2.5). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:The overall quality, accuracy, and reliability of MOUD and harm reduction related content posted on YouTube is poor. The lack of evidence-based content posted on YouTube reinforces the need for public health expert involvement in disseminating guideline-based content on social media.

The current study aimed to understand motivations of high-risk polysubstance use. Semistructured interviews were conducted in New York City with 20 individuals with frequent recent polysubstance use. Two analysts coded the interviews (κ = 93.97). Five themes related to motivation for polysubstance use were found: (1) balance, prolong, or enhance effects, (2) self-medicate physical ailments, (3) cope with emotional distress, (4) drug-induced cravings, and (5) responding to social contexts. Individuals reported simultaneous or sequential co-use to balance, prolong or enhance a 'high' (theme 1). Participants engaged in polysubstance use to alleviate withdrawal symptoms, to induce sleep and self-medicate physical pain (theme 2) and to provide relief from emotional distress (theme 3). Other themes included drug-induced cravings (theme 4) and responding to social contexts (theme 5) including both social situations and economic availability. Motivations for polysubstance use may provide important insight into harm reduction and treatment settings solutions.

BACKGROUND:Offering medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) in carceral settings significantly reduces overdose. However, it is unknown to what extent individuals in jails continue MOUD once they leave incarceration. We aimed to assess the relationship between in-jail MOUD and MOUD continuity in the month following release. METHODS:We conducted a retrospective cohort study of linked NYC jail-based electronic health records and community Medicaid OUD treatment claims for individuals with OUD discharged from jail between 2011 and 2017. We compared receipt of MOUD within 30 days of release, among those with and without MOUD at release from jail. We tested for effect modification based on MOUD receipt prior to incarceration and assessed factors associated with treatment discontinuation. RESULTS:Of 28,298 eligible incarcerations, 52.8 % received MOUD at release. 30 % of incarcerations with MOUD at release received community-based MOUD within 30 days, compared to 7 % of incarcerations without MOUD (Risk Ratio: 2.62 (2.44-2.82)). Most (69 %) with MOUD claims prior to incarceration who received in-jail MOUD continued treatment in the community, compared to 9 % of those without prior MOUD. Those who received methadone (vs. buprenorphine), were younger, Non-Hispanic Black and with no history of MOUD were less likely to continue MOUD following release. CONCLUSIONS:MOUD maintenance in jail is strongly associated with MOUD continuity upon release. Still, findings highlight a gap in treatment continuity upon-reentry, especially among those who initiate MOUD in jail. In the wake of worsening overdose deaths and troubling disparities, improving MOUD continuity among this population remains an urgent priority.

Medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) increase retention in care and decrease mortality during active treatment; however, information about the comparative effectiveness of different forms of MOUD is sparse. Observational comparative effectiveness studies are subject to many types of bias; a robust framework to minimize bias would improve the quality of comparative effectiveness evidence. This paper discusses the use of target trial emulation as a framework to conduct comparative effectiveness studies of MOUD with administrative data. Using examples from our planned research project comparing buprenorphine-naloxone and extended-release naltrexone with respect to the rates of MOUD discontinuation, we provide a primer on the challenges and approaches to employing target trial emulation in the study of MOUD.

BACKGROUND:Non-fatal overdose is a leading predictor of subsequent fatal overdose. For individuals who are incarcerated, the risk of experiencing an overdose is highest when transitioning from a correctional setting to the community. We assessed if enrollment in jail-based medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) is associated with lower risk of non-fatal opioid overdoses after jail release among individuals with opioid use disorder (OUD). METHODS:This was a retrospective, observational cohort study of adults with OUD who were incarcerated in New York City jails and received MOUD or did not receive any MOUD (out-of-treatment) within the last three days before release to the community in 2011-2017. The outcome was the first non-fatal opioid overdose emergency department (ED) visit within 1 year of jail release during 2011-2017. Covariates included demographic, clinical, incarceration-related, and other characteristics. We performed multivariable cause-specific Cox proportional hazards regression analysis to compare the risk of non-fatal opioid overdose ED visits within 1 year after jail release between groups. RESULTS:MOUD group included 8660 individuals with 17,119 incarcerations; out-of-treatment group included 10,163 individuals with 14,263 incarcerations. Controlling for covariates and accounting for competing risks, in-jail MOUD was associated with lower non-fatal opioid overdose risk within 14 days after jail release (adjusted HR=0.49, 95% confidence interval=0.33-0.74). We found no significant differences 15-28, 29-56, or 57-365 days post-release. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:MOUD group had lower risk of non-fatal opioid overdose immediately after jail release. Wider implementation of MOUD in US jails could potentially reduce post-release overdoses, ED utilization, and associated healthcare costs.