Faculty Bibliography

The inaugural Richard Slayman Clinical Xenotransplantation Workshop convened >140 participants from North America, Europe, and Asia to discuss emerging advances and challenges in translating xenotransplantation from bench to bedside. This report summarized key discussions spanning kidney, heart, and liver xenotransplantation, with an emphasis on clinical readiness and future directions. Core themes included the importance of patient selection, the role of genetic editing to reduce immune incompatibility, adaptive immunosuppressive strategies, novel molecular tools for immune and infectious surveillance, and the growing recognition of innate immune activation as a barrier to long-term graft survival. The workshop highlighted decedent models as a translational bridge, the use of machine perfusion in liver xenograft applications, and progress in living recipients. Notably, 1 patient achieved 9 mo of kidney xenograft function, underscoring the feasibility of extended survival in carefully selected candidates. Perspectives from patients and families, including a reflection honoring Richard Slayman, the first living recipient of a genetically edited pig kidney, framed the scientific dialogue within the broader human impact of this emerging field. The workshop marked a pivotal moment in aligning scientific, ethical, and regulatory efforts to advance safe and equitable access to xenotransplantation.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:Following implementation of the U.S. Kidney Allocation System (KAS) in 2014, deceased donor kidneys with a kidney donor profile index (KDPI) < 35% are prioritized for allocation to pediatric candidates. Early post-KAS data suggested this prioritization may have led to more frequent delayed graft function compared to pre-KAS, when pediatric allocation priority was based on donor age < 35 years. We sought to understand the impact of this allocation change on longer-term pediatric kidney transplant outcomes. METHODS:We used SRTR data to identify all deceased donor kidney transplants with pediatric recipients during two eras: "Pre-KAS" (12/1/2009-11/30/2014) and "KAS" (12/1/2015-11/30/2020). We used Cox proportional hazards models to calculate the association between study era and all-cause graft failure (graft failure or death) after adjusting for recipient characteristics. RESULTS:, p = 0.001). Results were similar in sensitivity analyses limited to recipients < 10 years old and recipients alive with a functioning graft 90 days post-transplant. CONCLUSIONS:KDPI-based prioritization of kidneys for pediatric allocation was associated with a lower risk of graft failure compared to donor age-based prioritization. Further refining donor risk scores may enable additional improvements in graft survival.

With U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) clearance of clinical trials of kidney xenotransplantation (XTx) in living humans, understanding the recipient experience is critical. Semi-structured interviews with the three living XTx recipients identified core domains of the recipient experience, including quality of life (QoL), fears about XTx, and healthcare team communication and support. Transcribed interviews were analyzed by two qualitative researchers using an inductive thematic approach and were mapped onto the Warwick Patient Experience Model, a validated framework to assess key aspects of patient satisfaction with the healthcare experience. All three recipients (53-year-old female; 66-year-old male; 54-year old male) described a restoration of hope, contrasted with their poor quality of life on dialysis. They emphasized that access to XTx and graft survival requires mutual confidence and commitment between recipients and healthcare teams. XTx recipients use dialysis as a point of reference when describing changes in their post-transplant QoL and seemed well-situated to handle the possibility of graft failure. These insights may aid in the creation of decision aids and educational materials tailored to the specific needs of XTx recipients.