Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND:Older adults sustain disproportionately morbid injuries from low energy mechanisms, yet guidance around computed tomography imaging is lacking for this demographic. We hypothesize that current imaging practices may lead to potentially missed injuries, increasing morbidity and mortality. METHODS:A secondary analysis of a prospective multicenter study (11/2020-12/2021) of older blunt trauma patients was performed. Suboptimal imaging was defined as a mismatch between final injury diagnosis and initial computed tomography imaging. We compared optimally vs not optimally imaged patients to determine factors associated with suboptimal imaging and examined mortality, hospital length of stay, and critical care use with a multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS:Among 5,496 patients from 18 trauma centers (median age 79), 5,023 (91.4%) were optimally imaged, and 473 (8.6%) were suboptimally imaged initially. Falls (75.1%) were the predominant injury mechanism. Computed tomography imaging was performed in 95% of cases. Most potentially missed injuries were in the thoracic and lumbar spine. Suboptimally imaged patients had higher mortality and longer median hospital stays. Patients imaged prior to transfer (odds ratio 1.39, 95% confidence interval 1.04-1.87, P = .027) or not triggering full or limited trauma activations (odds ratio 1.64, 95% confidence interval 1.09-2.45, P = .017) were more likely to have missed injuries. CONCLUSIONS:More than 1 in 12 older blunt trauma patients received suboptimal computed tomography imaging initially. Our findings suggest that clinicians should maintain heightened awareness when evaluating older trauma patients as consults, those transferred from other facilities, or those facing language barriers, as these factors were associated with suboptimal imaging practices.

BACKGROUND:Acute appendicitis is the most common abdominal surgical emergency worldwide. Researchers from various countries have evaluated the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on its diagnosis and treatment, as well as a possible change in its management, such as outpatient treatment. The objective of this study was to describe the characteristics of acute appendicitis treated during the COVID-19 State of Emergency (SOE) and to assess whether it could be included in an ambulatory surgery program. METHODS:Retrospective observational study involving patients treated at public hospitals for appendix diseases (K35-K38). We collected sociodemographic and clinical data. The influence of the lockdown on each variable was evaluated with a multivariate analysis. RESULTS:201 patients were included. The SOE period group comprised 78 patients, and the pre-SOE period (control) included 123 patients who met the same inclusion criteria. The risk of complicated acute appendicitis increased by 1.015 times with age (p = 0.000). The longer surgery time was associated with a 7.265 times higher risk of postsurgical complications (p = 0.000). No differences were observed with respect to drain placement (p = 0.281), although the percentage was higher in 2020 (13.9% vs 19.7%). The length of hospital stay decreased significantly during the lockdown (p = 0.017). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:The lockdown did not influence the outcome of complicated acute appendicitis from the standpoint of morbidity and mortality, reducing the hospital stay, facilitating the path towards outpatient treatment.

BACKGROUND:Increased efforts to understand the reasons for the rise in pedestrian related traffic fatalities have demonstrated that these injuries occur in minority and lower income neighborhoods. The purpose of our study was to characterize the patient population suffering from pedestrian injuries in suburban setting, to determine whether the incidence of pedestrian injuries is associated with the social deprivation index (SDI) and to identify zip codes with a higher incidence of pedestrian injuries. METHODS:Single center, descriptive, retrospective cohort study of all patients suffering from pedestrian injuries admitted to our Level I Trauma Center (01/2014-10/2022). Demographic characteristics were summarized by groups and presented using the median (IQR) or frequency (%). Spearman's rank correlation was computed to assess the relationship between incidence of pedestrian injuries and SDI. ArcGIS was utilized to map the number of pedestrians injured, SDI, and percentage of households without a vehicle by zip code. RESULTS:719 patients identified had suffered pedestrian injuries. Median age of injury was 49(IQR 29-64), and median ISS was 8(IQR 4-14). There was a weak, but significant positive correlation between incidence of pedestrian injuries and SDI [r = .16; p-value = 0.02]. The zip code with the most injuries was Hempstead. CONCLUSIONS:Hempstead has the highest number of pedestrian injuries, highest SDI and highest percentage of households without a vehicle. However, overall correlation between incidence of pedestrian injuries and SDI was weak, suggesting that SDI may not be the only factor. Future research should focus on investigating other factors such as the presence of multilane arterial roads in these areas.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:on the amount of FFP needed to normalize the R-time. METHODS:(ΔPV) and ΔR-time within 24 h of administration of FFP. Responders were divided in high and low based on a decrease in R-time > 5 min after the administration of FFP. Data presented as mean ± SD and median with interquartile range were analyzed with parametric and non-parametric tests as applicable. RESULTS:before transfusions but it was affected by the amount FFP and the resulting ΔPV (483 ± 173 vs. 296 ± 99 and 17.0% ± 6.6% vs. 8.6% ± 3.0%; p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS:is the key element required to estimate the volume of FFP needed to correct a prolonged R-time.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:Ballistics is the science that studies the trajectory, range, and effects of projectiles. Knowledge of the principles of wound ballistics is of particular importance to the surgeon because they allow the optimization of the diagnosis and treatment of those injured by firearms. This review focuses on the updated knowledge of wound ballistics as it pertains to the diagnosis and treatment of gunshot wounds. METHODS:A literature review was performed using PubMed, Scopus, and Embase databases. The search was limited to observational articles pertaining to wound ballistics and its relationship to patient management in English and Spanish published between January 2014 and March 2024. Studies about weapon design, patients with lethal injuries, experimental, forensic, historical studies, and those reports on pediatric population were excluded. RESULTS:Eleven articles from twenty-eight publications meeting the inclusion criteria were reviewed. CONCLUSIONS:The understanding of wound ballistics enhances the ability to identify potential injuries and to optimize the treatment of gunshot wounds in adults.

While there is agreement on the indications for intracranial pressure monitoring (ICPm) in patients with sTBI, there continues to be controversy concerning the ideal timing of its implementation. It is within this context that we decided to investigate whether a protocolization approach could optimize the timeliness of ICPm implementation. Neurosurgical and SICU providers agreed to a 3-tier protocol to identify patients with sTBI who could benefit from timelier ICPm implementation. The monthly compliance was monitored for a 9-month period. The study included a pre-protocolization group of 11 patients (2022) and a post-protocolization group of 9 patients (2023-2024). There was a trend toward earlier use of ICPm but the difference did not achieve statistical significance; there was no difference in the mortality rates between groups. A protocolization approach to the treatment of patients with sTBI developed with a consensus strategy may lead to earlier implementation of ICPm and possibly improved functional outcome.

BACKGROUND:Despite the high incidence of blunt trauma in older adults, there is a lack of evidence-based guidance for computed tomography (CT) imaging in this population. We aimed to identify an algorithm to guide use of a Pan-Scan (Head/C-spine/Torso) or a Selective Scan (Head/C-spine ± Torso). We hypothesized that a patient's initial history and exam could be used to guide imaging. METHODS:We prospectively studied blunt trauma patients aged 65+ at 18 Level I/II trauma centers. Patients presenting >24 h after injury or who died upon arrival were excluded. We collected history and physical elements and final injury diagnoses. Injury diagnoses were categorized into CT body regions of Head/C-spine or Torso (chest, abdomen/pelvis, and T/L spine). Using machine learning and regression modeling as well as a priori clinical algorithms based, we tested various decision rules against our dataset. Our priority was to identify a simple rule which could be applied at the bedside, maximizing sensitivity (Sens) and negative predictive value (NPV) to minimize missed injuries. RESULTS:We enrolled 5,498 patients with 3,082 injuries. Nearly half (47.1%, n = 2,587) had an injury within the defined CT body regions. No rule to guide a Pan-Scan could be identified with suitable Sens/NPV for clinical use. A clinical algorithm to identify patients for Pan-Scan, using a combination of physical exam findings and specific high-risk criteria, was identified and had a Sens of 0.94 and NPV of 0.86 This rule would have identified injuries in all but 90 patients (1.6%) and would theoretically spare 11.9% (655) of blunt trauma patients a torso CT. CONCLUSIONS:Our findings advocate for Head/Cspine CT in all geriatric patients with the addition of torso CT in the setting of positive clinical findings and high-risk criteria. Prospective validation of this rule could lead to streamlined diagnostic care of this growing trauma population. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE/METHODS:Level 2, Diagnostic Tests or Criteria.

Traumatic abdominal wall hernia (TAWH) is a protrusion of contents through a defect in the abdominal wall as a consequence of a blunt injury. The objective of this review was to describe demographic and clinical aspects of this rare pathology, identifying the optimal moment for surgical intervention, evaluating the need to use mesh, and analyzing the effectiveness of surgical treatment. Thus, a systematic review using PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases was carried out between January 2004 and March 2024. Computed tomography is the gold-standard imaging test for diagnosis. Open surgery is generally the preferred approach, particularly in emergencies. Acute TAWH can be treated by primary suture or mesh repair, depending on local conditions, while late cases usually require mesh.

BACKGROUND:Open Hartmann's procedure has traditionally been the procedure of choice to treat complicated diverticulitis. We analyzed the ACS-NSQIP database to compare outcomes in patients who underwent emergent laparoscopic Hartmann's procedure (LHP) to those who had an open Hartmann's procedure (OHP). STUDY DESIGN/METHODS:Data analyzed from 2015 to 2019 using ICD-10 codes. Patients were matched on several important covariates using a propensity score matching method (PSM). Patients were matched in a 4:1 ratio of controls to cases based on the propensity score. RESULTS:We identified 5026, of which 456 had LHP and 4570 had OHP. PSM analysis yielded 369 LHP and 1476 OHP patients. LHP had lower rates of superficial surgical site infection (SSSI) compared to OHP (2.44% vs. 5.89%, p = 0.007). LHP had similar post-operative outcomes compared to OHP, including 30-day mortality (5.15% vs. 2.98%, p = 0.060), organ space surgical site infection (OSSSI) (14.36% vs. 12.60%, p = 0.161), wound disruption (1.36% vs. 2.44%, p = 0.349), median LOS (8 vs. 9 days, p = 0.252), readmission within 30 days (11.92% vs. 8.67%, p = 0.176), rate of reoperation (6.0 vs. 6.5%, p = 0.897), and discharge to home (76% vs. 77%, p = 0.992). LHP had longer operative times compared to OHP (median 129 vs. 118 min, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:The LHP is associated with lower rates of SSSI. However, it is not associated with lower rates of mortality, OSSSI, readmissions and reoperations within 30 days. Surgical times are longer in LHP. More studies are needed to determine whether LHP offers advantages in the long-term, particularly in rates of incisional hernia and colostomy closure.