Faculty Bibliography

INTRODUCTION/UNASSIGNED:Alkyl nitrites ("poppers") are used recreationally for sexual enhancement, muscle relaxation, and euphoria. However, they can be toxic and cause adverse reactions such as methemoglobinemia. While inhalation is the typical route of usage, the New York City Poison Center has noted an increase in calls related to ingestion. Given the uncertainty of usage instructions at the point of sale, our study aimed to assess instructions provided to consumers about alkyl nitrite use and to evaluate the proximity and co-sale of alkyl nitrites with similarly appearing energy drink shots. METHODS/UNASSIGNED:We conducted a cross-sectional convenience sample survey of smoke shops, cannabis dispensaries, and exotic shops within the catchment area of an urban poison center. Plain clothes "investigators" (i.e., the researchers) visited these retailers and followed a predetermined protocol and script to request information regarding the availability and usage of alkyl nitrites. Additionally, the researchers attempted to visually assess the proximity of alkyl nitrites to similarly appearing energy drink shots during their visit. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:drinks and alkyl nitrites were located near these energy drink shots in twenty (39%) of these fifty-one stores. DISCUSSION/UNASSIGNED:Many commercial alkyl nitrite retailers in our survey area lack knowledge or provide potentially inaccurate information regarding the use of alkyl nitrites. Additionally, alkyl nitrites are often sold alongside commercial energy drinks, potentially increasing the risk of incidental ingestion. CONCLUSIONS/UNASSIGNED:Further research is necessary to determine the impact of these patterns of sale and potential misinformation. Discussing preliminary results of our survey with the New York City Department of Health led to the rapid creation of an informational poster and local outreach. Clinicians should report cases of alkyl nitrite use to their regional poison center to allow for more targeted and timely public health intervention.

CONTEXT/BACKGROUND:Short messaging service (SMS or text messaging) allows for the exchange of electronic text messages. Online chatting refers to Internet-based transmission of messages for real-time conversation. Poison Control Centers (PCCs) in the United States communicate with the public primarily via telephone. However, people increasingly prefer the convenience of SMS and chatting. Our objective is to describe the use of SMS and chatting by PCCs in the United States. METHODS:An electronic survey questionnaire was distributed to all 55 US poison control center members of the American Association of Poison Control Centers. The survey assessed protocols for SMS and chatting, inquiry volume, and staff satisfaction. Centers reporting use of SMS or chatting services were administered follow-up questions, which further documented SMS and chatting interfaces and startup and maintenance costs. Descriptive statistics were used to describe the data. No statistical analysis was performed. RESULTS:Of the 55 PCCs, 51 (93%) responded to the survey, 6 (12%) of which currently use or formerly used SMS and/or chatting. Inquiry volume ranged from 0 to 1 per day for SMS and 0 to 20 per day for chats. Startup costs ranged from $0 to $25,000. The most beneficial aspect, reported by 4 of the 6 PCCs (66.6%), was providing an alternative contact for inquiries. Most SMS and chatting interactions were completed within 10 and 30 min, respectively. All six centers completed telephone interactions within 10 min. The most disadvantageous aspects, reported by 2 of the 6 PCCs (33.3%), were staff apprehension and interaction length. Technology, such as syncing with existing call queuing software and databases, presented the greatest barrier to implementation. CONCLUSIONS:A minority of PCCs in the United States use SMS and chatting. Further research may investigate the economic feasibility of these systems, if SMS and chatting effectively expands public access, and patient comfort in contacting PCCs.

OBJECTIVES: To develop key messages for methadone and buprenorphine safety education material based on an analysis of calls to the NYC Poison Control Center (NYC PCC) and designed for distribution to caregivers of young children. METHODS: Retrospective review of all calls for children 5 years of age and younger involving methadone or buprenorphine from January 1, 2000, to June 15, 2014. A data abstraction form was completed for each case to capture patient demographics, exposure and caller sites, caller relation to patient, qualitative information regarding the exposure scenario, the product information, if naloxone was given, and the medical outcome of the case. RESULTS: A total of 123 cases were identified. The ages of the children ranged from 4 days to 5 years; 55% were boys. All exposures occurred in a home environment. The majority of the calls were made to the NYC PCC by the doctor (74%) or nurse (2%) at a health care facility. Approximately one-fourth of the calls came from the home and were made by the parent (22%) or grandparent (2%). More than one-half of the exposures involved methadone (64%). Naloxone was administered in 28% of cases. Approximately one-fourth of the children did not experience any effect after the reported exposure, one-half (51%) experienced some effect (minor, moderate, or major), and there was 1 death (1%). More than one-half of the children were admitted to the hospital, with 40% admitted to critical care and 13% to noncritical care. Approximately 23% were treated and released from the hospital, and 20% were lost to follow-up or never arrived to the hospital. The remaining 4% were managed on site without a visit to the hospital. CONCLUSION: Exposures to methadone and buprenorphine are dangerous with some leading to serious health effects. Safe storage and disposal instructions are needed for homes where children may be present.

OBJECTIVE: Warfarin is a high-risk medication whose safe use may be greatly improved by patient education. This study evaluate evaluated patients' understanding of warfarin instructions, medication management, the Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) warfarin medication guide content, and patient information recommendations. METHODS: Interviews conducted at 2 hospital-based outpatient primary care sites with patients initiated on warfarin therapy within the last year. RESULTS: Interviews were conducted with 49 patients. Seventy percent were between 36 and 64 years old and reported taking between 1 and 18 different medications daily. Many (76%) received information about warfarin when first prescribed to them, 65% written and 60% verbal (answers reflect more than one response). Patients found content in the medication guide difficult to understand; 18% were unable to identify information about diet and 21% were unable to locate information about when to call their provider. Analysis showed that 19% had trouble with numeracy issues related to warfarin. Patients' suggestions of ways to convey warfarin information included more graphics, in-person counseling, and multilingual translations. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates gaps in patients' understanding of warfarin therapy. Relying solely on the information in the FDA medication guide is insufficient to guarantee adequate understanding. Utilizing the suggestions from patients' feedback on other ways to deliver information should help future patients with different learning abilities and styles.

BACKGROUND: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) occurs less commonly among women than men in almost all regions of the world. The disparity in risk is particularly notable prior to menopause suggesting that hormonal exposures during reproductive life may be protective. Exogenous oestrogenic exposures such as oral contraceptives (OCs), however, have been reported to increase risk, suggesting that estrogens may be hepatocarcinogenic. To examine the effects of reproductive factors and exogenous hormones on risk, we conducted a prospective analysis among a large group of US women. METHODS: In the Liver Cancer Pooling Project, a consortium of US-based cohort studies, data from 799 500 women in 11 cohorts were pooled and harmonised. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to generate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the associations of reproductive factors and exogenous hormones with HCC (n=248). RESULTS: Bilateral oophorectomy was associated with a significantly increased risk of HCC (HR=2.67, 95% CI=1.22-5.85), which did not appear to be related to a shorter duration of exposure to endogenous hormones or to menopausal hormone therapy use. There was no association between OC use and HCC (HR=1.12, 95% CI=0.82-1.55). Nor were there associations with parity, age at first birth, age at natural menopause, or duration of fertility. CONCLUSIONS: The current study suggests that bilateral oophorectomy increases the risk of HCC but the explanation for the association is unclear. There was no association between OC use and HCC risk. Examination of endogenous hormone levels in relation to HCC may help to clarify the findings of the current study.