Faculty Bibliography

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE/UNASSIGNED:exposure and mortality, overall and by race and ethnicity. STUDY DESIGN/UNASSIGNED:Cohort study (2003-2019). SETTING & PARTICIPANTS/UNASSIGNED:National registry for patients with kidney failure. EXPOSURES/UNASSIGNED:), segregation scores (Theil's H method), deprivation scores (American Community Survey), and built environment factors (medically underserved areas [MUA] and urbanicity) by patients' residential ZIP code at dialysis initiation. OUTCOME/UNASSIGNED:All-cause mortality. ANALYTICAL APPROACH/UNASSIGNED:and mortality, overall and stratified by race and ethnicity. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:< 0.001]). LIMITATIONS/UNASSIGNED:may not reflect individual-level exposures. CONCLUSIONS/UNASSIGNED:and reduce related mortality.

IMPORTANCE/UNASSIGNED:Residence in a disadvantaged neighborhood is a key driver of racial and ethnic disparities in the diagnosis and management of chronic diseases; however, its impact on disparities in access to waitlisting and kidney transplantation (KT) is unclear. OBJECTIVE/UNASSIGNED:To examine the association between neighborhood disadvantage and access to waitlisting and KT. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS/UNASSIGNED:This retrospective cohort study (January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2021) used a US national registry to assess adults (aged ≥18 years) with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) and adult KT candidates. Statistical analysis was performed in March 2025. EXPOSURE/UNASSIGNED:Residential neighborhood disadvantage score (built environment disadvantage, criminal injustice, education disadvantage, unemployment, housing instability, poverty, social fragmentation, transportation barrier, and wealth inequality) ascertained by American Community Survey and other public data sources. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES/UNASSIGNED:The adjusted hazard ratios (AHRs) of waitlisting and KT (any KT, live-donor KT [LDKT], and preemptive KT) were assessed across tertiles of the neighborhood disadvantage score using cause-specific hazard models. Interaction terms were used to quantify these aforementioned associations by race and ethnicity. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:The study included 501 444 adults with ESKD initiating dialysis (mean [SD] age, 63.9 [14.6] years; 293 937 [58.6%] male; 25 790 [5.1%] Asian [Asian American, Native Hawaiian, and Pacific Islander], 133 923 [26.7%] Black, 66 323 [13.2%] Hispanic, and 275 408 [54.9%] White) and 95 068 KT candidates on the waitlist (mean [SD] age, 53.7 [13.0] years; 60 328 [63.5%] male; 6956 [7.3%] Asian, 25 215 [26.5%] Black, 15 685 [16.5%] Hispanic, and 47 212 [49.7%] White). A total of 173 880 adults with ESKD (34.7%) and 26 718 KT candidates (28.1%) resided in high-disadvantage neighborhoods. After adjustment, adults residing in high-disadvantage neighborhoods were less likely to be waitlisted (AHR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.69-0.72) compared with those in low-disadvantage neighborhoods. Specifically, Asian (AHR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.80-0.95), Black (AHR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.66-0.70), Hispanic (AHR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.86-0.92), and White (AHR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.66-0.71) adults in high-disadvantage neighborhoods were less likely to be waitlisted compared with White adults in low-disadvantage neighborhoods. Overall, candidates residing in high-disadvantage neighborhoods were less likely to receive any KT (AHR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.87-0.92), LDKT (AHR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.62-0.69), and preemptive KT (AHR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.58-0.67). Notably, Black candidates residing in high-disadvantage neighborhoods were less likely to receive KT (AHR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.58-0.62), LDKT (AHR, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.21-0.25), and preemptive KT (AHR, 0.22; 95% CI, 0.20-0.25) compared with White candidates in low-disadvantage neighborhoods. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE/UNASSIGNED:In this cohort study of adults with ESKD and KT candidates, residence in high-disadvantage neighborhoods was associated with reduced access to waitlisting and KT; it also was associated with persistent racial and ethnic disparities in LDKT and preemptive KT. These results suggest that to support equitable access, clinicians and transplant programs should work with social workers and community advocates to implement initiatives (eg, outreach and financial support) that address structural barriers and direct resources to affected neighborhoods.

BACKGROUND/UNASSIGNED:; environmental injustice) by racial/ethnic segregation (social injustice) on dementia diagnosis in ESKD. METHODS/UNASSIGNED:concentrations (annualized and matched to older adults' residential ZIP code at dialysis initiation) and by segregation scores (Theil's H method). FINDINGS/UNASSIGNED:and segregation. INTERPRETATION/UNASSIGNED:experienced an increased risk of dementia; this risk was particularly pronounced among individuals in high segregation and predominantly minority neighborhoods. Environmental and social injustices likely drive racial and ethnic disparities in dementia for older adults with ESKD, underscoring the need for interventions and policies to mitigate these injustices. FUNDING/UNASSIGNED:National Institutes of Health.

OBJECTIVE:This study examines how social determinants of health (SDOH) influence mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and its progression to dementia across racial/ethnic groups, identifying disparities and key predictors using machine learning approaches. METHODS:We analyzed data from 83,180 participants aged 50+ in the All of Us Research Program (65,582 White, 6,207 Black, 4,170 Hispanic, 7,221 Other). The sample had mean ages ranging from 62.4 (Hispanic) to 68.1 (White) years, with significant gender disparities (70.9% Black females vs. 46.0% Other females). We developed machine learning classification models to predict MCI and its progression to dementia across the four racial/ethnic groups using 18 SDOH, along with key sociodemographic variables. We then applied SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) to quantify each factor's contribution and interpret its risk and protective effects on individual predictions. RESULTS:MCI prevalence was comparable across groups (7.5%-8.0%), but progression to dementia varied (9.4% Black vs. 11.4% Other). Perceived stress was the strongest predictor of MCI across all groups, with SHAP values of 15.1% (White), 13.5% (Black), 17.4% (Other), and 19.3% (Hispanic). Predictors of progression to dementia varied by groups: perceived stress (7.0%) for Whites, instrumental social support (14.2%) for Hispanics, daily spiritual experience (34.0%) for Blacks, and everyday discrimination (11.2%) for other groups. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSIONS:The findings underscore the need for group-specific interventions addressing stress mitigation for MCI prevention and culturally-tailored support systems to delay dementia progression. This machine learning approach reveals complex SDOH interactions that traditional methods might overlook, particularly for racial/ethnic underrepresented populations.

BACKGROUND:Cardiovascular disease is the most common cause of morbidity and mortality in kidney transplant recipients. Screening for coronary disease is frequently required prior to kidney transplantation, but coronary intervention has not been shown to be beneficial except in complex coronary artery disease. The likelihood of finding significant coronary artery disease and the benefits of routine pre-transplant screening are uncertain. METHODS:We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis. Medline & Embase were searched to identify manuscripts published between 1998 and 2024 reporting the results of pre-transplant screening. The primary endpoints were the frequency of detecting significant coronary lesions for which there are AHA class 1 indications for revascularization: a) >50% left main stenosis; or b) multi-vessel disease with ejection fraction < 35% during pre-kidney transplant screening. Secondary endpoints included frequency of detecting multivessel disease, proximal left anterior descending artery (LAD) disease, and number of patients who underwent invasive coronary angiography. Meta-regression was used to explore outcome heterogeneity according to the presence of hypertension, diabetes, and age. RESULTS:We identified 1273 studies out of which 44 met eligibility criteria. The mean prevalence of class 1 indications was 2%, although the heterogeneity was high with estimates ranging from 0% to 17%. Estimated prevalence of proximal LAD disease was 2% and left main stenosis was 1%, whereas 10% of patients had multi-vessel coronary artery disease, and 35% were referred for invasive angiography. There was no evidence of significant heterogeneity according to sex of the population or prevalence of diabetes or hypertension. CONCLUSIONS:Identification of class I indications for revascularization during pre-transplant coronary screening was rare.

BACKGROUND:Falls are thought to be common in patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis, but little is known about their frequency or outcomes. In this prospective study, we sought to increase our knowledge regarding the incidence, timing, circumstances, and outcomes of falls in this population. METHODS:Between January 2021 and April 2023, adults undergoing maintenance hemodialysis from 103 U.S. dialysis facilities were enrolled in the HOPE Consortium trial, which randomized participants with moderate or severe chronic pain to a pain coping skills cognitive behavioral therapy intervention or usual care. Occurrence of falls was a pre-specified trial outcome. The research team inquired about falls at each four-week follow-up visit during the 36-week study. Multivariable regression was used to explore associations of demographic and clinical characteristics, including patient-reported symptoms, with fall risk. RESULTS:Of 643 trial participants, 178 (28%) experienced 293 falls over a cumulative follow-up period of 429 participant-years for an overall rate of 0.68 falls per participant-year (95% CI: 0.61, 0.76). Accidents were the most frequent cause of falls (38%). It was rare for falls to be related to the hemodialysis treatment or to occur in the hemodialysis unit. Of the 293 falls, 36 (12%) were evaluated in the emergency department without subsequent hospitalization, 41 (14%) resulted in a hospital admission, and 19 (7%) led to a fracture. In multivariable analyses, neither demographic characteristics severity of pain symptoms or medication use such as opioids at enrollment was associated with the fall risk. CONCLUSIONS:Falls were common in this cohort of maintenance hemodialysis patients with chronic pain, occurring in 28% of individuals during a planned follow-up of 36 weeks. Falls rarely occurred in the dialysis unit, with the vast majority occurring at participants' homes and due to accidental causes. There was no significant association between patient-reported symptoms or medication use and the risk of subsequent falls. TRIAL REGISTRATION/BACKGROUND:NCT04571619.

There is extensive system-wide evidence of disparities in access to organ transplantation in the US based on race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status. However, little information is available regarding care disparities among US organ procurement organizations (OPOs). Commissioned by the US Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), we studied racial/ethnic disparities in organ donation and transplantation across and within OPOs. Based on the 2020 CMS final rule, we calculated OPO donation and organ transplantation rates with 95% confidence intervals for racial (Black, White, and Asian American and Pacific Islander, AAPI) and ethnic (Hispanic and non-Hispanic) groups. OPOs were ranked with national rates as references and classified according to the CMS 3-tier system. Of the 58 OPOs, 8 and 4 had donation rates lower for Black and AAPI donors than for White donors; 21 and 18 had organ transplantation rates lower for Black and AAPI donors than for White donors; 1 and 1 had a donation rate or organ transplantation rate lower for Hispanic donors than for non-Hispanic donors. Significant racial/ethnic disparities in organ donation and transplantation exist among many OPOs, whereas the overall OPO performance is dominated by White and non-Hispanic donors. These disparities may be influenced by variations and structural barriers in resource access, donor identification, transplantation referral, and waitlisting processes-some of which lie partially outside the direct control of OPOs and disproportionately affect disadvantaged populations. Results support equitable organ donation and allocation through enhanced awareness of health care disparities, increased accountability of OPOs, and informed policies and interventions.

BACKGROUND/UNASSIGNED:Chronic kidney disease (CKD) impacts more than 800 million people. It causes significant suffering and disproportionately impacts marginalized populations in the United States. Kidney palliative care has the potential to alleviate this distress, but has not been tested. This pilot study evaluates the feasibility of a randomized clinical trial (RCT) testing the efficacy of integrated kidney palliative and CKD care in an urban safety-net hospital. METHODS/UNASSIGNED:, and are receiving care at our safety net hospital. Participants will be randomized in permuted blocks of two or four to either the intervention group, who will receive monthly ambulatory care visits for six months with a palliative care provider trained in kidney palliative care, or to usual nephrology care. Primary outcomes are feasibility of recruitment, retention, fidelity to the study visit protocol, and the ability to collect outcome data. These outcomes include symptom burden, quality of life, and engagement in advance care planning. DISCUSSION/UNASSIGNED:This pilot RCT will provide essential data on the feasibility of testing integrated palliative care in CKD care in an underserved setting. These outcomes will inform a larger, fully powered trial that tests the efficacy of our kidney palliative care approach. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION/UNASSIGNED:NCT04998110.