Faculty Bibliography

Background and ObjectivesWhile hearing loss is a known risk factor for dementia, the impact of incident hearing loss on subsequent dementia risk remains underexplored. This study examined the association between newly reported hearing loss and dementia risk in U.S. adults, focusing on critical intervention periods for dementia prevention.Research Design and MethodsParticipants from the Health and Retirement Study who reported no hearing loss or hearing aid use in 2010 or 2012 were included. Incident hearing loss and dementia were assessed via self-report and proxy report. Pooled logistic regression models with inverse probability weighting estimated the cumulative incidence of dementia at 2, 4, 6, and 8 years after baseline. Risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals were calculated from 200 bootstrap samples. Subgroup analyses were conducted by age, sex, and cardiovascular disease (CVD) status.ResultsAmong 13,599 participants, 1125 (8.3%) reported incident hearing loss. Dementia incidence was higher among those with hearing loss (6.6%) compared to those without (4.9%). Starting at 4 years, incident hearing loss was associated with a higher dementia risk, persisting at 8 years (RR = 1.34; 95% CI: 1.05, 1.59). This association was significant among individuals aged 50-64 years and those with CVD.Discussion and ImplicationsIncident hearing loss is associated with a heightened dementia risk, particularly in midlife and among individuals with CVD. Future research should investigate the effectiveness of timely interventions aimed at preventing dementia in individuals with hearing loss.

OBJECTIVE:To examine the associations between patient out-of-pocket (OOP) costs and nonadherence to glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1a), and the consequent impact on adverse outcomes, including hospitalizations and emergency department (ED) visits. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS/METHODS:This retrospective cohort study used MarketScan Commercial data (2016-2021). The cohort included nonpregnant adults aged 18-64 years with type 2 diabetes who initiated GLP-1a therapy. Participants were continuously enrolled in the same private insurance plan for 6 months before the prescription date and 1 year thereafter. Exposures included average first 30-day OOP costs for GLP-1a, categorized into quartiles (lowest [Q1] to highest [Q4]). Primary outcomes were the annual proportion of days covered (PDC) for GLP-1a and nonadherence, defined as PDC <0.8. Secondary outcomes included diabetes-related and all-cause hospitalizations and ED visits 1 year post-GLP-1a initiation. RESULTS:Among 61,907 adults who initiated GLP-1a, higher 30-day OOP costs were associated with decreased adherence. Patients in the highest OOP cost quartile (Q4: $80-$3,375) had significantly higher odds of nonadherence (odds ratio [OR]1.25; 95% CI 1.19-1.31) compared with those in Q1 ($0-$21). Nonadherence was linked to increased incidence rates of diabetes-related hospitalizations or ED visits (incidence rate ratio [IRR] 1.86; 95% CI 1.43-2.42), cumulative length of hospitalization (IRR 1.56; 95% CI 1.41-1.72), all-cause ED visits (IRR 1.38; 95% CI 1.32-1.45), and increased ED-related costs ($69.81, 95% CI $53.54-$86.08). CONCLUSIONS:Higher OOP costs for GLP-1a were associated with reduced adherence and increased rates of adverse outcomes among type 2 diabetes patients.

The recent escalation of racism in the U.S. during the COVID-19 pandemic points to the importance of examining the association between experienced racism and sexual health. Based on data from a nationally representative survey conducted in the U.S. in October 2020 (n = 1,915), Chi-square tests and multivariable logistic regressions were estimated to examine the association between experience of racism and changes in sex life during the pandemic. We further performed a causal mediation analysis using the bootstrap technique to assess the mediating role of psychological distress in the observed association between the experience of racism and changes in sex life. Among the respondents, the proportions reporting better, worse, or no change in sex life were, respectively, 15%, 21%, and 64%. Experiencing racial discrimination during COVID-19 was significantly associated with worsening sex life (adjusted odd ratio [AOR] = 1.53; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.04, 2.25). Respondents with experienced racism were also more likely to report psychological distress (AOR = 1.68; 95% CI = 1.09, 2.59). About one-third (32.66%) of the observed association between experienced racism and worsening sex life was mediated through psychological distress. Addressing racism and its association with psychological distress has the potential to improve sexual health and reduce related racial and ethnic disparities.

OBJECTIVE:To compare hospitalization rates between African American (AA) and European American (EA) deceased-donor (DD) kidney transplant (KT) recipients during over a10-year period. METHOD/METHODS:Data from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients and social determinants of health (SDoH), measured by the Social Deprivation Index, were used. Hospitalization rates were estimated for kidney recipients from AA and EA DDs who had one kidney transplanted into an AA and one into an EA, leading to four donor/recipient pairs (DRPs): AA/AA, AA/EA, EA/AA, and EA/EA. Poisson-Gamma models were fitted to assess post-transplant hospitalizations. RESULT/RESULTS:Unadjusted hospitalization rates (95% confidence interval) were higher among all DRP involving AA, 131.1 (122.5, 140.3), 134.8 (126.3, 143.8), and 102.4 (98.9, 106.0) for AA/AA, AA/EA, and EA/AA, respectively, compared to 97.1 (93.7, 100.6) per 1000 post-transplant person-years for EA/EA pairs. Multivariable analysis showed u-shaped relationships across SDoH levels within each DRP, but findings varied depending on recipients' race, i.e., AA recipients in areas with the worst SDoH had higher hospitalization rates. However, EA recipients in areas with the best SDoH had higher hospitalization rates than their counterparts. CONCLUSIONS:Relationship between healthcare utilization and SDoH depends on DRP, with higher hospitalization rates among AA recipients living in areas with the worst SDoH and among EA recipients in areas with the best SDoH profiles. SDoH plays an important role in driving disparities in hospitalizations after kidney transplantation.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:Hearing aids may reduce the risk of dementia among individuals with hearing loss. However, no evidence is available from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the effectiveness of hearing aids use in reducing incident dementia. Using target trial emulation, we leveraged an existing longitudinal cohort study to estimate the association between hearing aids initiation and risk of dementia. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS/METHODS:The Health and Retirement Study was used to emulate target trials among non-institutionalized participants aged ≥50 years with self-reported hearing loss, without dementia at baseline, and without use of hearing aids in the previous 2 years. Intention-to-treat analysis was conducted to estimate the risk of dementia associated with hearing aids initiation vs controls who did not initiate hearing aids. Pooled logistic regression models with inverse-probability of treatment and censoring weights were applied to estimate risk ratios, and 95% confidence intervals were calculated using 1000 sets of bootstrapping. RESULTS:Among 2314 participants (328 in the intervention group and 1986 in the control group; average age: 72.3 ± 9.7 years, 49% women, and 81% White), after 8 years of follow-up, risk of dementia was significantly lower among individuals who initiated hearing aids (risk difference (RD): -0.05, 95% confidence interval (CI): -0.08, -0.01). A lower risk was observed particularly among adults aged 50-74 years, men, and individuals with cardiovascular disease. DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS/CONCLUSIONS:Hearing aids use was associated with a significant reduction of incident dementia. Future interventional studies are needed to further assess the effectiveness of hearing aids in preventing dementia.

BACKGROUND:Food insecurity related to immigration status remains largely underexplored. This study examined trends and disparities in household food insecurity by immigration status in the United States (US). METHODS:We analyzed data from 427,942 households from the US Current Population Survey Food Security Supplement from 2011 to 2021. Immigration status categories included recent immigrants (< 5 years), long-term immigrants (≥ 5 years), naturalized citizens, and US-born citizens. Food insecurity was assessed using validated questions on consistent access to enough food for an active and healthy life. RESULTS:From 2011 to 2021, food insecurity prevalence declined from 14.9 % (95 % CI, 14.5 %-15.3 %) to 10.2 % (95 % CI, 9.8 %-10.6 %). Among recent immigrants, prevalence decreased from 25.2 % (95 % CI, 23.1-27.4) in 2011 to 15.0 % (95 % CI, 12.8 %-17.2 %) in 2019, then increased to 17.7 % (95 % CI, 14.7 %-20.2 %) in 2020 and 17.4 % (95 % CI, 14.7 %-20.2 %) in 2021. Long-term immigrants' prevalence dropped from 20.4 % (95 % CI, 16.9 %-24.0 %) in 2011 to 10.2 % (95 % CI, 7.2 %-13.1 %) in 2018, then increased to 17.7 % (95 % CI, 13.7 %-21.7 %) in 2021. Naturalized citizens' prevalence decreased from 14.4 % (95 % CI, 12.9 %-15.9 %) to 9.5 % (95 % CI, 8.2 %-10.9 %). US-born citizens' prevalence decreased from 14.2 % (95 % CI, 13.8 %-14.6 %) to 9.7 % (95 % CI, 9.3 %-10.2 %). Compared to the US-born citizens, the adjusted prevalence ratio was 1.63 (95 % CI,1.57-1.69) for recent immigrants, 1.22 (95 % CI, 1.13-1.31) for long-term immigrants, and 0.94 (95 % CI, 0.90-0.98) for naturalized citizens. Significant disparities exist in subgroups. CONCLUSIONS:The findings provide insights for stakeholders to address food insecurity among vulnerable immigrant groups in the US.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:Discrimination in medical settings (DMS) contributes to health care disparities in the United States, but few studies have determined the extent of DMS in a large national sample and across different populations. This study estimated the national prevalence of DMS and described demographic and health-related characteristics associated with experiencing DMS in seven different situations. METHODS:Survey data from 41,875 adults participating in the All of Us Research Program collected in 2021-2022 and logistic regression were used to examine the association between sociodemographic and health-related characteristics and self-reported DMS among adults engaged with a health care provider within the past 12 months. Statistical analysis was performed in 2023-2024. RESULTS:About 36.89% of adults reported having experienced at least one DMS situation. Adults with relative social and medical disadvantages had higher prevalence of experiencing DMS. Compared to their counterparts, respondents with higher odds of experiencing DMS in at least one situation identified as female, non-Hispanic Black, having at least some college, living in the South, renter, having other living arrangement, being publicly insured, not having a usual source of care, having multiple chronic conditions, having any disability, and reporting fair or poor health, p<0.05. CONCLUSIONS:The findings indicate a high prevalence of DMS, particularly among some population groups. Characterizing DMS may be a valuable tool for identifying populations at risk within the health care system and optimizing the overall patient care experience. Implementing relevant policies remains an essential strategy for mitigating the prevalence of DMS and reducing health care disparities.

OBJECTIVE:To examine the pattern of health services access and utilization that may contribute to racial/ethnic disparities in receiving continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) treatment for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). METHODS:This cross-sectional study used a national sample from the All of Us Research Program, which included over 80 % of participants from underrepresented populations in biomedical research. Study participants included adults aged 18 years and older diagnosed with OSA (N = 8518). Diagnosis of OSA and CPAP treatment were ascertained by diagnostic and procedural codes from the electronic health records. Sociodemographic characteristics and health service utilization factors were identified using self-reported survey data. RESULTS:With this national survey, the overall diagnosed prevalence of OSA was 8.8 %, with rates of 8.12 % in non-Hispanic (NH) Black adults, 5.99 % in Hispanic adults, and 10.35 % in NH White adults. When comparing to NH White adults, Hispanic adults were less likely to receive CPAP treatment for OSA after adjusting for socioeconomic and demographic characteristics, access to and utilization of health services, and comorbidities such as obesity and having multiple chronic conditions (OR = 0.73, 95 % CI = 0.59,0.90), p < 0.01. CONCLUSIONS:The rates of CPAP treatment among OSA patients are not consistent across racial and ethnic groups. Unequal access to health services based on residence may contribute to these differences. Interventions that target disparities in OSA diagnosis, access to treatment, and barriers in insurance coverage could potentially help reduce racial and ethnic differences in OSA diagnosis and management.