Try a new search

Format these results:

Searched for:

in-biosketch:yes

person:blaumc01

Total Results:

127


Diabetic management in older adults with dementia-are we overtreating? [Meeting Abstract]

Kennedy, H; Ferris, R; Arcila-Mesa, M; Rapozo, C; Chodosh, J; Blaum, C S
Background: Up to one third of older adults with diabetes (DM) have co-occurring cognitive impairment and/or Alzheimer's disease and Related Dementias (ADRD). These patients are more likely to experience episodes of hypo and hyperglycemia. The American Geriatric Society (AGS) and American Diabetic Association (ADA) recommend liberalizing hemoglobin (Hb) A1c targets for patients with multiple comorbidities, but the impact of ADRD on glycemic management of patients with DM-ADRD is unknown.
Method(s): Within the primary care and endocrine clinics in the NYU Langone Health System, we collected characteristics of DM-ADRD patients participating in a DM-ADRD clinical quality improvement program. We administratively collected patients' most recent (within18 months) HbA1c from the Electronic Medical Record. We also surveyed the English and Spanish-speaking caregivers (CG) of these DM-ADRD patients. The CG survey included a measure of CG-reported patient dementia severity using the Dementia Severity Rating Scale (DSRS). We examined the relationship between the DSRS score and HbA1c.
Result(s): Patients (n=173) had a mean age of 79.7 (+/-7.18) and a mean HbA1c of 7.08%. 63% (n=106) were female, 63% (n=106) white; 37% (n=64) identified as being Latino/Hispanic. The mean DSRS score was 25 (+/-12.7) (range: 0-54), within the range of moderate cognitive impairment (18-36). Those older than 75 and those who were Spanish speaking had higher DSRS scores (26.1, p=.02; and 26.7, p=.04, respectively). Mean HbA1c of patients in the severe DSRS range (scores 37-54) was 6.81 (N=35) and was lower than in patients with moderate and mild dementia severity (mean 7.15 and 7.24, respectively); however, this difference was not statistically significant.
Conclusion(s): While the data does not confirm a statistically significant relationship between dementia severity and lower A1c, this finding is worrisome for DM-ADRD patients. Our data suggests possible overtreatment and if confirmed, there is a clear need for increased family and provider education and quality improvement programs for this vulnerable population
EMBASE:633776311
ISSN: 1532-5415
CID: 4754602

Factors associated with burden for caregivers of patients with diabetes and dementia [Meeting Abstract]

Battista, C; Chodosh, J; Ferris, R; Arcila-Mesa, M; Rapozo, C; Blaum, C S
Background: Caregivers (CGs) of older-adults with Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD) and CGs of older-adults with diabetes (DM) report substantial CG burden. CG burden is known to be linked to patients' behavioral problems, poor cognition, and increased dependency. There is no literature addressing CG burden in CGs of individuals with co-occurring diabetes and dementia (DM-ADRD). The aim of this study was to identify CG and care-recipient (CR) factors associated with high levels of CG burden in CGs of DM-ADRD patients.
Method(s): This study used bivariate and descriptive statistics to analyze surveys collected as part of a quality improvement intervention being conducted at NYU Langone Health primary care and endocrine Faculty Group Practices and Family Health Centers. Inclusion criteria for patients were age >= 65, cognitive impairment, and DM with recent HbA1c > 6.4 or ever prescribed hyperglyemic medication. Telephonic surveys were conducted with CGs of eligible patients. The Treatment Burden Questionnaire (TBQ) was used to measure CG burden. TBQ results were analyzed for association with CG factors including age, sex, race, relationship to patient, education level, residence status, and level of social support, as well as CR factors including age, sex, race, dementia severity, Charlson comorbidity score, and recent HbA1c values.
Result(s): CGs that completed surveys (n=58) had a mean age of 54.3 years, 74% (n=43) female, 46% (n=27) white, 84% (n=49) were children of CRs, 70% (n=41) had education beyond 12th grade, and 55% (n=32) lived separately from CR. CRs of CGs that completed surveys (n=58) had a mean age of 80.5 years, 67% (n=39) female, 67% (n=37) white. We found CGs who were male, Asian, co-resident, with low level of social support, of CRs with more-advanced dementia, and of CRs with recent out-of-range HbA1c had significantly higher levels of CG burden (p<0.1).
Conclusion(s): Our study demonstrates there are several CG and CR factors that are associated with increased levels of CG burden in this population. Findings may assist in identification of CGs at risk for increased burden. If these results are found to be replicable, future studies should focus on the development of prevention and treatment plans consistent with these findings
EMBASE:633776777
ISSN: 1532-5415
CID: 4754532

BLEEDING READMISSIONS AFTER ACUTE MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION IN OLDER ADULTS: THE SILVER-AMI STUDY [Meeting Abstract]

Dodson, J A; Hajduk, A; Curtis, J P; Murphy, T; Krumholz, H M; Alexander, K; Clardy, D; Tsang, S; Geda, M; Blaum, C; Chaudhry, S I
Background We developed a risk model to predict hospitalization for bleeding within 6 months of discharge in older adults hospitalized for acute MI (AMI) and discharged on dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). Methods SILVER-AMI is a cohort study of 3041 patients age >=75 hospitalized with AMI at 96 U.S. hospitals. Participants underwent in-hospital functional assessment (cognition, vision, hearing, unintentional weight loss, ADLs, grip strength, functional mobility, falls). These analyses focused on participants discharged on DAPT (N=1858). Our outcome was rehospitalization for bleeding within 6 months. We used Bayesian model averaging to develop a risk model with split sample validation. Results Mean age was 81.5 years. Compared with participants not prescribed DAPT, those prescribed DAPT had slightly better functional mobility and lower cognitive impairment. Overall, 150 (8.1%) participants on DAPT experienced hospitalization for bleeding within 6 months; nearly half (48.7%) were gastrointestinal. Rates of functional impairments were similar among participants who did and did not experience bleeding. The final risk model included 8 predictors (Table), had moderate discrimination (C-statistic = 0.66), and good calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow P value > 0.05). Conclusion Hospitalization for bleeding within 6 months of discharge on DAPT among older AMI patients was not predicted by aging-related functional impairments, but 8 other clinically plausible predictors were identified. [Figure presented]
Copyright
EMBASE:2005042710
ISSN: 0735-1097
CID: 4367312

CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE AND CUMULATIVE INCIDENCE OF COGNITIVE IMPAIRMENT: LONGITUDINAL FINDINGS FROM THE HEALTH AND RETIREMENT STUDY [Meeting Abstract]

Covello, A; Horwitz, L; Singhal, S; Blaum, C; Dodson, J A
Background We sought to examine whether people with a diagnosis of cardiovascular disease (CVD) experienced a greater incidence of subsequent cognitive impairment (CI) compared to people without CVD, as suggested by prior studies, using a large longitudinal cohort. Methods We used biennial data collected on adults age >=50 from the Health and Retirement Study (HRS) to compare the incidence of CI over 8 years in 1,931 participants newly diagnosed with CVD vs. 3,862 age- and gender-matched controls. Diagnosis of CVD was adjudicated with an established HRS methodology. CI was defined as <=11 on the 27-point Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status, based on a previously accepted clinical cutpoint. To examine the incidence of CI, we used a cumulative incidence function accounting for competing risk of death. Results Mean age at study entry was 70 years, and 55% were female. CI developed in 1,335 participants over 8 years. Death was more common among participants with incident CVD (20.4% vs. 13.4%, p <.001). Cumulative incidence analysis for CI, after adjusting for death, showed no significant difference in incidence of cognitive impairment between the CVD and control groups at the end of the study period (Figure). Conclusion We found no increased risk of subsequent cognitive impairment among participants with CVD (compared with no CVD), despite previous research indicating that CVD accelerates cognitive decline. This finding may be due to appropriately accounting for the competing risk of death. [Figure presented]
Copyright
EMBASE:2005039508
ISSN: 0735-1097
CID: 4367682

A Descriptive Analysis of an Ambulatory Kidney Palliative Care Program

Scherer, Jennifer S; Harwood, Katherine; Frydman, Julia L; Moriyama, Derek; Brody, Abraham A; Modersitzki, Frank; Blaum, Caroline S; Chodosh, Joshua
PMID: 31295050
ISSN: 1557-7740
CID: 3976762

Determinants and outcomes of acute kidney injury among older patients undergoing invasive coronary angiography for acute myocardial infarction: The SILVER-AMI Study

Dodson, John A; Hajduk, Alexandra; Curtis, Jeptha; Geda, Mary; Krumholz, Harlan M; Song, Xuemei; Tsang, Sui; Blaum, Caroline; Miller, Paula; Parikh, Chirag R; Chaudhry, Sarwat I
BACKGROUND:Among older adults (age≥75) hospitalized for acute myocardial infarction, acute kidney injury after coronary angiography is common. Aging-related conditions may independently predict acute kidney injury, but have not yet been analyzed in large acute myocardial infarction cohorts. METHODS:We analyzed data from 2212 participants age≥75 in the SILVER-AMI study who underwent coronary angiography. Acute kidney injury was defined using KDIGO criteria (serum Cr increase ≥0.3mg/dL from baseline or≥1.5 times baseline). We analyzed the associations of traditional acute kidney injury risk factors and aging-related conditions (ADL impairment, prior falls, cachexia, low physical activity) with acute kidney injury, and then performed logistic regression to identify independent predictors. RESULTS:Participants' mean age was 81.3years, 45.2% were female, and 9.5% were nonwhite; 421 (19.0%) experienced acute kidney injury. Comorbid diseases and aging-related conditions were both more common among individuals experiencing acute kidney injury. However, after multivariable adjustment, no aging-related conditions were retained. There were 11 risk factors in the final model; the strongest were heart failure on presentation (OR 1.91, 95% CI 1.41-2.59), BMI >30 (vs. BMI 18-25: OR 1.75, 95% CI 1.27-2.42), and nonwhite race (OR 1.65, 95% CI 1.16-2.33). The final model achieved an AUC of 0.72 and was well calibrated (Hosmer-Lemeshow P=0.50). Acute kidney injury was independently associated with 6month mortality (OR 1.98, 95% CI 1.36-2.88) but not readmission (OR 1.26, 95% CI 0.98-1.61). CONCLUSIONS:Acute kidney injury is common among older adults with acute myocardial infarction undergoing coronary angiography. Predictors largely mirrored those in previous studies of younger individuals, which suggests that geriatric conditions mediate their influence through other risk factors.
PMID: 31170374
ISSN: 1555-7162
CID: 3923512

Association of Patient Priorities-Aligned Decision-Making With Patient Outcomes and Ambulatory Health Care Burden Among Older Adults With Multiple Chronic Conditions: A Nonrandomized Clinical Trial

Tinetti, Mary E; Naik, Aanand D; Dindo, Lilian; Costello, Darce M; Esterson, Jessica; Geda, Mary; Rosen, Jonathan; Hernandez-Bigos, Kizzy; Smith, Cynthia Daisy; Ouellet, Gregory M; Kang, Gina; Lee, Yungah; Blaum, Caroline
Importance/UNASSIGNED:Health care may be burdensome and of uncertain benefit for older adults with multiple chronic conditions (MCCs). Aligning health care with an individual's health priorities may improve outcomes and reduce burden. Objective/UNASSIGNED:To evaluate whether patient priorities care (PPC) is associated with a perception of more goal-directed and less burdensome care compared with usual care (UC). Design, Setting, and Participants/UNASSIGNED:Nonrandomized clinical trial with propensity adjustment conducted at 1 PPC and 1 UC site of a Connecticut multisite primary care practice that provides care to almost 15% of the state's residents. Participants included 163 adults aged 65 years or older who had 3 or more chronic conditions cared for by 10 primary care practitioners (PCPs) trained in PPC and 203 similar patients who received UC from 7 PCPs not trained in PPC. Participant enrollment occurred between February 1, 2017, and March 31, 2018; follow-up extended for up to 9 months (ended September 30, 2018). Interventions/UNASSIGNED:Patient priorities care, an approach to decision-making that includes patients' identifying their health priorities (ie, specific health outcome goals and health care preferences) and clinicians aligning their decision-making to achieve these health priorities. Main Outcomes and Measures/UNASSIGNED:Primary outcomes included change in patients' Older Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (O-PACIC), CollaboRATE, and Treatment Burden Questionnaire (TBQ) scores; electronic health record documentation of decision-making based on patients' health priorities; medications and self-management tasks added or stopped; and diagnostic tests, referrals, and procedures ordered or avoided. Results/UNASSIGNED:Of the 366 patients, 235 (64.2%) were female and 350 (95.6%) were white. Compared with the UC group, the PPC group was older (mean [SD] age, 74.7 [6.6] vs 77.6 [7.6] years) and had lower physical and mental health scores. At follow-up, PPC participants reported a 5-point greater decrease in TBQ score than those who received UC (ß [SE], -5.0 [2.04]; P = .01) using a weighted regression model with inverse probability of PCP assignment weights; no differences were seen in O-PACIC or CollaboRATE scores. Health priorities-based decisions were mentioned in clinical visit notes for 108 of 163 (66.3%) PPC vs 0 of 203 (0%) UC participants. Compared with UC patients, PPC patients were more likely to have medications stopped (weighted comparison, 52.0% vs 33.8%; adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 2.05; 95% CI, 1.43-2.95) and less likely to have self-management tasks (57.5% vs 62.1%; AOR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.41-0.84) and diagnostic tests (80.8% vs 86.4%; AOR, 0.22; 95% CI, 0.12-0.40) ordered. Conclusions and Relevance/UNASSIGNED:This study's findings suggest that patient priorities care may be associated with reduced treatment burden and unwanted health care. Care aligned with patients' priorities may be feasible and effective for older adults with MCCs. Trial Registration/UNASSIGNED:ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03600389.
PMID: 31589281
ISSN: 2168-6114
CID: 4130502

User-Centered Development of a Behavioral Economics Inspired Electronic Health Record Clinical Decision Support Module

Chokshi, Sara Kuppin; Troxel, Andrea; Belli, Hayley; Schwartz, Jessica; Blecker, Saul; Blaum, Caroline; Szerencsy, Adam; Testa, Paul; Mann, Devin
Changing physician behaviors is difficult. Electronic health record (EHR) clinical decision support (CDS) offers an opportunity to promote guideline adherence. Behavioral economics (BE) has shown success as an approach to supporting evidence-based decision-making with little additional cognitive burden. We applied a user-centered approach to incorporate BE "nudges" into a CDS module in two "vanguard" sites utilizing: (1) semi-structured interviews with key informants (n = 8); (2) a design thinking workshop; and (3) semi-structured group interviews with clinicians. In the 133 day development phase at two clinics, the navigator section fired 299 times for 27 unique clinicians. The inbasket refill alert fired 124 times for 22 clinicians. Fifteen prescriptions for metformin were written by 11 clinicians. Our user-centered approach yielded a BE-driven CDS module with relatively high utilization by clinicians. Next steps include the addition of two modules and continued tracking of utilization, and assessment of clinical impact of the module.
PMID: 31438106
ISSN: 1879-8365
CID: 4046992

Perspectives of Patients in Identifying Their Values-Based Health Priorities

Feder, Shelli L; Kiwak, Eliza; Costello, Darcé; Dindo, Lilian; Hernandez-Bigos, Kizzy; Vo, Lauren; Geda, Mary; Blaum, Caroline; Tinetti, Mary E; Naik, Aanand D
OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:Patient Health Priorities Identification (PHPI) is a values-based process in which trained facilitators assist older adults with multiple chronic conditions identify their health priorities. The purpose of this study was to evaluate patients' perceptions of PHPI. DESIGN/METHODS:Qualitative study using thematic analysis. SETTING/METHODS:In-depth semistructured telephone and in-person interviews. PARTICIPANTS/METHODS:Twenty-two older adults who participated in the PHPI process. MEASUREMENTS/METHODS:Open-ended questions about patient perceptions of the PHPI process, perceived benefits of the process, enablers and barriers to PHPI, and recommendations for process enhancement. RESULTS:Patient interviews ranged from 9 to 63 minutes (median = 20 min; interquartile range = 15-26). The mean age was 80 years (standard deviation = 7.96), 64% were female, and all patients identified themselves as white. Of the sample, 73% reported no caregiver involvement in their healthcare; 36% lived alone. Most patients felt able to complete the PHPI process with ease. Perceived benefits included increased knowledge and insight into disease processes and treatment options, patient activation, and enhanced communication with family and clinicians. Patients identified several factors that were both enablers and barriers to PHPI including facilitator characteristics, patient demographic and clinical characteristics, social support, relationships between the patient and their primary care provider, and the changing health priorities of the patient. Recommendations for process enhancement included more frequent and flexible facilitator contacts, selection of patients for participation based on specific patient characteristics, clarification of process aims and expectations, involvement of family, written reminders of established health priorities, short duration between facilitation and primary care provider follow-up, and the inclusion of health-related tasks in facilitation visits. CONCLUSIONS:Patients found the PHPI process valuable in identifying actionable health priorities and healthcare goals leading to enhanced knowledge, activation, and communication regarding their treatment options and preferences. PHPI may be useful for aligning the healthcare that patients receive with their values-based priorities.
PMID: 30844080
ISSN: 1532-5415
CID: 3759382

Functional Exercise Improves Mobility Performance in Older Adults With Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Gretebeck, Kimberlee A; Blaum, Caroline S; Moore, Tisha; Brown, Roger; Galecki, Andrzej; Strasburg, Debra; Chen, Shu; Alexander, Neil B
Background: Diabetes-related disability occurs in approximately two-thirds of older adults with diabetes and is associated with loss of independence, increased health care resource utilization, and sedentary lifestyle. The objective of this randomized controlled trial was to determine the effect of a center-based functional circuit exercise training intervention followed by a 10-week customized home-based program in improving mobility function in sedentary older adults with diabetes. Methods: Participants (n = 111; mean age 70.5 [7.1] y; mean body mass index 32.7 [5.9] kg/m2) were randomized to either a moderate-intensity functional circuit training (FCT) plus 10-week home program to optimize physical activity (FCT-PA) primary intervention or one of 2 comparison groups (FCT plus health education [FCT-HE] or flexibility and toning plus health education [FT-HE]). Results: Compared with FT-HE, FCT-PA improvements in comfortable gait speed of 0.1 m/s (P < .05) and 6-minute walk of 80 ft were consistent with estimates of clinically meaningful change. At 20 weeks, controlling for 10-week outcomes, improvements were found between groups for comfortable gait speed (FCT-PA vs FT-HE and FCT-HE vs FT-HE) and 6-minute walk (FCT-PA vs FCT-HE). Conclusions: Functional exercise training can improve mobility in overweight/obese older adults with diabetes and related comorbidities. Future studies should evaluate intervention sustainability and adaptations for those with more severe mobility impairments.
PMID: 31122111
ISSN: 1543-5474
CID: 3920932