Safety and reliability of tattooing colorectal neoplasms prior to laparoscopic resection
Feingold, Daniel L; Addona, Tommaso; Forde, Kenneth A; Arnell, Tracey D; Carter, Joseph J; Huang, Emina H; Whelan, Richard L
Accurate tumor localization is critical to performing minimally invasive colorectal resection. This study reviews the safety and reliability of tattooing colorectal neoplasms prior to laparoscopic resection. We retrospectively reviewed 50 consecutive patients with colorectal neoplasms who underwent endoscopic tattooing prior to laparoscopic resection. Data were obtained from medical charts, endoscopy records, and pathology reports. No complications related to endoscopy or tattooing were incurred. Five neoplasms (10%) were in the ascending colon, five (10%) were in the transverse colon, eight (16%) were in the descending colon, 23 (46%) were in the sigmoid colon, and nine (18%) were in the rectum. Tattoos were visualized intraoperatively and accurately localized the neoplasm in 44 patients (88%). Six patients (12%) did not have tattoos visualized laparoscopically and required intraoperative localization. On average, the pathology specimens in this series had a 15 cm proximal margin, a 12 cm distal margin, and 15 lymph nodes. In the context of laparoscopic colorectal resection, preoperative endoscopic tattooing is a safe and reliable method of tumor localization in most cases. Localizing colon and proximal rectal lesions with tattoos may be preferable to other localization techniques including intraoperative endoscopy
PMID: 15239988
ISSN: 1091-255x
CID: 96139
Laparoscopic-assisted cecectomy is associated with decreased formation of postoperative pulmonary metastases compared with open cecectomy in a murine model
Carter, Joseph J; Feingold, Daniel L; Kirman, Irena; Oh, Anthony; Wildbrett, Peer; Asi, Zishan; Fowler, Ryan; Huang, Emina; Whelan, Richard L
BACKGROUND: It was shown in a murine model that sham laparotomy is associated with a higher incidence of postoperative lung metastases when compared with results seen after carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum. Using the same tumor model, the present study was undertaken to determine if the addition of bowel resection to the operative procedure would impact the results. METHODS: Sixty mice underwent anesthesia alone (anesthesia control [AC]), laparoscopic-assisted cecectomy (LC), or open cecectomy (OC). After surgery, all animals received tail vein injections of 105 TA3-Ha tumor cells. On postoperative day 14, the lungs and trachea were excised en bloc and processed, and surface lung metastases were counted and recorded by a blinded observer. RESULTS: The mean number of surface lung metastases in the AC, LC, and OC groups was 30.9, 76.3, and 134.5, respectively. Significantly more metastases were documented after OC (P<.001) and LC (P<.05) than after anesthesia alone. Mice in the LC group had significantly fewer lung metastases (43% less) than mice in the OC group (P<.01). CONCLUSIONS: OC was associated with significantly more lung metastases than either LC or AC. Surgery-related immune suppression or trophic tumor cell stimulation occurring after surgery may contribute to this phenomenon.
PMID: 14555930
ISSN: 0039-6060
CID: 2119282