Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND:Numerous studies support the association of exercise training, physical activity (PA) and sedentary behaviour (SB) with both mortality and morbidity outcomes. The results across studies have been inconsistent, and no umbrella reviews have yet been conducted on this topic. METHODS:We conducted an umbrella review of meta-analyses of observational studies by screening articles in PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE and Web of Science databases from inception to 30 April 2024. Quality appraisal of each included meta-analysis was done using the AMSTAR 2 tool, with evidence certainty evaluated based on statistical significance, study size, heterogeneity, small-study effects, prediction intervals (PI) and potential biases. RESULTS:Frothy-eight meta-analyses were included (AMSTAR 2 ratings: high 25, moderate 10, low 2 and critically low 11). No evidence was highly suggestive or convincing. Suggestive evidence linked any PA and SB to lower and higher risks of all-cause, cardiovascular and cancer mortality. Suggestive evidence indicated a significant association between self-reported and device-measured total PA (equivalent odds ratio [eOR] 0.78 [0.70-0.86] and eHR = 0.50 [0.38-0.65], respectively), self-reported leisure time PA (eHR = 0.73 [0.66-0.80]), device-measured daily steps (eHR = 0.44 [0.35-0.56]) and aerobic plus resistance training (eHR = 0.60 [0.56-0.64]) with lower all-cause mortality. Weak evidence supported links between self-reported and device-measured SB and higher mortality (eHR = 1.3 [1.22-1.38] and eHR = 2.16 [1.09-4.28], respectively). Suggestive evidence was noted for the association between self-reported leisure time PA (eHR = 0.74 [0.69-0.80]) and resistance training (eHR = 0.82 [0.81-0.84]) with cardiovascular mortality. Suggestive evidence was also found for the association between self-reported leisure time PA (eHR = 0.87 [0.83-0.91]) with cancer mortality. Associations between self-reported running time and mortality from all causes, cardiovascular diseases (CVD) and cancer did not reach statistical significance nor did the association between low skeletal muscle mass and all-cause mortality. Meta-regression analyses showed that physical activity reduces mortality risk, with age reducing the protective effects against all-cause, CVD and cancer mortality. We also found that combined exercise training (aerobic plus resistance) most effectively reduces all-cause and CVD mortality. CONCLUSIONS:Converging evidence supports that physical activity and sedentary behaviour are associated with lower and higher rates of all-cause, cardiovascular and cancer mortality. More high-quality prospective studies are needed for a better understanding of the associations between running time and also TV-viewing time and health-related outcomes.

The use of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) medications during pregnancy is increasing, raising concerns about potential long-term effects on offspring. This study investigates in utero exposure to methylphenidate, amphetamines and atomoxetine and risk of offspring neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs). The population-based cohort study identified from Swedish registers included 861,650 children born by 572,731 mothers from 2008-2017. We categorized exposure based on redeemed medication during pregnancy and compared exposed children to those whose mothers discontinued medication before conception. Main outcomes were any NDD, including ADHD and autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Cox proportional hazards regression estimated hazard ratios (HRs), adjusting for maternal psychiatric and sociodemographic factors. Sensitivity analyses included stratifications by medication type, timing, and duration of exposure, and sibling comparisons. We also performed a meta-analysis combining data from the present study with those from a previous Danish study. Results showed no increased risk for any NDD (HR_adjusted 0.95, 95% CI 0.82-1.11), ADHD (HR_adjusted 0.92, 95% CI 0.78-1.08), or ASD (HR_adjusted 0.86, 95% CI 0.63-1.18). Sensitivity analyses showed consistent patterns of no increased risks across different exposure durations, medication types and between siblings. Meta-analyses further supported the findings (pooled HR for any NDD 1.00, 95% CI 0.83;1.20). Our study provides evidence that in utero exposure to ADHD medications does not increase the risk of long-term NDDs in offspring. This study replicates safety data for methylphenidate and extends it with new safety data on amphetamines and atomoxetine. These findings are crucial for informing clinical guidelines and helping healthcare providers and expectant mothers make informed decisions.

IMPORTANCE/UNASSIGNED:Expectancy effects are significant confounding factors in psychiatric randomized clinical trials (RCTs), potentially affecting the interpretation of study results. This narrative review is the first, to our knowledge, to explore the relationship between expectancy effects, compromised blinding integrity, and the effects of active treatment/placebo in psychiatric RCTs. Additionally, we present statistical and experimental approaches that may help mitigate the confounding impact of expectancy effects. The review concludes with recommendations to enhance the reliability of RCTs in psychiatry. OBSERVATIONS/UNASSIGNED:The placebo response comprises both specific and nonspecific elements, with expectation being a key specific component. Evidence from experimental and clinical studies suggests that expectancy can influence treatment responses in RCTs. Blinding integrity may be compromised by perceived treatment efficacy and adverse effects, introducing bias into outcome assessments. Treatment expectations can lead to unblinding during RCTs, and meta-analytic data from studies in the fields of psychedelics and anxiety disorders indicate that this can influence effect sizes. Therefore, controlling for expectancy effects is essential when interpreting RCT results. Novel statistical methods, though still in need of further validation, offer strategies to address this issue. Another approach may involve experimental medicine models, which aim to develop objective improvement markers (readouts) less affected by expectancy effects. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE/UNASSIGNED:Expectancy effects represent a significant confound in psychiatric RCTs. We recommend collecting data on treatment expectations alongside monitoring blinding integrity to more accurately interpret study results. Additionally, developing objective readouts that are less confounded by expectancy effects offers another promising avenue for mitigating these confounding influences in psychiatric RCTs.

BACKGROUND:It is unknown whether there is a general factor that accounts for the propensity for both physical and mental conditions in different age groups and how it is associated with lifestyle and well-being. METHODS:factor, lifestyles, and well-being was further explored. RESULTS:factor scores significantly correlated with lifestyle and well-being, suggesting healthier lifestyles were associated with a reduced likelihood of physical and mental health comorbidities, which in turn improved well-being. CONCLUSIONS:Contrary to the traditional dichotomy between mental and physical conditions, our study showed a general factor underlying the comorbidity across mental and physical diseases, related to lifestyle and well-being. Our results inform the conceptualization of mental and physical illness as well as future research assessing risk and pathways of disease transmission, intervention, and prevention. Our results also provide a strong rationale for a systematic screening for mental disorders in individuals with physical conditions and vice versa, and for integrated services addressing multimorbidity.

This editorial focuses on the seven studies published in the BMJ Mental Health topic collection Advances in Clinical Psychopharmacology in Children and Young People. Collectively, these articles provide evidence that informs key steps in the psychopharmacological management of children and adolescents with mental health or neurodevelopmental conditions. Papers in this collection contribute to strengthen evidence-based psychopharmacological practice. We look forward to further developments in the field, supported by adequate research funding.

OBJECTIVE:We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to quantify the effect of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) medication on quality of life (QoL), and to understand whether this effect differs between stimulants and nonstimulants. METHOD/METHODS:February 2023 (https://med-adhd.org/), we identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of ADHD medications for individuals aged 6 years or more with a diagnosis of ADHD based on the DSM (from third to fifth editions) or the International Classification of Diseases (ICD; ninth or tenth revision), reporting data on QoL (measured with a validated scale). The risk of bias for each RCTs was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool 2. Multilevel meta-analytic models were conducted with R 4.3.1. RESULTS:We included 17 RCTs (5,388 participants in total; 56% randomized to active medication) in the meta-analyses. We found that amphetamines (Hedge's g = 0.51, 95% CI = 0.08, 0.94), methylphenidate (0.38; 0.23, 0.54), and atomoxetine (0.30; 0.19, 0.40) were significantly more efficacious than placebo in improving QoL in people with ADHD, with moderate effect size. For atomoxetine, these effects were not moderated by the length of intervention, and did not differ between children/adolescents and adults. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:In addition to being efficacious in reducing ADHD core symptom severity, both stimulant and nonstimulant medications are efficacious in improving QoL in people with ADHD, albeit with lower effect sizes. Future research should explore whether, and to what degree, combining pharmacological and nonpharmacological interventions is likely to further improve QoL in people with ADHD. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY/CONCLUSIONS:From a prior dataset of a network meta-analysis, 17 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included in a meta-analysis to investigate if attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) medication improves quality of life (QoL) in people with ADHD. The analysis showed that medications such as amphetamines, methylphenidate, and atomoxetine improved QoL compared to placebo, with moderate effect sizes. This study underscores the importance of ADHD medications, both stimulants and nonstimulants, not only in alleviating core ADHD symptoms but also in enhancing overall QoL for individuals with ADHD. STUDY PREREGISTRATION INFORMATION/UNASSIGNED:Effects of pharmacological treatment for ADHD on quality of life: a systematic review and meta-analysis; https://osf.io/; qvgps.

BACKGROUND:Raynaud syndrome (RS) is a peripheral vasculopathy characterised be impaired acral perfusion typically manifesting as skin discolouration with pallor, cyanosis and/or erythema, and increased sensitivity to cold. RS may be primary or secondary to systemic disease, lifestyle and environmental factors or medication. RS has been reported with medication to treat ADHD, but we found no recent comprehensive overview of the literature. The aim of this review is to evaluate the evidence in the published literature for Raynaud syndrome associated with medication for ADHD. METHODS:We systematically searched PubMed and Embase from inception to 12 June 2024 for articles published in English describing cases of RS in individuals treated with stimulant medication, atomoxetine, guanfacine or clonidine. Identified cases were assessed against the Naranjo Adverse Drug Reaction Scale criteria to determine the probability of a causal relationship with the medication. RESULTS:The initial search identified 197 articles. A total of 61 cases were identified from 15 case reports, 5 case series, 1 retrospective case-control study, and 1 retrospective cohort study. No randomised, controlled studies were identified. Implicated medications included methylphenidate, (dex)amfetamine and, more rarely, atomoxetine. Most cases were mild and resolved within weeks of discontinuation, dose reduction or switch to an alternative medication. A few cases associated with systemic disease were reported, leading to ulceration, gangrene and the need for amputation or revascularisation in some individuals. Assessment of 28 cases using the Naranjo criteria suggested a 'possible' causative role of ADHD medication in 13 cases, a 'probable' role in 13 cases and a 'definite' role in two cases. CONCLUSIONS:Due to the uncontrolled nature of all but one of the available studies, a causal relationship between medication for ADHD and RS could not be determined reliably. However, in view of the possibility of severe sequelae, albeit in rare cases, routine monitoring for signs of RS is recommended in individuals treated with CNS stimulants or atomoxetine, especially when initiating treatment or increasing the dose. Large database studies in which individuals act as their own controls should be conducted to clarify any association between treatment with these medications and RS, controlling for confounding factors.

OBJECTIVE:We conducted an umbrella review of systematic reviews (SRs), with or without meta-analysis (MA), of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing nonpharmacological sleep interventions for children and adolescents across various clinical populations. METHOD/METHODS:We searched multiple electronic databases up to January 24, 2024. Meta-analyzable data from RCTs in the retrieved SRs/MAs were pooled using Metaumbrella. Primary outcomes were subjective/objective child sleep parameters. Additional outcomes included child health/functioning and parental sleep/health. The quality of the MAs/SRs was assessed with Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR-2), and the certainty of evidence using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE). RESULTS:We included 93 SRs/MAs covering 393 RCTs, with 25 (17%, 39%, and 30%: high, moderate, and low quality) providing data for quantitative synthesis. Behavioral interventions, usually multicomponent including parent training, psychoeducation, and/or specific sleep therapy/strategies, showed beneficial effects on night waking, sleep duration, overall sleep disturbance, mood/depression, and maternal sleep quality (standardized mean difference [SMD] = 0.10-0.80) in participants with sleep problems without a formal sleep disorder diagnosis. For those with a formal diagnosis (mainly insomnia), benefits were found for night waking, sleep efficiency (subjective/actigraphically measured), and sleep onset latency (mean SMD = 0.49-0.97). Those with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) improved in bedtime resistance, night waking, parasomnias, sleep anxiety, ADHD symptoms, sleep disturbance, and quality of life (mean SMD = 0.18-0.49). For those with autism, sleep disturbance improved (mean SMD = 0.70). However, all findings were of low to very low certainty of evidence. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Among nonpharmacological interventions for sleep difficulties in youth, only behavioral interventions are supported by meta-analytic evidence, yet with small-to-moderate effect sizes and limited certainty of evidence. STUDY PREREGISTRATION INFORMATION/UNASSIGNED:The efficacy and tolerability of nonpharmacological interventions for sleep problems in children and adolescents: protocol for an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials. https://osf.io; j9qna/.

IMPORTANCE/UNASSIGNED:Neurofeedback has been proposed for the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) but the efficacy of this intervention remains unclear. OBJECTIVE/UNASSIGNED:To conduct a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) using probably blinded (ie, rated by individuals probably or certainly unaware of treatment allocation) or neuropsychological outcomes to test the efficacy of neurofeedback as a treatment for ADHD in terms of core symptom reduction and improved neuropsychological outcomes. DATA SOURCES/UNASSIGNED:PubMed (MEDLINE), Ovid (PsycInfo, MEDLINE, Embase + Embase Classic), and Web of Science, as well as the reference lists of eligible records and relevant systematic reviews, were searched until July 25, 2023, with no language limits. STUDY SELECTION/UNASSIGNED:Parallel-arm RCTs investigating neurofeedback in participants of any age with a clinical ADHD or hyperkinetic syndrome diagnosis were included. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS/UNASSIGNED:Standardized mean differences (SMDs) with Hedges g correction were pooled in random effects meta-analyses for all eligible outcomes. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES/UNASSIGNED:The primary outcome was ADHD total symptom severity assessed at the first postintervention time point, focusing on reports by individuals judged probably or certainly unaware of treatment allocation (probably blinded). Secondary outcomes were inattention and/or hyperactivity-impulsivity symptoms and neuropsychological outcomes postintervention and at a longer-term follow-up (ie, after the last follow-up time point). RCTs were assessed with the Cochrane risk of bias tool version 2.0. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:A total of 38 RCTs (2472 participants aged 5 to 40 years) were included. Probably blinded reports of ADHD total symptoms showed no significant improvement with neurofeedback (k = 20; n = 1214; SMD, 0.04; 95% CI, -0.10 to 0.18). A small significant improvement was seen when analyses were restricted to RCTs using established standard protocols (k = 9; n = 681; SMD, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.02 to 0.40). Results remained similar with adults excluded or when analyses were restricted to RCTs where cortical learning or self-regulation was established. Of the 5 neuropsychological outcomes analyzed, a significant but small improvement was observed only for processing speed (k = 15; n = 909; SMD, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.01 to 0.69). Heterogeneity was generally low to moderate. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE/UNASSIGNED:Overall, neurofeedback did not appear to meaningfully benefit individuals with ADHD, clinically or neuropsychologically, at the group level. Future studies seeking to identify individuals with ADHD who may benefit from neurofeedback could focus on using standard neurofeedback protocols, measuring processing speed, and leveraging advances in precision medicine, including neuroimaging technology.

The differential influence of sex on premature mortality in schizophrenia is unclear. This study assessed the differences in all-cause and specific cause mortality risks in people with schizophrenia compared to several control groups stratified by sex. We conducted a PRISMA 2020-compliant systematic review and random-effects meta-analysis of cohort studies assessing mortality relative risk (RR) for people with schizophrenia, comparing by sex. We measured publication bias and conducted a quality assessment through the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. We meta-analyzed 43 studies reporting on 2,700,825 people with schizophrenia. Both males and females with schizophrenia had increased all-cause mortality vs. comparison groups (males, RR=2.62, 95%CI 2.35-2.92; females, RR=2.56, 95%CI 2.27-2.87), suicide (males, RR=9.02, 95%CI 5.96-13.67; females, RR=12.09, 95%CI 9.00-16.25), and natural cause mortality (males, RR=2.11, 95%CI 1.88-2.38; females, RR=2.14, 95%CI 1.93-2.38). No statistically significant differences in sex-dependent mortality risk emerged. There was an age-group-dependent increased mortality risk in females < 40 years vs. >/=40 years old (RR=4.23/2.17), and significantly higher risk of death due to neurological disorders (dementia) in males vs. females (RR=5.19/2.40). Increased mortality risks were often associated with specific modifiable risk factors. The increased mortality risk did not improve over time, calling for more studies to identify modifiable factors, and for better physical healthcare for males and females with schizophrenia.