Faculty Bibliography

OBJECTIVE:To explore attitudes and preferences related to remote nutrition education programming for Latino families in the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) and primary care. DESIGN/METHODS:Community-engaged, qualitative, thematic analysis of interviews and focus groups. SETTING/METHODS:Prenatal and pediatric primary care and WIC sites in Manhattan, Queens, and Nassau Counties, New York. PARTICIPANTS/METHODS:Four stakeholder groups: (1) past participants of a primary care-based obesity prevention program (Starting Early Program Prenatal) for Latino families that transitioned to remote delivery because of coronavirus disease 2019 (n = 40), (2) Latina WIC participants, including pregnant women and mothers of young children (n = 40), (3) Starting Early Program Prenatal staff (n = 6), and (4) WIC staff (n = 16). PHENOMENON OF INTEREST/METHODS:Attitudes and preferences related to in-person vs remote nutrition education programming. ANALYSIS/METHODS:Focus groups and interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analyzed for emergent themes using reflexive thematic analysis. RESULTS:Four themes emerged: (1) valuing in-person social connection while recognizing barriers to in-person gathering, (2) navigating distraction-related barriers to remote engagement, (3) consistent content delivery but uncertain quality of remote programs, and (4) coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic-related contextual factors. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS/CONCLUSIONS:Future remote programs in WIC may benefit from incorporating opportunities for social interaction, explicit discussion of anticipated barriers, and strategies to overcome them.

OBJECTIVE:To assess associations between exposure to intrauterine SARS-CoV-2 and subsequent child neurodevelopment in a large, diverse cohort with confirmation of maternal SARS-CoV-2 status. STUDY DESIGN/METHODS:edition (ASQ-3) and at 18 months with the ASQ Social-Emotional (ASQ-SE) and the Modified Checklist for Autism in Toddlers-Revised (M-CHAT-R). We compared exposed and unexposed infants' ASQ-3 total and subdomain scores, ASQ-SE and M-CHAT-R scores, and proportions meeting published referral thresholds, using multivariable linear and logistic regression. RESULTS:Among 1179 participants enrolled, 1008 (85.5%) had exposure, with 806 (80.0%) exposed during Omicron predominance. Of those with known timing, 349 (41.4%) and 295 (35.0%) were exposed in the second and third trimesters of pregnancy respectively. Exposure was not associated with differences in ASQ-3 (adjusted difference: -0.61, 95% CI: -10.03, 8.81) or ASQ-3 subdomains at 12 months, ASQ-SE at 18 months (adjusted difference: 0.19, 95% CI: -4.02, 4.41), or M-CHAT-R scores. Findings were similar for proportions meeting referral thresholds, and when stratified by variant or by trimester. CONCLUSIONS:In this multicenter cohort largely exposed since Omicron and in second or third trimester, intrauterine SARS-CoV-2 exposure was not associated with neurodevelopmental screening outcomes through 18 months of age. Further assessments of the impact of intrauterine SARS-CoV-2 on neurodevelopment beyond 18 months of age are needed.

We combined data from five cohorts of mothers of young children across three cities to understand how COVID-19 affected parenting among predominantly Black and Latine families with low incomes. We examined whether mothers reported that their parenting got worse, got better, or stayed the same; drew on a qualitative substudy to identify themes describing parenting experiences; and used quantitative data to identify psychosocial characteristics associated with changes in parenting. Forty-four percent of mothers reported their parenting stayed the same after COVID-19 onset, 32% reported improvements, and 24% reported their parenting got worse. Qualitative data illustrated that mothers whose parenting got better spent more and higher-quality time with children, whereas mothers whose parenting got worse did not maintain family routines, had financial worries, and exhibited harsh responses to child problem behaviors. Quantitative data showed that depression, social support, COVID-19-related distress, and parenting self-agency were all associated with reported changes in parenting.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:In adolescents (12-17 years), it is unknown whether COVID-19 vaccination reduces progression from COVID-19 to Long COVID (LC) beyond preventing SARS-CoV-2 infection. We assessed the effect of vaccination among SARS-CoV-2 infected adolescents. METHODS AND RESULTS/RESULTS:Participants were recruited from over 60 US healthcare and community settings. The exposure was any COVID-19 vaccination 6 months prior to infection. The outcome was LC defined using the LC research index. Vaccinated (n = 724) and unvaccinated (n = 507) adolescents were matched on sex, infection date, and enrollment date. The risk of LC was 36 % lower (95 % CI, 17 %, 50 %) in vaccinated compared to unvaccinated participants. CONCLUSIONS:Vaccination reduces the risk of LC. Given the profound impact LC can have on the health and well-being of adolescents and the limited availability of treatments during this developmental stage, this supports vaccination as a strategy for preventing LC by demonstrating an important secondary prevention effect.

BACKGROUND:Childhood obesity is a global public health issue, which has prompted governments to invest in prevention programmes. We aimed to investigate the effectiveness of parent-focused early childhood obesity prevention interventions globally. METHODS:We did a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis. We searched databases and trial registries (MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, CINAHL, PsycInfo, ClinicalTrials.gov, and WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform) from inception until Sept 30, 2024, for randomised controlled trials commencing before 12 months of age examining parent-focused behavioural interventions to prevent obesity in children, compared with usual care, no intervention, or attention control. Individual participant data were checked, harmonised, and assessed for integrity and risk of bias. We excluded trials that were quasi-randomised, investigated pregnancy-only interventions, or did not collect any child weight-related outcomes. The primary outcome was BMI Z score at age 24 months (±6 months). We did an intention-to-treat, two-stage, random effects meta-analysis to examine effects overall and for prespecified subgroups. We assessed certainty of evidence using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation. This study is registered with PROSPERO, CRD42020177408. FINDINGS/RESULTS:=0·01; n=6505; 2623 missing). Findings were robust to prespecified sensitivity analyses (eg, different analysis methods and missing data), and we found no evidence of differential intervention effects for prespecified subgroups including priority populations and trial-level factors. INTERPRETATION/CONCLUSIONS:These findings indicate that examined parent-focused behavioural interventions are insufficient to prevent obesity at age 24 months (±6 months). This evidence highlights a need to re-think childhood obesity prevention approaches. FUNDING/BACKGROUND:Australian National Health and Medical Research Council.

BACKGROUND:Incidence estimates of post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection, also known as long-COVID, have varied across studies and changed over time. We estimated long-COVID incidence among adult and pediatric populations in three nationwide research networks of electronic health records (EHR) participating in the RECOVER Initiative using different classification algorithms (computable phenotypes). METHODS:This EHR-based retrospective cohort study included adult and pediatric patients with documented acute SARS-CoV-2 infection and two control groups-- contemporary COVID-19 negative and historical patients (2019). We examined the proportion of individuals identified as having symptoms or conditions consistent with probable long-COVID within 30-180 days after COVID-19 infection (incidence proportion). Each network (the National COVID Cohort Collaborative (N3C), National Patient-Centered Clinical Research Network (PCORnet), and PEDSnet) implemented its own long-COVID definition. We introduced a harmonized definition for adults in a supplementary analysis. RESULTS:Overall, 4% of children and 10-26% of adults developed long-COVID, depending on computable phenotype used. Excess incidence among SARS-CoV-2 patients was 1.5% in children and ranged from 5-6% among adults, representing a lower-bound incidence estimation based on our control groups. Temporal patterns were consistent across networks, with peaks associated with introduction of new viral variants. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Our findings indicate that preventing and mitigating long-COVID remains a public health priority. Examining temporal patterns and risk factors of long-COVID incidence informs our understanding of etiology and can improve prevention and management.

Although it is known that caregiver dietary behaviors influence child eating patterns, a gap remains in addressing the diet of a caregiver as much as their child in pediatric practice. A dyadic (caregiver-child) dietary approach would enhance the promotion of healthy eating patterns in children (and their caregivers) and achieve the population health goal of healthy eating across demographic groups. This study aimed to understand factors influencing dyadic dietary patterns (concordance, discordance) and contexts. Twenty professionals who provide nutrition-related expertise for families were recruited via maximum variation sampling. Qualitative thematic analysis of semi-structured interviews revealed 3 themes: (1) variable professional perspectives on what constitutes "healthy eating," (2) eating patterns of a child in the setting of variable caregiver eating practices, and (3) challenges to the promotion of a healthy caregiver-child dyadic diet within a social context. The results offer insight for future interventions that promote positive intergenerational transmission of health.