Faculty Bibliography

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:This epidemiological analysis used procedure codes from dental insurance claims data to identify apexification cases and evaluate survival at the tooth-level. METHODS:Dental insurance claims data from New York State (2006-2019) and Massachusetts (2013-2018) were used in an observational, retrospective cohort study to evaluate the provision and treatment outcomes of apexification. Statistical analyses included Kaplan-Meier survival estimates and Cox proportional hazards regression. Cox proportional hazard regression was used to evaluate the hazard of adverse event occurrence by age, gender, tooth type, placement of permanent restoration, and dental provider type. A sensitivity analysis evaluated potential bias in the survival estimates and adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) due to differential loss to follow-up. Robust standard errors were used to account for potential dependence between teeth within an individual. RESULTS:The analytic cohort of 575 individuals included 632 teeth, with an average follow-up time of 64 months. The survival rates of apexification procedures were 95% at 1 year; 93% at 2 years; 90% at 3 years; and 86% at 5 years. Tooth retention following apexification was 98% at 1 year; 96% at 2 years; 95% at 3 years; and 90% at 5 years. Tooth type and subsequent placement of a permanent restoration were significant predictors of survival after apexification. CONCLUSIONS:The procedural and tooth survival outcomes of apexification were high and comparable to studies that analyzed clinical data on tooth survival following apexification.

Adequate nutrition is central to well-being and health and can enhance recovery during illness. Although it is well known that malnutrition, both undernutrition and overnutrition, poses an added challenge for patients with cancer diagnoses, it remains unclear when and how to intervene and if such nutritional interventions improve clinical outcomes. In July 2022, the National Institutes of Health convened a workshop to examine key questions, identify related knowledge gaps, and provide recommendations to advance understanding about the effects of nutritional interventions. Evidence presented at the workshop found substantial heterogeneity among published randomized clinical trials, with a majority rated as low quality and yielding mostly inconsistent results. Other research cited trials in limited populations that showed potential for nutritional interventions to reduce the adverse effects associated with malnutrition in people with cancer. After review of relevant literature and expert presentations, an independent expert panel recommends baseline screening for malnutrition risk using a validated instrument following cancer diagnosis and repeated screening during and after treatment to monitor nutritional well-being. Those at risk of malnutrition should be referred to registered dietitians for more in-depth nutritional assessment and intervention. The panel emphasizes the need for further rigorous, well-defined nutritional intervention studies to evaluate the effects on symptoms and cancer-specific outcomes, as well as effects of intentional weight loss before or during treatment in people with overweight or obesity. Finally, although data on intervention effectiveness is needed first, robust data collection during trials is recommended to assess cost effectiveness and inform coverage and implementation decisions.

BACKGROUND:Surgery is a potent motivator to help people quit smoking to reduce the risk of complications. Many patients who smoke receive tobacco cessation counseling prior to surgery and are able to quit, but do not receive the same resources after surgery and often resume smoking. METHODS:We present a case study describing the recruitment process, study components, and lessons learned from StayQuit, a comprehensive relapse prevention program designed to prevent relapse after arthroplasty. Lessons learned were examined post hoc to determine challenges related to program implementation, using existing study procedures and information collected. RESULTS:While a comprehensive postoperative relapse prevention program may be beneficial to patients, implementation of StayQuit is unlikely to be feasible under current circumstances. The primary challenges to successful implementation of StayQuit focused on themes of lack of engagement in the preoperative Orthopedic Surgery Quit Smoking Program (OSQSP) and an environment unfavorable to in-person enrollment on the day of surgery. CONCLUSIONS:Postoperative relapse prevention programs may be beneficial for patients who quit smoking prior to elective surgery. To help guide implementation, it is important to consider surgeon behavior, the collaboration of clinical and non-clinical teams, and best practices for study enrollment in surgical settings.

Economic evaluation for implementation science merits unique considerations for a local context, including the main audience of local decision makers. This local context is in contrast with traditional methods for developing coverage policy for medical tests and interventions, which typically emphasize benefits and costs more broadly, for society. Regardless of the strength of evidence backing the efficacy or effectiveness of a clinical intervention, local context is paramount when implementing evidence-based practices. Understanding the costs throughout the processes of implementing a program will inform the decision of whether to plan for and adopt the program, how to sustain the program, and whether to scale up widely. To guide economic evaluation for implementation of evidence-based imaging practices, we describe approaches that consider local stakeholders' needs and connect these with outcomes of cost and clinical utility. Illustrative examples of implementation strategies and economic evaluation are explored in areas of cancer screening and care delivery.

BACKGROUND:Despite substantial increases in dental benefits and improvements in the use of dental services among children and adolescents in the United States, oral health disparities according to dental insurance payer type persist. METHODS:The authors used an all-payer claims (2013-2017) database to perform a comparative analysis of the provision and treatment outcomes of an endodontic procedure (root canal therapy) in the permanent teeth of a pediatric population aged 6 through 18 years, according to dental insurance payer type. Statistical analyses, including logistic regression, Cox proportional hazards regression, and the Kaplan-Meier method, were performed at person and tooth levels. RESULTS:Compared with privately insured children and adolescents, public-payer children and adolescent beneficiaries were more likely to have had root canal therapy (adjusted odds ratio, 1.91; 95% CI, 1.73 to 2.11) and had poorer treatment outcomes associated with the procedure (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.19; 95% CI, 1.53 to 3.14; P < .0001) during the study period. Those enrolled in private insurance were more likely to receive treatment from an endodontist (specialist in providing root canal therapy) (P < .0001). Amounts allowed and paid by the insurer were significantly higher for private payers (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS:There were significant differences in the provision and outcomes of endodontic treatment between privately and publicly insured children and adolescents. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS:Despite ostensibly equal access to care, differences in the provision of oral health care exist between privately and publicly insured patients. These differences may be contributing to persisting oral health disparities.

INTRODUCTION/UNASSIGNED:Prostate cancer is the second leading cause of cancer deaths among men in the United States and harms Black men disproportionately. Most US men are uninformed about many key facts important to make an informed decision about prostate cancer. Most experts agree that it is important for men to learn about these problems as early as possible in their lifetime. OBJECTIVES/UNASSIGNED:To compare the effect of a community health worker (CHW)-led educational session with a physician-led educational session that counsels Black men about the risks and benefits of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening. METHODS/UNASSIGNED:One hundred eighteen Black men recruited in 8 community-based settings attended a prostate cancer screening education session led by either a CHW or a physician. Participants completed surveys before and after the session to assess knowledge, decisional conflict, and perceptions about the intervention. Both arms used a decision aid that explains the benefits, risks, and controversies of PSA screening and decision coaching. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:There was no significant difference in decisional conflict change by group: 24.31 physician led versus 30.64 CHW led (P=.31). The CHW-led group showed significantly greater improvement on knowledge after intervention, change (SD): 2.6 (2.81) versus 5.1 (3.19), P<.001). However, those in the physician-led group were more likely to agree that the speaker knew a lot about PSA testing (P<.001) and were more likely to trust the speaker (P<.001). CONCLUSIONS/UNASSIGNED:CHW-led interventions can effectively assist Black men with complex health decision-making in community-based settings. This approach may improve prostate cancer knowledge and equally minimize decisional conflict compared with a physician-led intervention.

BACKGROUND:Previously published epidemiological outcome studies of root canal therapy (NSRCT) in the Unites States utilize data only from a single, private dental insurer for adult populations. AIM/OBJECTIVE:This study aimed to investigate outcomes of initial NSRCT, performed on permanent teeth, in a publicly insured pediatric population. DESIGN/METHODS:New York State Medicaid administrative claims were used to follow 77,741 endodontic procedures in 51,545 patients aged 6-18, from the time of initial NSRCT until occurrence of an untoward event (retreatment, apicoectomy, extraction). Initial treatment and untoward events were identified by Current Dental Terminology codes. Kaplan-Meier survival estimates were calculated at 1, 3, and 5 years. Hazard ratios for time to permanent restoration and restoration type were calculated using Cox proportional hazard models. RESULTS:Median follow-up time was 44 months [range:12-158 months]. Procedural, NSRCT, survival was 98% at 1 year, 93% at 3 years, and 88% at 5 years. Extraction was the most common untoward event. Teeth permanently restored with cuspal coverage had the most favorable treatment outcomes. CONCLUSIONS:Overall, 89% of teeth were retained and remained functional over a minimum follow-up time of 5 years. These results elucidate expected outcomes of NSRCT in permanent teeth for pediatric patients with public-payer dental benefits.

To determine whether an opt-out approach is effective for referral to treatment for tobacco use, we designed a clinical reminder for nurses in a primary care setting that provides a referral for patients who smoke cigarettes. We will use a two-arm, cluster-randomized design to assign nurses at the VA New York Harbor Healthcare System to test which mode of referral (opt-in vs opt-out) is more effective. All patients will be referred to evidence-based treatment for tobacco cessation including counseling from the New York State Quitline, and VetsQuit, a text messaging-based system for tobacco cessation counseling. We will measure patient engagement with the referral both in the short and long term to determine if referral modality had an impact on tobacco cessation treatment. We will also measure nurse engagement with the referral before, during, and after the implementation of the reminder to determine whether an opt-out approach is cost effective at the health system level. At the conclusion of this project, we expect to have developed and tested an opt-out system for increasing tobacco cessation treatment for Veterans in VA primary care and to have a thorough understanding of factors associated with implementation. Trial Registration:Clinicaltrials.govIdentifierNCT03477435.

A lack of cost information has been cited as a barrier to implementation and a limitation of implementation research. This paper explains how implementation researchers might optimize their measurement and inclusion of costs, building on traditional economic evaluations comparing costs and effectiveness of health interventions. The objective of all economic evaluation is to inform decision-making for resource allocation and to measure costs that reflect opportunity costs-the value of resource inputs in their next best alternative use, which generally vary by decision-maker perspective(s) and time horizon(s). Analyses that examine different perspectives or time horizons must consider cost estimation accuracy, because over longer time horizons, all costs are variable; however, with shorter time horizons and narrower perspectives, one must differentiate the fixed and variable costs, with fixed costs generally excluded from the evaluation. This paper defines relevant costs, identifies sources of cost data, and discusses cost relevance to potential decision-makers contemplating or implementing evidence-based interventions. Costs may come from the healthcare sector, informal healthcare sector, patient, participant or caregiver, and other sectors such as housing, criminal justice, social services, and education. Finally, we define and consider the relevance of costs by phase of implementation and time horizon, including pre-implementation and planning, implementation, intervention, downstream, and adaptation, and through replication, sustainment, de-implementation, or spread.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:The omission of radiation therapy (RT) in elderly women with stage 1 estrogen-receptor positive (ER+) breast cancer receiving endocrine therapy (ET) is an acceptable strategy based on randomized trial data. Less is known about the omission of ET +/- RT. PATIENT AND METHODS/METHODS:We analyzed SEER-Medicare data for 13,321 women ≥ 66 years with stage I ER+ breast cancer from 2007-2012 who underwent breast conserving surgery. Patients were classified into 4 groups: 1) ET+RT (reference) 2) ET alone (ET), 3) RT alone (RT) and 4) neither RT nor ET (NT). Second breast cancer events (SBCE) were captured using Chubak's high-specificity algorithm. We used Chi-square tests for descriptive statistics, multivariable multinomial logistic regression to estimate relative risks (RR) of undergoing a treatment, and multivariable, propensity-weighted competing-risks survival regression to estimate standardized hazard ratio (SHR) of SBCE. We set significance at p≤0.01. RESULTS:Most women underwent both treatments, with 44% undergoing ET+RT, 41% RT, 6.6% ET, and 8.6% NT but practice patterns varied over time: from 2007-2012, RT decreased from 49% to 30%, whereas ET and ET+RT increased (ET: 5.4% to 9.6%; ET+RT: 38% to 51%). Compared to patients 66-69 years, patients 80-85 years were more likely to receive NT (OR=8.9), RT (OR=1.9), or ET (OR=8.8) vs. ET+RT (p<0.01).3% of subjects had an SBCE (2.2% ET+RT, 3.0% RT, 3.2% ET, 7.0% NT). Relative to ET+RT, NT and ET were associated with higher SBCE (NT: SHR 3.7, p<0.001; ET: SHR 2.2, p=0.008)), whereas RT was not associated with a higher SBCE (SHR 1.21, p=0.137). Clinical factors associated with higher SBCE were HER2 positivity and pT1c (SHR 1.7, p=0.006). CONCLUSIONS:Treatment with RT alone in older women with stage I ER+ disease is decreasing. RT alone is not associated with an increased risk for SBCE. By contrast, NT and ET are both associated with higher SBCE in multivariable analysis with propensity weighting. Further study of the omission of endocrine therapy in this patient population is warranted.