Faculty Bibliography

AIM/OBJECTIVE:To investigate the associations between the hour of the day and Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) scores assigned by radiologists in prostate MRI reports. MATERIALS AND METHODS/METHODS:Retrospective single-center collection of prostate MRI reports over an 8-year period. Mean PI-RADS scores assigned between 0800 and 1800 h were examined with a regression model. RESULTS: = 0.005, p < 0.001), with malignant scores more frequently assigned later in the day. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:These findings suggest chronobiological factors may contribute to variability in radiological assessments. Though the magnitude of the effect is small, this may potentially add variability and impact diagnostic accuracy.

OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:To assess radiologists' current use of, and opinions on, structured reporting (SR) in oncologic imaging, and to provide recommendations for a structured report template. MATERIALS AND METHODS/METHODS:An online survey with 28 questions was sent to European Society of Oncologic Imaging (ESOI) members. The questionnaire had four main parts: (1) participant information, e.g., country, workplace, experience, and current SR use; (2) SR design, e.g., numbers of sections and fields, and template use; (3) clinical impact of SR, e.g., on report quality and length, workload, and communication with clinicians; and (4) preferences for an oncology-focused structured CT report. Data analysis comprised descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, and Spearman correlation coefficients. RESULTS:A total of 200 radiologists from 51 countries completed the survey: 57.0% currently utilized SR (57%), with a lower proportion within than outside of Europe (51.0 vs. 72.7%; p = 0.006). Among SR users, the majority observed markedly increased report quality (62.3%) and easier comparison to previous exams (53.5%), a slightly lower error rate (50.9%), and fewer calls/emails by clinicians (78.9%) due to SR. The perceived impact of SR on communication with clinicians (i.e., frequency of calls/emails) differed with radiologists' experience (p < 0.001), and experience also showed low but significant correlations with communication with clinicians (r = - 0.27, p = 0.003), report quality (r = 0.19, p = 0.043), and error rate (r = - 0.22, p = 0.016). Template use also affected the perceived impact of SR on report quality (p = 0.036). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Radiologists regard SR in oncologic imaging favorably, with perceived positive effects on report quality, error rate, comparison of serial exams, and communication with clinicians. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT/CONCLUSIONS:Radiologists believe that structured reporting in oncologic imaging improves report quality, decreases the error rate, and enables better communication with clinicians. Implementation of structured reporting in Europe is currently below the international level and needs society endorsement. KEY POINTS/CONCLUSIONS:• The majority of oncologic imaging specialists (57% overall; 51% in Europe) use structured reporting in clinical practice. • The vast majority of oncologic imaging specialists use templates (92.1%), which are typically cancer-specific (76.2%). • Structured reporting is perceived to markedly improve report quality, communication with clinicians, and comparison to prior scans.

Relapse and toxicity limit the effectiveness of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy for large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL), yet biomarkers that predict outcomes and toxicity are lacking. We examined radiomic features extracted from pre-CAR-T ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography ([¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT) scans (n = 341) of 180 patients (121 male; median age, 66 years). Three conventional (maximum standardized uptake value [SUVmax], metabolic tumor volume [MTV], total lesion glycolysis [TLG]) and 116 novel radiomic features were assessed, along with inflammatory markers, toxicities, and outcomes. At both pre-apheresis and pre-infusion time points, conventional PET features of disease correlated with elevated inflammatory markers. At pre-infusion, MTV was associated with grade ≥ 2 cytokine release syndrome (odds ratio [OR] for 100 mL increase: 1.08 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.01-1.20], P = 0.031), and SUVmax was associated with failure to achieve complete response (CR) (OR 1.72 [95% CI, 1.24-2.43], P < 0.001). Higher pre-apheresis and pre-infusion MTV values were associated with shorter progression-free survival (PFS) (HR for 10-unit increase: 1.11 [95% CI, 1.05-1.17], P < 0.001; 1.04 [95% CI, 1.02-1.07], P < 0.001) and shorter overall survival (HR for 100-unit increase: 1.14 [95% CI, 1.07-1.21], P < 0.001; 1.04 [95% CI, 1.02-1.06], P < 0.001). A combined MTV and LDH measure stratified patients into high and low PFS risk groups. Multiple pre-infusion novel radiomic features were associated with CR. These quantitative conventional [¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT features obtained before CAR-T cell infusion, which were correlated with inflammation markers, may provide prognostic biomarkers for CAR-T therapy efficacy and toxicity. The use of conventional and novel radiomic features may thus help identify high-risk patients for earlier interventions.

OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:To collect real-world data about the knowledge and self-perception of young radiologists concerning the use of contrast media (CM) and the management of adverse drug reactions (ADR). METHODS:A survey (29 questions) was distributed to residents and board-certified radiologists younger than 40 years to investigate the current international situation in young radiology community regarding CM and ADRs. Descriptive statistics analysis was performed. RESULTS:Out of 454 respondents from 48 countries (mean age: 31.7 ± 4 years, range 25-39), 271 (59.7%) were radiology residents and 183 (40.3%) were board-certified radiologists. The majority (349, 76.5%) felt they were adequately informed regarding the use of CM. However, only 141 (31.1%) received specific training on the use of CM and 82 (18.1%) about management ADR during their residency. Although 266 (58.6%) knew safety protocols for handling ADR, 69.6% (316) lacked confidence in their ability to manage CM-induced ADRs and 95.8% (435) expressed a desire to enhance their understanding of CM use and handling of CM-induced ADRs. Nearly 300 respondents (297; 65.4%) were aware of the benefits of contrast-enhanced ultrasound, but 249 (54.8%) of participants did not perform it. The preferred CM injection strategy in CT parenchymal examination and CT angiography examination was based on patient's lean body weight in 318 (70.0%) and 160 (35.2%), a predeterminate fixed amount in 79 (17.4%) and 116 (25.6%), iodine delivery rate in 26 (5.7%) and 122 (26.9%), and scan time in 31 (6.8%) and 56 (12.3%), respectively. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Training in CM use and management ADR should be implemented in the training of radiology residents. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT/UNASSIGNED:We highlight the need for improvement in the education of young radiologists regarding contrast media; more attention from residency programs and scientific societies should be focused on training about contrast media use and the management of adverse drug reactions. KEY POINTS/CONCLUSIONS:• This survey investigated training of young radiologists about use of contrast media and management adverse reactions. • Most young radiologists claimed they did not receive dedicated training. • An extreme heterogeneity of responses was observed about contrast media indications/contraindications and injection strategy.

BACKGROUND:F]FDG-PET-CT scans of patients with lymphoma with or without hypermetabolic tumour sites. METHODS:F]FDG-PET-CTs were obtained from a second centre (Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria). Seven model variants were evaluated, including MIP-based LARS-avg (optimised for accuracy) and LARS-max (optimised for sensitivity), and 3D PET-CT-based LARS-ptct. Following expert curation, areas under the curve (AUCs), accuracies, sensitivities, and specificities were calculated. FINDINGS/RESULTS:In the internal test cohort (3325 PET-CTs, 1012 patients), LARS-avg achieved an AUC of 0·949 (95% CI 0·942-0·956), accuracy of 0·890 (0·879-0·901), sensitivity of 0·868 (0·851-0·885), and specificity of 0·913 (0·899-0·925); LARS-max achieved an AUC of 0·949 (0·942-0·956), accuracy of 0·868 (0·858-0·879), sensitivity of 0·909 (0·896-0·924), and specificity of 0·826 (0·808-0·843); and LARS-ptct achieved an AUC of 0·939 (0·930-0·948), accuracy of 0·875 (0·864-0·887), sensitivity of 0·836 (0·817-0·855), and specificity of 0·915 (0·901-0·927). In the external test cohort (1000 PET-CTs, 503 patients), LARS-avg achieved an AUC of 0·953 (0·938-0·966), accuracy of 0·907 (0·888-0·925), sensitivity of 0·874 (0·843-0·904), and specificity of 0·949 (0·921-0·960); LARS-max achieved an AUC of 0·952 (0·937-0·965), accuracy of 0·898 (0·878-0·916), sensitivity of 0·899 (0·871-0·926), and specificity of 0·897 (0·871-0·922); and LARS-ptct achieved an AUC of 0·932 (0·915-0·948), accuracy of 0·870 (0·850-0·891), sensitivity of 0·827 (0·793-0·863), and specificity of 0·913 (0·889-0·937). INTERPRETATION/CONCLUSIONS:F]FDG-PET-CT scans of lymphoma patients with and without hypermetabolic tumour sites. Deep learning might therefore be potentially useful to rule out the presence of metabolically active disease in such patients, or serve as a second reader or decision support tool. FUNDING/BACKGROUND:National Institutes of Health-National Cancer Institute Cancer Center Support Grant.

OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:The aims of this study were to determine whether ComBat harmonization improves multiclass radiomics-based tissue classification in technically heterogeneous MRI data sets and to compare the performances of 2 ComBat variants. MATERIALS AND METHODS/METHODS:One hundred patients who had undergone T1-weighted 3D gradient echo Dixon MRI (2 scanners/vendors; 50 patients each) were retrospectively included. Volumes of interest (2.5 cm3) were placed in 3 disease-free tissues with visually similar appearance on T1 Dixon water images: liver, spleen, and paraspinal muscle. Gray-level histogram (GLH), gray-level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM), gray-level run-length matrix (GLRLM), and gray-level size-zone matrix (GLSZM) radiomic features were extracted. Tissue classification was performed on pooled data from the 2 centers (1) without harmonization, (2) after ComBat harmonization with empirical Bayes estimation (ComBat-B), and (3) after ComBat harmonization without empirical Bayes estimation (ComBat-NB). Linear discriminant analysis with leave-one-out cross-validation was used to distinguish among the 3 tissue types, using all available radiomic features as input. In addition, a multilayer perceptron neural network with a random 70%:30% split into training and test data sets was used for the same task, but separately for each radiomic feature category. RESULTS:Linear discriminant analysis-based mean tissue classification accuracies were 52.3% for unharmonized, 66.3% for ComBat-B harmonized, and 92.7% for ComBat-NB harmonized data. For multilayer perceptron neural network, mean classification accuracies for unharmonized, ComBat-B-harmonized, and ComBat-NB-harmonized test data were as follows: 46.8%, 55.1%, and 57.5% for GLH; 42.0%, 65.3%, and 71.0% for GLCM; 45.3%, 78.3%, and 78.0% for GLRLM; and 48.1%, 81.1%, and 89.4% for GLSZM. Accuracies were significantly higher for both ComBat-B- and ComBat-NB-harmonized data than for unharmonized data for all feature categories (at P = 0.005, respectively). For GLCM (P = 0.001) and GLSZM (P = 0.005), ComBat-NB harmonization provided slightly higher accuracies than ComBat-B harmonization. CONCLUSIONS:ComBat harmonization may be useful for multicenter MRI radiomics studies with nonbinary classification tasks. The degree of improvement by ComBat may vary among radiomic feature categories, among classifiers, and among ComBat variants.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:The aim of this study was to compare CXCR4 imaging with 68Ga-pentixafor PET to MRI for treatment response assessment in patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). PATIENTS AND METHODS/METHODS:Twenty-two posttreatment 68Ga-pentixafor PET/MRI scans of 16 patients (7 women and 9 men; mean age, 69.9 ± 7.9) with a total of 67 target lesions on baseline PET/MRI were analyzed. Rates of complete remission per lesion and per scan, according to MRI (based on lesion size) and 68Ga-pentixafor PET (based on SUV decrease to lower than liver and blood pool uptake), were compared using McNemar tests. The t tests and Pearson correlation coefficients (r) were used to compare rates of change in lesion diameter products (DPs) on MRI, and standardized uptake values (SUVmax, SUVmean) on PET, relative to baseline. RESULTS:At interim PET/MRI, 18/32 (56.3%) target lesions met CR criteria on 68Ga-pentixafor PET, and 16/32 (50.0%) lesions met size-based MRI criteria for CR (P = 0.63). At end-of-treatment PET/MRI, 40/57 (70.2%) target lesions met 68Ga-pentixafor PET criteria for CR, and 27/57 (47.4%) lesions met size-based MRI criteria for CR (P = 0.021). Complete remission after treatment was observed more frequently on 68Ga-pentixafor PET (11/22 scans, 54.5%) than on MRI (6/22 scans, 27.3%) (P = 0.031). Rates of change did not differ significantly between lesion DP (-69.20% ± 34.62%) and SUVmax (-64.59% ± 50.78%, P = 0.22), or DP and SUVmean (-60.15 ± 64.58, P = 0.064). Correlations were strong between DP and SUVmax (r = 0.71, P < 0.001) and DP and SUVmean (r = 0.73, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS:In MCL patients, 68Ga-pentixafor PET may be superior for assessment of complete remission status than anatomic MRI using lesion size criteria, especially at the end of treatment.

Our purpose was to determine whether ComBat harmonization improves ¹⁸F-FDG PET radiomics-based tissue classification in pooled PET/MRI and PET/CT datasets. Methods: Two hundred patients who had undergone ¹⁸F-FDG PET/MRI (2 scanners and vendors; 50 patients each) or PET/CT (2 scanners and vendors; 50 patients each) were retrospectively included. Gray-level histogram, gray-level cooccurrence matrix, gray-level run-length matrix, gray-level size-zone matrix, and neighborhood gray-tone difference matrix radiomic features were calculated for volumes of interest in the disease-free liver, spleen, and bone marrow. For individual feature classes and a multiclass radiomic signature, tissue was classified on ComBat-harmonized and unharmonized pooled data, using a multilayer perceptron neural network. Results: Median accuracies in training and validation datasets were 69.5% and 68.3% (harmonized), respectively, versus 59.5% and 58.9% (unharmonized), respectively, for gray-level histogram; 92.1% and 86.1% (harmonized), respectively, versus 53.6% and 50.0% (unharmonized), respectively, for gray-level cooccurrence matrix; 84.8% and 82.8% (harmonized), respectively, versus 62.4% and 58.3% (unharmonized), respectively, for gray-level run-length matrix; 87.6% and 85.6% (harmonized), respectively, versus 56.2% and 52.8% (unharmonized), respectively, for gray-level size-zone matrix; 79.5% and 77.2% (harmonized), respectively, versus 54.8% and 53.9% (unharmonized), respectively, for neighborhood gray-tone difference matrix; and 86.9% and 84.4% (harmonized), respectively, versus 62.9% and 58.3% (unharmonized), respectively, for radiomic signature. Conclusion: ComBat harmonization may be useful for multicenter ¹⁸F-FDG PET radiomics studies using pooled PET/MRI and PET/CT data.

BACKGROUND:High-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) is essential in narrowing the possible differential diagnoses of diffuse and interstitial lung diseases. PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:To investigate the value of a novel computer-based decision support system (CDSS) for facilitating diagnosis of diffuse lung diseases at HRCT. MATERIAL AND METHODS/METHODS:A CDSS was developed that includes about 100 different illustrations of the most common HRCT signs and patterns and describes the corresponding pathologies in detail. The logical set-up of the software facilitates a structured evaluation. By selecting one or more CT patterns, the program generates a ranked list of the most likely differential diagnoses. Three independent and blinded radiology residents initially evaluated 40 cases with different lung diseases alone; after at least 12 weeks, observers re-evaluated all cases using the CDSS. RESULTS: < 0.01). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Addition of a CDSS using a structured approach providing explanations of typical HRCT patterns and graphical illustrations significantly improved the performance of trainees in characterizing and correctly identifying diffuse lung diseases.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:To develop a deep network architecture that would achieve fully automated radiologist-level segmentation of cancers at breast MRI. MATERIALS AND METHODS/METHODS:In this retrospective study, 38 229 examinations (composed of 64 063 individual breast scans from 14 475 patients) were performed in female patients (age range, 12-94 years; mean age, 52 years ± 10 [standard deviation]) who presented between 2002 and 2014 at a single clinical site. A total of 2555 breast cancers were selected that had been segmented on two-dimensional (2D) images by radiologists, as well as 60 108 benign breasts that served as examples of noncancerous tissue; all these were used for model training. For testing, an additional 250 breast cancers were segmented independently on 2D images by four radiologists. Authors selected among several three-dimensional (3D) deep convolutional neural network architectures, input modalities, and harmonization methods. The outcome measure was the Dice score for 2D segmentation, which was compared between the network and radiologists by using the Wilcoxon signed rank test and the two one-sided test procedure. RESULTS:= 250). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS: