Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND:Donor pool expansion is critical as lung candidates suffer high mortality, yet older donor lungs remain underutilized. We evaluated whether accepting an older donor (defined 4 ways: donor age 30-39, 40-49, 50-59, or 60-69 y) lung transplant was associated with a survival benefit over waiting for a younger donor offer. METHODS:Adult candidates who received a lung offer were identified using Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients data, 2015-2022. Offers were categorized by donor age and candidate lung allocation score (LAS; <40, 40-55, >55). Postoffer mortality was compared between candidates for whom the offer was accepted ("acceptors") versus declined ("decliners") within each age-LAS category using weighted Cox regression. RESULTS:A total of 21 426 candidates received an offer from a donor age ≥30 y; 11 679 accepted. For LAS >55 candidates, a survival benefit was observed for acceptors of donors ages 30-39 y (weighted hazard ratio [wHR] of mortality: 0.450.520.59), 40-49 y (wHR: 0.610.700.79), and 50-59 y (wHR: 0.670.770.88); P < 0.001. For candidates with LAS 40-55, results suggest a survival benefit of accepting lung offers from donors age 30-39 y (wHR: 0.770.870.99) and 40-49 y (wHR: 0.760.870.99); P = 0.03. However, for candidates with LAS <40, a survival benefit was not observed for accepting any older donor transplant, with possible harm in accepting an age 50+ donor offer. CONCLUSIONS:Compared with declining and waiting for a younger donor offer, accepting an older donor lung transplant was associated with a survival advantage in candidates with high LAS in the precontinuous distribution era. Decision makers should consider these findings while recognizing potential changes in waiting time dynamics in the current era.

Racial/ethnic disparities in the deceased organ donor referral process may contribute to the organ shortage and place minority communities at a greater disadvantage. Prior literature cites substantial inequalities, though methodological concerns may bias estimates. Using Organ Retrieval and Collection of Health Information for Donation data, we conducted a simulation study and re-analysis of 132,968 referrals 2015-2021 across six organ procurement organizations (OPOs). We excluded brain death declaration and cause/mechanism/circumstances of death from the approach model and conducted Poisson regression with robust standard errors. We found Black patients were approached at a more similar rate relative to White patients, although disparities remained (incidence rate ratio (IRR): _0.910.94_0.97). Black patients provided authorization at a 31% lower rate than White patients (IRR: _0.670.69_0.71). Slight disparities were observed at procurement (IRR: _0.940.96_0.99). Our findings are directionally similar to prior literature but suggest substantially less inequality (vs 23% and 65% higher risk of approach and authorization, for non-Black vs Black referrals). Accurate quantification of racial/ethnic disparities in transplantation impacts public perception of those involved, particularly OPOs, and is paramount to any study. Importantly, continued measures are needed to promote equality among Black and minority patients in our national organ donation and transplant system.

BACKGROUND:People with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) are at an increased risk for end-stage lung disease, for which lung transplantation (LT) may be necessary. METHODS:We aimed to characterize the national practice patterns of LT in recipients with HIV (HIV R+) and post-LT outcomes, including rejection in the US over time. Using the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients data (from January 1, 2004, to December 1, 2024, for practice patterns and from January 1, 2016, to December 1, 2024, for outcomes), we compared 96 adult HIV R+ to 42 341 LT recipients without HIV (HIV R-). We examined the association between HIV and outcomes using Gini coefficients, Cox regression, and modified Poisson regression before and after 2020. RESULTS:HIV R+ LTs increased from 0.1% in 2004 to 0.4% of LTs in 2024 (p = 0.07). Pre-2020, 18 centers performed 80% of HIV R+ LTs (Gini = 0.78); post-2020, 14 centers performed 80% of HIV R+ LTs (Gini = 0.76), indicating no expansion of the practice across centers. HIV R+ did not have an increased risk of mortality (adjusted hazard ratio pre-2020: 0.91 [95% confidence interval 0.41-1.62], p = 0.7 and post-2020: 1.05 [0.49-3.25], p = 0.8), or increased risk of 1-year rejection rate (adjusted relative risk pre-2020: 0.60 [0.20-1.77], p = 0.3, and post-2020: 0.77 [0.26-2.2], p = 0.6). CONCLUSIONS:Increasing numbers of HIV R+ LTs and comparable outcomes to those without HIV are encouraging, yet few centers perform these transplants.

The proportion of deceased donor kidneys recovered for transplantation that are not transplanted reached 28% in 2023. Past research demonstrated that >90% of the non-use rate increase in the 2000s could be explained by the broadening donor pool. We used OPTN data to study kidneys recovered 2010-2023, applying causal inference methods to assess the degree to which the recent, sharp rise in the non-use rate could be explained by changes in donor clinical characteristics. Unadjusted odds of kidney non-use were 63% higher (95% CI: 56%, 70%) in 2023 vs 2018. After adjusting for donor factors, odds of non-use were only 12% (9%, 15%) higher in 2023. Both regression and propensity weighting demonstrated that 75-80% of the recent non-use rate increase can be explained by a rapidly expanding donor pool. Encouragingly, the non-use rate has not increased and remains low for above-average quality kidneys. However, the unexplained risk of non-use for kidneys in the highest kidney donor risk index quartile increased by ∼30%, potentially due to residual confounding and/or system-level, exogenous factors such as allocation policy changes. To improve placement efficiency, allocation policy should adapt to the increasingly heterogeneous donor pool by allocating kidneys differently along the donor quality spectrum.

BACKGROUND:Transplant waitlist registrants in the United States may be delisted because of receipt of a transplant abroad. Although not universally unethical, "travel for transplantation" poses risks to posttransplant care. To better understand this phenomenon, this study identifies temporal trends, geographic patterns, and demographic factors associated with cross-border transplantation. METHODS:Using Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients data, we identified 818 US waitlist candidates who were removed because of transplantation abroad between 2010 and 2023. We described recipient characteristics overall, by organ, and by top transplant destinations. We used a Cox regression framework to identify characteristics associated with waitlist removal due to transplantation abroad. RESULTS:Transplants abroad averaged 58.4 per year. Incidence peaked at 80 transplants in 2017, with an upward trend after 2021. Kidney transplants made up 92.1% of cases. The most common destinations were the Philippines (19.8%), India (16.5%), Mexico (9.4%), China (8.4%), and Iran (4.4%). India and Mexico experienced the smallest drop-off during the height of the COVID-19 pandemic 2020-2021. Most recipients were US citizens (65.0%) or residents (23.5%). Female (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.520.610.71; P < 0.001) and Black candidates (aHR, 0.120.180.26; P < 0.001) were less likely to travel abroad compared with Asian candidates (aHR, 5.927.108.52; P < 0.001). Nonresidents (aHR, 6.708.6911.26; P < 0.001) and, among registrations in 2012 or later, nonresidents who traveled to the United States for transplantation (aHR, 27.2738.9155.50; P < 0.001) had a greater chance of undergoing transplantation abroad. CONCLUSIONS:Understanding patterns of international travel for transplantation is key not only for preventing resource drains from destination countries but also for providing adequate posttransplant care for recipients.

OBJECTIVE:Peripheral artery disease (PAD) is a common comorbidity among patients waitlisted for deceased donor kidney transplant (DDKT). However, some centers consider PAD a contraindication for transplant given the higher risk of post-operative complications. We aimed to examine the survival benefit of DDKT among patients with and without PAD. METHODS:We used data from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) from January 2003 to December 2022 to identify all DDK waitlist candidates. Kaplan-Meier survival estimates and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to compare patient mortality for those who received a DDKT versus those remaining on the waitlist, stratified by PAD status. RESULTS:506,785 candidates were listed for adult kidney-only transplant during the study period, of which 8.7% had PAD and 36.0% received a DDKT. After a median follow-up time of 3.21 years from waitlist activation [interquartile range 1.11-7.03 years], mortality varied significantly according to DDKT and PAD status. After adjusting for baseline differences, DDKT was associated with a significantly lower hazard of death compared to remaining on the waitlist, regardless of PAD status [adjusted hazards ratio (aHR) 0.45-0.60, P<0.001]. Further stratifying by sex, race and ethnicity, and diabetes status did not substantially alter these results. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:PAD includes a spectrum of diseases with varying mortality risks. As captured and dichotomized in the SRTR database, DDKT conferred a similar long-term benefit relative to remaining on the waitlist for candidates with and without PAD. Therefore, PAD should not be an absolute contraindication to DDKT.

Transplantation from donors with hepatitis C virus (HCV) viremia to recipients without HCV-viremia (HCV D⁺/R^-) is common, but no data exist for recipients with HIV or donors with HCV/HIV coinfection. We assessed outcomes of HCV D⁺/R^- transplants within 3 HIV Organ Policy Equity Act studies of HIV⁺ abdominal transplantation to recipients with HIV between 2017 and 2023. Eighteen kidney and 6 liver transplant recipients with HIV received organs from 19 donors with HCV viremia, including 7 with HCV/HIV coinfection. Median recipient age was 58 years, 96% were male, and median waitlist time was 1 year. All recipients had undetectable HIV RNA at time of transplant with median cluster of differentiation 4 count 499 cells/mm³. HCV/HIV-coinfected donors had median cluster of differentiation 4 count 210 cells/mm³, and 4 of the 7 had detectable HIV RNA. HCV treatment with direct-acting antivirals was initiated at median 33 days after transplant and sustained virologic response was achieved in 23 of the 23 treated recipients without HCV-related adverse events; data unavailable for 1 participant. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis demonstrated 100% 1-year and 96% 3-year survival. Graft survival was 96% at 1 and 3 years. HCV D⁺/R^- abdominal transplantation, including donors with HCV/HIV coinfection, demonstrates favorable patient and graft survival in recipients with HIV and is a viable strategy to increase organ utilization.

Procurement biopsies are routinely obtained in the United States to evaluate kidneys considered for transplantation, but some argue that they may contribute to kidney nonutilization. Historically, biopsy decisions have been left solely to the discretion of organ procurement organizations (OPOs) and transplant centers. In September 2022, an organ procurement and transplantation network (OPTN) policy designating donors meeting specific clinical criteria as "biopsy-required" went into effect. Using OPTN data from 1 year before and after policy implementation, we used causal inference methods to estimate the policy's impacts on biopsy practices and kidney utilization. The overall biopsy rate remained stable at 62%, rising from 90.6% to 95.8% (P < .001) among biopsy-required kidneys while falling from 49.1% to 43.4% (P < .001) among biopsy-optional kidneys. After adjusting for changing donor characteristics, the policy was associated with a 5% decline in the biopsy rate (adjusted risk ratio = 0.95; P = .007). The overall kidney nonuse rate rose from 27.2% to 28.7%. After accounting for changes in donor characteristics, the policy was not associated with elevated nonuse (adjusted risk ratio = 0.96, P = .06). Although most OPOs are now biopsying nearly all required kidneys, practices still vary widely regarding biopsy-optional kidneys. No correlation was found between OPO-level changes in adjusted biopsy and nonuse rates (ρ = 0.05, P = .70). The OPTN policy has partially standardized biopsy practices without harming kidney utilization.

Research shows that donor families report feeling abandoned, lacking social support, and receiving insufficient aftercare services. To meet the needs of these families, Taylor's Gift Foundation developed a free, virtual grief support program that pairs participating donor family members with Caring Guides trained in assertive community engagement and offers peer-facilitated support groups. Project Aim: The aim was to assess participant experiences with Taylor's Gift Foundation grief support program to understand its impact on grief symptoms, donor family access to grief support, and perceived social support. Design: Researchers conducted a qualitative evaluation using semi-structured interviews with 21 program participants. Results were analyzed using rapid qualitative analysis and descriptive statistics. Results: Eighteen (86%) participants worked with Caring Guides, 12 (57%) attended an average of 7 support groups, and 8 (39%) worked with Caring Guides and attended support groups. Eleven (52%) program participants reported difficulties accessing mental health services. Most program participants (86%) reported a decrease in grief intensity since enrolling in the program. Conclusion: Effective aftercare services were critical in helping donor families cope with, and adapt to, their loss. The Taylor's Gift Foundation grief support program helped donor family members access otherwise inaccessible grief support services and provided a valuable means of social support.