Faculty Bibliography

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:World Trade Center (WTC) exposure is associated with obstructive airway diseases and sarcoidosis. There is limited research regarding the incidence and progression of non-sarcoidosis interstitial lung diseases (ILD) after WTC-exposure. ILD encompasses parenchymal diseases which may lead to progressive pulmonary fibrosis (PPF). We used the Fire Department of the City of New York's (FDNY's) WTC Health Program cohort to estimate ILD incidence and progression. METHODS:This longitudinal study included 14,525 responders without ILD prior to 9/11/2001. ILD incidence and prevalence were estimated and standardized to the US 2014 population. Poisson regression modeled risk factors, including WTC-exposure and forced vital capacity (FVC), associated with ILD. Follow-up time ended at the earliest of incident diagnosis, end of study period/case ascertainment, transplant or death. RESULTS:ILD developed in 80/14,525 FDNY WTC responders. Age, smoking, and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) prior to diagnosis were associated with incident ILD, though FVC was not. PPF developed in 40/80 ILD cases. Among the 80 cases, the average follow-up time after ILD diagnosis was 8.5 years with the majority of deaths occurring among those with PPF (PPF: n = 13; ILD without PPF: n = 6). CONCLUSIONS:The prevalence of post-9/11 ILD was more than two-fold greater than the general population. An exposure-response gradient could not be demonstrated. Half the ILD cases developed PPF, higher than previously reported. Age, smoking, and GERD were risk factors for ILD and PPF, while lung function was not. This may indicate that lung function measured after respirable exposures would not identify those at risk for ILD or PPF.

BACKGROUND:Particulate matter exposure (PM) is a cause of aerodigestive disease globally. The destruction of the World Trade Center (WTC) exposed first responders and inhabitants of New York City to WTC-PM and caused obstructive airways disease (OAD), gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and Barrett's Esophagus (BE). GERD not only diminishes health-related quality of life but also gives rise to complications that extend beyond the scope of BE. GERD can incite or exacerbate allergies, sinusitis, bronchitis, and asthma. Disease features of the aerodigestive axis can overlap, often necessitating more invasive diagnostic testing and treatment modalities. This presents a need to develop novel non-invasive biomarkers of GERD, BE, airway hyperreactivity (AHR), treatment efficacy, and severity of symptoms. METHODS:No GERD or AHR, from the sub-cohort control group. We will then phenotype and examine non-invasive biomarkers of these subgroups to identify under-diagnosis and/or treatment efficacy. The findings may further contribute to the development of future biologically plausible therapies, ultimately enhance patient care and quality of life. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSIONS:Although many studies have suggested interdependence between airway and digestive diseases, the causative factors and specific mechanisms remain unclear. The detection of the disease is further complicated by the invasiveness of conventional GERD diagnosis procedures and the limited availability of disease-specific biomarkers. The management of reflux is important, as it directly increases risk of cancer and negatively impacts quality of life. Therefore, it is vital to develop novel noninvasive disease markers that can effectively phenotype, facilitate early diagnosis of premalignant disease and identify potential therapeutic targets to improve patient care. TRIAL REGISTRATION/BACKGROUND:ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05216133; January 18, 2022.

In the original publication [...].

BACKGROUND AND AIMS/OBJECTIVE:Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a prevalent gastrointestinal disorder that may complicate conditions such as obstructive airway disease. Our group has identified predictive biomarkers of GERD in particulate exposed first responders with obstructive airway disease. In addition, GERD diagnosis and treatment is costly and invasive. In light of these clinical concerns, we aimed to systematically review studies identifying noninvasive, multiOmic, and multicompartmental biomarkers of GERD. METHODS:A systematic review of PubMed and Embase was performed using keywords focusing on reflux disease and biomarkers and registered with PROSPERO. We included original human studies in English, articles focusing on noninvasive biomarkers of GERD published after December 31, 2009. GERD subtypes (non-erosive reflux disease and erosive esophagitis) and related conditions (Barrett's Esophagus [BE] and Esophageal Adenocarcinoma). Predictive measures were synthesized and risk of bias assessed (Newcastle-Ottawa Scale). RESULTS:0.94 (95% confidence interval; 0.85-1.00). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Prior studies identified significant multiOmic, multicompartmental noninvasive biomarker risks for GERD and BE. However, studies have a high risk of bias and the reliability and accuracy of the biomarkers identified are greatly limited, which further highlights the need to discover and validate clinically relevant noninvasive biomarkers of GERD.