Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:Approximately half of male cancer survivors experience infertility following cancer treatment, which can lead to psychosocial distress. The aim of this study was to identify support needs and reflections on the decision-making process related to sperm banking among adolescent male cancer survivors and their caregivers at 1 year post-diagnosis. METHODS:As part of a randomized controlled trial testing a family-centered sperm banking decision-making intervention, males diagnosed with cancer (12-25 years old) and their caregivers completed semi-structured interviews 1 year post-diagnosis. Thematic analysis was conducted by three independent coders (κ = 0.80) and focused on two interview questions: (1) Is there anything you wish you would have known or done before making the [sperm banking] decision? and (2) What information or support do you think is needed regarding your/your son's future fertility goals? RESULTS:Qualitative interviews with adolescents (n = 20) and caregivers (n = 18) revealed three primary themes: (1) satisfaction with information received at diagnosis, but retrospective desire for more decision-making time; (2) current desire for additional fertility-related support; (3) potential need for future fertility-related support. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Despite satisfaction with the oncofertility consultation at diagnosis, clinical teams should prioritize fertility education moving forward and allow additional time for sperm banking decision-making (when possible) at diagnosis. Counseling gaps can lead to uncertainty, unplanned pregnancies, and adverse mental health outcomes. Thus, it is important to revisit issues surrounding fertility and family planning after treatment, particularly among adolescents transitioning to adulthood.

OBJECTIVE:To obtain perspectives about existing compensation structures in gynecologic oncology, including common challenges and successful strategies within diverse systems. METHODS:Electronic mail was used to recruit OB/GYN department chairs and directors of cancer centers who were gynecologic oncologists and responsible for administering compensation structures at their institution. Using a semi-structured guide, three interviewers conducted 30-min qualitative interviews, which were recorded and transcribed. Two coders used the constant comparative method to summarize key themes. RESULTS:Response rate was 65 %, resulting in 17 interviewees. Participants were a third women and in their current position for a median of 7 years. The most prominent theme was the tension of balancing reimbursement for revenue-generating clinical activities with non-clinical work in research and education. Chair discretionary funds were useful to offset unfunded responsibilities. Broad clinical productivity measures were used: from more traditional work Relative Value Units (wRVUs) to measures that captured downstream impact, such as number of new patients or surgeries. Even in institutions with centralized funds flow systems, disparities were frequently noted for the monetary value assigned per wRVU. Academic scorecards were described as a method to ascribe value for academic work, often for bonus incentives. Another common stressor unique to gynecologic oncology was low reimbursement for chemotherapy-related services compared to surgery. Provision of regular productivity reports was common, but full transparency was controversial. CONCLUSIONS:Our inquiry demonstrates that our academic leaders are unable to use compensation to fully support areas they deem important.

OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:To study the impact of an educational intervention on obstetrician-gynecologist clinicians' knowledge of racial and ethnic disparities in the menopause experience. METHODS:Twenty-five obstetrician-gynecologist physicians (residents, fellows, and attendings) at an academic medical center in New York, NY, completed the Achieving Menopausal Health Equity Network course, a brief web-based intervention consisting of four modules delivered through narrated didactic videos and interactive tools, a 10-item pretest and posttest, and a course evaluation survey. The primary outcome was a change in knowledge scores after the completion of the educational intervention. Item analysis was also performed to assess item discrimination, item difficulty, and response frequency. Feedback on modules was obtained, and thematic analysis was performed. RESULTS:In this study, 25 participants completed the educational intervention. There was a statistically significant increase in mean test scores after participation (pretest mean score=7.1/10 vs. posttest mean score=8.1/10, P =0.0021). The following themes emerged in thematic analysis: knowledge building with potential for practical application for clinicians and non-clinicians, clarity and relevance, and opportunities for growth for future iterations of the modules. CONCLUSIONS:This brief, online educational curriculum focused on racial and ethnic disparities in menopause significantly improved the knowledge of obstetrician-gynecologist clinicians at various levels of training and provides a useful model for introducing more formal training on menopause medicine for obstetrician-gynecologist clinicians.

BACKGROUND:Lack of sexual orientation and gender identity (SOGI) collection hinders the ability to identify cancer disparities, create opportunities for improvement, and reveal the burden of cancer among sexual and gender minority (SGM) populations. Our institution is one of the first NCI-Designated Comprehensive Cancer Centers to collect SOGI as standard-of-care demographics. METHODS:This analysis includes 118 320 patients who came to the H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute ("Moffitt") between January 1, 2016 and December 31, 2023 and completed the institutional standard-of-care electronic patient questionnaire. Descriptive analyses were conducted to assessed overall and age-specific differences between SGM and non-SGM patients (ie, cisgender-heterosexual) for demographics, SOGI disclosure, clinical covariates, and psychosocial and quality-of-life needs. RESULTS:Compared with non-SGM patients, SGM patients were statistically significant younger, single, self-identified as racial and ethnic minorities, reported higher psychosocial and quality-of-life needs, and had higher-than-expected rates for several specific cancer sites. CONCLUSIONS:Revealing these real-world cancer disparities among SGM patients based on only 7 years of SOGI data collection highlights the fundamental importance of systematic collection of this demographic information for identifying and eventually mitigating health disparities.

BACKGROUND:Routine collection and use of sexual orientation and gender identity data can assist in understanding and addressing the health disparities that affect lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer+ (LGBTQ+), also known as sexual and gender minority, individuals and communities. This study explored the implementation of a culturally relevant sexual and gender minority/sexual orientation and gender identity training program at a National Cancer Institute (NCI)-Designated Comprehensive Cancer Center. METHODS:The training consisted of 6 in-person 15-minute modules or 3 virtual 30-minute modules that occurred during established high-reliability organization huddles attended by oncology faculty and staff. Module topics were (1) Building LGBTQ+ Knowledge & LGBTQ+ Cancer Disparities, (2) Creating an Inclusive Environment, (3) Recovering From Misgendering/Making Assumptions, (4) How to Receive & Respond to Feedback, (5) Witnessing & Responding to Discrimination, and (6) Making and Sustaining a Change. All high-reliability organization attendees were considered eligible for participation and were provided with pretraining and post-training surveys. Survey items included comfort caring for sexual and gender minority patients, practice collecting sexual orientation and gender identity data, knowledge of sexual and gender minority health, and demographics. RESULTS:A total of 344 individuals completed the presurvey and 187 completed the postsurvey. Postsurvey results demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in self-perceived knowledge about sexual and gender minority health (scale: 0-100, with 100 = highest; presurvey vs postsurvey, 69 vs 84; P < .001). Respondents also reported statistically significant improvements in confidence in engaging with sexual orientation and gender identity questions (53 vs 79, P < .001) as well as intention to collect patient sexual orientation and gender identity information (49 vs 75, P < .001). Notably, sexual orientation and gender identity data collection tracking demonstrated a 311% increase in sexual orientation and 262% in gender identity disclosure during the study period. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Despite the availability of sexual orientation and gender identity data fields within electronic health records, sexual orientation and gender identity disclosure remains an ongoing nationwide problem. Use of culturally relevant sexual and gender minority/sexual orientation and gender identity training can help improve oncology staff and clinician sexual and gender minority knowledge and confidence when engaging patients with and subsequent documentation of sexual orientation and gender identity data, resulting in improvement of data completion.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:To evaluate outcomes from the Trainers in Oncofertility Reproductive Communication and Health (TORCH) program, which trains Allied Health Professionals (AHPs) to become leaders in counseling AYA cancer patients on reproductive health. METHODS:ECHO-TORCH was developed for alumni of the Enriching Communication Skills for Health Professionals in Oncofertility (ECHO) program. It included web-based modules on evidence-based content, adult learning principles, and a simulation exercise for skill practice. Evaluation involved pre/post-tests, skills assessments during simulation via standardized learners (SLs) and faculty observers, and online focus groups. RESULTS:ECHO-TORCH learners (n = 10) showed improved knowledge, from 76% on pre-test to 86% on post-test (p < 0.01). Both SLs (86%) and faculty observers (90%) showed high likelihood of inviting learners back for future presentations. In online focus groups, participants described the modules as clear, relevant, and highly satisfying. Learners appreciated the opportunity for practice and structured review of the ECHO content. CONCLUSIONS:The ECHO-TORCH program improved AHPs' knowledge and skills in teaching reproductive health content to AYA cancer patients. The train-the-trainer model empowers AHPs to disseminate knowledge within their institutions, ultimately improving care quality and empowering AYA patients to make informed decisions about reproductive health. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS/CONCLUSIONS:Continued development of professionals in reproductive healthcare will significantly enhance cancer survivors' quality of life by supporting informed decision-making regarding their reproductive health.