Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND:Sustaining evidence-based interventions in resource-limited settings is critical to optimizing gains in health outcomes. In 2015, we published a review of the sustainability of health interventions in African countries, highlighting gaps in the measurement and conceptualization of sustainability in the region. This review updates and expands upon the original review to account for developments in the past decade and recommendations for promoting sustainability. METHODS:First, we searched five databases (PubMed, SCOPUS, Web of Science, Global Health, and Cumulated Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL)) for studies published between 2015 and 2022. We repeated the search in 2023 and 2024. The review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis guidelines. Studies were included if they reported on the sustainability of health interventions implemented in African countries. Study findings were summarized using descriptive statistics and narrative synthesis, and sustainability strategies were categorized based on the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) strategies. RESULTS:Thirty-four publications with 22 distinct interventions were included in the review. Twelve African countries were represented in this review, with Nigeria (n = 6) having the most representation of available studies examining sustainability. Compared to the 2016 review, a similar proportion of studies clearly defined sustainability (52% in the current review versus 51% in the 2015 review). Eight unique strategies to foster sustainability emerged, namely: a) multi-sectorial partnership and developing stakeholder relationships, b) tailoring strategies to enhance program fit and integration, c) active stakeholder engagement and collaboration, d) capacity building through training, e) accessing new funding, f) adaptation, g) co-creation of intervention and implementation strategies and h) providing infrastructural support. The most prevalent facilitators of sustainability were related to micro-level factors (e.g., intervention fit and community engagement). In contrast, salient barriers were related to structural-level factors (e.g., limited financial resources). CONCLUSIONS:This review highlights some progress in the published reports on the sustainability of evidence-based intervention in Africa. The review emphasizes the importance of innovation in strategies to foster funding determinants for sustainable interventions. In addition, it underscores the need for developing contextually relevant sustainability frameworks that emphasize these salient determinants of sustainability in the region.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:Black sexually minoritized men and gender-expansive people (SGM), including transgender women, have higher levels of alcohol use and experience greater negative consequences from alcohol consumption than the general population. We investigated the role of multilevel factors contributing to alcohol use among these groups. METHODS:We analyzed data collected from HIV-negative participants in the Neighborhoods and Network (N2) cohort study in Chicago, IL (N = 138). Participants completed a social network inventory (November 2018-April 2019) and reported alcohol use (frequency, quantity, and frequency of binge drinking) during a quantitative assessment. We used stepwise negative binomial regression to identify associations with social network and individual-level alcohol use while controlling for sociodemographic variables. RESULTS: = 2.7), of whom 93% were Black and 78% were friends/family. Among the confidants, 30% drank alcohol at least several times per week. Identifying as Latine (RR = 2.21; 95% CI: 1.44-3.10), having a higher Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 score (RR = 1.03; 95%CI: 1.00-1.05), living with a problem drinker during one's childhood (RR = 1.80; 95% CI: 1.39-2.34), and having a greater proportion of regular drinkers in one's social network (RR = 1.49; 95% CI: 1.02-2.17) were positively associated with alcohol use. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Black SGM exposed to social network alcohol use during childhood and adulthood reported increased alcohol use. Interventions targeting Black SGM should address social norms around alcohol, intersectional discrimination, and mental health.

BACKGROUND/UNASSIGNED:Evidence-based interventions (EBI) for cardiovascular disease (CVD) in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) may face feasibility challenges due to the inadequacy of existing instruments. To address this, researchers developed the Contextual Index of Feasibility on Early-Stage Implementation in LMIC (CATALYTIC) tool, which integrates contextual factors into the assessment of feasibility. METHODS/UNASSIGNED:The tool's items were developed through a systematic review and key informant interviews, and were later assessed for relevance and importance by 13 LMIC researchers and implementers employing a Delphi technique. The survey was then tested for usability by five individuals with CVD experience in LMIC. The CATALYTIC tool consists of 17 items that measure contextual factors that directly influence early-stage LMIC implementation. Descriptive analysis, logistic regression, item reliability using Cronbach's alpha, and exploratory factor analysis (EFA) were performed on survey data. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:In a survey of 216 respondents from 46 countries, 63.4 to 81.5% of respondents noted a significant impact of contextual factors on implementation feasibility, with high reliability (Cronbach's alpha 0.88) for 12 items. The majority of interventions focused on patient-level care in rural settings. The survey items align primarily with constructs related to implementation climate and readiness for implementation, as well as inductive themes addressing existing needs and barriers to inform intervention design. The survey found diversity in geographic and experiential backgrounds, with significant representation from South Africa, Mexico, and India. Over a third identified as researchers, and 15% held multiple roles. The survey identified three distinct factors influencing how researchers and implementers assess CVD intervention feasibility in LMIC. A 6% increase in odds for moderately feasible interventions was linked to each point increase in the composite score of perceived contextual influence. CONCLUSION/UNASSIGNED:Overall, the CATALYTIC tool with 12 reliable survey items can help researchers and implementers elucidate perceptions of contextual factors influencing the feasibility of CVD-related EBI in LMIC. The survey items reflect respondents' practical focus in resource-limited settings and can inform intervention design by addressing existing needs and barriers. The tool's integration of contextual factors into the assessment of feasibility can help overcome the inadequacy of existing instruments by providing more tailored and conceptually clear assessments of feasibility.

Despite progress to define primary care practice transformation models, there remain gaps in translating evidence-based guidelines into routine clinical care. Primary care providers (MD, DO, NP, PA) and researchers need tools to assess modifiable factors that improve practice performance to inform practice transformation efforts. We aimed to develop a pragmatic tool for assessing practice-level primary care structures and processes that are associated with better care quality and clinical outcomes. We generated 314 candidate items for the Tool for Advancing Practice Performance (TAPP) using data from a comprehensive literature review, Delphi study, and qualitative interviews with high-performing practices. We used empirical criteria and expert review to eliminate redundancy and improve clarity via removing and retaining items. The retained items were formatted into a survey tool, and we further revised the tool based on feedback elicited from cognitive interviews and pilot testing with primary care providers and staff. The final candidate pool comprised 126 items after refinement and expert review. For the survey tool, we adapted and developed survey questions for each of the 126 items. Eight cognitive interview participants reviewed the tool and provided feedback on its content and language. Based on this feedback, we eliminated 13 items because they were poorly or incorrectly understood by participants, resulting in a 113-item tool. Fifteen participants pilot tested the tool and no additional items were eliminated. The TAPP is a novel, low-burden tool that researchers and primary care providers can use to identify areas for improvement at the practice-level. Practices and health systems could use the TAPP to assess their own performance and identify gaps in their structures and processes, and practice networks and health systems can use the tool to assess structures and processes at individual clinics, track this information over time, and evaluate its relationship to care quality and clinical outcomes.

BACKGROUND/UNASSIGNED:As part of an initiative to increase COVID-19 testing uptake among underserved populations, we conducted focus groups to explore experiences and attitudes related to testing in two understudied groups-young adults and socially-isolated older adults-recruited from residents living in New York City Housing Authority (NYCHA) public housing developments. MATERIALS AND METHODS/UNASSIGNED: = 32 total). To identify themes, we conducted a rapid qualitative analysis approach. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:Residents discussed four overarching themes: (1) trusted COVID-19 information sources; (2) reasons for testing; (3) barriers to testing, and (4) strategies to increase testing uptake. Findings were similar across the two age groups; both cited multiple sources of information, including major media outlets, government or public health officials, and doctors. Young adults were more likely to access information from social media despite concerns about misinformation. Participants identified several barriers to testing, such as long lines, insurance coverage, and cost. Young adults reported that at-home COVID testing was more convenient, while older adults expressed concern about accuracy and administering the tests themselves. Recommendations for improving testing emphasized easier access via a central well-known location, in-home visits, free or low-cost tests, and increased outreach. CONCLUSION/UNASSIGNED:Mainstream media, doctors and public agencies remain the most trusted sources of information among younger and older residents alike. Many resident recommendations involved leveraging NYCHA infrastructure, highlighting the continuing role public housing authorities can play in COVID-19 and other health initiatives.

OBJECTIVE:To identify primary care structures and processes that have the highest and lowest impact on chronic disease management and screening and prevention outcomes as well as to assess the feasibility of implementing these structures and processes into practice. DESIGN/METHODS:A two-round Delphi study was conducted to establish consensus on the impact and feasibility of 258 primary care structures and processes. PARTICIPANTS/METHODS:29 primary care providers, health system leaders and health services researchers in the USA. OUTCOMES/RESULTS:Primary outcomes were (1) consensus on the impact of each structure and process on chronic disease management and screening and prevention outcomes, separately and (2) consensus on feasibility of implementation by primary care practices. RESULTS:Consensus on high impact and feasibility of implementation was reached on four items for chronic disease management: 'Providers use motivational interviewing to help patients set goals', 'Practice has designated staff to manage patient panel', 'Practice has onsite providers or staff that speak the most dominant, non-English language spoken by patients' and 'Practice includes mental health providers and/or behavioural health specialists in care team' and seven items for screening and prevention: 'Practice utilizes standing protocols and orders', 'Practice generates reports to alert clinicians to missed targets and to identify gaps in care, such as overdue visits, needed vaccinations, screenings or other preventive services', 'Practice has designated staff to manage patient panel', 'Practice sets performance goals and uses benchmarking to track quality of care', 'Practice uses performance feedback to identify practice-specific areas of improvement', 'Practice builds quality improvement activities into practice operations' and 'Pre-visit planning data are reviewed during daily huddles'. Only 'Practice has designated staff to manage patient panel' appeared on both lists. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Findings suggest that practices need to focus on implementing mostly distinct, rather than common, structures and processes to optimise chronic disease and preventive care.

BACKGROUND:Emergency departments (EDs) are critical touchpoints for overdose prevention efforts. In New York City (NYC), the Health Department's Relay initiative dispatches trained peer "Wellness Advocates" (WAs) to engage with patients in EDs after an overdose and for up to 90 days subsequently. Interest in peer-delivered interventions for patients at risk for overdose has grown nationally, but few studies have explored challenges and opportunities related to implementing such interventions in EDs. METHODS:We conducted in-depth interviews with Relay WAs, ED patients, and ED providers across 4 diverse NYC EDs. Sampling was purposeful and continued until theoretical saturation was reached. Interviews followed a semi-structured interview guide based on key domains from the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). Interviews were conducted by telephone or web conferencing; audio recordings were professionally transcribed. The study utilized rapid qualitative analysis using template summaries and summary matrices followed by line-by-line coding conducted independently by 3 researchers, then discussed and harmonized at group coding meetings. Coding was both inductive (using an a priori code list based on CFIR domains and study goals) and deductive (new codes allowed to emerge from transcripts). Dedoose software was used for data organization. RESULTS:We conducted 32 in-depth interviews (10 WAs, 12 patients, 10 ED providers). Four overarching themes emerged: 1) EDs are characterized by multiple competing demands (e.g., related to provider time and physical space), underscoring the utility of Relay and leading to some practical challenges for its delivery; 2) There is a strong role distinction of WAs as peers with lived experience; 3) ED providers value Relay, even though they have a limited understanding of its full scope and outcomes; 4) While the role of structural factors (e.g., homelessness and unstable housing) is recognized, responsibility is often placed on patients for controlling their own success. CONCLUSIONS:We identified four themes that shed new light on the implementation of peer-based overdose prevention programs in EDs. Our findings highlight unique ED inner and outer setting factors that may impact program implementation and effectiveness. The findings provide actionable information to inform implementation of similar programs nationally.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:The overdose crisis in the U.S. disproportionately impacts people experiencing homelessness. Permanent supportive housing (PSH) - permanent, affordable housing with voluntary support services - is an effective, evidence-based intervention to address homelessness. However, overdose risk remains high even after entering PSH for individual and structural reasons. In this study, we aimed to refine a set of evidence-based overdose prevention practices (EBPs) and an associated implementation support package for PSH settings using focus groups with PSH tenants, frontline staff, and leaders. METHODS:Our community-academic team identified an initial set of overdose EBPs applicable for PSH through research, public health guidance, and a needs assessment. We adapted these practices based on feedback from focus groups with PSH leaders, staff, and tenants. Focus groups followed semi-structured interview guides developed using the EPIS (Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, Sustainment) framework constructs of inner context, outer context, and bridging factors related to overdose prevention and response. RESULTS:We conducted 16 focus groups with 40 unique participants (14 PSH tenants, 15 PSH staff, 11 PSH leaders); focus groups were held in two iterative rounds and individuals could participate in one or both rounds. Participants were diverse in gender, race, and ethnicity. Focus group participants were enthusiastic about the proposed EBPs and implementation strategies, while contributing unique insights and concrete suggestions to improve upon them. The implementation support package contains an iteratively refined PSH Overdose Prevention (POP) Toolkit with 20 EBPs surrounding overdose prevention and response, harm reduction, and support for substance use treatment and additional core implementation strategies including practice facilitation, tenant-staff champion teams, and learning collaboratives. CONCLUSIONS:This manuscript describes how robust community-academic partnerships and input from people with lived experience as tenants and staff in PSH informed adaptation of evidence-based overdose prevention approaches and implementation strategies to improve their fit for PSH settings. This effort can inform similar efforts nationally in other settings serving highly marginalized populations. We are currently conducting a randomized trial of the refined overdose prevention implementation support package in PSH.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:Six hospitals within the New York City public hospital system implemented the Consult for Addiction Treatment and Care in Hospitals (CATCH) program, an interprofessional addiction consult service. A stepped-wedge cluster randomized controlled trial tested the effectiveness of CATCH for increasing initiation and engagement in post-discharge medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD) treatment among hospital patients with opioid use disorder (OUD). The objective of this study was to identify facility characteristics that were associated with stronger performance of CATCH. METHODS:This study used a mixed methods multiple-case study design. The six hospitals in the CATCH evaluation were each assigned a case rating according to intervention reach. Reach was considered high if ≥50 % of hospitalized OUD patients received an MOUD order. Cross-case rating comparison identified attributes of high-performing hospitals and inductive and deductive approaches were used to identify themes. RESULTS:Higher-performing hospitals exhibited attributes that were generally absent in lower-performing hospitals, including (1) complete medical provider staffing; (2) designated office space and resources for CATCH; (3) existing integrated OUD treatment resources; and (4) limited overlap between the implementation period and COVID-19 pandemic. CONCLUSIONS:Hospitals with attributes indicative of awareness and integration of OUD services into general care were generally higher performing than hospitals that had siloed OUD treatment programs. Future implementations of addiction consult services may benefit from an increased focus on hospital- and community-level buy-in and efforts to integrate MOUD treatment into general care.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:Cervical cancer is the fourth most common cancer in women globally. It is the most common cancer in Tanzania, resulting in about 9772 new cases and 6695 deaths each year. Research has shown an association between low levels of risk perception and knowledge of the prevention, risks, signs, etiology, and treatment of cervical cancer and low screening uptake, as contributing to high rates of cervical cancer-related mortality. However, there is scant literature on the perspectives of a wider group of stakeholders (e.g., policymakers, healthcare providers (HCPs), and women at risk), especially those living in rural and semi-rural settings. The main objective of this study is to understand knowledge and perspectives on cervical cancer risk and screening among these populations. METHODS:We adapted Risso-Gill and colleagues' framework for a Health Systems Appraisal (HSA), to identify HCPs' perspective of the extent to which health system requirements for effective cervical cancer screening, prevention, and control are in place in Tanzania. We adapted interview topic guides for cervical cancer screening using the HSA framework approach. Study participants (69 in total) were interviewed between 2014 and 2018-participants included key stakeholders, HCPs, and women at risk for cervical cancer. The data were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis methodology. RESULTS:Seven themes emerged from our analysis of semi-structured interviews and focus groups: (1) knowledge of the role of screening and preventive care/services (e.g., prevention, risks, signs, etiology, and treatment), (2) training and knowledge of HCPs, (3) knowledge of cervical cancer screening among women at risk, (4) beliefs about cervical cancer screening, (5) role of traditional medicine, (6) risk factors, and (7) symptoms and signs. CONCLUSIONS:Our results demonstrate that there is a low level of knowledge of the role of screening and preventive services among stakeholders, HCPs, and women living in rural and semi-rural locations in Tanzania. There is a critical need to implement more initiatives and programs to increase the uptake of screening and related services and allow women to make more informed decisions on their health.