Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND:Permanent supportive housing (PSH) is the gold standard intervention for chronic homelessness, but PSH tenants face high risk for overdose due to a combination of individual and environmental risk factors. Little research has examined overdose prevention in PSH. METHODS:We conducted baseline surveys with staff from 20 New York PSH buildings participating in an overdose prevention technical assistance intervention study. PSH staff from participating buildings were invited via email to complete a brief online survey about their knowledge of overdose and perspectives on implementing overdose prevention practices in PSH. RESULTS:Surveys were completed by 178 staff of 286 invitations sent (response rate 62.2%). Average score on the Brief Opioid Overdose Knowledge (BOOK) questionnaire was 8.62 (SD 2.64) out of 12 points. Staff felt very positively (91.6-97.2% agreed or completely agreed) regarding the appropriateness and acceptability of implementing overdose prevention practices in PSH, but less certain about the feasibility of implementing these practices (62.4-65.5% agreed or completely agreed). Most (77.3%) felt it was mostly or definitely true that overdose prevention was a top priority in their building. Most PSH staff (median = 85.0%) but fewer tenants (median = 22.5%) had received a naloxone kit and training in overdose response. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Staff feel positively about the acceptability and appropriateness of implementing overdose response practices in PSH, but somewhat more uncertain about the feasibility of implementing these practices. This study's results help hone targets for interventions to help PSH buildings take steps to reduce tenant overdose risk.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:Effective July 2018, the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development issued a rule requiring all public housing authorities to implement smoke-free housing (SFH) policies in their developments. We examined the differential impacts of SFH policy on hospitalizations for myocardial infarction (MI) and stroke among adults aged ≥50 years old living in New York City (NYC) Housing Authority (NYCHA) versus a matched-comparison population in NYC. AIMS AND METHODS/OBJECTIVE:We identified census block groups (CBGs) comprised solely of 100% NYCHA units (N = 160) and compared NYCHA CBGs to a selected subset of CBGs from all CBGs with no NYCHA units (N = 5646). We employed propensity score matching on distributions of key CBG-level sociodemographic and housing covariates. We constructed incident rates per 1000 persons by aggregating 3-month "quarterly" counts of New York State all-payer hospitalization data from October 2015 to December 2022 and dividing by the population aged ≥50 in selected CBGs, ascertained from 2016 American Community Survey 5-year estimates. We selected a difference-in-differences (DID) analytic approach to examine pre- and post-policy differences in incident hospitalizations between the intervention and matched-comparison groups. RESULTS:Matching results indicated a balanced match for all covariates, with standardized mean differences <0.10. In DID analyses, we observed small declines in both MI (DID = -0.26, p = .02) and stroke (DID = -0.28, p = .06) hospitalization rates for NYCHA CBGs compared to non-NYCHA CBGs from pre-to post-54 months' policy. CONCLUSIONS:SFH policies in NYC were associated with small reductions in CVD-related hospitalizations among older adults living in housing subject to the policy. IMPLICATIONS/CONCLUSIONS:Housing remains a key focal setting for interventions to reduce SHS exposure and associated morbidities. Ongoing monitoring is warranted to understand the long-term impacts of SFH policies in public housing developments.

BACKGROUND:Sustaining evidence-based interventions in resource-limited settings is critical to optimizing gains in health outcomes. In 2015, we published a review of the sustainability of health interventions in African countries, highlighting gaps in the measurement and conceptualization of sustainability in the region. This review updates and expands upon the original review to account for developments in the past decade and recommendations for promoting sustainability. METHODS:First, we searched five databases (PubMed, SCOPUS, Web of Science, Global Health, and Cumulated Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL)) for studies published between 2015 and 2022. We repeated the search in 2023 and 2024. The review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis guidelines. Studies were included if they reported on the sustainability of health interventions implemented in African countries. Study findings were summarized using descriptive statistics and narrative synthesis, and sustainability strategies were categorized based on the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) strategies. RESULTS:Thirty-four publications with 22 distinct interventions were included in the review. Twelve African countries were represented in this review, with Nigeria (n = 6) having the most representation of available studies examining sustainability. Compared to the 2016 review, a similar proportion of studies clearly defined sustainability (52% in the current review versus 51% in the 2015 review). Eight unique strategies to foster sustainability emerged, namely: a) multi-sectorial partnership and developing stakeholder relationships, b) tailoring strategies to enhance program fit and integration, c) active stakeholder engagement and collaboration, d) capacity building through training, e) accessing new funding, f) adaptation, g) co-creation of intervention and implementation strategies and h) providing infrastructural support. The most prevalent facilitators of sustainability were related to micro-level factors (e.g., intervention fit and community engagement). In contrast, salient barriers were related to structural-level factors (e.g., limited financial resources). CONCLUSIONS:This review highlights some progress in the published reports on the sustainability of evidence-based intervention in Africa. The review emphasizes the importance of innovation in strategies to foster funding determinants for sustainable interventions. In addition, it underscores the need for developing contextually relevant sustainability frameworks that emphasize these salient determinants of sustainability in the region.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:Black sexually minoritized men and gender-expansive people (SGM), including transgender women, have higher levels of alcohol use and experience greater negative consequences from alcohol consumption than the general population. We investigated the role of multilevel factors contributing to alcohol use among these groups. METHODS:We analyzed data collected from HIV-negative participants in the Neighborhoods and Network (N2) cohort study in Chicago, IL (N = 138). Participants completed a social network inventory (November 2018-April 2019) and reported alcohol use (frequency, quantity, and frequency of binge drinking) during a quantitative assessment. We used stepwise negative binomial regression to identify associations with social network and individual-level alcohol use while controlling for sociodemographic variables. RESULTS: = 2.7), of whom 93% were Black and 78% were friends/family. Among the confidants, 30% drank alcohol at least several times per week. Identifying as Latine (RR = 2.21; 95% CI: 1.44-3.10), having a higher Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 score (RR = 1.03; 95%CI: 1.00-1.05), living with a problem drinker during one's childhood (RR = 1.80; 95% CI: 1.39-2.34), and having a greater proportion of regular drinkers in one's social network (RR = 1.49; 95% CI: 1.02-2.17) were positively associated with alcohol use. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Black SGM exposed to social network alcohol use during childhood and adulthood reported increased alcohol use. Interventions targeting Black SGM should address social norms around alcohol, intersectional discrimination, and mental health.

BACKGROUND:Quitline counseling is an effective method for supporting smoking cessation, offering personalized and accessible assistance. Tobacco use is a significant public health issue among people living with HIV. In Vietnam, over 50% of men living with HIV use tobacco. However, there is limited research on Quitline use and retention rates in this population and a lack of research on factors associated with retention in Quitline counseling. The study aims to evaluate the factors associated with retention in Quitline counseling for smoking cessation among HIV-positive smokers receiving care at HIV outpatient clinics in Vietnam. METHOD/METHODS:The study analyzed data from a randomized controlled trial (RCT) that compared the effectiveness of three smoking cessation interventions for smokers living with HIV at 13 Outpatient Clinics in Ha Noi. A total of 221 smokers aged 18 and above living with HIV participated in Arm 1 of the RCT, which included screening for tobacco use (Ask), health worker-delivered brief counseling (Assist), and proactive referral to Vietnam's national Quitline (AAR), in which the Quitline reached out to the patient to engage them in up to 10 sessions of smoking cessation counseling. Retention in Quitline counseling was defined as participating in more than five counseling calls. The study used bivariate and logistic regression analyses to explore the associations between retention and other factors. RESULTS:Fifty-one percent of HIV-positive smokers completed more than five counseling sessions. Smokers living with HIV aged 35 or older (OR = 5.53, 95% CI 1.42-21.52), who had a very low/low tobacco dependence level (OR = 2.26, 95% CI 1.14-4.51), had a lower score of perceived importance of quitting cigarettes (OR = 0.87, 95% CI 0.76-0.99), had a household ban or partial ban on cigarettes smoking (OR = 2.58, 95% CI 1.39-4.80), and had chosen a quit date during the Quitline counseling (OR = 3.0, 95% CI 1.63-5.53) were more likely to retain in the Quitline counseling than those smokers living with HIV whose ages were less than 35, who had a high/very high tobacco dependence level, had a higher score of perception of the importance of quitting cigarettes, did not have a household ban on cigarettes smoking, and did not choose a quit date during counseling. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:There is a high retention rate in Quitline counseling services among PLWHs receiving care at HIV outpatient clinics. Tailoring interventions to the associated factors such as age, tobacco dependence, perceived importance of quitting, household smoking bans, and setting a quit date during counseling may improve engagement and outcomes, aiding in the reduction of smoking prevalence among HIV-positive individuals.

OBJECTIVE:To identify primary care structures and processes that have the highest and lowest impact on chronic disease management and screening and prevention outcomes as well as to assess the feasibility of implementing these structures and processes into practice. DESIGN/METHODS:A two-round Delphi study was conducted to establish consensus on the impact and feasibility of 258 primary care structures and processes. PARTICIPANTS/METHODS:29 primary care providers, health system leaders and health services researchers in the USA. OUTCOMES/RESULTS:Primary outcomes were (1) consensus on the impact of each structure and process on chronic disease management and screening and prevention outcomes, separately and (2) consensus on feasibility of implementation by primary care practices. RESULTS:Consensus on high impact and feasibility of implementation was reached on four items for chronic disease management: 'Providers use motivational interviewing to help patients set goals', 'Practice has designated staff to manage patient panel', 'Practice has onsite providers or staff that speak the most dominant, non-English language spoken by patients' and 'Practice includes mental health providers and/or behavioural health specialists in care team' and seven items for screening and prevention: 'Practice utilizes standing protocols and orders', 'Practice generates reports to alert clinicians to missed targets and to identify gaps in care, such as overdue visits, needed vaccinations, screenings or other preventive services', 'Practice has designated staff to manage patient panel', 'Practice sets performance goals and uses benchmarking to track quality of care', 'Practice uses performance feedback to identify practice-specific areas of improvement', 'Practice builds quality improvement activities into practice operations' and 'Pre-visit planning data are reviewed during daily huddles'. Only 'Practice has designated staff to manage patient panel' appeared on both lists. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Findings suggest that practices need to focus on implementing mostly distinct, rather than common, structures and processes to optimise chronic disease and preventive care.

BACKGROUND:Emergency departments (EDs) are critical touchpoints for overdose prevention efforts. In New York City (NYC), the Health Department's Relay initiative dispatches trained peer "Wellness Advocates" (WAs) to engage with patients in EDs after an overdose and for up to 90 days subsequently. Interest in peer-delivered interventions for patients at risk for overdose has grown nationally, but few studies have explored challenges and opportunities related to implementing such interventions in EDs. METHODS:We conducted in-depth interviews with Relay WAs, ED patients, and ED providers across 4 diverse NYC EDs. Sampling was purposeful and continued until theoretical saturation was reached. Interviews followed a semi-structured interview guide based on key domains from the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). Interviews were conducted by telephone or web conferencing; audio recordings were professionally transcribed. The study utilized rapid qualitative analysis using template summaries and summary matrices followed by line-by-line coding conducted independently by 3 researchers, then discussed and harmonized at group coding meetings. Coding was both inductive (using an a priori code list based on CFIR domains and study goals) and deductive (new codes allowed to emerge from transcripts). Dedoose software was used for data organization. RESULTS:We conducted 32 in-depth interviews (10 WAs, 12 patients, 10 ED providers). Four overarching themes emerged: 1) EDs are characterized by multiple competing demands (e.g., related to provider time and physical space), underscoring the utility of Relay and leading to some practical challenges for its delivery; 2) There is a strong role distinction of WAs as peers with lived experience; 3) ED providers value Relay, even though they have a limited understanding of its full scope and outcomes; 4) While the role of structural factors (e.g., homelessness and unstable housing) is recognized, responsibility is often placed on patients for controlling their own success. CONCLUSIONS:We identified four themes that shed new light on the implementation of peer-based overdose prevention programs in EDs. Our findings highlight unique ED inner and outer setting factors that may impact program implementation and effectiveness. The findings provide actionable information to inform implementation of similar programs nationally.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:Six hospitals within the New York City public hospital system implemented the Consult for Addiction Treatment and Care in Hospitals (CATCH) program, an interprofessional addiction consult service. A stepped-wedge cluster randomized controlled trial tested the effectiveness of CATCH for increasing initiation and engagement in post-discharge medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD) treatment among hospital patients with opioid use disorder (OUD). The objective of this study was to identify facility characteristics that were associated with stronger performance of CATCH. METHODS:This study used a mixed methods multiple-case study design. The six hospitals in the CATCH evaluation were each assigned a case rating according to intervention reach. Reach was considered high if ≥50 % of hospitalized OUD patients received an MOUD order. Cross-case rating comparison identified attributes of high-performing hospitals and inductive and deductive approaches were used to identify themes. RESULTS:Higher-performing hospitals exhibited attributes that were generally absent in lower-performing hospitals, including (1) complete medical provider staffing; (2) designated office space and resources for CATCH; (3) existing integrated OUD treatment resources; and (4) limited overlap between the implementation period and COVID-19 pandemic. CONCLUSIONS:Hospitals with attributes indicative of awareness and integration of OUD services into general care were generally higher performing than hospitals that had siloed OUD treatment programs. Future implementations of addiction consult services may benefit from an increased focus on hospital- and community-level buy-in and efforts to integrate MOUD treatment into general care.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:The overdose crisis in the U.S. disproportionately impacts people experiencing homelessness. Permanent supportive housing (PSH) - permanent, affordable housing with voluntary support services - is an effective, evidence-based intervention to address homelessness. However, overdose risk remains high even after entering PSH for individual and structural reasons. In this study, we aimed to refine a set of evidence-based overdose prevention practices (EBPs) and an associated implementation support package for PSH settings using focus groups with PSH tenants, frontline staff, and leaders. METHODS:Our community-academic team identified an initial set of overdose EBPs applicable for PSH through research, public health guidance, and a needs assessment. We adapted these practices based on feedback from focus groups with PSH leaders, staff, and tenants. Focus groups followed semi-structured interview guides developed using the EPIS (Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, Sustainment) framework constructs of inner context, outer context, and bridging factors related to overdose prevention and response. RESULTS:We conducted 16 focus groups with 40 unique participants (14 PSH tenants, 15 PSH staff, 11 PSH leaders); focus groups were held in two iterative rounds and individuals could participate in one or both rounds. Participants were diverse in gender, race, and ethnicity. Focus group participants were enthusiastic about the proposed EBPs and implementation strategies, while contributing unique insights and concrete suggestions to improve upon them. The implementation support package contains an iteratively refined PSH Overdose Prevention (POP) Toolkit with 20 EBPs surrounding overdose prevention and response, harm reduction, and support for substance use treatment and additional core implementation strategies including practice facilitation, tenant-staff champion teams, and learning collaboratives. CONCLUSIONS:This manuscript describes how robust community-academic partnerships and input from people with lived experience as tenants and staff in PSH informed adaptation of evidence-based overdose prevention approaches and implementation strategies to improve their fit for PSH settings. This effort can inform similar efforts nationally in other settings serving highly marginalized populations. We are currently conducting a randomized trial of the refined overdose prevention implementation support package in PSH.