Try a new search

Format these results:

Searched for:

in-biosketch:yes

person:timori01

Total Results:

377


The Impact of Uterine Incision Closure Techniques on Post-cesarean Delivery Niche Formation and Size: Sonohysterographic Examination of Nonpregnant Women

Antoine, Clarel; Meyer, Jessica A; Silverstein, Jenna S; Alexander, Jameshisa; Oh, Cheongeun; Timor-Tritsch, Ilan E
OBJECTIVE:To compare the prevalence and size of residual niche in the nongravid uterus following Cesarean delivery (CD) with different hysterotomy closure techniques (HCTs). METHODS:, T-test (ANOVA), and analyzed using logistic regression and two-sided test (P < .05). RESULTS:Forty-five women had SIS performed, 25 and 20 via Technique A and B, respectively. Technique groups varied by average interval time from CD to SIS (13.6 versus 74.5 months, P = 0.006) but were otherwise similar. Twenty niches were diagnosed, 85% of which were clinically significant, including five following Technique A, nine following Technique B with double-layer closure, and three following Technique B with single-layer (P = .018). The average niche depth was 2.4 mm and 4.9 mm among the two-layer subgroups following Techniques A and B, respectively (P = .005). A clinically significant niche development was six times higher with Technique B when compared to Technique A (OR 6.0, 95% CI 1.6-22.6, P = .008); this significance persisted after controlling for SIS interval on multivariate analysis (OR 4.4, 95% CI 1.1-18.3, P = .04). The average niche depth was 5.7 ± 2.9 mm following Technique B with single-layer. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Hysterotomy closure techniques determine the prevalence of post-Cesarean delivery niche formation and size. Exclusion of the endometrium at uterine closure reduces the development of significant scar defects.
PMID: 34726789
ISSN: 1550-9613
CID: 5038012

Placenta accreta spectrum disorders in the first trimester: a systematic review

Guzmán López, Julieth Alexandra; Gutiérrez Sánchez, Luz Ángela; Pinilla-Monsalve, Gabriel David; Timor-Tritsch, Ilan E
Placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) disorders involve an abnormality in the implantation of the placenta, being rarely diagnosed in the first trimester. To conduct a systematic review of the risk factors, clinical and imaging features, and outcomes of histopathologically confirmed cases of PAS disorders in the first trimester of pregnancy. Different databases including PubMed, MEDLINE Complete, Scopus, Web of Science, EMBASE, SciELO, LILACS, and Ovid were reviewed up to November 2018. 55 patients with a definitive histopathological diagnosis were reported. About 18 had a history of prior curettage and 47 of previous caesarean deliveries (CD). About 74.54% presented with miscarriage and ultrasound signs of caesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) were reported in 22.49%. Temporal sequence of diagnostic studies could be determined in 52 women, and, among these, PAS disorders were defined through imaging techniques in 11 (21.15%) while surgical findings unveiled them in 15 (28.84%). Nonetheless, in half of the cases, the diagnosis was concluded only on histopathological samples. PAS disorders in the first trimester of pregnancy are rarely diagnosed through imaging techniques and lead to hysterectomy in most cases. Ultrasound training to detect PAS disorders in women with risk factors is crucial for early diagnosis and prevention of adverse outcomes.
PMID: 35724241
ISSN: 1364-6893
CID: 5281842

Placenta accreta spectrum disorders in the first trimester: A systematic review [Meeting Abstract]

Lopez, J A G; Sanchez, L A G; Pinilla-Monsalve, G D; Timor-Tritsch, I E
Background: Placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) disorders involve an abnormality in the implantation of the placenta, being rarely diagnosed in the first semester.
Objective(s): To conduct a systematic review about the risk factors, clinical and imaging features, and outcomes of histopathologically-confirmed cases of PAS disorders in the first trimester of pregnancy.
Method(s): Different databases including PubMed, MEDLINE Complete, Scopus, SciELO, Web of Science, EMBASE, LILACS, and Ovid were reviewed up to November 2018. Case reports and series with histopathological confirmation of PAS disorders before week 14 of pregnancy were included.
Result(s): 53 patients with a definitive histopathological diagnosis were reported in the final list of 50 articles. 18 (33.96%) had a history of at least one curettage and 45 (84.90%) had prior cesarean deliveries (CD). Only 9 (16.98%) patients were diagnosed during first trimester using imaging techniques, and signs of cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) were as well seen in 9 patients with ultrasound report. PAS disorders were diagnosed upon miscarriage in 41 (77.35%) patients, 15 (30%) were identify in surgery, and 26 (52%) were confirmed based solely on the histopathological report. Hysterectomy was performed in 48 (90.56%) patients. 8 (15.09%) cases of placenta accreta, 17 (32.07%) of increta, and 28 (52.83%) of percreta were reported.
Conclusion(s): PAS disorders in the first trimester of pregnancy are rarely diagnose through imaging techniques and lead to hysterectomy in almost every case. Training in ultrasound to detect PAS disorders in women with risk factors is crucial for early diagnose and prevention of adverse outcomes
EMBASE:638512737
ISSN: 1471-0528
CID: 5292122

Proving microcystic ultrasound appearance of borderline ovarian tumors by three-dimensional 'silhouette' rendering

Timor-Tritsch, I E; Monteagudo, A; Popiolek, D A; Duncan, K M; Goldstein, S R
PMID: 35195307
ISSN: 1469-0705
CID: 5172182

Uterine incision closure: Is it the culprit in the cesarean scar niche and related complications?

Antoine, Clarel; Goldstein, Steven R; Timor-Tritsch, Ilan E
ORIGINAL:0015565
ISSN: 1044-307x
CID: 5221202

A Cesarean scar pregnancy is not an ectopic pregnancy

Timor-Tritsch, I E
PMID: 35266211
ISSN: 1469-0705
CID: 5182292

New classification of placenta accreta spectrum disorders should include presence of Cesarean scar pregnancy [Letter]

D'Antonio, F; Timor-Tritsch, I E; Khalil, A; Calì, G
PMID: 35363411
ISSN: 1469-0705
CID: 5221132

Cesarean scar pregnancy is associated with abnormal implantation but not macroscopic myometrial invasion in early first trimester of pregnancy [Letter]

D'Antonio, F; Calì, G; Palacios-Jaraquemada, J; Khalil, A; Timor-Tritsch, I E
PMID: 34605589
ISSN: 1469-0705
CID: 5221122

Reference ranges for fetal brain structures using magnetic resonance imaging: systematic review

Di Mascio, D; Khalil, A; Rizzo, G; Kasprian, G; Caulo, M; Manganaro, L; Odibo, A O; Flacco, M E; Giancotti, A; Buca, D; Liberati, M; Timor-Tritsch, I E; D'Antonio, F
OBJECTIVE:To evaluate the methodology of studies reporting reference ranges for fetal brain structures on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). METHODS:MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and the Web of Science databases were searched electronically up to 31 December 2020 to identify studies investigating biometry and growth of the fetal brain and reporting reference ranges for brain structures using MRI. The primary aim was to evaluate the methodology of these studies. A list of 26 quality criteria divided into three domains, including 'study design', 'statistical and reporting methods' and 'specific aspects relevant to MRI', was developed and applied to evaluate the methodological appropriateness of each of the included studies. The overall quality score of a study, ranging between 0 and 26, was defined as the sum of scores awarded for each quality criterion and expressed as a percentage (the lower the percentage, the higher the risk of bias). RESULTS:Fifteen studies were included in this systematic review. The overall mean quality score of the studies evaluated was 48.7%. When focusing on each domain, the mean quality score was 42.0% for 'study design', 59.4% for 'statistical and reporting methods' and 33.3% for 'specific aspects relevant to MRI'. For the 'study design' domain, sample size calculation and consecutive enrolment of women were the items found to be at the highest risk of bias. For the 'statistical and reporting methods' domain, the presence of regression equations for mean and SD for each measurement, the number of measurements taken for each variable and the presence of postnatal assessment information were the items found to be at the highest risk of bias. For the 'specific aspects relevant to MRI' domain, whole fetal brain assessment was not performed in any of the included studies and was therefore considered to be the item at the highest risk of bias. CONCLUSIONS:Most of the previously published studies reporting fetal brain reference ranges on MRI are highly heterogeneous and have low-to-moderate quality in terms of methodology, which is similar to the findings reported for ultrasound studies. © 2021 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
PMID: 34405927
ISSN: 1469-0705
CID: 5180842

Recurrent Cesarean Scar Pregnancy: Case Series and Literature Review [Note]

Timor-Tritsch, I E; Horwitz, G; D'Antonio, F; Monteagudo, A; Bornstein, E; Chervenak, J; Messina, L; Morlando, M; Cali, G
EMBASE:2016531746
ISSN: 1533-9866
CID: 5157552