Faculty Bibliography

Purpose of Review: The role of genetics in renal disorders is being increasingly recognized, prompting the need to describe and address barriers to meaningful implementation of genetic testing in clinical care. Recent Findings: The rapid expansion in accessibility and decreased cost of sequencing technologies has prompted increased identification of monogenic contributors to kidney disease and demonstration of the high yield of genetic testing in renal cohorts. Genetic testing in kidney disease and transplantation offers meaningful applications, including those relating to diagnosis, prognosis, management, and implications for family members and potential living donors. However, clinical implementation raises notable logistical, ethical, legal, and social considerations. Summary: Chief among barriers and concerns are difficulties in variant interpretation, lack of adequate clinician training and genetic counseling availability, disparities in composition of reference databases, considerations in obtaining informed consent and returning genetic results, and concerns relating to privacy and legal protections. These considerations are not discrete and the complex issues among them overlap considerably, requiring multifaceted and adaptive interventions.

Use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in cardiopulmonary resuscitation, termed eCPR, offers the prospect of improving survival with good neurological function after cardiac arrest. After death, ECMO can also be used for enhanced preservation of abdominal and thoracic organs, designated normothermic regional perfusion (NRP), before organ recovery for transplantation. To optimize resuscitation and transplantation outcomes, healthcare networks in Portugal and Italy have developed cardiac arrest protocols that integrate use of eCPR with NRP. Similar dissemination of eCPR and its integration with NRP in the USA raise novel ethical issues due to a non-nationalized health system and an opt-in framework for organ donation, as well as other legal and cultural factors. Nonetheless, eCPR investigations are ongoing, and both eCPR and NRP are selectively employed in clinical practice. This paper delineates the most pressing relevant ethical considerations and proposes recommendations for implementation of protocols that aim to promote public trust and reduce conflicts of interest. Transparent policies should rely on protocols that separate lifesaving from organ preservation considerations; robust, centralized eCPR data to inform equitable and evidence-based allocations; uniform practices concerning clinical decision-making and resource utilization; and partnership with community stakeholders, allowing patients to make decisions about emergency care that align with their values. Proactively addressing these ethical and logistical challenges could enable eCPR dissemination and integration with NRP protocols in the USA, with the potential to maximize lives saved through both improved resuscitation with good neurological outcomes and increased organ donation opportunities when resuscitation is unsuccessful or not in accordance with individuals' wishes.

Background/UNASSIGNED:The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic has or threatens to overwhelm health care systems. Many institutions are developing ventilator triage policies. Objective/UNASSIGNED:To characterize the development of ventilator triage policies and compare policy content. Design/UNASSIGNED:Survey and mixed-methods content analysis. Setting/UNASSIGNED:North American hospitals associated with members of the Association of Bioethics Program Directors. Participants/UNASSIGNED:Program directors. Measurements/UNASSIGNED:Characteristics of institutions and policies, including triage criteria and triage committee membership. Results/UNASSIGNED:Sixty-seven program directors responded (response rate, 91.8%); 36 (53.7%) hospitals did not yet have a policy, and 7 (10.4%) hospitals' policies could not be shared. The 29 institutions providing policies were relatively evenly distributed among the 4 U.S. geographic regions (range, 5 to 9 policies per region). Among the 26 unique policies analyzed, 3 (11.3%) were produced by state health departments. The most frequently cited triage criteria were benefit (25 policies [96.2%]), need (14 [53.8%]), age (13 [50.0%]), conservation of resources (10 [38.5%]), and lottery (9 [34.6%]). Twenty-one (80.8%) policies use scoring systems, and 20 of these (95.2%) use a version of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score. Among the policies that specify the triage team's composition (23 [88.5%]), all require or recommend a physician member, 20 (87.0%) a nurse, 16 (69.6%) an ethicist, 8 (34.8%) a chaplain, and 8 (34.8%) a respiratory therapist. Thirteen (50.0% of all policies) require or recommend those making triage decisions not be involved in direct patient care, but only 2 (7.7%) require that their decisions be blinded to ethically irrelevant considerations. Limitation/UNASSIGNED:The results may not be generalizable to institutions without academic bioethics programs. Conclusion/UNASSIGNED:Over one half of respondents did not have ventilator triage policies. Policies have substantial heterogeneity, and many omit guidance on fair implementation.