Searched for: in-biosketch:yes
person:zelopc01
2021 Interim Guidance to Health Care Providers for Basic and Advanced Cardiac Life Support in Adults, Children, and Neonates With Suspected or Confirmed COVID-19
Hsu, Antony; Sasson, Comilla; Kudenchuk, Peter J; Atkins, Dianne L; Aziz, Khalid; Becker, Lance B; Berg, Robert A; Bhanji, Farhan; Bradley, Steven M; Brooks, Steven C; Chan, Melissa; Chan, Paul S; Cheng, Adam; Clemency, Brian M; de Caen, Allan; Duff, Jonathan P; Edelson, Dana P; Flores, Gustavo E; Fuchs, Susan; Girotra, Saket; Hinkson, Carl; Joyner, Benny L; Kamath-Rayne, Beena D; Kleinman, Monica; Lasa, Javier J; Lavonas, Eric J; Lee, Henry C; Lehotzky, Rebecca E; Levy, Arielle; Mancini, Mary E; McBride, Mary E; Meckler, Garth; Merchant, Raina M; Moitra, Vivek K; Morgan, Ryan W; Nadkarni, Vinay; Panchal, Ashish R; Peberdy, Mary Ann; Raymond, Tia; Roberts, Kathryn; Sayre, Michael R; Schexnayder, Stephen M; Sutton, Robert M; Terry, Mark; Walsh, Brian; Wang, David S; Zelop, Carolyn M; Topjian, Alexis
PMCID:8522336
PMID: 34641719
ISSN: 1941-7705
CID: 5037192
Factors Associated with Non-Survival from In-Hospital Maternal Cardiac Arrest: An Analysis of Get With The Guidelines® (GWTG) Data
Zelop, Carolyn M; Shaw, Richard E; Edelson, Dana P; Lipman, Steven S; Mhyre, Jill M; Arafeh, Julie; Jeejeebhoy, Farida M; Einav, Sharon
INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:century. Factors influencing outcome of maternal cardiac arrest (MCA) remain largely unexplored. OBJECTIVE:We sought to further elucidate the factors affecting maternal death from in-hospital (IH) MCA. METHODS:Our query of the American Heart Association's GWTG®-Resuscitation voluntary registry from 2000-2017 revealed 561 index cases of IH MCA with complete outcome data. Logistic regression was performed using hospital death as the primary outcome and included variables with a p value = 0.1 or less based upon univariate analysis. Age, race, year of arrest, pre-existing conditions, first documented pulseless rhythm and location of arrest were used in the model. Sensitivity analyses and assessment of variable interaction were also performed to test model stability. Institutional review deemed this research exempt from ethical approval. RESULTS:Among 561 cases of MCA, 57.2% (321/561) did not survive to hospital discharge. IH death was not associated with maternal age, race and year of event. In the final model, IH death was significantly associated with pre-arrest hypotension/hypoperfusion (OR = 1.80 (95% CI, 1.16-2.79); p = 0.009). The occurrence of MCA outside of the delivery suite (referent group) or operating room was associated with a significantly higher risk of death: ICU/Post-Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU) (OR = 3.32 (95% CI, 2.00- 5.52); p < 0.001) and ER/other (OR = 1.89 (95% CI, 1.15-3.11); p = 0.012). While MCA cases with a shockable vs. non-shockable first documented pulseless rhythm had similar outcomes, those with an indeterminate rhythm were less likely to die, (OR = 0.41(95% CI, 0.20-0.84); p = 0.014). In a sensitivity analysis, removal of the indeterminate group did not alter outcomes regarding first documented pulseless rhythm or arrest location. Area under the curve for the final model was 0.715 (95% CI 0.673- 0.757). CONCLUSIONS:Our study identified several novel factors associated with IH death of our MCA cohort. More research is required to further understand the pathophysiologic dynamics affecting outcomes of IH MCA in this unique population.
PMID: 34004263
ISSN: 1873-1570
CID: 4877002
ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Second and Third Trimester Screening for Fetal Anomaly
Sussman, Betsy L; Chopra, Prajna; Poder, Liina; Bulas, Dorothy I; Burger, Ingrid; Feldstein, Vickie A; Laifer-Narin, Sherelle L; Oliver, Edward R; Strachowski, Loretta M; Wang, Eileen Y; Winter, Tom; Zelop, Carolyn M; Glanc, Phyllis
The Appropriateness Criteria for the imaging screening of second and third trimester fetuses for anomalies are presented for fetuses that are low risk, high risk, have had soft markers detected on ultrasound, and have had major anomalies detected on ultrasound. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.
PMID: 33958112
ISSN: 1558-349x
CID: 4866722
Cardiovascular Health After Preeclampsia: Patient and Provider Perspective
Seely, Ellen W; Celi, Ann C; Chausmer, Jaimie; Graves, Cornelia; Kilpatrick, Sarah; Nicklas, Jacinda M; Rosser, Mary L; Rexrode, Kathryn M; Stuart, Jennifer J; Tsigas, Eleni; Voelker, Jennifer; Zelop, Carolyn; Rich-Edwards, Janet W
PMID: 32986503
ISSN: 1931-843x
CID: 4616542
ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Nuchal Translucency Evaluation at 11 to 14 Weeks of Gestation
Simpson, Lynn; Maturen, Katherine E; Feldstein, Vickie A; Oliver, Edward R; Poder, Liina; Strachowski, Loretta M; Sussman, Betsy L; Weber, Therese M; Winter, Tom; Zelop, Carolyn M; Glanc, Phyllis
A fetus with an increased nuchal translucency at 11 to 14 weeks gestation is at risk for aneuploidy, genetic syndromes, structural anomalies, and intrauterine fetal demise in both single and twin gestations. In addition to referral to genetics for counseling and consideration of diagnostic genetic testing, a detailed anatomic survey and fetal echocardiogram are indicated in the second trimester to screen for congenital malformations and major heart defects. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.
PMID: 33153556
ISSN: 1558-349x
CID: 4664352
Adult Advanced Life Support: International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations
Berg, Katherine M; Soar, Jasmeet; Andersen, Lars W; Böttiger, Bernd W; Cacciola, Sofia; Callaway, Clifton W; Couper, Keith; Cronberg, Tobias; D'Arrigo, Sonia; Deakin, Charles D; Donnino, Michael W; Drennan, Ian R; Granfeldt, Asger; Hoedemaekers, Cornelia W E; Holmberg, Mathias J; Hsu, Cindy H; Kamps, Marlijn; Musiol, Szymon; Nation, Kevin J; Neumar, Robert W; Nicholson, Tonia; O'Neil, Brian J; Otto, Quentin; de Paiva, Edison Ferreira; Parr, Michael; Reynolds, Joshua C; Sandroni, Claudio; Scholefield, Barnaby R; Skrifvars, Markus B; Wang, Tzong-Luen; Wetsch, Wolfgang A; Yeung, Joyce; Morley, Peter T; Morrison, Laurie J; Welsford, Michelle; Hazinski, Mary Fran; Nolan, Jerry P; Mahmoud, Issa; Kleinman, Monica E; Ristagno, Giuseppe; Arafeh, Julie; Benoit, Justin L; Chase, Maureen; Fischberg, Bryan L; Flores, Gustavo E; Link, Mark S; Ornato, Joseph P; Perman, Sarah M; Sasson, Comilla; Zelop, Carolyn M
This 2020 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations for advanced life support includes updates on multiple advanced life support topics addressed with 3 different types of reviews. Topics were prioritized on the basis of both recent interest within the resuscitation community and the amount of new evidence available since any previous review. Systematic reviews addressed higher-priority topics, and included double-sequential defibrillation, intravenous versus intraosseous route for drug administration during cardiac arrest, point-of-care echocardiography for intra-arrest prognostication, cardiac arrest caused by pulmonary embolism, postresuscitation oxygenation and ventilation, prophylactic antibiotics after resuscitation, postresuscitation seizure prophylaxis and treatment, and neuroprognostication. New or updated treatment recommendations on these topics are presented. Scoping reviews were conducted for anticipatory charging and monitoring of physiological parameters during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Topics for which systematic reviews and new Consensuses on Science With Treatment Recommendations were completed since 2015 are also summarized here. All remaining topics reviewed were addressed with evidence updates to identify any new evidence and to help determine which topics should be the highest priority for systematic reviews in the next 1 to 2 years.
PMID: 33098922
ISSN: 1873-1570
CID: 4663522
COVID-19 in pregnancy: possible mechanisms not to be discounted
Zelop, Carolyn M; Bonney, Elizabeth A
SARS-CoV-2 has infected more than 16 million people worldwide. Related complications and death from COVID-19 disease and their underlying pathophysiology are intensely investigated. Pregnant women are among the affected. Although the severity of disease in pregnancy does not appear to be increased, the effects of infection on pregnancy should not escape careful examination. The currently known receptor for the virus, ACE2, regulates the renin-angiotensin system and is increased during pregnancy. Virus-receptor interactions may have significant effects on placental function, fetal development, and maternal immunity. The manifestation of cardiovascular complications of infection produces the hypothesis that a significant effect of the virus may be its influence on the maternal vascular system. Interference with the vascular adaptations to pregnancy and the post-partum may have implications for concurrent and future pregnancies as well as for long-term cardiovascular health. We should not miss the opportunity to learn from this virus about the physiology of pregnancy.
PMID: 32811230
ISSN: 1476-4954
CID: 4566842
Interim Guidance for Basic and Advanced Life Support in Adults, Children, and Neonates With Suspected or Confirmed COVID-19: From the Emergency Cardiovascular Care Committee and Get With the Guidelines®-Resuscitation Adult and Pediatric Task Forces of the American Heart Association in Collaboration with the American Academy of Pediatrics, American Association for Respiratory Care, American College of Emergency Physicians, The Society of Critical Care Anesthesiologists, and American Society of Anesthesiologists: Supporting Organizations: American Association of Critical Care Nurses and National EMS Physicians
Edelson, Dana P; Sasson, Comilla; Chan, Paul S; Atkins, Dianne L; Aziz, Khalid; Becker, Lance B; Berg, Robert A; Bradley, Steven M; Brooks, Steven C; Cheng, Adam; Escobedo, Marilyn; Flores, Gustavo E; Girotra, Saket; Hsu, Antony; Kamath-Rayne, Beena D; Lee, Henry C; Lehotzky, Rebecca E; Mancini, Mary E; Merchant, Raina M; Nadkarni, Vinay M; Panchal, Ashish R; Peberdy, Mary Ann R; Raymond, Tia T; Walsh, Brian; Wang, David S; Zelop, Carolyn M; Topjian, Alexis
N/A.
PMID: 32270695
ISSN: 1524-4539
CID: 4377572
Interim Guidance for Basic and Advanced Life Support in Children and Neonates With Suspected or Confirmed COVID-19
Topjian, Alexis; Aziz, Khalid; Kamath-Rayne, Beena D; Atkins, Dianne L; Becker, Lance; Berg, Robert A; Bradley, Steven M; Bhanji, Farhan; Brooks, Steven; Chan, Melissa; Chan, Paul; Cheng, Adam; de Caen, Allan; Duff, Jonathan P; Escobedo, Marilyn; Flores, Gustavo E; Fuchs, Susan; Girotra, Saket; Hsu, Antony; Joyner, Benny L; Kleinman, Monica; Lasa, Javier J; Lee, Henry C; Lehotzky, Rebecca E; Levy, Arielle; Mancini, Mary E; McBride, Mary E; Meckler, Garth; Merchant, Raina M; Morgan, Ryan W; Nadkarni, Vinay; Panchal, Ashish R; Peberdy, Mary Ann; Raymond, Tia; Roberts, Kathryn; Sasson, Comilla; Schexnayder, Stephen M; Sutton, Robert M; Terry, Mark; Walsh, Brian; Wang, David S; Zelop, Carolyn M; Edelson, Dana P
PMID: 32366608
ISSN: 1098-4275
CID: 4429942
ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Clinically Suspected Adnexal Mass, No Acute Symptoms
Atri, Mostafa; Alabousi, Abdullah; Reinhold, Caroline; Akin, Esma A; Benson, Carol B; Bhosale, Priyadarshani R; Kang, Stella K; Lakhman, Yulia; Nicola, Refky; Pandharipande, Pari V; Patel, Maitray D; Salazar, Gloria M; Shipp, Thomas D; Simpson, Lynn; Sussman, Betsy L; Uyeda, Jennifer W; Wall, Darci J; Whitcomb, Bradford P; Zelop, Carolyn M; Glanc, Phyllis
There are approximately 9.1 pelvic surgeries performed for every histologically confirmed adnexal malignancy in the United States, compared to 2.3 surgeries per malignancy (in oncology centers) and 5.9 surgeries per malignancy (in other centers) in Europe. An important prognostic factor in the long-term survival in patients with ovarian malignancy is the initial management by a gynecological oncologist. With high accuracy of imaging for adnexal mass characterization and consequent appropriate triage to subspecialty referral, the better use of gynecologic oncology can improve treatment outcomes. Ultrasound, including transabdominal, transvaginal, and duplex ultrasound, combined with MRI with contrast can diagnose adnexal masses as benign with specific features (ie, functional masses, dermoid, endometrioma, fibroma, pedunculated fibroid, hydrosalpinx, peritoneal inclusion cyst, Tarlov cyst), malignant, or indeterminate. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.
PMID: 31054761
ISSN: 1558-349x
CID: 3918702