Faculty Bibliography

In this pioneering study, inspired by AutoGPT, the state-of-the-art open-source application based on the GPT-4 large language model, we develop a novel tool called AD-AutoGPT, which can conduct data collection, processing, and analysis about complex health narratives of Alzheimer's Disease in an autonomous manner via users' textual prompts. We collated comprehensive data from a variety of news sources, including the Alzheimer's Association, BBC, Mayo Clinic, and the National Institute on Aging since June 2022, leading to the autonomous execution of robust trend analyses, intertopic distance map visualization, and identification of salient terms pertinent to Alzheimer's Disease. This approach has yielded not only a quantifiable metric of relevant discourse but also valuable insights into public focus on Alzheimer's Disease. This application of AD-AutoGPT in public health signifies the transformative potential of AI in facilitating a data-rich understanding of complex health narratives like Alzheimer's Disease in an autonomous manner, setting the groundwork for future AI-driven investigations in global health landscapes. Code, a demo video, and other information are available at https://github.com/levyisthebest/AD-AutoGPT.

Background and ObjectivesWhile hearing loss is a known risk factor for dementia, the impact of incident hearing loss on subsequent dementia risk remains underexplored. This study examined the association between newly reported hearing loss and dementia risk in U.S. adults, focusing on critical intervention periods for dementia prevention.Research Design and MethodsParticipants from the Health and Retirement Study who reported no hearing loss or hearing aid use in 2010 or 2012 were included. Incident hearing loss and dementia were assessed via self-report and proxy report. Pooled logistic regression models with inverse probability weighting estimated the cumulative incidence of dementia at 2, 4, 6, and 8 years after baseline. Risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals were calculated from 200 bootstrap samples. Subgroup analyses were conducted by age, sex, and cardiovascular disease (CVD) status.ResultsAmong 13,599 participants, 1125 (8.3%) reported incident hearing loss. Dementia incidence was higher among those with hearing loss (6.6%) compared to those without (4.9%). Starting at 4 years, incident hearing loss was associated with a higher dementia risk, persisting at 8 years (RR = 1.34; 95% CI: 1.05, 1.59). This association was significant among individuals aged 50-64 years and those with CVD.Discussion and ImplicationsIncident hearing loss is associated with a heightened dementia risk, particularly in midlife and among individuals with CVD. Future research should investigate the effectiveness of timely interventions aimed at preventing dementia in individuals with hearing loss.

OBJECTIVE:To examine the associations between patient out-of-pocket (OOP) costs and nonadherence to glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1a), and the consequent impact on adverse outcomes, including hospitalizations and emergency department (ED) visits. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS/METHODS:This retrospective cohort study used MarketScan Commercial data (2016-2021). The cohort included nonpregnant adults aged 18-64 years with type 2 diabetes who initiated GLP-1a therapy. Participants were continuously enrolled in the same private insurance plan for 6 months before the prescription date and 1 year thereafter. Exposures included average first 30-day OOP costs for GLP-1a, categorized into quartiles (lowest [Q1] to highest [Q4]). Primary outcomes were the annual proportion of days covered (PDC) for GLP-1a and nonadherence, defined as PDC <0.8. Secondary outcomes included diabetes-related and all-cause hospitalizations and ED visits 1 year post-GLP-1a initiation. RESULTS:Among 61,907 adults who initiated GLP-1a, higher 30-day OOP costs were associated with decreased adherence. Patients in the highest OOP cost quartile (Q4: $80-$3,375) had significantly higher odds of nonadherence (odds ratio [OR]1.25; 95% CI 1.19-1.31) compared with those in Q1 ($0-$21). Nonadherence was linked to increased incidence rates of diabetes-related hospitalizations or ED visits (incidence rate ratio [IRR] 1.86; 95% CI 1.43-2.42), cumulative length of hospitalization (IRR 1.56; 95% CI 1.41-1.72), all-cause ED visits (IRR 1.38; 95% CI 1.32-1.45), and increased ED-related costs ($69.81, 95% CI $53.54-$86.08). CONCLUSIONS:Higher OOP costs for GLP-1a were associated with reduced adherence and increased rates of adverse outcomes among type 2 diabetes patients.

OBJECTIVE:To compare hospitalization rates between African American (AA) and European American (EA) deceased-donor (DD) kidney transplant (KT) recipients during over a10-year period. METHOD/METHODS:Data from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients and social determinants of health (SDoH), measured by the Social Deprivation Index, were used. Hospitalization rates were estimated for kidney recipients from AA and EA DDs who had one kidney transplanted into an AA and one into an EA, leading to four donor/recipient pairs (DRPs): AA/AA, AA/EA, EA/AA, and EA/EA. Poisson-Gamma models were fitted to assess post-transplant hospitalizations. RESULT/RESULTS:Unadjusted hospitalization rates (95% confidence interval) were higher among all DRP involving AA, 131.1 (122.5, 140.3), 134.8 (126.3, 143.8), and 102.4 (98.9, 106.0) for AA/AA, AA/EA, and EA/AA, respectively, compared to 97.1 (93.7, 100.6) per 1000 post-transplant person-years for EA/EA pairs. Multivariable analysis showed u-shaped relationships across SDoH levels within each DRP, but findings varied depending on recipients' race, i.e., AA recipients in areas with the worst SDoH had higher hospitalization rates. However, EA recipients in areas with the best SDoH had higher hospitalization rates than their counterparts. CONCLUSIONS:Relationship between healthcare utilization and SDoH depends on DRP, with higher hospitalization rates among AA recipients living in areas with the worst SDoH and among EA recipients in areas with the best SDoH profiles. SDoH plays an important role in driving disparities in hospitalizations after kidney transplantation.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:Hearing aids may reduce the risk of dementia among individuals with hearing loss. However, no evidence is available from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the effectiveness of hearing aids use in reducing incident dementia. Using target trial emulation, we leveraged an existing longitudinal cohort study to estimate the association between hearing aids initiation and risk of dementia. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS/METHODS:The Health and Retirement Study was used to emulate target trials among non-institutionalized participants aged ≥50 years with self-reported hearing loss, without dementia at baseline, and without use of hearing aids in the previous 2 years. Intention-to-treat analysis was conducted to estimate the risk of dementia associated with hearing aids initiation vs controls who did not initiate hearing aids. Pooled logistic regression models with inverse-probability of treatment and censoring weights were applied to estimate risk ratios, and 95% confidence intervals were calculated using 1000 sets of bootstrapping. RESULTS:Among 2314 participants (328 in the intervention group and 1986 in the control group; average age: 72.3 ± 9.7 years, 49% women, and 81% White), after 8 years of follow-up, risk of dementia was significantly lower among individuals who initiated hearing aids (risk difference (RD): -0.05, 95% confidence interval (CI): -0.08, -0.01). A lower risk was observed particularly among adults aged 50-74 years, men, and individuals with cardiovascular disease. DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS/CONCLUSIONS:Hearing aids use was associated with a significant reduction of incident dementia. Future interventional studies are needed to further assess the effectiveness of hearing aids in preventing dementia.

BACKGROUND:Studies have examined the association between dual sensory impairment and late-life cognitive outcomes in the U.S with inconsistent findings. OBJECTIVE:To examine the associations between sensory impairment and 10-year risk of dementia or Alzheimer's disease among U.S. adults aged ≥ 50. METHODS:A prospective cohort study based on the Health and Retirement Study from 2010 to 2020. Individuals aged ≥ 50 years without self-reported dementia and Alzheimer's disease in 2010 were included in the analysis. Self-reported visual and hearing impairments were measures in 2010. Main failure events included self-reported incident dementia and Alzheimer's disease over a 10-year follow-up period. Participants were categorized as having no visual or hearing impairment, visual impairment only, hearing impairment only, and dual sensory impairment. Fine-Gray competing risk regression model was applied to estimate the associations of sensory impairment with incident dementia and Alzheimer's disease, adjusted for demographic characteristics, health behaviors, and health conditions at baseline. RESULTS:Of 20,248 identified individuals, 14.6% had visual impairment only, 11.2% had hearing impairment only, and 9.1% had dual impairment at baseline. After adjusting for all covariates, dual sensory impairment was associated with higher risk of dementia (HR = 1.46, 95% CI: 1.23-1.73) and Alzheimer's disease (HR = 1.35, 95% CI: 1.03-1.76). Visual impairment only was also associated with incident dementia and Alzheimer's disease among individuals <65 years. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Older adults in the U.S. with visual and hearing impairments simultaneously had a particularly greater risk of dementia and Alzheimer's disease, indicating the needs of targeted screening for timely treatment and further prevention of dementia and Alzheimer's disease.

BACKGROUND:Food insecurity related to immigration status remains largely underexplored. This study examined trends and disparities in household food insecurity by immigration status in the United States (US). METHODS:We analyzed data from 427,942 households from the US Current Population Survey Food Security Supplement from 2011 to 2021. Immigration status categories included recent immigrants (< 5 years), long-term immigrants (≥ 5 years), naturalized citizens, and US-born citizens. Food insecurity was assessed using validated questions on consistent access to enough food for an active and healthy life. RESULTS:From 2011 to 2021, food insecurity prevalence declined from 14.9 % (95 % CI, 14.5 %-15.3 %) to 10.2 % (95 % CI, 9.8 %-10.6 %). Among recent immigrants, prevalence decreased from 25.2 % (95 % CI, 23.1-27.4) in 2011 to 15.0 % (95 % CI, 12.8 %-17.2 %) in 2019, then increased to 17.7 % (95 % CI, 14.7 %-20.2 %) in 2020 and 17.4 % (95 % CI, 14.7 %-20.2 %) in 2021. Long-term immigrants' prevalence dropped from 20.4 % (95 % CI, 16.9 %-24.0 %) in 2011 to 10.2 % (95 % CI, 7.2 %-13.1 %) in 2018, then increased to 17.7 % (95 % CI, 13.7 %-21.7 %) in 2021. Naturalized citizens' prevalence decreased from 14.4 % (95 % CI, 12.9 %-15.9 %) to 9.5 % (95 % CI, 8.2 %-10.9 %). US-born citizens' prevalence decreased from 14.2 % (95 % CI, 13.8 %-14.6 %) to 9.7 % (95 % CI, 9.3 %-10.2 %). Compared to the US-born citizens, the adjusted prevalence ratio was 1.63 (95 % CI,1.57-1.69) for recent immigrants, 1.22 (95 % CI, 1.13-1.31) for long-term immigrants, and 0.94 (95 % CI, 0.90-0.98) for naturalized citizens. Significant disparities exist in subgroups. CONCLUSIONS:The findings provide insights for stakeholders to address food insecurity among vulnerable immigrant groups in the US.