Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND: Geriatric conditions, such as incontinence and falling, are not part of the traditional disease model of medicine and may be overlooked in the care of older adults. The prevalence of geriatric conditions and their effect on health and disability in older adults has not been investigated in population-based samples. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the prevalence of geriatric conditions and their association with dependency in activities of daily living by using nationally representative data. DESIGN: Cross-sectional analysis. SETTING: Health and Retirement Study survey administered in 2000. PARTICIPANTS: Adults age 65 years or older (n = 11 093, representing 34.5 million older Americans) living in the community and in nursing homes. MEASUREMENTS: Geriatric conditions (cognitive impairment, falls, incontinence, low body mass index, dizziness, vision impairment, hearing impairment) and dependency in activities of daily living (bathing, dressing, eating, transferring, toileting). RESULTS: Of adults age 65 years or older, 49.9% had 1 or more geriatric conditions. Some conditions were as prevalent as common chronic diseases, such as heart disease and diabetes. The association between geriatric conditions and dependency in activities of daily living was strong and significant, even after adjustment for demographic characteristics and chronic diseases (adjusted risk ratio, 2.1 [95% CI, 1.9 to 2.4] for 1 geriatric condition, 3.6 [CI, 3.1 to 4.1] for 2 conditions, and 6.6 [CI, 5.6 to 7.6] for > or =3 conditions). LIMITATIONS: The study was cross-sectional and based on self-reported data. Because measures were limited by the survey questions, important conditions, such as delirium and frailty, were not assessed. Survival biases may influence the estimates. CONCLUSIONS: Geriatric conditions are similar in prevalence to chronic diseases in older adults and in some cases are as strongly associated with disability. The findings suggest that geriatric conditions, although not a target of current models of health care, are important to the health and function of older adults and should be addressed in their care.

BACKGROUND: The metabolic syndrome (MetS) is highly prevalent in the growing U.S. Latino population. We hypothesize that MetS, with or without diabetes, is associated with progressive disability in older Mexican Americans. METHODS: Data from Mexican Americans 60-98 years old participating in the Sacramento Area Latino Study on Aging (SALSA) were analyzed from baseline through 3 years (3 years of follow-up). Disability was assessed by self-reported limitations in activities of daily living (ADLs), instrumental ADLs (IADLs), and mobility/strength tasks. MetS (46% of sample) was defined by National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Adult Treatment Panel III criteria. Diabetes (DM, 33%) was defined by fasting blood sugar>125 mg/dL, physician diagnosis, and/or medication use. Four metabolic groups were defined: MetS with diabetes (MetS+DM+, n=402); MetS without diabetes (MetS+DM-, n=330); diabetes without MetS (MetS-DM+, n=125); and neither (MetS-DM-, n=749). Generalized estimating equation (GEE) regression models were used to evaluate the effect of metabolic group on physical limitations and disability changes over time. RESULTS: Diabetes, with or without MetS, was associated with a higher percent rate of increase over 3 years in ADL and IADL disability than was no diabetes, even after controlling for demographics, body mass index (BMI), and incident disease. The mean ADL score had a 35% higher rate of increase (higher = more impairment) for the MetS+DM+ group and 68% higher for the MetS-DM+ group. Results for IADL were similar. The baseline MetS, without or with diabetes, was associated with a significantly higher rate of increase in mobility/strength limitations (8% and 36.5%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In older Mexican Americans, MetS is associated with progressive limitations in mobility and strength. Preventing progressive mobility/strength limitations may require assessing and treating these impairments in people with MetS regardless of the presence of diabetes. However, preventing the progression of MetS without to MetS with diabetes may be important to limit the progression of ADL and IADL disability found in people with MetS and diabetes.

BACKGROUND: Our research group has previously shown that the geriatric syndrome of frailty is associated with features of the metabolic syndrome (MetS) on cross-sectional analysis. METHODS: To test whether MetS and its physiologic determinants-insulin resistance as measured by homeostasis model assessment score (IR-HOMA), increased inflammation and coagulation factor levels, and elevated blood pressure-are associated with incident frailty, we studied a subcohort of participants from the Cardiovascular Health Study observed from 1989/1990 through 1998/1999: 3141 community-dwelling adults, aged 69 to 74 years, without frailty and illnesses that increase inflammation markers or mimic frailty. The association of baseline MetS, IR-HOMA, levels of inflammation and coagulation factors, and systolic blood pressure (SBP) with time to onset of frailty was adjusted for demographic and psychosocial factors and incident events. Our main outcome measure was incident frailty. RESULTS: Metabolic syndrome was not significantly associated with incident frailty (hazard ratio, 1.16 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.85-1.57). On the other hand, IR-HOMA and C-reactive protein levels were associated with incident frailty: for every standard deviation increment the hazard ratio for frailty was 1.15 (95% CI, 1.02-1.31) and 1.16 (95% CI, 1.02-1.32), respectively. The white blood cell count and factor VIIIc levels had a borderline association. Elevated systolic blood pressure had no association. Similar trends were found for incident prefrailty, a condition that precedes frailty. CONCLUSIONS: Two physiologic components of MetS- IR-HOMA and inflammation-are associated with incident frailty. Based on these results, IR-HOMA can be considered part of a larger process that leads to generalized decline.

OBJECTIVE: to determine whether low serum carotenoid levels, an indicator of low intake of fruits and vegetables, are associated with the progression of disability in older women. DESIGN: longitudinal analysis in a population-based cohort. SETTING: moderately-severely disabled women, >or=65 years, living in the community in Baltimore, Maryland (the Women's Health and Aging Study I). PARTICIPANTS: 554 women without severe walking disability (inability to walk or walking speed <0.4 m/s) at baseline. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: incidence of severe walking disability assessed every 6 months over 3 years. RESULTS: 155 women (27.9%) developed severe walking disability during follow-up. Rates of development of severe walking disability per 100 person-years among women in the lowest and in the three upper quartiles of total carotenoids were, respectively, 13.8 versus 10.9 (P=0.0017). Adjusting for confounders, women in the lowest quartile of total carotenoids were more likely to develop severe walking disability (hazards ratio 1.57, 95% confidence interval 1.24-2.00, P=0.0002) compared with women in the three upper quartiles. CONCLUSION: low serum carotenoid levels, an indicator of low intake of fruits and vegetables, are independent predictors of the progression towards severe walking disability among older women living in the community.

BACKGROUND: The role of nutritional status in the disablement process is still unclear. The objective of this study was to assess whether low concentrations of nutrients predict the development and course of disability. METHODS: Longitudinal study including community-dwelling women 65 years or older enrolled in the Women's Health and Aging Study I. In total, 643 women were assessed prospectively at 6-month intervals from 1992 to 1995. RESULTS: Incidence rates of disability in activities of daily living (ADLs) during 3 years of follow-up. Incidence rates in the lowest quartile of each selected nutrient were compared with those in the upper quartiles. The hazard ratios were estimated from Cox models adjusted for potential confounders. Women in the lowest quartile of serum concentrations of vitamin B(6) (hazard ratio [HR], 1.31; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.03-1.67), vitamin B(12) (HR, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.12-1.74), and selenium (HR, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.12-1.71) had significantly higher risk of disability in ADLs during 3 years of follow-up compared with women in the upper 3 quartiles. CONCLUSIONS: Low serum concentrations of vitamins B(6) and B(12) and selenium predict subsequent disability in ADLs in older women living in the community. Nutritional status is one of the key factors to be considered in the development of strategies aimed at preventing or delaying the disablement process.

OBJECTIVE: We investigated the relationship of micronutrient deficiencies with the frailty syndrome in older women living in the community. METHODS: Frailty status and serum micronutrients were assessed in a cross-sectional study of 754 women, 70-80 years old, from the Women's Health and Aging Studies I and II. RESULTS: Among nonfrail, prefrail, and frail women, respectively, geometric mean serum concentrations were 1.842, 1.593, and 1.376 micromol/L for total carotenoids (p <.001); 2.66, 2.51, and 2.43 micromol/L for retinol (p =.04); 50.9, 47.4, and 43.8 nmol/L for 25-hydroxyvitamin D (p =.019); 43.0, 35.8, and 30.9 nmol/L for vitamin B(6) (p =.002); and 10.2, 9.3, and 8.7 ng/mL for folate (p =.03). Frail women were more likely to have at least two or more micronutrient deficiencies (p =.05). The age-adjusted odds ratios of being frail were significantly higher for those participants whose micronutrient concentrations were in the lowest quartile compared to the top three quartiles for total carotenoids, alpha-tocopherol, 25-hydroxyvitamin D, and vitamin B(6). The association between nutrients and frailty was strongest for beta-carotene, lutein/zeaxanthin, and total carotenoids (odds ratio ranging from 1.82 to 2.45, p =.05), after adjusting for age, sociodemographic status, smoking status, and body mass index. CONCLUSION: Frail women are more likely to have relatively low serum carotenoid and micronutrient concentrations and are more likely to have multiple micronutrient deficiencies. Future longitudinal studies are needed to examine the relationships between micronutrient concentrations and frailty in older women.

BACKGROUND: Micronutrient deficiencies are common among older adults. We hypothesized that low serum micronutrient concentrations were predictive of frailty among older disabled women living in the community. METHODS: We studied 766 women, aged 65 and older, from the Women's Health and Aging Study I, a population-based study of moderately to severely disabled community-dwelling women in Baltimore, Maryland. Serum vitamins A, D, E, B(6), and B(12), carotenoids, folate, zinc, and selenium were measured at baseline. Frailty status was determined at baseline and during annual visits for 3 years of follow-up. RESULTS: At baseline, 250 women were frail and 516 women were not frail. Of 463 nonfrail women who had at least one follow-up visit, 205 (31.9%) became frail, with an overall incidence rate of 19.1 per 100 person-years. Compared with women in the upper three quartiles, women in the lowest quartile of serum carotenoids (hazard ratio [HR] 1.39; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01-1.92), alpha-tocopherol (HR 1.39; 95% CI, 1.02-1.92), and 25-hydroxyvitamin D (HR 1.34; 95% CI, 0.94-1.90) had an increased risk of becoming frail. The number of nutritional deficiencies (HR 1.10; 95% CI, 1.01-1.20) was associated with an increased risk of becoming frail, after adjusting for age, smoking status, and chronic pulmonary disease. Adjusting for potential confounders, we found that women in the lowest quartile of serum carotenoids had a higher risk of becoming frail (HR 1.54; 95% CI, 1.11-2.13). CONCLUSIONS: Low serum micronutrient concentrations are an independent risk factor for frailty among disabled older women, and the risk of frailty increases with the number of micronutrient deficiencies.

BACKGROUND:The relationships between denture use, malnutrition, frailty, and mortality in older women have not been well characterized. OBJECTIVE:To determine whether women who use dentures and have difficulty chewing or swallowing are at higher risk of malnutrition, frailty, and mortality. DESIGN/METHODS:Cross-sectional and longitudinal study of 826 women, aged 70-79, from the Women's Health and Aging Studies, two population-based longitudinal studies of community-dwelling women in Baltimore, Maryland. At enrollment, data on frailty and self-reported denture use and difficulty chewing or swallowing that limited the ability to eat was collected, and plasma vitamins A, D, E, B6, and B12, carotenoids, folate, and albumin were measured. RESULTS:63.5% of women reported using dentures, of whom 11.6% reported difficulty chewing or swallowing food. Denture users with and without difficulty chewing or swallowing and those not using dentures had, respectively, geometric mean (95% Confidence Interval [C.I.]) total plasma carotenoid concentrations of 1.481 (1.302, 1.684), 1.616 (1.535, 1.700), and 1.840 (1.728, 1.958) micromol/L, respectively (P < 0.0001), and 25- hydroxyvitamin D of 50.90 (44.25, 58.55), 47.46 (45.15, 50.40), and 54.0 (50.9, 56.8) nmol/L (P < 0.0001). The proportion using dentures among non-frail, pre-frail, and frail women was 58%, 66%, and 73%, respectively (P = 0.018). Women who used dentures and reported difficulty chewing or swallowing had lower five-year survival (H.R. 1.43, 95% C.I. 1.05-1.97), after adjusting for potential confounders. CONCLUSIONS:Older women living in the community who use dentures and have difficulty chewing or swallowing have a higher risk of malnutrition, frailty, and mortality.

OBJECTIVES: To examine different clinically relevant eligibility criteria sets to determine how they differ in numbers and characteristics of individuals served. DESIGN: Cross-sectional analysis of the 2000 wave of the Health and Retirement Study (HRS), a nationally representative longitudinal health interview survey of adults aged 50 and older. SETTING: Population-based cohort of community-dwelling older adults, subset of an ongoing longitudinal health interview survey. PARTICIPANTS: Adults aged 65 and older who were respondents in the 2000 wave of the HRS (n=10,640, representing approximately 33.6 million Medicare beneficiaries). MEASUREMENTS: Three clinical criteria sets were examined that included different combinations of medical conditions, cognitive impairment, and activity of daily living/instrumental activity of daily living (ADL/IADL) dependency. RESULTS: A small portion of Medicare beneficiaries (1.3-5.8%) would be eligible for care coordination, depending on the criteria set chosen. A criteria set recently proposed by Congress (at least four severe complex medical conditions and one ADL or IADL dependency) would apply to 427,000 adults aged 65 and older in the United States. Criteria emphasizing cognitive impairment would serve an older population. CONCLUSION: Several criteria sets for a Medicare care-coordination benefit are clinically reasonable, but different definitions of eligibility would serve different numbers and population groups of older adults.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine whether older disabled women with diabetes have an increased risk of falls compared to women without diabetes and to identify fall risk factors among this high-risk subgroup of patients. METHODS: Data are from the Women's Health and Aging Study I (n = 1002, age > or = 65 years), a prospective, population-based cohort study of the one third most disabled women in the Baltimore (MD) urban community-dwelling population. Participants were followed semiannually for 3 years. Falls were ascertained at each interview. Diabetes was ascertained by means of a standardized algorithm using multiple sources of information. RESULTS: Baseline prevalence of diabetes was 15.5%. Of the 878 women who participated in at least one follow-up visit and were able to walk at baseline, 64.9% fell at least once during the study and 29.6% experienced two or more falls during a follow-up interval. After adjustment for traditional risk factors, women with diabetes had a higher probability of any fall (odds ratio [OR] 1.38; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.04-1.81) and of falling two or more times during a follow-up interval (OR 1.69; CI, 1.18-2.43), compared with women without diabetes. Among diabetic women, presence of widespread musculoskeletal pain (OR 5.58; CI, 1.89-16.5), insulin therapy (OR 2.02; CI, 1.10-3.71), overweight (OR 3.50; CI, 1.21-10.1), and poor lower-extremity performance (OR 7.76; CI, 1.03-58.8) were independently associated with increased likelihood of recurrent falls, after adjusting for major risk factors. There were synergistic effects of diabetes and lower-extremity pain and also diabetes and body mass index levels on the risk of falling (p for interactions <.05). CONCLUSION: Even among disabled older women diabetes is associated with an increased risk of falling, independent of established fall risk factors. In this specific group of older women, pain, high body mass index, and poor lower-extremity performance are powerful predictors of falling.