Faculty Bibliography

Two regions of human genomic DNA, each containing several keratin genes, were isolated and partially sequenced. The keratin genes are inactive, having suffered deleterious mutations. Both regions contain at least four keratin genes arranged in a head-to-tail orientation including a pseudogene for keratin K#16. Within each segment there are two keratin genes in close linkage with only 1.5 kb of DNA between them. Sequence comparison of the two regions showed 98.9% identity in both the coding and the intronic segments of the pseudogenes. The pseudogenes show 94% identity to their functional counterparts. Southern hybridization analysis showed that the segments are paralogous, not allelic. The regions are products of two independent, recent duplication events. The first occurred approximately 24 million years ago, after the separation of primates from the rhesus/baboon line. The second is specific for the human lineage, having occurred approximately 3.8 million years ago. Analysis of the genomic DNAs of primates showed the presence of only one of the regions in the DNAs of gibbon and gorilla, while rhesus monkey and baboon were missing both copies. We conclude that the human keratin genes are still actively evolving, with new duplications having occurred as recently as after the separation of human and gorilla ancestors

To elucidate the elements required for regulation of keratin expression in epidermis, we have linked a short, 300 base pair segment, corresponding to the promoter region of a human K#14 gene, to the chloramphenicol-acetyl-transferase gene. This construct was introduced into various mammalian cell lines and primary cultures via Ca3(PO4)2 precipitation. The 300 base pair segment from the keratin gene promoter region was active in all epithelial cells studied including transformed, simple epithelial cells such as HeLa and ME-180, cell lines derived from stratified epithelium, such as SCC-12, as well as primary cultures of epithelial cells. The construct was inactive in all non-epithelial cells tested including fibroblasts and melanocytes. The segment does not function as a silencer in nonepithelial cells but it can function as an enhancer in epithelial cells. Using the polymerase chain reaction we have constructed a series of deletions of the promoter and have localized an essential function within a 40 bp sequence. We conclude that we have identified the keratin gene promoter that is sufficient to confer epithelial-specific expression

The earliest gene duplications in the evolution of the intermediate filament proteins created the ancestors of acidic keratins, basic keratins, nonepithelial intermediate filament proteins, and lamins. Biochemistry and function of cytoplasmic intermediate filaments differ greatly from those of lamins. Cytoplasmic intermediate filament proteins have a different cellular location than lamins, form different types of supramolecular structures, and are missing a protein segment found in lamins; but the data presented here indicate that the cytoplasmic intermediate filaments do not have a common ancestor separate from the ancestor of lamins. In the non-epithelial intermediate filament branch, the ancestor of neurofilament proteins and the common ancestor of desmin, vimentin, and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) diverged first. By evolutionary criteria, the intermediate filament protein recently discovered in neuronal cells does not belong to the neurofilament family but is more closely related to desmin, vimentin, and GFAP. Sequences of different sub-domains yield different evolutionary trees, possibly indicating existence of sub-domain-specific functions

Analysis of the cytoskeletal components of early murine embryos has detected expression of two keratin proteins, K#8 and K#18, at the 4-8-cell stage. Comparable data for human embryos do not exist, although several processed pseudogenes corresponding to K#8 and K#18 have been discovered in the human genome. Because only genes that are expressed in pre-germ-line and germ-line cells can give rise to processed pseudogenes, the existence of human K#8 and K#18 processed pseudogenes is prima facie evidence for expression of keratins K#8 and K#18 in the early human embryo. We have cloned and determined the complete sequence of a processed pseudogene corresponding to another acidic human keratin. Comparison of its sequence with known sequences of other mammalian keratins indicates that the pseudogene arose from a reverse transcript of a correctly initiated and terminated functional human K#19 gene. This implies expression of K#19 keratin in addition to K#8 and K#18 in the early human embryo. We have proposed previously that K#19 evolved specifically to redress unbalanced production of various basic keratins, and our current evidence, that it is expressed at an early stage of development, implies that K#19 may fulfill this same role during human embryogenesis

Keratins are cytoskeletal proteins encoded by a multigene family. We have identified the first human keratin pseudogene and determined its complete nucleotide sequence. Sequence comparisons indicate that the pseudogene arose from a very recent duplication of the 50-kd keratin (K14) gene. The coding and the intron sequences of the two genes are 95% and 93% identical, respectively. Although the sequence of the regulatory region in the pseudogene is virtually identical to that in the 50-kd functional gene, several deleterious mutations have been identified in the pseudogene. There are three frameshifts in the coding regions, one of which is a perfect 8-bp duplication. A single-base-pair deletion in the first exon and a single-base-pair insertion in the penultimate exon also result in frameshifts. The three remaining deleterious mutations interfere with the mRNA processing signals: two alter the intron/exon boundaries, and the third disrupts the polyadenylation signal. These mutations clearly identify the sequence as a human keratin pseudogene

Evolutionary trees were derived from the keratin protein sequences using the Phylogeny Analysis Using Parsimony (PAUP) set of programs. Three major unexpected conclusions were derived from the analysis: The smallest keratin protein subunit, K#19 (Moll et al. 1982), is not the most primitive one, but has evolved to fulfill a highly specialized function, presumably to redress the unbalanced synthesis of keratin subunits. Second, the ancestors of keratins expressed in the early embryonic stages, K#8 and K#18, were the first to diverge from the ancestors of all the other keratins. The branches leading to these two keratins are relatively short, indicating a comparatively strong selection against changes in the sequences of these two proteins. Third, the two keratin families show extraordinary parallelism in their patterns of gene duplications. In both families the genes expressed in embryos diverged first, later bursts of gene duplications created the subfamilies expressed in various differentiated cells, and relatively recent gene duplications gave rise to the hair keratin genes and separated the basal cell-specific keratin from those expressed under hyperproliferative conditions. The parallelism of gene duplications in the two keratin gene families implies a mechanism in which duplications in one family influence duplication events in the other family

Intermediate filaments are composed of a family of proteins that evolved from a common ancestor. The proteins consist of three domains: a central, alpha-helical domain similar in all intermediate filaments, bracketed by two domains that are variable in length and structure. Within the intermediate-filament family, several subfamilies have been recognized by immunologic and nucleic acid hybridization techniques. In this paper we present the sequence of the genomic DNA coding for a 65-kilodalton human keratin and compare it with the sequences of other intermediate-filament proteins. While the central, alpha-helical domains of these proteins show homologies that indicate a common ancestor, the sequences of the variable terminal domains indicate that the variable domains evolved through a series of tandem duplications and possibly by gene-conversion mechanisms