Faculty Bibliography

A deceased donor (DD) allocation system incorporating net life survival benefit has been proposed. In this system, many kidneys will be shifted to younger recipients, thereby decreasing their waiting times. The goal of this study was to determine the potential effects of altering waiting times on the likelihood of live donor kidney transplantation (LDKT). We analyzed 93,727 waiting list candidates to determine the association of various patient factors with likelihood of LDKT. The proportion of patients receiving LDKT was compared by the median DD waiting time at that patient's transplant center for someone of that patient's age category and race. LDKT was consistently higher as waiting times became longer. After adjusting for all other factors associated with likelihood of LDKT, waiting time remained a significant, independent predictor. Patients with the longest DD waiting times had 2.3-fold higher odds of LDKT (95% CI 2.11-2.58, p < 0.001). In planning the new DD allocation policy, we must account for resulting alterations in LDKT. It is possible that shifting DD kidneys to younger recipients may decrease LDKT or shift it to older recipients, net effects not consistent with the goal of net life survival benefit.

In kidney paired donation (KPD), incompatible pairs exchange kidneys so that each recipient receives a compatible organ. This modality is underutilized partly because of the difficulty of finding a suitable match among incompatible pairs. Alternatively, recipients with compatible donors might enter KPD arrangements in order to be matched with a donor predicted to give greater allograft durability or for other altruistic reasons. Using simulated donors and recipients, we investigated the impact of allowing recipients and their compatible donors to participate in KPD. For KPD programs of any size, the participation of compatible donor/recipient pairs nearly doubled the match rate for incompatible pairs (28.2% to 64.5% for single-center program, 37.4% to 75.4% for national program). Legal, logistical, and governmental controversies have hampered the expansion of KPD in the United States by delaying the creation of a national program. The inclusion of compatible pairs into small single-center pools could achieve match rates that would surpass that which could be realized by a national list made up of only incompatible pairs. This new paradigm of KPD can immediately be instituted at the single-center level, while the greatest gains will be achieved by incorporating compatible pairs into a national program.

One of the greatest obstacles to the implementation of regional or national kidney paired donation programs (KPD) is the need for the donor to travel to their matched recipient's hospital. While transport of the kidney is an attractive alternative, there is concern that prolonged cold ischemia time (CIT) would diminish the benefits of live donor transplantation (LDTx). To examine the impact of increased CIT in LDTx, 1-year serum creatinine (SCr), delayed graft function (DGF), acute rejection (AR) and allograft survival (AS) were analyzed in 38 467 patients by 2 h CIT groups (0-2, 2-4, 4-6 and 6-8 h) using data from the United Network for Organ Sharing/Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (UNOS/OPTN). Adjusted probabilities of DGF and AR were estimated in multivariate logistic regression models and AS was examined in multivariate Cox proportional hazards models. Although some increase in DGF was observed between the 0-2 h (4.7%) and 4-6 h (8.3%) groups, prolonged CIT did not result in inferior SCr, increased AR or compromised AS in any group with >2 h CIT compared with the 0-2 h group. Comparable long-term outcomes for these grafts suggests that transport of live donor organs may be a feasible alternative to donor travel in KPD regions where CIT can be limited to 8 h.

Purpose of review. The aim of this article is to review all publications regarding kidney paired donation published over the past 2 years and in doing so provide an evaluation of the current state of development of the field. Recent findings. A few large multicenter paired donation consortia have been developed, and using computer-based matching algorithms have entered significant numbers of donor-recipient pairs (although no program to date has conducted computer match runs with over 75donor-recipient pairs). In addition, significant progress has been made in developing innovative matching strategies and in modeling potential results of paired donation programs. Despite these advances, these programs have only scratched the surface of the estimated potential of paired donation programs to increase living kidney donation. The greatest effects on increasing volume can be made by increasing donor/recipient identification and enrolment. Summary. Significant advances have been made in clinical experience and technological development of paired donation programs. Technical advances have occurred, however, at a more rapid pace than clinical advances in paired donation. Significant work with respect to ethical and educational foundations needs to be accomplished to close this gap.

A national kidney paired donation (KPD) program will substantially increase transplant opportunities for recipients with blood type incompatible or cross-match positive donors. It seems likely that donor-recipient pairs with certain blood types, races or restrictions will wait longer than others for a match, although no data exist to confirm this assumption. We simulated patients and characterized the predicted waiting times for different blood type sub-groups, as well as the effects of patient-imposed restrictions on waiting time. We also compared waiting times of different racial sub-groups. Almost all patients with panel-reactive antibody (PRA) less than 80% match within a few months in a national KPD program, with the longest waiting time seen by O recipients with AB donors. Highly sensitized patients wait considerably longer, especially those unwilling to travel or accept older donors, and those with AB or B donors may not match in a timely manner. Although patients are better served by matching in a combined pool than within their own race, racial inequalities exist and bonus points can offset some of these differences. These data provide the first waiting time predictions that can aid patients with incompatible donors in choosing between KPD and desensitization, and can also facilitate planning for a national KPD program.