Faculty Bibliography

A national kidney paired donation (KPD) program will substantially increase transplant opportunities for recipients with blood type incompatible or cross-match positive donors. It seems likely that donor-recipient pairs with certain blood types, races or restrictions will wait longer than others for a match, although no data exist to confirm this assumption. We simulated patients and characterized the predicted waiting times for different blood type sub-groups, as well as the effects of patient-imposed restrictions on waiting time. We also compared waiting times of different racial sub-groups. Almost all patients with panel-reactive antibody (PRA) less than 80% match within a few months in a national KPD program, with the longest waiting time seen by O recipients with AB donors. Highly sensitized patients wait considerably longer, especially those unwilling to travel or accept older donors, and those with AB or B donors may not match in a timely manner. Although patients are better served by matching in a combined pool than within their own race, racial inequalities exist and bonus points can offset some of these differences. These data provide the first waiting time predictions that can aid patients with incompatible donors in choosing between KPD and desensitization, and can also facilitate planning for a national KPD program.

Options for utilizing live donor kidneys from those who are blood type incompatible or crossmatch positive with their intended recipients include kidney paired donation (KPD), list paired donation (LPD) and desensitization. KPD provides live donor kidneys for both recipients but requires a match to another incompatible pair, while LPD utilizes the deceased donor pool but is restricted by ethical and logistic concerns. We simulated patients and their potential donors to determine which recipients could receive a kidney through KPD and LPD. With smaller populations (100 pairs or fewer), more kidneys were matched through LPD, although the greatest benefit was derived from a combination of LPD and KPD. With increasing population sizes, more patients were matched through KPD, including almost all patients who would have been eligible for LPD. At population sizes predicted to be achieved by a national paired donation system, the role of LPD became minimal, with only 3.9% of pairs unmatched through KPD eligible for LPD. Considerable overlap was seen between the pairs unmatchable by KPD and those ineligible for LPD, namely less-demanded donors and hard-to-match recipients. For this population, the best option may be desensitization.

CONTEXT: Blood type and crossmatch incompatibility will exclude at least one third of patients in need from receiving a live donor kidney transplant. Kidney paired donation (KPD) offers incompatible donor/recipient pairs the opportunity to match for compatible transplants. Despite its increasing popularity, very few transplants have resulted from KPD. OBJECTIVE: To determine the potential impact of improved matching schemes on the number and quality of transplants achievable with KPD. DESIGN, SETTING, AND POPULATION: We developed a model that simulates pools of incompatible donor/recipient pairs. We designed a mathematically verifiable optimized matching algorithm and compared it with the scheme currently used in some centers and regions. Simulated patients from the general community with characteristics drawn from distributions describing end-stage renal disease patients eligible for renal transplantation and their willing and eligible live donors. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Number of kidneys matched, HLA mismatch of matched kidneys, and number of grafts surviving 5 years after transplantation. RESULTS: A national optimized matching algorithm would result in more transplants (47.7% vs 42.0%, P<.001), better HLA concordance (3.0 vs 4.5 mismatched antigens; P<.001), more grafts surviving at 5 years (34.9% vs 28.7%; P<.001), and a reduction in the number of pairs required to travel (2.9% vs 18.4%; P<.001) when compared with an extension of the currently used first-accept scheme to a national level. Furthermore, highly sensitized patients would benefit 6-fold from a national optimized scheme (2.3% vs 14.1% successfully matched; P<.001). Even if only 7% of patients awaiting kidney transplantation participated in an optimized national KPD program, the health care system could save as much as $750 million. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of a national KPD program and a mathematically optimized matching algorithm yields more matches with lower HLA disparity. Optimized matching affords patients the flexibility of customizing their matching priorities and the security of knowing that the greatest number of high-quality matches will be found and distributed equitably.

Normal alveolar ventilation tends to be maintained during external mechanical loading. The precise manner by which this occurs is unclear but may involve intrinsic mechanisms related to the muscular pump, neural influences, and chemoreceptor control. Recent observations suggest that submaximal threshold loads may result in hyperventilation. In this study we explicitly examined the respiratory effects of sustained threshold loading in normal subjects. We found that sustained threshold loading resulted in hyperventilation associated with high P100's (mouth pressure 100 ms after the start of an occluded breath) and increased tidal volumes but with little effect on duty cycle or respiratory rate. In addition, this increased respiratory motor output was sustained for 30-60 s after the load was removed. At very high threshold loads, hyperventilation failed to occur, despite increased P100's. We conclude that threshold loading results in increased respiratory motor output and hyperventilation, a response that is different from that observed with either resistive or elastic loads, and that the failure to hyperventilate at the higher loads may be the result of mechanical limitation.

Influenza virus-induced tracheobronchitis causes limited epithelial deciliation but markedly decreased mucociliary transport. This suggests that virus-induced alterations in airway mucus play a role in decreased mucociliary transport. Airway submucosal glands are a primary source of mucus. Therefore, we examined virus-gland cell interactions by exposing primary cultures of isolated feline tracheal gland cells to influenza A/Scotland/840/74 H3N2 virus for 1 h at a multiplicity of infection of 0.1. Virus production and release into the culture medium first occurred between 8 and 12 h postinfection and eventually reached a steady state that continued for at least 8 days. Virus which was produced and released by infected cells infected other monolayers, resulting in viral production similar to that after infection with stock virus. Hemadsorption assays conducted 24 h after infection demonstrated that most of the cells in a monolayer became infected. The infection was nonlytic according to cell morphology, trypan blue dye exclusion, and release of lactate dehydrogenase. Because lysis of a cell subpopulation could have been masked by subsequent cell division, we compared the uptake of [3H]thymidine by infected and control monolayers. There was no increase in uptake by infected monolayers. These results demonstrate that feline tracheal gland cells in primary culture undergo productive and nonlytic infection with influenza A virus. This model provides a unique system for the study of virus-gland interactions isolated from the influence of other tissues.