Searched for: in-biosketch:yes
person:osmani01
Mechanisms of primary resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitors in Melanoma [Meeting Abstract]
Moogk, Duane; Wang, Lin; Li, Kaitao; Yuan, Zhou; Zhong, Shi; Yu, Zhiya; Liadi, Ivan; Rittase, William; Fang, Victoria; Dougherty, Janna; Perez-Garcia, Arianne; Varadarajan, Navin; Restifo, Nicholas P.; Frey, Alan; Osman, Iman; Weber, Jeff; Zhu, Cheng; Krogsgaard, Michelle
ISI:000455805400022
ISSN: 1479-5876
CID: 3613502
A KDR germline variant is associated with increased risk of melanoma, a pro-angiogenic phenotype and resistance to immunotherapy [Meeting Abstract]
Illa-Bochaca, Irineu; Giles, Keith; Darvishian, Farbod; Moran, Una; Zhong, Judy; Krogsgaard, Michelle; Kirchhoff, Tomas; Osman, Iman
ISI:000455805400024
ISSN: 1479-5876
CID: 3613492
Microglandular Adenosis is an advanced precursor breast lesion with evidence of molecular progression to matrix-producing metaplastic carcinoma
Schwartz, Christopher J; Dolgalev, Igor; Yoon, Esther; Osman, Iman; Heguy, Adriana; de Miera, Eleazar Vega-Saenz; Nimeh, Diana; Jour, George; Darvishian, Farbod
Microglandular adenosis (MGA) is a rare breast lesion reported to be associated with invasive carcinoma in up to 20-30% of cases, and has been proposed as a non-obligate precursor to basal-like breast cancers. We identified a case of matrix-producing metaplastic carcinoma with morphologic and immunohistochemical evidence of progression from MGA to atypical MGA (AMGA), carcinoma in situ (CIS) and invasive carcinoma. We performed whole exome sequencing of each component (MGA, AMGA, CIS and cancer) to characterize the mutational landscape of these foci. There was significant copy number overlap between all foci, including a segmental amplification of the CCND1 locus (partial chromosome 11 trisomy) and MYC (8q24.12-13). Using a bioinformatics approach, we were able to identify three putative mutational clusters and recurrent, stop-gain non-synonymous mutations in both ZNF862 and TP53 that were shared across all foci. Finally, we identified a novel deleterious splice-acceptor site mutation of chr5:5186164G>T (chromosome 5p15) encoding the gene, ADAMTS16, in the invasive component.
PMID: 30428388
ISSN: 1532-8392
CID: 3457342
Revisiting the clinical and biologic relevance of partial PTEN loss in melanoma
Giles, Keith M; Rosenbaum, Brooke E; Berger, Marlies; Izsak, Allison; Li, Yang; Illa Bochaca, Irineu; Vega-Saenz de Miera, Eleazar; Wang, Jinhua; Darvishian, Farbod; Zhong, Hua; Osman, Iman
The extent of PTEN loss that confers clinical and biological impact in melanoma is unclear. We evaluated the clinical and biologic relevance of PTEN dosage in melanoma, and tested the postulate that partial PTEN loss is due to epigenetic mechanisms. PTEN expression was assessed by immunohistochemistry in a stage III melanoma cohort (n=190) with prospective follow up. 21/190 (11%) of tumors had strong PTEN expression, 51/190 (27%) had intermediate PTEN, 44/190 (23%) had weak PTEN, and 74/190 (39%) had absent PTEN. Both weak and absent PTEN expression predicted shorter survival in multivariate analyses (HR 2.13, p<0.01). We demonstrate a continuous negative correlation between PTEN and activated Akt in melanoma cells with titrated PTEN expression and in two additional independent tumor datasets. PTEN genomic alterations (deletion, mutation), promoter methylation, and protein destabilization did not fully explain PTEN loss in melanoma, whereas PTEN levels increased with treatment of melanoma cells with the histone deacetylase inhibitor LBH589. Our data indicate that partial PTEN loss is due to modifiable epigenetic mechanisms and drives Akt activation and worse prognosis, suggesting a potential approach to improve the clinical outcome for a subset of advanced melanoma patients.
PMID: 30148988
ISSN: 1523-1747
CID: 3255762
Primary Melanoma Histologic Subtype: Impact on Survival and Response to Therapy
Lattanzi, Michael; Lee, Yesung; Simpson, Danny; Moran, Una; Darvishian, Farbod; Kim, Randie H; Hernando, Eva; Polsky, David; Hanniford, Doug; Shapiro, Richard; Berman, Russell; Pavlick, Anna C; Wilson, Melissa A; Kirchhoff, Tomas; Weber, Jeffrey S; Zhong, Judy; Osman, Iman
Background/UNASSIGNED:Two primary histologic subtypes, superficial spreading melanoma (SSM) and nodular melanoma (NM), comprise the majority of all cutaneous melanomas. NM is associated with worse outcomes, which have been attributed to increased thickness at presentation, and it is widely expected that NM and SSM would exhibit similar behavior once metastasized. Herein, we tested the hypothesis that primary histologic subtype is an independent predictor of survival and may impact response to treatment in the metastatic setting. Methods/UNASSIGNED:We examined the most recent Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) cohort (n = 118 508) and the New York University (NYU) cohort (n = 1621) with available protocol-driven follow-up. Outcomes specified by primary histology were studied in both the primary and metastatic settings with respect to BRAF-targeted therapy and immunotherapy. We characterized known driver mutations and examined a 140-gene panel in a subset of NM and SSM cases using next-generation sequencing. All statistical tests were two-sided. Results/UNASSIGNED:NM was an independent risk factor for death in both the SEER (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.55, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.41 to 1.70, P < .001) and NYU (HR = 1.47, 95% CI = 1.05, 2.07, P = .03) cohorts, controlling for thickness, ulceration, stage, and other variables. In the metastatic setting, NM remained an independent risk factor for death upon treatment with BRAF-targeted therapy (HR = 3.33, 95% CI = 1.06 to 10.47, P = .04) but showed no statistically significant difference with immune checkpoint inhibition. NM was associated with a higher rate of NRAS mutation (P < .001), and high-throughput sequencing revealed NM-specific genomic alterations in NOTCH4, ANK3, and ZNF560, which were independently validated. Conclusions/UNASSIGNED:Our data reveal distinct clinical and biological differences between NM and SSM that support revisiting the prognostic and predictive impact of primary histology subtype in the management of cutaneous melanoma.
PMID: 29912415
ISSN: 1460-2105
CID: 3158042
Anti-CTLA4 toxicity associates with genetic variation correlating with serum antibody diversity [Meeting Abstract]
Simpson, D.; Ferguson, R.; Gowen, M.; Giles, K. M.; Tchack, J.; Zhou, H.; Moran, U.; Dawood, Z.; Pavlick, A.; Hu, S.; Wilson, M. A.; Zhong, H.; Krogsgaard, M.; Weber, J. S.; Osman, I.; Kirchhoff, T.
ISI:000459277302361
ISSN: 0923-7534
CID: 4354712
Discovery of novel germline genetic biomarkers of melanoma recurrence impacting exonic and long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) transcripts [Meeting Abstract]
Kirchhoff, T.; Simpson, D.; Hekal, T.; Ferguson, R.; Kazlow, E.; Moran, U.; Lee, Y.; Izsak, A.; Wilson, M. A.; Shapiro, R.; Pavlick, A.; Osman, I.
ISI:000459277303067
ISSN: 0923-7534
CID: 4354702
Immunomodulatory germline variation impacts the development of multiple primary melanoma (MPM) [Meeting Abstract]
Ferguson, R; Archambault, A; Simpson, D; Kazlow, E; Lax, R; Moran, U; Wilson, M A; Shapiro, R; Pavlick, A; Osman, I; Polsky, D; Kirchhoff, T
Background: During their lifetime about 8% of patients with single primary cutaneous melanoma (SPM) will develop multiple primary melanomas (MPM), which are associated with significantly higher mortality compared to patients with SPM. Based on the evidence that the immune system plays a role in regulating melanoma progression we explored whether germline genetic variants controlling the expression of immunomodulatory genes (immunomodulatory quantitative trait loci, eQTLs) discern risk of MPMcompared to patients with SPM or healthy controls.
Method(s): Previously, we identified 50 eQTLs significantly associated with the expression of 265 immunomodulatory genes using the MuTHer twin cohort. These 50 SNPs were genotyped in 837 SPM and 104MPM individuals using MassARRAY system. 1047 healthy controls were obtained from a publically available GWAS on CMascertained at MDAnderson (phs000187.v1.p1). We employed multivariate logistic regression to test the association of SNPs withMPM vs cancer-free controls andMPMvs SPM.
Result(s): When comparing MPMvs SPM, rs2071304, previously linked to expression of SPI1 in MuTHer data, showed a strong association with reduction ofMPM risk (OR=0.60; 95% CI=0.45-0.81; p=0.0007). Intriguingly, this variant also trended toward significance when comparing MPM vs controls (OR=0.61; 95% CI: 0.44-0.85; p=0.003). Finally, our most significant association when comparingMPM to controls was for rs2276645 (OR=0.60; 95% CI=0.45-0.81; p=0.0008), an eQTL associated with Zap-70 expression.
Conclusion(s): Our data, for the first time, indicate that the inherited host immunity impacts risk ofMPMin individuals with SPM, highlighting an importance of immune involvement in melanoma progression. The MPMrisk-predicting genetic variants identified here or in expanded efforts, currently underway, may eventually lead to a diagnostic tool allowing for enhanced screening and clinical management of patients at risk of MPM, hence reducing elevated MPM-associated mortality. Additionally, our results further support thatMPM and SPM may have different genetics underpinnings and should be treated as separate clinical entities
EMBASE:628562736
ISSN: 1569-8041
CID: 4001462
Functional genomics to identify germline markers of melanoma immunotherapy efficacy and toxicity [Meeting Abstract]
Ferguson, R; Simpson, D; Martinez, C; Vogelsang, M; Kazlow, E; Wilson, M; Pavlick, A; Weber, J; Sullivan, R; Flaherty, K; Ribas, A; Osman, I; Kirchhoff, T
Background: Approximately 40% of metastatic cutaneous melanoma (CM) patients do not respond to the current immunotherapy (IT) regimens, pointing to other, yet unknown factors conferring IT resistance. In addition, > 60% of patients from single-line or combined treatment (COMBO) regimens present severe immune related adverse events (irAEs). In this study we have developed a novel genomic approach interrogating expression quantitative trait loci (eQTLs) to explore weather germline genetic variation can serve as novel personalized determinant of immunotherapy response and toxicity.
Method(s): By interrogating the genome wide expression data and SNP array datasets of healthy twin cohort (MuTHER), we have identified 85 eQTLs most significantly associated with the expression of 265 immune genes. Using the MassARRAY system, the 85 SNPs were genotyped in 138 anti-CTLA-4 treated patients, 87 PD-1 treated patients, and 69 patients from combined (COMBO) treatments, collected from multi-institutional collaborations. To test the association of SNPs with IT response and irAEs, logistic regression analyses were performed for each treatment group adjusting by demographic and clinical covariates.
Result(s): We found significant associations with COMBO IT resistance for and eQTL in IL10/IL19 (OR = 4.249, p = 0.0167), which we have recently identified for association with melanoma survival and which, interestingly, is an established locus associated with the risk of several autoimmune diseases. Additionally, we also identified eQTLs that are associated with IT sensitivity; IL1-beta with resistance to anti-CTLA-4 and SPI1 with resistance to anti-PD-1. Interestingly, genomic scan of 85 eQTLs has identified novel loci predictive of severe autoimmunity and site specific irAEs in patients treated with COMBO or single-line anti- CTLA4 IT.
Conclusion(s): In this study, we report that eQTLs from IL19/IL10 locus, previously shown to predict autoimmunity risk and CM survival, is also a surrogate marker of response to COMBO IT, indicating a strong relationship between interleukin pathways and tumor immunogenicity. Novel loci have been found as predictive markers for autoimmune toxicity, in patients treated with COMBO and anti-CTLA4 IT. This is a first evidence that immunomodulatory pathways modulated by germline genetic variation can impact susceptibility to irAEs as well as IT efficacy. Currently, a large scan is underway using genome-wide genetic screens to further test the functional validity of these findings in a large collaborative setting
EMBASE:627350121
ISSN: 1479-5876
CID: 3831922
Mechanisms of primary resistance to cancer immunotherapies [Meeting Abstract]
Moogk, D; Li, K; Yuan, Z; Zhong, S; Yu, Z; Liadi, I; Rittase, W; Fang, V; Dougherty, J; Perez-Garcia, A; Osman, I; Varadarajan, N; Restifo, N P; Frey, A; Zhu, C; Krogsgaard, M
Background: Although much clinical progress has been made in harnessing the immune system to recognize and target cancer, there is still a significant lack of an understanding of how tumors evade immune recognition and the mechanisms that drive tumor resistance to both T cell and checkpoint blockade immunotherapy. Our objective is to understand how tumor-mediated signaling through inhibitory receptors, including PD-1, combine to affect the process of T cell recognition of tumor antigen and activation signaling, with the goal of understanding the basis of resistance to PD-1 blockade and the potential identification of new molecular targets to enable T cells to overcome dysfunction mediated by multiple inhibitory receptors.
Methods and Results: We show that Lck activity affects T cell sensitivity and influences the probability of inducing effector function [1]. Under non-activating conditions, Lck and Shp-1 phosphorylation and activity vary based on CD8+ memory T cell phenotype. Shp-1 interaction with Lck under non-activation conditions can also vary, as suggested by our results showing decreased Shp-1 S591 phosphorylation, which affects Shp-1 localization and correlates with increased Shp-1 colocalization with Lck. Further, we showed that Shp-1 directly influences Lck activity under non-activating conditions, as inhibition of Shp-1 leads to increased Lck activity. Importantly, inhibition of Shp- 1/2, a major mediator of PD-1 signaling, targeting CD28 and Lck [2], prior to activation leads to increased T cell cytotoxic effector function. Our proteomics-based analysis of patient T cells identified both mediators of PD-1 signaling and signaling components and pathways associated with blockade resistance. It has generally been thought that TCR and CD8 binding depend mainly on their ectodomain interactions with pMHC. We have shown, however, that Lck-CD8 binding [3] and Lck activity [4] are required for upregulated CD8 binding to prebound TCR-pMHC complex. Therefore, the cytoplasmic associations of Lck with CD8 and Zap-70, as well as CD3 with Zap-70 may influence formation and stability of the TCRpMHCCD8 complex. To determine the mechanistic basis of PD-1 inhibition of TCR-pMHCCD8 binding we utilized 2D affinity combined with Biomembrane Force Probe (BFP) measurements[5, 6] and showed that PD-1 directly suppresses TCR pMHCCD8 binding. Our data also revealed that TCR-pMHC binding was independent of PD-1-PD-L1, but TCRpMHCCD8 binding was suppressed by PD-1-PD-L1 binding demonstrating negative cooperativity, as fewer bonds formed than the sum of bonds formed by each interaction alone.
Conclusion(s): Together, our results show that the activities of TCRproximal signaling components affect T cell mechanosensing and sensitivity at the earliest stages of antigen recognition and are influenced by PD-1. Targeting these interactions may enhance tumor-specific T cell sensitivity for cancer immunotherapy and understanding the basis of resistance to PD-1 blockade to potentially allow identification of new molecular targets to enable T cells to overcome dysfunction mediated by multiple inhibitory receptors
EMBASE:627349888
ISSN: 1479-5876
CID: 3831912