Faculty Bibliography

Growing evidence supports a causal relationship between cardiovascular disease and psychosocial factors such as mental health and behavioral disorders, acute and chronic stress, and low socioeconomic status. While this has enriched our understanding of the interaction between cardiovascular risk factors, much less is known about its economic implications. In this review, we evaluate the economic impact of psychosocial factors in persons at risk for or diagnosed with cardiovascular disease. Most studies have focused on depression and almost uniformly conclude that patients with cardiovascular disease and comorbid depression use a greater number of ambulatory and hospital services and incur higher overall costs. Additionally, comorbid depression may also reduce employment productivity in patients with cardiovascular disease, further magnifying its economic impact. Recent randomized trials have demonstrated that innovative care delivery models that target depression may reduce costs or at least be cost neutral while improving quality of life. The growing population burden and overlap of cardiovascular disease, comorbid mental illness, and other psychosocial factors suggest that future research identifying cost-effective or cost-saving treatment models may have significant health and economic implications.

OBJECTIVE: The prehypertension classification was introduced to facilitate prevention efforts among patients at increased risk for hypertension. Although patients who have been told that they have hypertension report worse outcomes than unaware hypertensives, little is known about whether or not prehypertension labeling has negative effects. We evaluated the effects of labeling individuals with prehypertension on blood pressure and health-related quality of life three months later. METHODS: One hundred adults (aged 19 to 82 [mean=40.0] years; 54% women; 64% racial/ethnic minorities) with screening blood pressure in the prehypertensive range (120-139/80-89mmHg) and no history of diagnosis or treatment of elevated blood pressure were randomly assigned to either a "Labeled" group in which they were informed of their prehypertension, or an "Unlabeled" group in which they were not informed. Subjects underwent office blood pressure measurement, 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and completed self-report questionnaires at baseline and at three months. RESULTS: Multilevel mixed effects regression analyses indicated that changes in the white coat effect, office blood pressure, mean daytime ambulatory blood pressure, and physical and mental health did not differ significantly between the two groups. Adjusting for age, sex, race/ethnicity and body mass index did not affect the results. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that labeling patients with prehypertension does not have negative effects on blood pressure or quality of life. Additional research is needed to develop approaches to communicating with patients about their blood pressure that will maximize the clinical and public health impact of the prehypertension classification.

BackgroundBlood pressure screening is an important component of cardiovascular disease prevention, but a hypertension diagnosis (i.e., label) can have unintended negative effects on patients' well-being. Despite persistent disparities in hypertension prevalence and outcomes, whether the impact of labeling differs by race is unknown. The purpose of this study was to evaluate possible race differences in the relationship between hypertension labeling and health-related quality of life and depression.MethodsThe sample included 308 normotensive and unmedicated hypertensive subjects from the Neighborhood Study of Blood Pressure and Sleep, a cross-sectional study conducted between 1999 and 2003. Labeled hypertension was defined (by self-report) as having been diagnosed with high blood pressure or prescribed antihypertensive medications. Effects of labeling and race on self-reported physical and mental health and depressive symptoms were tested using multivariate analysis of covariance, controlling for age, sex, body mass index (BMI), previous medication use, and "true" hypertension status, defined by average daytime ambulatory blood pressure (ABP).ResultsBoth black and white subjects who had been labeled as hypertensive reported similarly poorer physical health than unlabeled subjects (P = 0.001). However, labeling was associated with poorer mental health and greater depressive symptoms only among blacks (Ps < 0.05 for the interactions). These findings were not explained by differences in socioeconomic status.ConclusionsThese results are consistent with previous studies showing negative effects of hypertension labeling, and demonstrate important race differences in these effects. Clinical approaches to communicating diagnostic information that avoid negative effects on well-being are needed, and may require tailoring to patient characteristics such as race.American Journal of Hypertension 2012; doi:10.1038/ajh.2011.258.

OBJECTIVE: Obtaining an accurate blood pressure (BP) reading is vital for diagnosing hypertension. However, BP measures taken in the physician's clinic (CBP) are subject to the 'white coat' bias. Measurements taken outside the office using ambulatory (ABP) and home (HBP) monitoring are superior predictors of cardiovascular diseases compared with CBP, but ABP remains underutilized because of the effort and expense involved. Unfortunately, HBP has limitations, including questionable device validity and patient compliance. Thus, it is important to identify feasible alternative techniques to measure BP in the office that will increase the accuracy of the diagnosis. METHODS: Auscultatory BP was measured in 249 patients in a nonclinical setting by trained technicians (NCBP); on the following day, patients were taken to their physician (CBP). They were also given an HBP monitor, and a 36 h ABP monitoring. Because ABP is considered the gold standard for prediction of cardiovascular disease, these readings were used as the criterion in a statistical model in which CBP, HBP, and NCBP were entered as predictors. The level of agreement between measurements was estimated. RESULTS: Multiple regression analysis showed that HBP and NCBP (P < 0.001) explained 94 and 87% of the variance in systolic and diastolic ABP, respectively. The agreement between NCBP and ABP was greater than that between CBP and ABP or between HBP. CONCLUSION: When ABP monitoring and HBP monitoring are not options, the NCBP at the clinic can avoid the white coat bias and therefore improve diagnosis

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of coronary artery disease (CAD) among Bangladeshis greatly exceeds that of Caucasians. Bangladeshis also suffer from premature onset, clinically aggressive and angiographically extensive disease. The role of conventional CAD risk factors (CCRFs) has been questioned. We therefore sought to determine if the CCRFs of Bangladeshis differed from non-Bangladeshis. We also sought to determine whether CAD was more extensive in Bangladeshis and if Bangladeshi ethnicity was independently predictive of extensive i.e., 3-vessel CAD at angiography. METHODS: We reviewed the coronary angiograms and medical records of 75 Bangladeshis and 57 non-Bangladeshis presenting with myocardial infarction or angina pectoris. RESULTS: Bangladeshis were younger (56.1 vs. 62.4 years, p=.001), had a lower body-mass index (25.2 vs. 27.2 kg/m(2), p=.017) and were less likely to be current or recent smokers (40% vs. 58%, p=.041) than non-Bangladeshis. There were no statistically significant differences in the proportion of subjects in the 2 groups with respect to diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, hypertension or family history of CAD. Bangladeshis had twice the rate of 3-vessel CAD of non-Bangladeshis (53% vs. 26%, p=.002). Bangladeshi ethnicity was independently associated with >3X the likelihood of having 3-vessel CAD at angiography (p=.011). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that the CCRF burden of Bangladeshis with CAD is not excessive compared to that of non-Bangladeshis and is therefore unlikely to account for the excessive CAD risk found in this cohort. We also conclude that Bangladeshis have more angiographically extensive CAD than non-Bangladeshis and that Bangladeshi ethnicity is independently predictive of 3-vessel disease

Genetic and behavioral factors do not fully explain the development of hypertension, and there is increasing evidence suggesting that psychosocial factors may also play an important role. Exposure to chronic stress has been hypothesized as a risk factor for hypertension, and occupational stress, stressful aspects of the social environment, and low socioeconomic status have each been studied extensively. The study of discrimination is a more recent and rapidly growing area of investigation and may also help to explain the well-known racial disparities in hypertension. Research regarding mechanisms underlying stress effects on hypertension has largely focused on cardiovascular reactivity, but delayed recovery to the pre-stress level is increasingly being evaluated as another possible pathway. Recent findings in each of these areas are reviewed, and directions for future research are discussed

BackgroundReduced nocturnal blood pressure (BP) dipping is more prevalent among blacks living in the United States than whites and is associated with increased target organ damage and cardiovascular risk. The primary aim of this study was to determine whether socioeconomic and psychosocial factors help to explain racial differences in dipping. In order to address the limited reproducibility of dipping measures, we investigated this question in a sample of participants who underwent multiple ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) sessions.MethodsThe study sample included 171 black and white normotensive and mildly hypertensive participants who underwent three ABPM sessions, each 1 month apart, and completed a battery of questionnaires to assess socioeconomic and psychosocial factors.ResultsAs expected, blacks showed less dipping than whites, after adjusting for age, sex, body mass index (BMI), and mean 24-h BP level (mean difference = 3.3%, P = 0.002). Dipping was related to several of the socioeconomic and psychosocial factors examined, with higher education and income, being married, and higher perceived social support, each associated with a larger dipping percentage. Of these, marital status and education were independently associated with dipping and together accounted for 36% of the effect of race on dipping.ConclusionsWe identified a number of socioeconomic and psychosocial correlates of BP dipping and found that reduced dipping among blacks vs. whites is partially explained by marital status (being unmarried) and lower education among blacks. We also present results suggesting that repeated ABPM may facilitate the detection of associations between dipping and other variables.American Journal of Hypertension 2009; doi:10.1038/ajh.2009.58American Journal of Hypertension 2009; doi:10.1038/ajh.2009.58