Faculty Bibliography

Purpose : To examine the effect of co-variables commonly used in ocular structure models on ocular vessel density (VD) measurements provided by OCT angiography (OCTA) Methods : Healthy subjects with a normal comprehensive ophthalmic examination, axial length (AL) measurements, qualified visual fields (VF; Humphrey Field Analyzer; Zeiss, Dublin, CA), and optic nerve head (ONH) and macula OCT and OCTA scans (Cirrus HD-OCT 200x200 cube scans and 3x3 mm/ 6x6 mm Angioplex; Zeiss) were included. Subjects with comorbidities affecting the systemic or local micro or macro vasculature and subjects taking medications that modify vessel diameter were excluded. Peripapillary, ONH, and macular VD were calculated using the device's native software. Mixed-effects models were used accounting for age, gender, signal strength, AL, and inter- and intra-subject correlation. Results : 72 eyes (46 subjects) with a mean age of 45.1 (+/-13.9) years, mean AL of 23.82 (+/-1.03) mm, and mean signal strength of 8.32 (+/-1.04) were included in the study for ONH analysis and a subset of 33 eyes were included for macular analysis. The 3x3 and 6x6 ONH inner VD measurements decrease as age advances (-0.1 +/-0.02 mm/mm2, p=0.005; -0.07 +/-0.02 mm/mm2, p=0.0026, respectively). The central and inner measurements in the 3x3 macular scans decrease with age (-0.14 +/-0.03 mm/mm2, p=0.0006; -0.06 +/-0.01mm/mm2, p=0.0003, respectively). ONH and macula VD in both scanning sizes were not associated with AL, except for the macula 6x6 outer region (0.41 +/-0.05 mm/mm2, p=0.05). Only macular VD measurements were associated with signal strength. Conclusions : When analyzing ocular VD, the variables of age, AL, and image quality, should be considered

Purpose : OCT Angiography (OCTA) can be used to measure retinal vessel density (VD). These scans can be of various sizes and may be centered on the optic nerve head (ONH) or macula. In this study, we examined the glaucoma discrimination performance of VD using different scanning sizes and locations and compared it with the performance of conventional structural and functional biomarkers to identify the best glaucoma discrimination scanning protocol. Methods : 79 healthy and glaucomatous eyes (50 subjects) were included in the study. Subjects with diabetes, vascular disease, or who were using medications known to affect retinal thickness were excluded. 3x3 and 6x6mm ONH and macula OCTA images were obtained using Cirrus HD-OCT Angioplex (Zeiss, Dublin, CA). Global and sectoral VD was calculated using native software on the device. Area under the receiver operating characteristics (AUC) was used to determine the discrimination ability of VD, retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness, rim area, cup-to-disc (C/D) ratio, ganglion cell inner plexiform layer (GCIPL) thickness, and visual field mean deviation (MD). Bootstrapping was used for comparison between the AUCs. Results : Subjects with glaucoma had statistically significantly different measurements than healthy individuals for all tested parameters except for the majority of macula VD (both 3x3 and 6x6 scanning sizes; Table). VD measurements that had the best glaucoma discrimination ability were acquired from the ONH from all sectors of the 3x3 scans and in the outer and full sectors in the 6x6 scans (Table). For these ONH parameters, no significant difference was detected from the best discriminating parameter (average RNFL and rim area). All macula VD measurements had significantly worse discrimination performance. Conclusions : Among VD scanning options, the ONH scans are the most suitable for glaucoma discrimination. However, the coarse sampling in the larger scan (6x6mm) reduces this capability inside and immediately adjacent to the ONH

Observational studies in glaucoma patients can provide important evidence on treatment effects, especially for combination therapies which are often used in reality. But the success relies on the reduction of selection bias through methods such as propensity score (PS) weighting. The objective of this study was to assess the effects of five glaucoma treatments (medication, laser, non-laser surgery (NLS), laser + medication, and NLS + medication) on 1-year intraocular pressure (IOP) change. Data were collected from 90 glaucoma subjects who underwent a single laser, or NLS intervention, and/or took the same medication for at least 6 months, and had IOP measures before the treatment and 12-months after. Baseline IOP was significantly different across groups (p = 0.007) and this unbalance was successfully corrected by the PS weighting (p = 0.81). All groups showed statistically significant PS-weighted IOP reductions, with the largest reduction in NLS group (-6.78 mmHg). Baseline IOP significantly interacted with treatments (p = 0.03), and at high baseline IOP medication was less effective than other treatments. Our findings showed that the 1-year IOP reduction differed across treatment groups and was dependent on baseline IOP. The use of PS-weighted methods reduced treatment selection bias at baseline and allowed valid assessment of the treatment effect in an observational study.