Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND:Nurse scientists are highly sought after and find satisfaction in serving as members of interdisciplinary research teams. These teams also tend to be highly productive. However, nurse scientists in academia also have to reach certain productivity milestones to be promoted and receive tenure that may be incongruent with team science principles. PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:This study therefore sought to examine whether APT documents in research intensive nursing schools incorporate team science principles. METHODS:Qualitatively analyzed the appointment, promotion and tenure documents of 18 U.S. based research intensive schools of nursing with over $2 million in NIH funding in fiscal year 2014. RESULTS:The study found that only 8 of 18 documents included any reference to team science principles and even these mentions were largely negligible. There were few best practices to recommend across documents. By not recognizing team science within these documents, nursing risks marginalization within the larger scientific community by limiting mentorship and learning opportunities for early career nurse scientists. CONCLUSIONS:Schools of nursing should revisit their promotion and tenure criteria and include a greater commitment to encouragement of team science.

Background: Patients with advanced kidney disease have an elevated symptom burden, increased mortality, and poor quality of life. While palliative care can address these issues, nephrology patients infrequently receive such care. To address this, we implemented an ambulatory kidney palliative care program. We describe our initial outcomes.
Method(s): Utilizing chart abstractions, we characterized the clinic population and symptom burden for patients seen from May 6, 2016-July 6, 2018.
Result(s): Ninety-four patients were referred; 74 (78.7%) patients seen. Forty (54.1%) had follow-up appointments (range 2-13). Mean patient age was 72.7 +/-16 years with 32 (43.2%) on dialysis. The mean symptom burden (n=65) was 12 (+/- 4.9) symptoms (out of 17) with mean severity of 2 (range 0-4), representing moderate severity. The most common physical symptoms were nausea (78%), dyspnea (72%), pain (68%) and itch (66%). Eighty-seven percent reported anxiety and 73% reported depression. There was no difference in symptom burden between patients on dialysis and those on conservative management (n=22). Patients on conservative management were significantly older and had more comorbidities. By visit two, there was a significant reduction in global symptom score (21.9 vs 19.0, p=0.01) in addition to a reduction in anxiety (2.1 vs 1.7, p=0.03), vomiting (0.8 vs 0.2, p=0.04), and restless legs syndrome (1.3 vs 0.8, p = 0.02).
Conclusion(s): Patients with serious kidney disease treated in a kidney palliative care clinic have a high symptom burden regardless of treatment choice. The decision to pursue conservative management is more prevalent in older patients with more comorbidities. Follow up visits to the clinic demonstrated a decrease in symptom burden, suggesting that a dedicated kidney-palliative care clinic may be successful in managing symptoms and addressing unmet need

PURPOSE OF REVIEW/OBJECTIVE:Despite increased survivorship and the subsequent need for chronic management of cancer, the association of self-management and palliative care is still emerging within cancer care. Routine and timely use of self-management strategies in the palliative setting can help reduce self-management burden and maximize quality of life. In this review, we consider the complementary relationship of self-management and palliative care and how they support living with cancer as a chronic illness. RECENT FINDINGS/RESULTS:Recent studies provide evidence of support among patients, family caregivers and healthcare professionals for integration of self-management interventions into palliative cancer care. As a guiding framework, components of the revised Self and Family Management Framework correspond to the provision of palliative care across the care trajectory, including the phases of curative care, palliative care, end-of-life care and bereavement. Additional work among self-management partners facing cancer and other life-limiting illnesses, that is patients, family caregivers and healthcare professionals, would be useful in developing interventions that incorporate self-management and palliative care to improve health outcomes. SUMMARY/CONCLUSIONS:There is an increasing acceptance of the complementarity of self-management and palliative care in cancer care. Their integration can support patients with cancer and their family caregivers across the care trajectory.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:Despite higher rates of modifiable risk factors for cardiovascular disease (CVD) in gay and bisexual men, few studies have examined sexual orientation differences in CVD among men. The purpose of this study was to examine sexual orientation differences in modifiable risk factors for CVD and CVD diagnoses in men. METHODS:A secondary analysis of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2001-2012) was conducted. Multiple imputation was performed for missing values. Differences across four distinct groups were analyzed: gay-identified men, bisexual-identified men, heterosexual-identified men who have sex with men (MSM), and heterosexual-identified men who denied same-sex behavior (categorized as exclusively heterosexual). Multiple logistic regression models were run with exclusively heterosexual men as the reference group. RESULTS:The analytic sample consisted of 7731 men. No differences between heterosexual-identified MSM and exclusively heterosexual men were observed. Few differences in health behaviors were noted, except that, compared to exclusively heterosexual men, gay-identified men reported lower binge drinking (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 0.58, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.37-0.85). Bisexual-identified men had higher rates of mental distress (AOR 2.39, 95% CI = 1.46-3.90), obesity (AOR 1.69, 95% CI = 1.02-2.72), elevated blood pressure (AOR 2.30, 95% CI = 1.43-3.70), and glycosylated hemoglobin (AOR 3.01, 95% CI = 1.38-6.59) relative to exclusively heterosexual men. CONCLUSIONS:Gay-identified and heterosexual-identified MSM demonstrated similar CVD risk to exclusively heterosexual men, whereas bisexual-identified men had elevations in several risk factors. Future directions for sexual minority health research in this area and the need for CVD and mental health screenings, particularly in bisexual-identified men, are highlighted.

OBJECTIVE:Sexual minority women (lesbian and bisexual) experience significant stigma, which may increase their cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. The purpose of this study was to examine the prevalence of modifiable risk factors for CVD (including mental distress, health behaviors, blood pressure, glycosylated hemoglobin, and total cholesterol) and CVD in sexual minority women compared with their heterosexual peers. MATERIALS AND METHODS/METHODS:A secondary analysis of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2001-2012) was conducted. Multiple imputation with chained equations was performed. Logistic regression models adjusted for relevant covariates were run. Self-report (medical history and medication use) and biomarkers for hypertension, diabetes, and high total cholesterol were examined. RESULTS:The final analytic sample consisted of 7,503 that included 346 sexual minority women (4.6%). Sexual minority women were more likely to be younger, single, have a lower income, and lack health insurance. After covariate adjustment, sexual minority women exhibited excess CVD risk related to higher rates of frequent mental distress (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 2.05; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.45-2.88), current tobacco use (AOR, 2.11; 95% CI, 1.53-2.91), and binge drinking (AOR, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.17-2.34). Sexual minority women were more likely to be obese (AOR, 1.61; 95% CI, 1.23-2.33) and have glycosylated hemoglobin consistent with prediabetes (AOR, 1.56; 95% CI, 1.04-2.34). No differences were observed for other outcomes. CONCLUSIONS:Sexual minority women demonstrated increased modifiable risk factors for CVD, but no difference in CVD diagnoses. Several emerging areas of research are highlighted, in particular, the need for CVD prevention efforts that target modifiable CVD risk in sexual minority women.