Faculty Bibliography

The therapy for insulin-dependent diabetes has been changing in the last 3 years with the increasing application of intensive ambulatory treatment programs involving self-monitoring of blood glucose levels by the patient. Insulin is administered either as multiple manual daily injections or as a continuous subcutaneous infusion delivered by a portable pump. We discuss the implementation, efficacy, complications (including recent reports of deaths in pump-treated patients), and cost of such programs. The potential effectiveness in preventing the long-term complications of diabetes warrants offering a program of self-monitoring of blood glucose levels combined with multiple manual daily insulin injections as a routine treatment option to virtually all patients with insulin-dependent diabetes. Additional observations on safety and efficacy are needed before insulin pump treatment can be considered a routine option. Furthermore, whether intensive treatment involving either manual or pump administration of insulin alters the risk of hypoglycemia as compared with conventional management remains to be established

Restoration of near-normal glucose metabolism with the insulin pump reduces retinal fluorescein leakage and microalbuminuria in diabetes. However, it is not known whether these functional changes reflect a true reversal of diabetic retinopathy or nephropathy. To evaluate this question, we studied the effect of 1-2 yr of insulin pump treatment on clinical endpoints in 17 type I diabetic patients. In each patient, plasma glucose and total glycosylated hemoglobin levels fell to normal or near-normal levels. The total daily dose of insulin given during the first month of pump treatment (52 +/- 5 U/day) was comparable to that given during conventional treatment (44 +/- 3 U/day) and varied little over the 1-2 yr period of observation. Ten eyes without retinopathy at the start of the study remained without retinopathy after 15-23 mo of pump treatment. One of eleven eyes with background retinopathy developed proliferative retinopathy and 3 of 13 eyes with proliferative retinopathy progressed during pump treatment. Similarly, no improvement in renal function was observed in the six patients with diabetic nephropathy on entry to the study. In the first month of pump treatment, proteinuria consistently fell to values 30% below prepump levels (P less than 0.005). However, the diminution in proteinuria was not sustained and all remain proteinuric after 13-18 mo of pump therapy. Serum creatinine rose slightly and creatinine clearance did not significantly change. These data suggest that insulin pump treatment does not reverse established diabetic microvascular complications, despite a sustained improvement in metabolic control for up to 2 yr.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

We examined whether changes in somatomedin accompany those seen in glucose and growth hormone during treatment with the insulin-infusion pump. somatomedin levels in eight insulin-dependent diabetics (13 to 29 years of age) were measured before and after 16 weeks of outpatient insulin-pump treatment, which lowered mean glucose from 245 +/- 21 to 100 +/- 5 mg per deciliter and total glycosylated hemoglobin from 16.2 +/- 1.2 to 9.7 +/- 0.3 per cent (mean +/- S.E.M.). During conventional insulin therapy, both total somatomedin and somatomedin C were within the normal range, despite elevations in growth hormone. Pump treatment resulted in a 70 to 75 per cent increase in both total somatomedin and somatomedin C (P less than 0.05) and a fall in growth-hormone concentrations. In the two growing adolescents, growth velocity doubled during 13 to 15 months of pump treatment. Our data suggest that the improved insulin delivery or metabolic control increases somatomedin levels despite a decrease in growth hormone. Thus, insulin-pump treatment may be useful in optimizing growth in diabetic children