Faculty Bibliography

Costochondral grafting for reconstruction of the Pruzansky type III mandible has given variable results. Lengthening of the rib graft by means of distraction had been advocated when subsequent growth of the grafted mandible is inadequate. This retrospective study reviews a series of patients with mandibular costochondral grafts who underwent subsequent distraction osteogenesis of the graft. A retrospective review identified two patient groups: group 1 consisted of individuals (n = 9) who underwent costochondral rib grafting of the mandible followed by distraction osteogenesis several months later at a rate of 1 mm/day. Group 2 consisted of patients with Pruzansky type II mandibles who had distraction osteogenesis without prior rib grafting (n = 9). The biomechanical parameters, orthodontic treatment regimens, and complications were examined versus patient age and quality of the rib graft. Distraction osteogenesis was successfully performed in six of the rib graft patients (group 1) and in all of the group 2 individuals. On the basis of the Haminishi scale, the computed tomographic scan appearance of the regenerate was classified as 'standard or external' in six of the group 1 patients and as either 'agenetic' or 'pillar' (fibrous union) in the remaining three patients. In group 1, the average device was expanded 23 mm (range, 20 to 30 mm). Group 2 mandibular distraction results were all classified as either standard or external, and there was an average device expansion of 22.4 mm (range, 16 to 30 mm). The length of consolidation averaged 12.6 weeks in group 1, compared with 8.5 weeks in the traditional mandibular distraction patients (group 2). The mean shift of the dental midline to the contralateral side was 2.5 mm in group 1 versus 4.0 mm in group 2. Complex multiplanar and transport distractions were successfully performed on grafts of adequate bony volume. All four patients in group 1 with tracheostomies were successfully decannulated after consolidation. Rib graft distraction complications included pin tract infections in two patients, hardware failure with premature pin pullout in one patient, and evidence of fibrous nonunions in three young patients with single, diminutive rib grafts. In group 2, there were no distraction failures. Distraction osteogenesis can be successfully performed on costochondral rib grafts of the mandible; however, the complication rate is higher than in non-rib-graft patients. Performing the technique on older, more cooperative individuals seems to reduce this risk. In addition, placement of a double rib graft or an iliac bone graft of sufficient volume to create a neomandible with greater bone stock is an absolute requirement to decrease the risk of fibrous nonunion and provide a bone base of sufficient size for retention of the distraction device and manipulation of the regenerate

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the financial impact of two treatment approaches to the unilateral cleft alveolus. The recently advocated nasoalveolar molding (NAM; and gingivoperiosteoplasty (GPP; at the time of lip repair were compared with the traditional approach of secondary alveolar bone graft. DESIGN: The records of all patients (n = 30) with unilateral cleft lip and alveolus treated by a single surgeon during 1985 through 1988 were examined retrospectively. The patients were divided into two groups: group 1 patients (n = 14) were treated by lip repair, primary nasal repair, and secondary alveolar bone graft prior to eruption of permanent dentition; group 2 patients (n = 16) were treated by NAM, GPP, lip repair, and primary nasal repair. Patients who required secondary alveolar bone graft after GPP were noted. The cost of treatment by each protocol was calculated in 1998 dollars. RESULTS: The average cost of treatment for a patient treated by lip repair, primary nasal repair, and secondary alveolar bone graft prior to eruption of permanent dentition was $22,744. Of the 16 patients treated by NAM, GPP, lip repair, and primary nasal repair, 10 required no further treatment of the unilateral cleft alveolus; six patients required secondary alveolar bone graft. The average per-patient treatment cost in this group was $19,745. The average cost savings of NAM and GPP, compared with alveolar bone graft is $2999. CONCLUSIONS: The treatment of unilateral cleft alveolus by nasoalveolar molding and gingivoperiosteoplasty results in substantial cost savings, compared with treatment by secondary alveolar bone graft

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to examine possible associations between severity of clefting in infants and maxillary growth in children with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate. DESIGN: This was a retrospective study of measurements made on infant maxillary study casts and maxillary cephalometric variables obtained at 5 to 6 years of follow-up. SETTING: The study was performed at the Institute of Reconstructive Plastic Surgery of New York University Medical Center, New York, New York. PATIENTS: Twenty-four consecutive nonsyndromic unilateral complete cleft lip and palate patients treated during the years 1987 to 1994. INTERVENTIONS: All the patients received uniform treatment (i.e., presurgical orthopedics followed by gingivoperiosteoplasty to close the alveolar cleft combined with repair of the lip and nose in a single stage at the age of 3 to 4 months). Closure of the palate was performed at the age of 12 to 14 months. RESULTS: Infant maxillary study cast measurements correlated in a statistically significant manner with maxillary cephalometric measurements at age 5 to 6 years. CONCLUSIONS: The results demonstrate the large variation in the severity of unilateral cleft lip and palate deformity at birth. Patients with large clefts and small arch circumference, arch length, or both demonstrated less favorable maxillary growth than those with small clefts and large arch circumference or arch length at birth

OBJECTIVE: To present the case of an 18-year-old boy with a cleft lip scar and an obligatory need for facial hair who underwent single-follicular-unit graft hair transplantation that resulted in significant moustache hair restoration in a single procedure. SETTING: The surgery was performed in an outpatient private practice setting using oral sedation and local anesthesia. RESULTS: Advances in instrumentation technology and an increased understanding of the anatomical clustering of hair follicles into so-called 'follicular units' containing one to six hairs per unit has resulted in a rapid expansion of hair restoration surgery into new areas including female-pattern alopecia, scarring alopecias, and cosmetic surgery scars. These new techniques can be employed to create natural-looking hair lines in front of artificial hair replacement systems; to improve unnatural looking, old 'large-plug' hair transplants; and to correct discontinuity of eyebrows and hairlines in patients with congenital facial clefts. Increased awareness is needed to incorporate follicular-unit graft hair transplant surgery into the family of corrective surgery subspecialties

This addendum to the 'State of the Art Dental Treatment of Predental and Infant Patients With Clefts and Craniofacial Anomalies,' by Prahl-Andersen (Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2000;37:528532), offers an extended perspective on this controversial subject. This article reviews the role of combined nasal and alveolar (nasoalveolar) molding in the primary correction of the nose, lip, and alveolus of infants born with unilateral and bilateral clefts. The background of presurgical nasoalveolar orthopedic molding, the technique, and the literature are presented. The proposed benefits of treatment from the traditional techniques of presurgical orthopedics have been shown to be unsubstantiated (Kuijpers-Jagtman and Prahl, 1996). A close comparison of the proposed benefits of earlier forms of presurgical orthopedics, along with those of the current technique of nasoalveolar molding, is presented

Various agents have been theoretically and experimentally implicated as mediators of distraction osteogenesis (DO). The purpose of this study was to develop a vehicle for the potential delivery of these factors to the region of the distraction site in an attempt to manipulate this biologic process. Three adult mongrel dogs (12 months old) had oblique osteotomies performed bilaterally through the gonial regions. In group I, the external distracter was affixed to the right hemimandible of two dogs (n = 2 hemimandibles) with cannulated pins (external diameter = 1.5 mm; lumen diameter = 1.0 mm; length = 60 mm), whereas the distracter on the left was affixed with standard, noncannulated pins of the same dimensions. In group II, cannulated pins were used to affix the external distracter to both hemimandibles (n = 2 hemimandibles) of a dog. The devices were activated after a 5-day latency period and were lengthened at a rate of 1 mm/day for 20 days. During the distraction period, 0.1 ml/d of sterile india ink was injected into the cannulated pins, after which the sterile stylet was replaced. The activation protocol was followed by 28 days of fixation (consolidation period). The hemimandibles from group I underwent removal of soft tissues, acetone fixation, and gross examination/photography, whereas the hemimandibles from group II were prepared for histologic evaluation (whole mount, hematoxylin and eosin staining). All dogs survived to the end of the study and demonstrated successful DO without evidence of complications. Hemimandibles in group I displayed evidence of india ink on both the lingual and buccal cortex around the cannulated pin site, in the regenerate and on the neocortices of the distracted segment. Hemimandibles of group II showed histologic evidence of the india ink being deposited densely around the cannulated pin site and extending in a radial fashion around the pin site into the regenerate. This study demonstrates for the first time a vehicle device for the delivery of an inert dye to the regenerate site during distraction osteogenesis. This vehicle offers the potential of delivery of various factors implicated in distraction osteogenesis (i.e., mitogens) in an attempt to alter this process and also substances (i.e., chemotherapy, antibiotics, etc.) for use in the treatment of various osteopathies

Distraction osteogenesis has proven to be an effective technique for the correction of mandibular deficiencies. However, problems have been encountered in achieving a final, idealized form of the mandible when using distraction devices capable of moving the bone segments in only one dimension (uniplanar). Specifically, occlusal irregularities and deficiencies in lower facial contour have been seen following uniplanar distraction. To address these problems, a distraction device capable of independent movements in three planes (multiplanar) was developed. Previously reported studies in a canine model have demonstrated that this device can successfully distract the mandible along both the sagittal axis (anteroposterior or z-axis) and the vertical axis (superoinferior or y-axis). This study examines the ability of the multiplanar device to distract along the sagittal and horizontal axes (mediolateral or x-axis). A total of 12 dogs were included in the study. All animals underwent unilateral or bilateral mandibular distraction using an external multiplanar device. After a latency period of 5 days, primary distraction along the anteroposterior axis at a rate of 1 mm/day for 10 days (10 mm total) was performed. During the following 10 days, along with an additional 11 mm to 20 mm of anteroposterior axis distraction, concomitant secondary distraction was performed along the horizontal (mediolateral) axis at a rate of 5 degrees/day (50 degrees total). Cephalometric radiographs were obtained preoperatively and at the conclusion of both anteroposterior and combined anteroposterior-mediolateral distraction. Computed tomography (CT) scans were obtained preoperatively and at the end of consolidation (28 days), after which all animals were sacrificed and the dry skulls examined. In all animals, distraction along the mediolateral or x-axis was found to change the anteroposterior projection of the mandible. Varus angulation of the device with respect to the midline of the mandible caused compression of the distracted segments and reduced the anteroposterior thrust of the mandible. In contrast, valgus positioning of the device, with respect to the midline of the mandible, created the opposite effect, increasing the distracted length in the anteroposterior direction. The bone (mandibular) segments being distracted assumed the orientation of the device only for valgus positioning of the device (producing a decrease in the bigonial distance). Conversely, there was no effect from the mediolateral angulation on the distracted segments during varus positioning of the device. A possible explanation for this finding may be a greater resistance to an increase in the bigonial distance (varus positioning of the device) posed by obstruction of lateral movement of the condyle. This stands in contrast to a decrease in the bigonial distance observed following valgus positioning of the device. These findings confirm the clinical impression that distraction along the anteroposterior or sagittal axis remains the critical or keystone therapeutic maneuver in distraction of the mandible. Mediolateral or horizontal axis distraction is best used only as a supplementary movement; in essence, it only affects the anteroposterior dimension with little impact on clinically relevant changes to the bigonial distance