Faculty Bibliography

OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the feasibility and efficacy of a cognitive remediation program in improving cognitive and work functioning for intermediate- to long-stay psychiatric inpatients. METHODS: Eighty-five inpatients with predominantly DSM-IV-defined schizophrenia were randomly assigned to cognitive remediation or to a control condition. The cognitive remediation program consisted of 24 hours of computerized practice over a 12-week period and a weekly discussion group to facilitate transfer of cognitive skills to daily activities. A computer control group received similar hours of staff and computer exposure without cognitive training exercises. A comprehensive neuropsychological battery was administered at baseline and posttreatment. Symptoms were assessed with the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) at baseline, midtreatment (six weeks), and posttreatment (12 weeks) and at six- and 12-month follow-ups. Work functioning was tracked during a 12-month follow-up period. RESULTS: The average number of 45-minute sessions completed was 23. Patients in the cognitive remediation group demonstrated significantly greater improvements over three months than the control group in the composite measure of overall cognitive functioning, psychomotor speed, and verbal learning. In addition, patients who received cognitive remediation worked more weeks than the control group over the 12-month follow-up period. Patients in both groups showed significant and comparable improvements over the follow-up period on the positive, activation, and depression subscales of the PANSS. CONCLUSIONS: Cognitive remediation was a feasible treatment for this group of inpatients and more effective at improving cognitive functioning than a computer control intervention. Longer-term follow-up indicated that cognitive remediation was associated with better work outcomes, suggesting benefits in psychosocial functioning

Functional impairment is observed in the majority of patients with schizophrenia and is now considered a core diagnostic feature of the disorder. Nonetheless, patient function has been a neglected aspect of the burden of schizophrenia. Despite the availability of numerous assessment scales, patient functioning has not been routinely assessed in clinical practice or as a major outcome in clinical trials. This article highlights the independence of functioning from the psychopathologic features of schizophrenia and its interference with patient recovery even when effective symptom control is achieved. This article details the complexity of measuring patient functioning and the need for increased use of assessment scales in clinical practice, in particular those scales that can assess functioning independent of the symptoms of schizophrenia. The ease of use of such scales should also help to promote their routine use in the attainment of improving patient function and, therefore, improving the long-term prognosis for patients with schizophrenia.

Objectives: This study aimed to demonstrate efficacy of once-daily extended release quetiapine fumarate (quetiapine XR) versus placebo in patients with acute schizophrenia. Methods: In this 6-week, randomized, double-blind study (5077IL/0041) patients were randomized to receive quetiapine XR (300, 600, or 800 mg/day), quetiapine fumarate immediate release (quetiapine IR) [300 or 600 mg/day], or placebo. Primary endpoint was change from baseline in the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score at Day 42. Secondary variables included PANSS response rate at Day 42 (>/=30% decrease in PANSS total score from baseline) and Clinical Global Impressions Severity (CGI-S) and Improvement (CGI-I) ratings. Safety assessments included adverse event (AE) reporting and laboratory measures. Results: Of 532 patients randomized, 222 (41.7%) completed the study. Improvements in PANSS total scores from baseline to Day 42 across treatment groups were: quetiapine XR 300 mg/day -5.01, 600 mg/day -13.01 and 800 mg/day -11.17, quetiapine IR 300 mg/day -9.42 and 600 mg/day -6.97, and placebo -5.19; the difference in change was statistically significant only for quetiapine XR 600 mg/day (p = 0.033). There were no statistically significant differences between active treatment groups and placebo for PANSS response rates. Several post hoc analyses were conducted to explain the study efficacy outcome but these were inconclusive. Quetiapine XR was generally well tolerated with the majority of AEs being mild or moderate in intensity and no unexpected AEs. Conclusions: Superior efficacy of quetiapine XR versus placebo in patients with schizophrenia was demonstrated for quetiapine XR 600 mg/day. The safety and tolerability profile of quetiapine XR was similar to that of quetiapine IR

BACKGROUND: Psychosis is present in 50% or more of patients with bipolar mania and is commonly evaluated in clinical research by means of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS). The aim of the present analysis was to investigate the psychotic dimensions of bipolar disorder and its contributing symptoms based on a factor analysis of baseline PANSS scores and to compare them with those identified in studies of patients with schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. SAMPLING AND METHODS: Baseline data were analyzed from two 3-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies of risperidone monotherapy for acute mania associated with bipolar I disorder (n = 535). Inclusion criteria were a DSM-IV diagnosis of bipolar I disorder with manic features, with or without psychotic features, age > or =18 years, and mean baseline Young Mania Rating Scale scores > or =20. A principal component analysis of the 30 PANSS item scores of the 535 patients with a diagnosis of a manic episode at baseline was conducted. RESULTS: Five factors were extracted by the analysis: anxiety (13.4% of the variance), negative symptoms (12.3%), depression (10.5%), excitement (10.3%), and positive symptoms (8.7%). Similar factors, in particular the negative, excitement, and positive factors, have been identified in patients with schizophrenia. There was an absence of a cognitive factor supporting the notion that bipolar patients may present fewer cognitive symptoms. CONCLUSION: The results of the present analysis and those of other studies indicate similarities in psychotic symptom domains, as measured by the PANSS, in patients with bipolar mania and schizophrenia. Future analyses will address the effects of treatment on the identified factors

BACKGROUND: Statistical models based on item response theory were used to examine (a) the performance of individual Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) items and their options, (b) the effectiveness of various subscales to discriminate among individual differences in symptom severity, and (c) the appropriateness of cutoff scores recently recommended by Andreasen and her colleagues (2005) to establish symptom remission. METHODS: Option characteristic curves were estimated using a nonparametric item response model to examine the probability of endorsing each of 7 options within each of 30 PANSS items as a function of standardized, overall symptom severity. Our data were baseline PANSS scores from 9205 patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder who were enrolled between 1995 and 2003 in either a large, naturalistic, observational study or else in 1 of 12 randomized, double-blind, clinical trials comparing olanzapine to other antipsychotic drugs. RESULTS: Our analyses show that the majority of items forming the Positive and Negative subscales of the PANSS perform very well. We also identified key areas for improvement or revision in items and options within the General Psychopathology subscale. The Positive and Negative subscale scores are not only more discriminating of individual differences in symptom severity than the General Psychopathology subscale score, but are also more efficient on average than the 30-item total score. Of the 8 items recently recommended to establish symptom remission, 1 performed markedly different from the 7 others and should either be deleted or rescored requiring that patients achieve a lower score of 2 (rather than 3) to signal remission. CONCLUSION: This first item response analysis of the PANSS supports its sound psychometric properties; most PANSS items were either very good or good at assessing overall severity of illness. These analyses did identify some items which might be further improved for measuring individual severity differences or for defining remission thresholds. Findings also suggest that the Positive and Negative subscales are more sensitive to change than the PANSS total score and, thus, may constitute a 'mini PANSS' that may be more reliable, require shorter administration and training time, and possibly reduce sample sizes needed for future research

A key problem in schizophrenia research is how to assess the effects of treatment interventions given the spectrum of schizophrenia symptoms and patients' functioning. Measuring symptoms is complex, because these symptoms cover a wide variety of psychopathologic domains. The commonly recognized domains are the positive, negative, cognitive, excitement, and depression domains. This article critically reviews some of the available assessment tools of these domains together with other associated syndromes. The instruments discussed cover the broad range of psychopathology found in patients who have schizophrenia

OBJECTIVE: Primary negative symptoms are intrinsic to the pathology of schizophrenia and are associated with significant deficits in motivation, verbal and nonverbal communication, affect, and cognitive and social functioning. Overall, atypical antipsychotic medications have been found to be more efficacious than conventional antipsychotics in the treatment of negative symptoms, based on studies with acute patients. Results have been confounded by concomitant improvements in positive, depressive, and extrapyramidal symptoms. This 12-week, double-blind, controlled study aimed to examine the effects of the atypical antipsychotic olanzapine versus haloperidol on persistent, primary negative symptoms and neurocognitive functions in stable schizophrenic patients with the deficit syndrome and low levels of concomitant positive, depressive, and extrapyramidal symptoms. METHOD: Thirty-five patients with DSM-IV-TR schizophrenia and predominant negative symptoms were randomly assigned in a 12-week double-blind study to either olanzapine (15-20 mg/day) or haloperidol (15-20 mg/day). Patients taking haloperidol received additional blinded benztropine. Inclusion criteria were Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) negative score of >or=20, PANSS positive score < 20, and fulfilling the criteria for the Schedule for the Deficit Syndrome. The PANSS, Clinical Global Impressions, Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D), Simpson-Angus Scale, and Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale were assessed at regular subsequent intervals. A neuropsychological battery examining declarative verbal learning memory, attention and processing speed, executive functioning, and simple motor functioning domains of cognition was assessed at baseline and endpoint. The study ran from September 1998 through May 2005. RESULTS: Clinical Results: There was a statistically significant difference for PANSS negative symptoms (F = 5.44, df = 1,15; p

PMID: 17388705

ISSN: 1555-2101

CID: 73068