Faculty Bibliography

HYPOTHESIS: Decreased length of stay (LOS) after pancreatoduodenectomy is due to multiple factors, including a lower complication rate and more efficient perioperative care for all patients, with and without complications. DESIGN: A retrospective review, validation cohort. SETTING: A single university hospital referral center. PATIENTS: A consecutive sample of patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy from January 9, 1986, to December 21, 1992 (group 1 [n = 104]) and from February 16, 1993, to November 9, 1998 (group 2 [n = 111]). INTERVENTION: Mann-Whitney test and linear [correction of logistic] regression analysis applied to clinical variables and LOS. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Difference in median LOS between early and late groups and identification of factors predictive of decreased LOS. RESULTS: Total LOS decreased between the 2 groups (26 days [range, 13-117 days] vs 15 days [range, 5-61 days]; P<.001), with a decrease in preoperative (4 days [range, 0-28 days] vs 2 days [range, 0-36 days]; P<.001) and postoperative (19 days [range, 11-95 days] vs 12 days [range, 4-58 days]; P<.001) LOS (data given for group 1 vs group 2). Major complications decreased from 49% in group 1 to 25% in group 2 (P<.001). Postoperative LOS decreased for patients with (25 days [range, 15-95 days] vs 20 days [range, 8-58 days]; P = .05) and without (15 days [range, 11-47 days] vs 11 days [range, 4-55 days]; P<.001) major complications (data given for group 1 vs group 2). Multivariate analysis identified age (P = .01), pancreatic fistula (P<.001), delayed gastric emptying (P<.001), biliary complications (P<.001), operative time (P<.005), extra-abdominal infection (P<.005), use of a percutaneous stent (P = .04), and year of operation (P<.001) as independent predictors of total LOS. CONCLUSION: A reduction in complications in combination with factors leading to a streamlining of perioperative care has contributed to the decreased LOS after pancreatoduodenectomy

The recognition of the fundamental role of the spleen in the immune response has led to greater efforts to preserve the spleen after injury. Whenever possible, splenic preservation is the preferred treatment modality for both blunt and penetrating injuries. The past 2 decades have seen an evolution in the way this goal is accomplished. Operative splenic preservation achieved by splenorrhaphy as the most prevalent method for the management of splenic trauma has progressed to the nonoperative management of these injuries. The factor most responsible for bringing about this change has been the development of more sophisticated and accurate imaging techniques in the evaluation of these patients. Splenectomy should be avoided whenever possible, as the procedure continues to be associated with excessive transfusion requirements and increased postoperative sepsis rates

The liver is the solid organ most commonly injured as a result of blunt abdominal trauma. Complete avulsion of the common hepatic duct is a rare and devastating type of hepatobiliary trauma. Here the authors report the case of a 7-year-old child who had complete biliary disruption as a result of an abdominal crush injury that was not diagnosed correctly preoperatively. The intraoperative diagnosis and treatment of this injury is discussed

OBJECTIVE: The recognition that splenectomy renders patients susceptible to lifelong risks of septic complications has led to routine attempts at splenic conservation after trauma. In 1990, the authors reported that over an 11-year study period involving 193 patients, splenorrhaphy was the most common splenic salvage method (66% overall) noted, with nonoperative management employed in only 13% of blunt splenic injuries. This report describes changing patterns of therapy in 190 consecutive patients with splenic injuries seen during a subsequent 6-year period (1990 to 1996). An algorithmic approach for patient management and pitfalls to be avoided to ensure safe nonoperative management are detailed. METHODS: Nonoperative management criteria included hemodynamic stability and computed tomographic examination without shattered spleen or other injuries requiring celiotomy. RESULTS: Of 190 consecutive patients, 102 (54%) were managed nonoperatively: 96 (65%) of 147 patients with blunt splenic injuries, which included 15 patients with intrinsic splenic pathology, and 6 hemodynamically stable patients with isolated stab wounds (24% of all splenic stab wounds). Fifty-six patients underwent splenectomy (29%) and 32 splenorrhaphy (17%). The mean transfusion requirement was 6 units for splenectomy survivors and 0.8 units for nonoperative therapy (85% received no transfusions). Fifteen of the 16 major infectious complications that occurred followed splenectomy. Two patients failed nonoperative therapy (2%) and underwent splenectomy, and one patient required splenectomy after partial splenic resection. There no missed enteric injuries in patients managed nonoperatively. The overall mortality rate was 5.2%, with no deaths following nonoperative management. CONCLUSIONS: Nonoperative management of blunt splenic injuries has replaced splenorrhaphy as the most common method of splenic conservation. The criteria have been extended to include patients previously excluded from this form of therapy. As a result, 65% of all blunt splenic injuries and select stab wounds can be managed with minimal transfusions, morbidity, or mortality, with a success rate of 98%. Splenectomy, when necessary, continues to be associated with excessive transfusion and an inordinately high postoperative sepsis rate

BACKGROUND: How should the stable patient with penetrating abdominal or lower chest trauma be evaluated? Evolving trends have recently included the use of diagnostic laparoscopy. In September 1995 we instituted a protocol of diagnostic laparoscopy to identify those patients who could safely avoid surgical intervention. DESIGN: Prospective case series. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Hemodynamically stable patients with penetrating injuries to the anterior abdomen and lower chest were prospectively evaluated by diagnostic laparoscopy, performed in the operating room under general anesthesia, and considered negative if no peritoneal violation or an isolated nonbleeding liver injury had occurred. If peritoneal violation, major organ injury or hematoma was noted, conversion to open celiotomy was undertaken. RESULTS: Seventy consecutive patients were evaluated over a two-year period. The average length of stay (LOS) following negative laparoscopy was 1.5 days, and for negative celiotomy 5.2 days. There were no missed intra-abdominal injuries following 30 negative laparoscopies, and 26 of 40 laparotomies were therapeutic. The technique also proved useful in evaluation of selected blunt and HIV+ trauma victims with unclear clinical presentations. However, while laparoscopy was accurate in assessing the abdomen following penetrating lower chest injuries, significant thoracic injuries were missed in 2 out of 11 patients who required subsequent return to OR for thoracotomy. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopy has become a useful and accurate diagnostic tool in the evaluation of abdominal trauma. Nevertheless, laparoscopy still carries a 20% nontherapeutic laparotomy rate. Additionally, significant intrathoracic injuries may be missed when laparoscopy is used as the primary technique to evaluate penetrating lower thoracic trauma

Despite decreased operative mortality, pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) remains a formidable operation with substantial morbidity. We have evaluated the influence of preoperative endoscopic biliary drainage (EBD) on morbidity after PD for malignant biliary obstruction by retrospectively reviewing the medical records of 182 patients undergoing PD between April 1985 and August 1996. Of 52 study patients with malignant obstructive jaundice, 22 underwent preoperative EBD, and 30 were not drained. Eighty-three patients were excluded for bilirubin levels less than 5 mg/dl, 43 had other biliary drainage, and 4 had jaundice with benign pathology. Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative factors were compared. The two groups were well matched for clinical presentation and operative characteristics except for lower preoperative values of liver chemistries in patients undergoing EBD. Length of postoperative hospitalization for patients undergoing EBD was 13.5 days, compared with 19 days for patients who were not drained (p = 0.02). Patients who were not drained tended to have more overall complications (p = 0.054). Multivariate analysis revealed time to regular diet (p < 0.0001) and no preoperative drainage (p = 0.04) to be independent factors significantly increasing the length of hospitalization. Endoscopic biliary drainage before PD significantly reduced the length of postoperative hospitalization and was associated with less postoperative morbidity. Further studies, including cost analysis, are warranted

OBJECTIVE: While immunosuppression 2 degrees to human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection should logically render HIV+ trauma victims more prone to infection after injury, little data is available regarding trauma outcome in this group of patients. Since the helper CD4+ lymphocyte count is a marker for progression of HIV-associated diseases, we examined the relationship between CD4+ counts, Injury Severity Score (ISS), and bacterial infectious complications in HIV+ trauma patients. METHOD: Retrospective review of 56 consecutive HIV+ trauma patients treated at a Level I trauma center. RESULTS: Nine patients (15%) developed significant infectious complications (four pneumonias, three soft-tissue infections, one urinary tract infection, one wound infection) with no pattern to the causative agents. Evaluation of CD4+ counts, white blood cell counts, serum albumin levels, blood transfusion requirements, and ISS revealed that only the ISS was associated with infectious complications. CONCLUSION: Despite the profound immunosuppression in this group of patients, the incidence of bacterial infectious complications was independent of the CD4+ count (p = 0.958), but was associated with increases in the ISS (p = 0.003)