Faculty Bibliography

In this study, we demonstrate specific interaction of the GluR2 alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionate (AMPA) receptor subunit C-terminal peptide with an ATPase N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive fusion protein (NSF) and alpha- and beta-soluble NSF attachment proteins (SNAPs), as well as dendritic colocalization of these proteins. The assembly of the GluR2-NSF-SNAP complex is ATP hydrolysis reversible and resembles the binding of NSF and SNAP with the SNAP receptor (SNARE) membrane fusion apparatus. We provide evidence that the molar ratio of NSF to SNAP in the GluR2-NSF-SNAP complex is similar to that of the t-SNARE syntaxin-NSF-SNAP complex. NSF is known to disassemble the SNARE protein complex in a chaperone-like interaction driven by ATP hydrolysis. We propose a model in which NSF functions as a chaperone in the molecular processing of the AMPA receptor

The tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) gene encodes the rate-limiting enzyme in the biosynthesis of catecholamines. We have investigated the roles of two elements of the TH promoter, the TH-'Fat Specific Element' (TH-FSE) which binds the Fos-Jun complex, and the cAMP Response Element (CRE), which binds CREB and the co-activator protein, CREB Binding Protein (CBP) in regulating TH gene transcription. In PC12 cells, the TH-FSE was required for induction by NGF while the CRE was required for induction by cAMP. We show that both elements can function independently and contribute strongly to TH promoter basal activity in PC12 cells. We employed transient expression in the F9 teratocarcinoma cell line to vary experimentally the levels of the nuclear regulators implicated in TH control by the PC12 studies. In F9 cells, the TH promoter was strongly activated by Fos and Jun, and by PKA-stimulated CREB protein. In F9 and NIH3T3 cells, CBP, a co-activator which targets Fos-Jun and PKA-stimulated CREB, also induced the TH promoter. Immunohistochemical studies in rat brain regions enriched in dopaminergic neurons, including the midbrain and olfactory bulb (OB), suggest that Fos-Jun and CREB make differential contributions to TH gene activity in different tissues. Whereas changes in Fos protein levels parallel decreases in TH protein upon olfactory deprivation, CBP levels remain unchanged. This suggests that CRE-associated factors, including CBP, are not major regulators in the OB. In contrast, the presence of CREB and the absence of Fos immunoreactivity in midbrain dopaminergic cells suggests that the CRE is the primary regulator in this region

Cell proliferation is regulated by the induction of growth promoting genes and the suppression of growth inhibitory genes. Malignant growth can result from the altered balance of expression of these genes in favor of cell proliferation. Induction of the transcription factor, c-Myc, promotes cell proliferation and transformation by activating growth promoting genes, including the ODC and cdc25A genes. We show that c-Myc transcriptionally represses the expression of a growth arrest gene, gas1. A conserved Myc structure, Myc box 2, is required for repression of gas1, and for Myc induction of proliferation and transformation, but not for activation of ODC. Activation of a Myc-estrogen receptor fusion protein by 4-hydroxytamoxifen was sufficient to repress gas1 gene transcription. These findings suggest that transcriptional repression of growth arrest genes, including gas1, is one step in promotion of cell growth by Myc

The PC12 pheochromocytoma cell line responds to nerve growth factor (NGF) by gradually exiting from the cell cycle and differentiating to a sympathetic neuronal phenotype. We have shown previously () that NGF induces the expression of the p21 WAF1/CIP1/Sdi1 (p21) cyclin-dependent kinase (Cdk) inhibitor protein and the G1 phase cyclin, cyclin D1. In this report, we show that induction is at the level of transcription and that the DNA elements in both promoters that are required for NGF-specific induction are clusters of binding sites for the Sp1 transcription factor. NGF also induced a synthetic promoter with repeated Sp1 sites linked to a core promoter, and a plasmid regulated by a chimeric transactivator in which the Gal4 DNA binding domain is fused to the Sp1 transactivation domain, indicating that this transactivation domain is regulated by NGF. Epidermal growth factor, which is a weak mitogen for PC12, failed to induce any of these promoter constructs. We consider a model in which the PC12 cell cycle is arrested as p21 accumulates and attains inhibitory levels relative to Cdk/cyclin complexes. Sustained activation of p21 expression is proposed to be a distinguishing feature of the activity of NGF that contributes to PC12 growth arrest during differentiation

The regulated expression of synaptic vesicle (SV) proteins during development and the assembly of these proteins into functional SVs are critical aspects of nervous system maturation. We have examined the expression patterns of four SV proteins in embryonic hippocampal neurons developing in culture and have found that increases in the levels of these proteins result primarily from post-transcriptional regulation. Synaptotagmin I, vamp 2, and synapsin I proteins are synthesized at nearly constant rates as the neurons develop. However, these proteins are relatively unstable at early times in culture and undergo a progressive increase in half-life with time, possibly as a result of an increase in the efficiency with which they are incorporated into SVs. In contrast, synaptophysin is synthesized at a very low rate at early times in culture, and its rate of synthesis increases dramatically with time. The increase in synaptophysin synthesis is not simply the result of an increase in mRNA level, but is largely attributable to an increase in the rate of translational initiation. Despite the nearly constant rates of synthesis of synaptotagmin I, vamp 2, and synapsin I, we show that the number of SVs in these developing neurons increases, and that SV proteins are more efficiently targeted to SVs at later times in culture. Our results suggest that SV production during development is not limited by the rates of transcription of genes encoding the component proteins, thus allowing control of this process by cytoplasmic mechanisms, without signaling to the nucleus