Faculty Bibliography

STUDY DESIGN/METHODS:Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE:To demonstrate the relationship between perioperative use of catheters and the incidence of surgical site infection (SSI) after cervical spine surgery, after adjusting for patient's age, severity of comorbidity, surgical approach, and use of instrumentation. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA/BACKGROUND:Although the association between SSI and the use of arterial catheters (ACs) or central venous catheters (CVCs) is established in cardiac surgery, the relation in the cervical spine was not well elucidated. METHODS:A private insurance database was analyzed. The incidence of SSI within 1 month postoperatively and the crude odds ratio (cOR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were calculated based on the use of catheters. Subsequently, logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent factors for SSI. Independent variables of the regression analysis included Charlson comorbidity index with the score of age, the use of CVC, the use of AC, surgical approach (anterior or posterior), and instrumentation (fusion or decompression alone). RESULTS:A total of 39,893 patients received cervical surgery between 2007 and 2015. Of these, 1.6% patients experienced an SSI. The incidence of SSI in patients treated with and without AC was 3.2% and 1.3%, respectively (cOR 2.44, 95% CI: 2.05-2.99, P < 0.001). Likewise, incidence of SSI in patients with and without CVC was 5.8% and 1.5%, respectively (cOR 2.61, 95% CI: 2.97-5.55, P < 0.001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that the adjusted OR was 1.66 in CVC use (95% CI: 1.08-2.46, P = 0.016), whereas the AC use was not significant variable (P = 0.086). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:The use of CVC can be a potential risk factor for SSI regardless of age, severity of comorbidity, surgical approach, or presence of instrumentation. Although the essential benefits of catheters are undisputed, our data can bring up the surgeon's attention to appropriate management of the CVC. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE/METHODS:3.

The objective of the study is to identified the correlation between Modic changes (MCs), disc degeneration, motions (translation and angulation) and facet osteoarthritis in lumbar spine. 425 patients who underwent multi-positional lumbar MRI were reviewed. A total of 2250 lumbar spinal segments in neutral position were evaluated for MCs, disc degeneration grading, translation and angulation motion, and facet osteoarthritis. The chi-square test, Kruskal-Wallis, Mann-Whitney U test, Pearson's correlation and linear regression were used to test for statistically significant difference between parameters. MCs type 2 showed the most translational motion. The presence of MCs was significantly correlated with advanced disc degeneration (grade 4-5, Odds ratio 6.29, 95% CI 4.48-8.83) and the presence of facet osteoarthritis (Odds ratio 9.50, 95% CI 6.18-14.62). The presence of facet osteoarthritis had significantly more translation motion than non-osteoarthritis facet (p=0.04). The facet osteoarthritis grade was positively correlated with disc degeneration grade (r=0.309, p-value<0.001). The facet osteoarthritis correlated with the presence of MCs and more translation motion. The severity of facet osteoarthritis was correlated with the advanced disc degeneration. The MCs, translation motion, and disc degeneration were the significant parameters which affected lumbar facet osteoarthritis.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT:Cervical sagittal vertical axis (cSVA) of ≥40 mm is recognized as the key factor of poor health-related quality of life, poor surgical outcomes, and correction loss after surgery for cervical deformity. However, little is known about the radiological characteristics of patients with cSVA≥40 mm. PURPOSE:The purpose of this study was to identify the radiological characteristics of patients with cervical imbalance. DESIGN:Retrospective analysis of weight-bearing cervical magnetic resonance (MR) images. PATIENT SAMPLE:Consecutive 1,500 MR images of symptomatic patients in weight-bearing position. OUTCOME MEASURES:Cervical sagittal vertical axis, cervical alignment, cervical balance parameters (T1 slope, Co-C2 angle, C2-C7 angle, C7-T1 angle, neck tilt, and thoracic inlet angle), disc degeneration (Pfirmann and Suzuki classification), end plate degeneration (Modic change), spondylolisthesis (antero- and retrolisthesis), anteroposterior (AP) diameter of dural sac, cross-sectional area (CSA), and fat infiltration ratio of the transversospinalis muscles at C4 and C7 levels. METHODS:Patients were divided into two groups: cSVA≥40 mm and cSVA<40 mm. Gender, age, and cervical alignment were analyzed. Subsequently, matched imbalance (cSVA≥40 mm) and control (<40 mm) groups were created using the propensity score to adjust for age, gender, and cervical alignment. Cervicothoracic angular parameters, disc degeneration, Modic change, spondylolisthesis, and degeneration of the transversospinalis muscles at C4 and C7 were compared. Variables with p<.05 were included in the multinomial logistic regression model to identify factors that relate to the cervical balance grouping. RESULTS:The incidence of patients with cervical imbalance was 2.5% (37 patients). Those patients had a higher incidence of kyphosis, were older, and there were more male patients. In the matched imbalance group, the T1 slope was greater (p=.028), C7-T1 lordotic angle was smaller (p<.001), the number of anterolisthesis was greater (p=.012), and the fat infiltration ratio at C4 and C7 was higher (p=.023, 0.030) compared with the control. Logistic regression analysis showed that the C7-T1 angle (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]=0.592, p=.001) and fat infiltration ratio at C7 level (aOR=1.178, p=.030) were significant independent variables. CONCLUSIONS:Smaller C7-T1 lordotic angle and severe muscle degeneration at C7 level were independent characteristics of patients with cervical imbalance.

STUDY DESIGN:Retrospective study. OBJECTIVE:To evaluate how each type of sagittal cervical alignment affects the motion of the upper and subaxial cervical spine using kinematic magnetic resonance imaging. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA:The sagittal malalignment of the cervical spine from degeneration in the subaxial cervical spine reflects a disruption in the kinematic properties of the cervical spine and affects the motion of adjacent segments. Changes in the sagittal parameters and kinematics of the upper cervical spine and upper thoracic spine due to the kyphosis are unknown. METHODS:Kinematic magnetic resonance imaging of the cervical spine in neutral position from 311 patients, including 90 lordotic, 90 straight, 90 global kyphotic, and 41 segmental kyphotic were analyzed. The lordotic angle at the upper and lower cervical spine, and T1 slope were measured in the neutral position and again in flexion and extension for dynamic analysis. RESULTS:The number of levels with significant disk degeneration was higher in the global kyphosis group. In the global kyphosis group, neutral sagittal parameters showed some characteristics of compensation to the malalignment. Compared with the lordotic group, patients with global kyphosis demonstrated significantly higher lordotic angle of the upper cervical spine and more horizontal T1 slope. The dynamic evaluation showed greater range of motion of the entire cervical spine and subaxial cervical spine in younger patients. However, we still found greater range of motion of the occipito-atlanto-axial complex in global kyphosis, even when controlling for age and number of levels with significant disk degeneration. CONCLUSION:Sagittal malalignment of the cervical spine affects all parts of the cervical motion complex. The global kyphotic alignment of subaxial cervical spine affects the kinematic properties of the occipito-atlanto-axial complex and upper thoracic spine to compensate for the alteration of cervical alignment. These differences are not seen in straight and segmental kyphosis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:Level 3.

STUDY DESIGN/METHODS:Retrospective case study. OBJECTIVE:To evaluate the trends and demographics of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein 2 (rhBMP2) utilization in single-level anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) in the United States. METHODS:Patients who underwent single-level ALIF from 2005 to 2011 were identified by searching ICD-9 diagnosis and procedure codes in the PearlDiver Patient Records Database (PearlDiver Technologies, Fort Wayne, IN), a national database of orthopedic insurance records. The year of procedure, age, gender, and region of the United States were analyzed for each patient. RESULTS:< .001), with an incidence of 0.21 per 100 000 patients. CONCLUSIONS:The incidence of rhBMP2 utilization in single-level ALIF increased from 2006 to 2009, but decreased in 2010 and 2011. The Northeast region had the lowest incidence of rhBMP2 utilization. The group aged less than 65 years trended to have the higher incidence of single-level ALIF with rhBMP2 utilization.

PURPOSE:The cross-sectional area and fat infiltration are accepted as standard parameters for quantitative and qualitative evaluation of muscle degeneration. However, they are time-consuming, which prevents them from being used in a clinical setting. The aim of this study was to analyze the relationship between lumbar muscle degeneration and spinal degenerative disorders, using lumbar indentation value (LIV) as quantitative and Goutallier classification as qualitative measures. METHODS:This is a retrospective analysis of kinematic magnetic resonance images (kMRI). Two-hundred and thirty patients with kMRIs taken in weight-bearing positions were selected randomly. The LIV and Goutallier classification were evaluated at L4-5. The correlation of these two parameters with patients' age, gender, lumbar lordosis (LL), range of motion, disc degeneration, disc height, and Modic change were analyzed. RESULTS:There was no significant trend of LIV among the different grades of Goutallier classification (p = 0.943). There was a significant increase in age with higher grades of Goutallier classification (p < 0.001). In contrast, there was no correlation between LIV and age (p = 0.799). The Goutallier classification positively correlated with LL (r = 0.377) and severe disc degeneration (r = 0.249). The LIV positively correlated with LL (r = 0.476) and degenerative spondylolisthesis (r = 0.184). Multinomial logistic regression analysis showed that age (p = 0.026), gender (p = 0.003), and LIV (p < 0.001) were significant predictors for patients with low LL (< 10°). CONCLUSION:Lumbar muscle quantity and quality showed specific correlation with age and spine disorders. Additionally, LL can be predicted by the muscle quantity, but not the quality. These time-saving evaluation tools potentially accelerate the study of lumbar muscles. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

STUDY DESIGN/METHODS:Retrospective database study. OBJECTIVE:Low back and neck pain are among the top leading causes of disability worldwide. The aim of our study was to report the current trends on spine degenerative disorders and their treatments. METHODS:Patients diagnosed with lumbar or cervical spine conditions within the orthopedic subset of Medicare and Humana databases (PearlDiver). From the initial cohorts we identified subgroups based on the treatment: fusion or nonoperative within 1 year from diagnosis. Poisson regression was used to determine demographic differences in diagnosis and treatment approaches. RESULTS:Within the Medicare database there were 6 206 578 patients diagnosed with lumbar and 3 156 215 patients diagnosed with cervical degenerative conditions between 2006 and 2012, representing a 16.5% (lumbar) decrease and 11% (cervical) increase in the number of diagnosed patients. There was an increase of 18.5% in the incidence of fusion among lumbar patients. For the Humana data sets there were 1 160 495 patients diagnosed with lumbar and 660 721 patients diagnosed with cervical degenerative disorders from 2008 to 2014. There was a 33% (lumbar) and 42% (cervical) increases in the number of diagnosed patients. However, in both lumbar and cervical groups there was a decrease in the number of surgical and nonoperative treatments. CONCLUSIONS:There was an overall increase in both lumbar and cervical conditions, followed by an increase in lumbar fusion procedures within the Medicare database. There is still a burning need to optimize the spine care for the elderly and people in their prime work age to lessen the current national economic burden.

STUDY DESIGN/METHODS:Retrospective review. PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:To identify the trends in stimulator use, pair those trends with various grafting materials, and determine the influence of stimulators on the risk of revision surgery. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE/BACKGROUND:A large number of studies has reported beneficial effects of electromagnetic energy in healing long bone fractures. However, there are few clinical studies regarding the use of electrical stimulators in spinal fusion. METHODS:We used insurance billing codes to identify patients with lumbar disc degeneration who underwent anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF). Comparisons between patients who did and did not receive electrical stimulators following surgery were performed using logistic regression analysis, chi-square test, and odds ratio (OR) analysis. RESULTS:Approximately 19% of the patients (495/2,613) received external stimulators following ALIF surgery. There was a slight increase in stimulator use from 2008 to 2014 (multi-level R2=0.08, single-level R2=0.05). Patients who underwent multi-level procedures were more likely to receive stimulators than patients who underwent single-level procedures (p<0.05; OR, 3.72; 95% confidence interval, 3.02-4.57). Grafting options associated with most frequent stimulator use were bone marrow aspirates (BMA) plus autograft or allograft for single-level and allograft alone for multi-level procedures. In both cohorts, patients treated with bone morphogenetic proteins were least likely to receive electrical stimulators (p<0.05). Patients who received stimulation generally had higher reimbursements. Concurrent posterior lumbar fusion (PLF) (ALIF+PLF) increased the likelihood of receiving stimulators (p<0.05). Patients who received electrical stimulators had similar revision rates as those who did not receive stimulation (p>0.05), except those in the multilevel ALIF+PLF cohort, wherein the patients who underwent stimulation had higher rates of revision surgery. CONCLUSIONS:Concurrent PLF or multi-level procedures increased patients' likelihood of receiving stimulators, however, the presence of comorbidities did not. Patients who received BMA plus autograft or allograft were more likely to receive stimulation. Patients with and without bone stimulators had similar rates of revision surgery.

Outpatient arthroplasty is an appealing option among select patient populations as a mechanism for reducing health care expenditure. The purpose of this study was to determine the nationwide trends and complication profile of outpatient total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). The authors reviewed a national administrative claims database to identify patients undergoing TSA as outpatients and inpatients from 2007 to 2016. The incidence of perioperative surgical and medical complications was determined by querying for relevant International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, and Current Procedural Terminology codes. Multivariate logistic regression adjusted for age, sex, and Charlson Comorbidity Index was used to calculate odds ratios of complications among outpatients relative to inpatients undergoing TSA. The query identified 1555 patients who underwent outpatient TSA and 15,987 patients who underwent inpatient TSA. The median age was in the 70 to 74 years age group in both the outpatient and the inpatient cohorts, and the age distribution was comparable between the 2 cohorts (P=.287). The incidence of both outpatient (P<.001) and inpatient (P<.001) TSA increased during the study period. On adjustment for age, sex, and comorbidities, patients undergoing outpatient TSA had significantly lower rates of stiffness requiring manipulation under anesthesia (outpatient, 1.09%; inpatient, 2.35%; odds ratio, 0.52; 95% confidence interval, 0.38-0.71; P<.001) and higher rates of postoperative surgical site infections requiring reoperation (outpatient, 0.90%; inpatient, 0.65%; odds ratio, 1.65; 95% confidence interval, 1.15-2.35; P<.001) at 1 year. Rates of all other postoperative complications were comparable. Ambulatory TSA is increasing in incidence nationwide and is associated with an overall favorable postoperative complication profile. [Orthopedics. 2018; 41(3):e400-e409.].

STUDY DESIGN:Retrospective analysis of consecutive 45 radiographs and 120 kinematic magnetic resonance images (kMRI) OBJECTIVE.: The aim was to assess the visibility of C7 and T1 endplates on radiographs, and to verify the correlation between C7 or T1 slope and cervical balance parameters using kMRI. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA:Because the T1 slope is not always visible due to the anatomical interference, several studies have used C7 slope instead of T1. However, it is still unclear whether the C7 endplate is more visible on radiographs than T1, and if C7 slope has similarity with T1 slope. METHODS:The endplate visibility was determined using weight-bearing radiography. Subsequently, using weight-bearing MR images, the C7 slope of upper and lower endplate, T1 slope, C1 inclination, C2 slope, atlas-dens interval (ADI), C2-C7 lordotic angle, cervical sagittal vertical axis (cSVA), cervical tilt, cranial tilt, neck tilt, thoracic inlet angle (TIA) were measured, for the analysis of correlation between three types of slopes and cervical balance parameters. RESULTS:82% of the upper C7, and 18% of T1 endplate were clearly visible. The upper C7 endplate was significantly visible, whereas T1 endplate was significantly invisible (residual analysis, P < 0.01). Linear regression analysis showed correlation between the upper C7 slope and T1 slope (R = 0.818, P < 0.01) and, lower C7 slope and T1 slope (R = 0.840, P < 0.01). T1 slope significantly correlated with neck tilt, TIA, C2-C7 angle, cSVA, cervical and cranial tilt, but not with the C1 inclination, C2 slope, and ADI. Upper and lower C7 slopes showed the close resemblance with T1 slope in terms of correlation with those parameters. CONCLUSION:Both, upper and lower C7 slope correlated strongly with T1 slope and showed similar relationship with cervical balance parameters as T1 slope. Therefore, C7 slope could potentially substitute T1 slope, especially upper C7 slope due to the good visibility. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:3.