Faculty Bibliography

The three-dimensionally reconstructed hippocampal formations in three patients with very severe, immobile Alzheimer disease (AD) and three age-matched nondemented individuals were examined for a correlation between atrophy of hippocampal formation subdivisions and neurofibrillary changes, neuronal loss, and extent of amyloid deposition in plaques and vessels. In AD, a similar severe volume loss was observed in both cellular layers and layers composed of fibers. A strong correlation between the decrease in the volume of hippocampal formation subdivisions and the decrease in the total number of neurons suggests a causative role for neuronal loss in hippocampal formation volumetric loss. Strong regional correlations between the relative decreases in the total number of neurons and the relative increases in the total number of neurofibrillary tangles implicates neurofibrillary pathology as a possible etiologic proximate factor in neuronal and volumetric loss in the hippocampal formation of AD patients

It is important that clinicians who rate global change as part of Alzheimer's disease (AD) clinical drug trials agree on a relevant set of behaviors and information to be considered in formulating their rating. Yet, consensus among raters has been difficult to establish, and inter-rater reliability of clinical global impression of change (CGIC) ratings has been low. In preparation for the development of a new CGIC scale to be used in AD clinical trials, the Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Clinical Global Impression of Change (ADCS-CGIC), we surveyed clinicians at sites comprising the National Institute on Aging-sponsored ADCS participating centers to identify whether or not consensus regarding CGICs exists. Overall, respondents reported that a CGIC should include an assessment of the patient's function and mental status, a care giver interview, and a standardized set of questions, and it should take approximately 20 minutes per interview. Depending on a patient's level of impairment, raters consider different areas of behavior in formulating a CGIC rating. These findings demonstrate the considerable consensus regarding the CGIC rating process, and were integrated into the design of the ADCS-CGIC, currently in use

Most dementias in old age are characterized by a progressive course with interindividual variability in pattern and rate of progression. Developing a system for staging such dementia poses a challenge in capturing this variability in a system that will afford comparisons among individuals and predictions of future change. Several core questions underlie the development of such systems: (1) Is there a definable order in which abilities are lost? (2) Which skills and functions should be considered essential for the staging of dementia and what is their relative weight? (3) Can the different skills be captured within one staging system? (4) How is the whole range of function captured, and are the differences between stages clearly defined? (5) Which populations can be rated with each staging system? The determination of this last question is based on understanding which other medical conditions may interfere with the course of dementia and how prior characteristics, such as education, affect ratings on specific scales for the staging of dementia. Several systems for staging dementia in older adults are described. These include the Clinical Dementia Rating, the Global Deterioration Scale/Brief Cognitive Rating Scale/Functional Assessment Staging System, the Six Clinical Phases of Cognitive Decline, the Hierarchic Dementia Scale, and the Functional Capacity Scale. Some aspects of the utility of these systems are reviewed, and the issues for further research are discussed