Faculty Bibliography

STUDY DESIGN/METHODS:Retrospective database review. OBJECTIVE:Posterior/posterolateral lumbar fusion (PLF) is an effective treatment for a variety of spinal disorders; however, variations in surgical technique have different complication profiles. The aim of our study was to quantify the frequency of various complications in patients undergoing PLF with and without human recombinant bone morphogenetic protein 2 (rhBMP2). METHODS:We queried the orthopedic subset of the Medicare database (PearlDiver) between 2005 and 2011 for patients undergoing PLF procedures with and without rhBMP2. Complication and reoperation rates were analyzed within 1 year of the index procedure. Complications assessed include: acute renal failure, deep vein thrombosis, dural tear, hematoma, heterotopic ossification, incision and drainage, cardiac complications, nervous system complications, osteolysis, pneumonia, pseudarthrosis, pulmonary embolism, radiculopathy, respiratory complications, sepsis, urinary retention, urinary tract infection, mechanical, and wound complications. Chi-square analysis was used to calculate the complication differences between the groups. RESULTS:< .05). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Our data revealed higher overall complication rates in PLF patients given rhBMP2 compared with no_rhBMP2. Furthermore, our data suggests that rhBMP2-associated complications may be gender specific.

BACKGROUND:The purpose of this study is to assess the incidence, risk factors for, and types of respiratory complications occurring in patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery. METHODS:codes and Current Procedural Terminology codes to determine the incidence of pneumonia, pleural effusion, pulmonary collapse, and acute respiratory failure for each procedure type. The incidence of these complications in patients with the risk factors diabetes mellitus, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and smoking was also examined. RESULTS:< .01). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:The results of this study show that patients who have a history of smoking, COPD, or diabetes mellitus are at a greater risk for respiratory complications following lumbar spine surgery. These findings are useful for patient selection, clinical decision-making, and preoperative counseling.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT:The thoracic spine was previously known as a relatively stable region in human spine. Several studies reported that the motion of the thoracic spine and changes in the cross-sectional area of the spinal cord changed with positions in the sagittal plane. The kinematic relationship between the thoracic disc and the space available for cord (SAC) with the positional change is still not well investigated. PURPOSE:The objective of this study was to evaluate the kinematic change of the intervertebral disc and space available for the spinal cord of the thoracic spine using kinematic magnetic resonance imaging (kMRI). STUDY DESIGN:This is a retrospective study. PATIENT SAMPLE:The patient sample included 105 patients who underwent thoracic spine kMRI. OUTCOME MEASUREMENT:Disc bulging and the SAC were evaluated from T4-T5 to T11-T12 in flexion, neutral, and extension positions. METHODS:MRAnalyzer3 (TrueMRI Corporation, Bellflower, CA, USA) was used to analyze disc bulging and SAC from T4-T5 to T11-T12. The Friedman test was used to analyze the differences in disc bulging and SAC between neutral, flexion, and extension positions at each segment. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used for post hoc analysis for the significant levels from the Friedman test. RESULTS:The mean value of the thoracic intervertebral disc area from T4-T5 to T11-T12 tended to be larger in flexion than in extension. Initial analysis with the Friedman test revealed a significant difference in disc bulging at T8-T9, T9-T10, and T11-T12 among the three positions (p<.05). Post hoc analysis showed that disc bulging was only significant at T8-T9 between flexion and extension (p<.001), at T9-T10 between neutral and flexion (0.003), and at T9-T10 between flexion and extension (p=.004). The SAC from T4-T5 to T11-T12 tended to be widest in extension and narrowest in flexion. Only T5-T6 exhibited a statistically significant difference in SAC between flexion and extension (p=.002). CONCLUSIONS:The thoracic discs and the SAC from T4-T5 to T11-T12 showed kinematic changes from flexion to extension. The thoracic spinal canal tended to be narrowest in flexion and widest in the extension. Thus, kyphotic deformities could be one of the etiologies for neurogenic deterioration in patients with thoracic myelopathy.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT:With the changing landscape of health care, outpatient spine surgery is being more commonly performed to reduce cost and to improve efficiency. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is one of the most common spine surgeries performed and demand is expected to increase with an aging population. PURPOSE:The objective of this study was to determine the nationwide trends and relative complication rates associated with outpatient ACDF. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING:This is a large-scale retrospective case control study. PATIENT SAMPLE:The patient sample included Humana-insured patients who underwent one- to two-level ACDF as either outpatients or inpatients from 2011 to 2016 OUTCOME MEASURES: The outcome measures included incidence and the adjusted odds ratio (OR) of postoperative medical and surgical complications within 1 year of the index surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS:A retrospective review was performed of the PearlDiver Humana insurance records database to identify patients undergoing one- to two-level ACDF (Current Procedural Terminology [CPT]-22551 and International Classification of Diseases [ICD]-9-816.2) as either outpatients or inpatients from 2011 to 2016. The incidence of perioperative medical and surgical complications was determined by querying for relevant ICD and CPT codes. Multivariate logistic regression adjusting for age, gender, and Charlson Comorbidity Index was used to calculate ORs of complications among outpatients relative to inpatients undergoing ACDF. RESULTS:=0.82, p=.04). Adjusting for age, gender, and comorbidities, patients undergoing outpatient ACDF were more likely to undergo revision surgery for posterior fusion at both 6 months (OR 1.58, confidence interval [CI] 1.27-1.96, p<.001) and 1 year (OR 1.79, CI 1.51-2.13, p<.001) postoperatively. Outpatient ACDF was also associated with a higher likelihood of revision anterior fusion at 1 year postoperatively (OR 1.46, CI 1.26-1.70, p<.001). Among medical complications, postoperative acute renal failure was more frequently associated with outpatient ACDF than inpatient ACDF (OR 1.25, CI 1.06-1.49, p=.010). Adjusted rates of all other queried surgical and medical complications were comparable. CONCLUSIONS:Outpatient ACDF is increasing in frequency nationwide over the past several years. Nationwide data demonstrate a greater risk of perioperative surgical complications, including revision anterior and posterior fusion, as well as a higher risk of postoperative acute renal failure. Candidates for outpatient ACDF should be counseled and carefully selected to reduce these risks.

Studies have demonstrated superior outcomes and cost effectiveness of the spinal cord stimulation (SCS) for the treatment of chronic pain syndromes such as failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS) or complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS). However, little is known about the impact of primary diagnosis or mental disorders on the revision rate. This is the Retrospective cohort study to analyze the reintervention rates based on the primary diagnosis or comorbid mental disorder. Data of the annual trends of SCS use, revision and removal rate of SCS and additional surgical rate after removal was collected and analyzed for patients undergoing SCS between 2007 and 2015, within a private insurance billing database. Trial cases were excluded from this study. The results showed 11,029 patients received SCS implantation with percutaneous electrodes (PE, n = 7418) or surgical electrode (SE, n = 3611). There was a trend of increasing use of SCS from 2007 to 2013, followed by a decrease in last two years. There was no significant difference in the neither removal nor revision rate regardless between the patients with FBSS or CRPS at each time point. Although the removal rates within 2 years were significantly higher in the patients with anxiety disorders compared to the patients without any mental disorders (PE: p < .001, SE: 0.003), the rate of additional surgery after the removal showed no significant difference (PE: p = .532, SE: p = .262). Therefore, we concluded that the primary diagnosis and the presence of anxiety disorders did not have an impact on the additional surgical rate following SCS implantation.

PURPOSE:Although the T1 vertebra is considered as an important factor of cervical balance, little is known about its motion between flexion and extension. The purpose of present study was to analyze the T1 sagittal motion using kinematic magnetic resonance imaging (kMRI), and to identify factors that relate to T1 sagittal motion. METHODS:We retrospectively analyzed 145 kMR images taken in weight-bearing neutral, flexion and extension positions. Cervical balance parameters were evaluated in each position. The degree of T1 sagittal motion was defined as [(T1 slope at extension) - (T1 slope at flexion)]. All patients were divided into three groups: Positive group (T1 followed the head motion, T1 sagittal motion > 5°), Stable group (5 ≥, ≥ - 5) and Negative group (T1 moved in the opposite direction from the head motion, > - 5). The groups were compared and multivariate logistic regression analysis was calculated. RESULTS:There were 57 (40%) patients in the positive, 56 (39%) in the stable and 32 (22%) in the negative group. The positive group had the largest C2-7 sagittal vertical axis in flexion (p < 0.001) and the shortest in the extension (p = 0.023). Similar trends were seen in cranial tilt and cervical tilt. The value of T1 height < 27 mm was a significant independent factor for the negative group (p = 0.008, adjusted odds ratio = 5.958). CONCLUSION:Based on T1 sagittal motion, 40% of the patients were classified in positive group (the T1 vertebra followed the head motion in flexion and extension), and 20% were classified in the negative group (the T1 vertebra moved in the opposite direction from the head motion). T1 height < 27 mm was a potential predictor of negative group.

PURPOSE:To test the reliability and validity of the multi-positional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in measuring cervical angular parameter using the standard dynamic cervical X-ray as a reference. METHODS:All patients who underwent both cervical dynamic plain radiograph and multi-positional MRI on the same day between 2010 and 2016 were included in this study. The C2-7 angle and the segmental angles of the C2-3 to C6-7 segments were measured in all three positions (neutral, flexion, and extension) using multi-positional MRI and dynamic radiograph. The Pearson's correlation coefficients and linear regression analysis were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: = 0.107-0.571). CONCLUSIONS:The C2-7 angle and segmental cervical angles measured by multi-positional MRI were valid, and reliability substituted the dynamic X-ray measurement within the acceptable range of error. Multi-positional MRI can be used as a reliable tool for angular parameter measurement and detection of angular instability in the cervical spine.

The purpose of this study was to determine the relative incidence of postoperative complications in 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25D)-deficient and -sufficient patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Patients who were either serum 25D deficient (25D <20 ng/mL) or 25D sufficient (25D ≥20 ng/mL) 90 days prior to primary TKA from 2007 to 2016 were identified using the Humana administrative claims registry. The incidence of postoperative medical and surgical complications was determined by querying for relevant International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision and Current Procedural Terminology codes. Risk-adjusted odds ratios (ORs) were calculated using multivariate logistic regression with age, sex, and Charlson Comorbidity Index as covariates. In total, 868 of 6593 patients who underwent TKA from 2007 to 2016 were 25D deficient, corresponding to a 13.2% prevalence rate. On adjustment for age, sex, and Charlson Comorbidity Index, 25D-deficient patients had a higher incidence of postoperative stiffness requiring manipulation under anesthesia (OR, 1.69; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.39-2.04; P<.001), surgical site infection requiring irrigation and debridement (OR, 1.76; 95% CI, 1.25-2.48; P=.001), and prosthesis explantation (OR, 2.97; 95% CI, 2.04-4.31; P<.001) at 1 year. Patients who were 25D deficient also had higher rates of postoperative deep venous thrombosis (OR, 1.80; 95% CI, 1.36-2.38; P<.001), myocardial infarction (OR, 2.11; 95% CI, 1.41-3.15; P<.001), and cerebrovascular accident (OR, 1.73; 95% CI, 1.17-2.57; P=.006). Thus, serum 25D levels below 20 ng/mL are associated with a higher incidence of postoperative complications and may be a perioperative modifiable risk factor in TKA. [Orthopedics. 2018; 41(4):e489-e495.].

STUDY DESIGN/METHODS:Retrospective, observational, case series. PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:To elucidate the prevalence of degenerative changes in the cervical and lumbar spine and estimate the degenerative changes in the cervical spine based on the degeneration of lumbar disc through a retrospective review of magnetic resonance (MR) images. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE/BACKGROUND:Over 50% of middle-aged adults show evidence of spinal degeneration. However, the relationship between degenerative changes in the cervical and lumbar spine has yet to be elucidated. METHODS:A retrospective review of positional MR images of 152 patients with symptoms related to cervical and lumbar spondylosis with or without a neurogenic component was conducted. The degree of intervertebral disc degeneration (IDD) was assessed on a grade of 1-5 for each segment of the cervical and lumbar spine using MR T2-weighted sagittal images. The grades across all segments were summed to produce the degenerative disc score (DDS) for the cervical and lumbar spine. The patients were divided into two groups based on the IDD grade for each lumbar segment: normal (grades 1 and 2) and degenerative (grades 3-5). RESULTS:DDSs for the cervical and lumbar spine were positively correlated. Significant differences in cervical DDSs between the groups were observed in all lumbar segments. Although there were no significant differences in cervical DDSs among the degenerative lumbar segment, cervical DDSs at the L1-2 and L2-3 segments tended to be higher than those at the L3-4, L4-5, and L5-S degenerative segments. CONCLUSIONS:Our study shows that participants with degenerative changes in the upper lumbar segments are more likely to have a certain amount of cervical spondylosis. This information could be used to lower the incidence of a missed diagnosis of cervical spine disorders in patients presenting with lumbar spine symptomology.

STUDY DESIGN/METHODS:Systematic review. OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:The aim was to determine the fusion efficacy of allograft and demineralized bone matrix (DBM) in lumbar instrumented and noninstrumented fusion procedures for degenerative lumbar disorders. METHODS:A literature search was conducted using the PubMed and Cochrane databases. To be considered, publications had to meet 4 criteria: patients were treated for a degenerative lumbar disorder, a minimum group size of 10 patients, use of allograft or DBM, and at least a 2-year follow-up. Data on the study population, follow-up time, surgery type, grafting material, fusion rates, and its definition were collected. RESULTS:The search yielded 692 citations with 17 studies meeting the criteria including 4 retrospective and 13 prospective studies. Six studies used DBM and 11 employed allograft alone or in the combination with autograft. For the allograft, fusion rates ranged from 58% to 68% for noninstrumented and from 68% to 98% for instrumented procedures. For DBM, fusion rates were 83% for noninstrumented and between 60% and 100% for instrumented lumbar fusion procedures. CONCLUSIONS:Both allograft and DBM appeared to provide similar fusion rates in instrumented fusions. On the other hand, in noninstrumented procedures DBM was superior. However, a large variation in the type of surgery, outcomes collection, lack of control groups, and follow-up time prevented any significant conclusions. Thus, studies comparing the performance of allograft and DBM to adequate controls in large, well-defined patient populations and with a sufficient follow-up time are needed to establish the efficacy of these materials as adjuncts to fusion.