Faculty Bibliography

Despite a burgeoning literature on adherence to HIV therapies, few studies have examined the impact of ongoing drug use on adherence and viral suppression, and none of these have utilized electronic monitors to quantify adherence among drug users. We used 262 electronic monitors to measure adherence with all antiretrovirals in 85 HIV-infected current and former drug users, and found that active cocaine use, female gender, not receiving Social Security benefits, not being married, screening positive for depression, and the tendency to use alcohol or drugs to cope with stress were all significantly associated with poor adherence. The strongest predictor of poor adherence and, in turn, failure to maintain viral suppression, was active cocaine use. Overall adherence among active cocaine users was 27%, compared to 68% among subjects who reported no cocaine use during the 6-month study period. Consequently, 13% of active cocaine users maintained viral suppression, compared to 46% of nonusers. Interventions to improve adherence should focus on reducing cocaine use, developing adaptive coping skills, and identifying and treating depression

OBJECTIVES: A population-based Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia (PCP) Index was developed in New York City to identify geographic areas and subpopulations at increased risk for PCP. METHODS: A zip code-level PCP Index was created from AIDS surveillance and hospital discharge records and defined as (number of PCP-related hospitalizations)/(number of persons living with AIDS). RESULTS: In 1997, there were 2262 hospitalizations for PCP among 39 740 persons living with AIDS in New York City (PCP Index =.05691). PCP Index values varied widely across neighborhoods with high AIDS prevalence (West Village =.02532 vs Central Harlem =.08696). Some neighborhoods with moderate AIDS prevalence had strikingly high rates (Staten Island =.14035; northern Manhattan =.08756). CONCLUSIONS: The PCP Index highlights communities in particular need of public health interventions to improve HIV-related service delivery

This study examined whether costs associated with tuberculosis (TB) screening and directly observed preventive therapy (DOPT) among drug injectors attending a syringe exchange are justified by cases and costs of active TB cases prevented and examined the impact of monetary incentives to promote adherence on cost-effectiveness. We examined program costs and projected savings using observed adherence and prevalence rates and literature estimates of isoniazid (INH) preventive therapy efficacy, expected INH hepatoxicity rates, and TB treatment costs; we conducted sensitivity analyses for a range of INH effectiveness, chest X-ray (CXR) referral adherence, and different strategies regarding anergy among persons affected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). For 1,000 patients offered screening, incorporating real observed program adherence rates, the program would avert $179,934 in TB treatment costs, for a net savings of $123,081. Assuming a modest risk of TB among HIV-infected anergic persons, all strategies with regard to anergy were cost saving, and the strategy of not screening for anergy and not providing DOPT to HIV-infected anergic persons resulted in the greatest cost savings. If an incentive of $25 per person increased CXR adherence from the observed 31% to 50% or 100%, over a 5-year follow-up the net cost savings would increase to $170,054 and $414,856, respectively. In this model, TB screening and DOPT at a syringe exchange is a cost-effective intervention and is cost-saving compared to costs of treating active TB cases that would have occurred in the absence of the intervention. This model is useful in evaluating the cost impact of planned program refinements, which can then be tested. Monetary incentives for those referred for screening CXRs would be justified on a cost basis if they had even a modest beneficial impact on adherence

To compare electronically monitored (MEMS) with self-reported adherence in drug users, including the impact of adherence on HIV load, we conducted a 6-month observational study of 67 antiretroviral-experienced current and former drug users. Adherence (percentage of doses taken as prescribed) was calculated for both the day and the week preceding each of 6 research visits. Mean self-reported 1-day adherence was 79% (median, 86%), and mean self-reported 1-week adherence was 78% (median, 85%). Mean MEMS 1-day adherence was 57% (median, 52%), and mean MEMS 1-week adherence was 53% (median, 49%). One-day and 1-week estimates were highly correlated (r>.8 for both measures). Both self-reported and MEMS adherence were correlated with concurrent HIV load (r=.43-.60), but the likelihood of achieving virologic suppression was greater if MEMS adherence was high than if self-reported adherence was high. We conclude that self-reported adherence is higher than MEMS adherence, but a strong relationship exists between both measures and virus load. However, electronic monitoring is more sensitive than self-report for the detection of nonadherence and should be used in adherence intervention studies

SETTING: In persons infected with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), a decreased tuberculin reaction cut-point of > or = 5 mm induration is recommended. OBJECTIVE: To determine tuberculosis risk in non-anergic HIV-infected persons with 5-9 mm tuberculin reactions. DESIGN: A prospective study with semi-annual tuberculin and anergy testing, HIV antibody and T cell subset assays, and active surveillance for tuberculosis. RESULTS: Participants were 572 HIV-seronegative and 241 HIV-seropositive non-anergic drug users. No tuberculosis occurred in HIV-seronegative persons. Tuberculosis incidence among HIV-seropositive drug users was 3.3, 7.7, 0, and 0.34 per 100 person-years in those with tuberculin reaction sizes of > or = 10 mm, 5-9 mm, 1-4 mm, and 0 mm, respectively, and was significantly increased in persons with 5-9 mm induration compared with those with 0-4 mm induration (rate ratio 27.7, 95%CI 2.9-268). Among persons with reaction sizes of 5-9 mm, tuberculosis occurred exclusively in those with CD4+ lymphocyte counts <500/mm3 at the time of their 5-9 mm tuberculin reactions. CONCLUSION: HIV-infected persons with tuberculin reaction sizes of 5-9 mm are at increased risk for tuberculosis compared to non-anergic persons with smaller (0-4 mm) reaction sizes. However, this increased risk may be limited to those with low CD4+ lymphocyte counts at the time of tuberculin testing

CONTEXT: Patients and the public could benefit from identification of factors that prevent drug users' heavy reliance on inpatient care; however, optimal health care delivery models for illicit drug users remain ill-defined. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate associations of outpatient medical and drug abuse care with drug users' subsequent hospitalization rates. DESIGN AND SETTING: Retrospective cohort study of data from longitudinally linked claims for all ambulatory physician/clinic services and drug abuse services covered by the New York State Medicaid program. SUBJECTS: A total of 11 556 human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-positive and 46 687 HIV-negative drug users. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Hospitalization in federal fiscal year (FFY) 1997 compared by 4 patterns of care in FFY 1996: regular drug abuse care (>/=6 months in 1 program), regular medical care (>35% of care from 1 clinic, group practice, or individual physician), both, or neither. RESULTS: Hospitalization occurred in 55.6% of HIV-positive and 37.5% of HIV-negative drug users, with a mean of 27.5 and 24.5 inpatient days, respectively. In HIV-positive drug users, the adjusted odds ratio (AOR) for hospitalization was lowest among those with both regular medical and drug abuse care (AOR, 0.76; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.67-0.85) followed by those with regular medical care alone (AOR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.74-0.91) and regular drug abuse care alone (AOR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.76-0.96) vs those with neither. In HIV-negative drug users, the AOR of hospitalization was lower for those with regular medical and drug abuse care (AOR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.68-0.79), regular drug abuse care alone (AOR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.66-0.76), and regular medical care (AOR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.86-0.95) vs those with neither. Both types of care showed favorable effects for all but drug abuse-related hospitalizations. CONCLUSION: Our data indicate that regular drug abuse care with regular medical care for drug users is associated with less subsequent hospitalization

BACKGROUND: It is critical for providers caring for HIV-positive methadone recipients to have accurate information on pharmacologic interactions between methadone and antiretroviral therapy. If providers do not have these data, symptoms of narcotic withdrawal or excess due to medication interactions may be mismanaged, and antiretroviral regimens may be suboptimal in efficacy or associated with increased side effects and toxicities. This review was undertaken to clarify what is known about interactions between pharmacotherapies of opiate dependence and HIV-related medications, to suggest clinically useful approaches to these issues, and to outline areas which need further study. METHOD: A search for relevant published papers and abstracts presented at scientific meetings was conducted using electronic databases. These documents were obtained and reviewed, and additional publications referenced in them were also reviewed. RESULTS: Pharmacokinetic interactions between methadone and zidovudine, didanosine, stavudine, abacavir, nevirapine, efavirenz and nelfinavir have been documented. The mechanisms, clinical implications and management of these interactions are reviewed. CONCLUSIONS: Interactions between methadone and some HIV-related medications are known to occur, yet their characteristics cannot reliably be predicted based on current understanding of metabolic enzyme induction and inhibition, or through in vitro studies. Only carefully designed and conducted pharmacologic studies involving human subjects can help us define the nature of the interactions between methadone (and other pharmacotherapies for opiate dependence) and specific HIV-related medications. Clinicians must be aware of known interactions and be alert to the possibility that interactions which are still undocumented may be present among their patients