Faculty Bibliography

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic, relapsing autoimmune connective tissue disease, primarily affecting the skin, joints, kidneys, heart, lungs, nervous system, blood elements, and serosal membranes. SLE is characterized by cytokine dysregulation, polyclonal B-cell activation, autoantibody production, and increased immune complex formation due to aberrations involving hyperactive B cells, T cells, and cells of the monocytic lineage. The symptoms of SLE are often diverse and nonspecific, and timely identification of SLE and associated comorbidities in patients is critical as aggressive monitoring and therapy may be warranted, especially in patients with poor prognoses. Based on the up-to-date understanding of the pathophysiology of SLE, the first targeted biological agent belimumab has been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in more than 50 years, and many targeted agents are being evaluated in late-stage clinical trials. There is a clear need to discuss how and when to incorporate new and emerging biological agents in managing patients with SLE. Additionally, the potential for increased risk of infections is a factor that heavily influences the rheumatologists decision to use biological agents in managing patients with SLE. Hence, in this roundtable educational activity, expert faculty will review and discuss the strategies for timely diagnosis of SLE and associated comorbidities. They will also discuss the current understanding of the pathophysiology of SLE and how new and emerging biological agents help address the underlying pathophysiological aberrations in patients with SLE. The faculty will also review strategies to minimize the risk of infections and other toxicities in patients with SLE.

Objective: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a complex and multifactorial autoimmune disease with striking clinical, immunologic and genetic heterogeneity, despite nearly ubiquitous antinuclear antibody (ANA) production. Multiple gene polymorphisms have been associated with the disease, but individually account for only a very small percentage of overall SLE risk. In earlier studies, constitutive expression of the DNA-binding protein, A+T rich interacting domain 3a (ARID3a) in transgenic mouse B lymphocyte lineage cells led to spontaneous ANA production and preferential development of B cells associated with production of polyreactive antibodies. Therefore, we asked if ARID3a was over-expressed in B lymphocytes of SLE patients and if ARID3a expression was associated with disease severity. Methods: A cross section of SLE patients and age and gender-matched controls were analyzed longitudinally for lupus disease activity, numbers of ARID3a+ peripheral blood mononuclear B cells from multiple B cell subsets, immunoglobulin and cytokine levels. Results: Fifty of 115 patients (43%) had dramatically increased numbers of ARID3a+ B cells compared to healthy controls. ARID3a is not expressed in naive B cells of healthy controls, but was abundant in these precursors of antibody-secreting cells in SLE patients. Total numbers of ARID3a+ B cells correlated with increased disease activity as defined by SLE Disease Activity Index scores in individuals assessed at three time points. Conclusion: These findings identify B cell anomalies in SLE that allow stratification of patient samples based on ARID3a expression and implicate ARID3a as a potential marker of CD19+ B lymphocytes correlated with disease activity. (c) 2014 American College of Rheumatology.

Objective. The efficacy and safety of subcutaneous tocilizumab (TCZ-SC) vs placebo (PBO-SC) was evaluated in patients with RA with an inadequate response to DMARDs in the BREVACTA study. Methods. Patients (n=656) were randomized 2:1 to receive TCZ-SC 162 mg every other week (q2w) or PBO-SC q2w for 24 weeks; 20% previously received anti-TNF treatment. Escape therapy with TCZ-SC 162 mg weekly was offered from week 12 for inadequate response. The primary endpoint was ACR20 response at week 24. Key secondary outcomes were radiographic progression and safety. Results. TCZ-SC was superior to PBO-SC for ACR20 response at week 24 (60.9% vs 31.5%; P<0.0001). All secondary endpoints showed TCZ-SC to be superior to PBO-SC: ACR50 and ACR70 (40% vs 12% and 20% vs 5%; both P<0.0001) and DAS28 remission (DAS28<2.6 32% vs 4%; P<0001). The mean change in mTSS score was significantly lower with TCZ-SC vs PBO (0.62 vs 1.23; P=0.0149). AEs and SAEs were comparable between the TCZ-SC and PBO-SC groups: respectively, 4.6% and 3.7% had at least one SAE, and infection was the most common SAE in 2.1% and 1.8%. More injection-site reactions occurred with TCZ-SC vs PBO-SC (7.1% vs 4.1%). No anaphylaxis or serious hypersensitivity reactions occurred. There were 3 deaths in the TCZ-SC group and 0 in the PBO-SC group. Conclusion. TCZ-SC q2w had significantly greater efficacy, including ACR endpoints and inhibition of joint damage compared with PBO-SC. TCZ-SC was well tolerated, and its safety profile was comparable with that of previous TCZ-IV studies. (c) 2014 American College of Rheumatology.

Efforts to identify lupus-associated causal variants in the FAM167A/BLK locus on 8p21 are hampered by highly associated noncausal variants. In this report, we used a trans-population mapping and sequencing strategy to identify a common variant (rs922483) in the proximal BLK promoter and a tri-allelic variant (rs1382568) in the upstream alternative BLK promoter as putative causal variants for association with systemic lupus erythematosus. The risk allele (T) at rs922483 reduced proximal promoter activity and modulated alternative promoter usage. Allelic differences at rs1382568 resulted in altered promoter activity in B progenitor cell lines. Thus, our results demonstrated that both lupus-associated functional variants contribute to the autoimmune disease association by modulating transcription of BLK in B cells and thus potentially altering immune responses.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of intravenous (IV) abatacept, a selective T cell costimulation modulator, versus placebo for the treatment of active class III or IV lupus nephritis, when used on a background of mycophenolate mofetil and glucocorticoids. METHODS: This was a 12-month, randomized, phase II/III, multicenter, international, double-blind study. A total of 298 patients were treated in 1 of 3 IV treatment arms: placebo, abatacept at the standard weight-tiered dose (approximating 10 mg/kg), or abatacept at 30 mg/kg for 3 months, followed by the standard weight-tiered dose (abatacept 30/10). The primary end point, time to confirmed complete response, was a composite measure that required maintenance of glomerular filtration rate, minimal proteinuria, and inactive urinary sediment over the 52-week treatment period. RESULTS: There were no differences among treatment arms in the time to confirmed complete response or in the proportion of subjects with confirmed complete response following 52 weeks of treatment. Treatment with abatacept was associated with greater improvements from baseline in anti-double-stranded DNA antibody, C3, and C4 levels. Among 122 patients with nephrotic-range proteinuria, treatment with abatacept resulted in an approximately 20-30% greater reduction in mean urinary protein-to-creatinine ratio compared with placebo. Abatacept was well tolerated; rates of deaths, serious adverse events, and serious infections were similar across treatment arms. Gastroenteritis and herpes zoster occurred more frequently with abatacept treatment. CONCLUSION: Although the primary end point was not met, abatacept showed evidence of biologic activity and was well tolerated in patients with active class III or IV lupus nephritis.

OBJECTIVE: Lupus nephritis (LN) is a severe manifestation of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) that exhibits familial aggregation and may progress to end-stage renal disease (ESRD). LN is more prevalent among African Americans than among European Americans. This study was undertaken to investigate the hypothesis that the apolipoprotein L1 gene (APOL1) nephropathy risk alleles G1/G2, common in African Americans and rare in European Americans, contribute to the ethnic disparity in risk. METHODS: APOL1 G1 and G2 nephropathy alleles were genotyped in 855 African American SLE patients with LN-ESRD (cases) and 534 African American SLE patients without nephropathy (controls) and tested for association under a recessive genetic model, by logistic regression. RESULTS: Ninety percent of the SLE patients were female. The mean +/- SD age at SLE diagnosis was significantly lower in LN-ESRD cases than in SLE non-nephropathy controls (27.3 +/- 10.9 years versus 39.5 +/- 12.2 years). The mean +/- SD time from SLE diagnosis to development of LN-ESRD in cases was 7.3 +/- 7.2 years. The G1/G2 risk alleles were strongly associated with SLE-ESRD, with 25% of cases and 12% of controls having 2 nephropathy alleles (odds ratio [OR] 2.57, recessive model P = 1.49 x 10(-9)), and after adjustment for age, sex, and ancestry admixture (OR 2.72, P = 6.23 x 10(-6)). The age-, sex-, and admixture-adjusted population attributable risk for ESRD among patients with G1/G2 polymorphisms was 0.26, compared to 0.003 among European American patients. The mean time from SLE diagnosis to ESRD development was approximately 2 years earlier among individuals with APOL1 risk genotypes (P = 0.01). CONCLUSION: APOL1 G1/G2 alleles strongly impact the risk of LN-ESRD in African Americans, as well as the time to progression to ESRD. The high frequency of these alleles in African Americans with near absence in European Americans explains an important proportion of the increased risk of LN-ESRD in African Americans.

Despite rapid accumulation of knowledge about complex immune dysregulation in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and major primary lupus syndromes, and a plethora of promising new treatments reaching preclinical and early clinical studies, advanced-phase trials of new biologic agents have repeatedly failed to achieve their clinical end points. It is possible that none of these agents work, but the accuracy of this suggestion is as unclear as the case for efficacy, owing to issues in the design of studies and the opacity of the data that have resulted. Disease heterogeneity and complexity might be a hurdle that is simply too high to overcome by existing methodological approaches, and the way forward to interpretable trial results remains unclear. Nonetheless, well-characterized patterns of immune pathology are shared by substantial subsets of patients, and selective targeting of one or more relevant immune system molecules seems to offer the promise of safer and more effective treatments. Evolution dictates a more personalized approach to therapy and trial design, but this option seems challenging in the current economic, regulatory and scientific environment. This Review addresses these concerns by considering the progress of some of the investigational treatments targeting key physiological abnormalities in lupus.

Objective. Accurate assessment of lupus flares is critical but problematic in clinical trials. This study examined the impact of modifications to the classic Safety of Estrogens in Lupus Erythematosus National Assessment (SELENA)-SLEDAI flare index (cSFI).Methods. Ninety-one SLE patient records were evaluated at two visits at which the SLEDAI and BILAG had been scored prospectively. The cSFI was compared with an experimental version (eSFI) that eliminated medication criteria and separated the mild/moderate flare category into its components by clinical judgement based on records. The revised SFI (SFI-R) and some physician's global assessments (PGAs) were also scored using chart notes.Results. eSFI-rated moderate flares had higher PGA and BILAG scores than those rated as mild. When medication criteria were excluded, 42 of 55 cSFI severe flares and 15 of 49 mild/moderate flares were downgraded in severity. Comparing flares that remained severe with those that were downgraded, disease activity was higher by PGA (P < 0.001), SLEDAI (P < 0.001), BILAG (P < 0.001), number of active BILAG organs (P < 0.04) and flaring SFI-R organs (P < 0.01). PGA (P < 0.001) and the number of SFI-R domains flaring (P < 0.001) were higher in mild/moderate eSFI flares than in those that were downgraded. Twenty-one of 83 (25%) medication changes occurred with no flare. Forty-six of 52 (88%) medication changes defining severe flare by cSFI involved patients rated by physicians with no, mild or moderate flares.Conclusion. A deconstructed flare index improves the discrimination of mild from moderate flares and selects more ill patients with true clinical worsening for each category of flare.