Faculty Bibliography

The Organ Injury Scaling (O.I.S.) Committee of the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (A.A.S.T.) was appointed by President Trunkey at the 1987 Annual Meeting. The principal charge was to devise injury severity scores for individual organs to facilitate clinical research. The resultant classification scheme is fundamentally an anatomic description, scaled from 1 to 5, representing the least to the most severe injury. A number of similar scales have been developed in the past, but none has been uniformly adopted. In fact, this concept was introduced at the A.A.S.T. in 1979 as the Abdominal Trauma Index (A.T.I.) and has proved useful in several areas of clinical research. The enclosed O.I.S.'s for spleen, liver, and kidney represent an amalgamation of previous scales applied for these organs, and a consensus of the O.I.S. Committee as well as the A.A.S.T. Board of Managers. The O.I.S. differs from the Abbreviated Injury Score (A.I.S.), which is also based on an anatomic scale but designed to reflect the impact of a specific organ injury on ultimate patient outcome. The individual A.I.S.'s are, of course, the basic elements used to calculate the Injury Severity Score (I.S.S.) as well as T.R.I.S.S. methodology. To ensure that the O.I.S. interdiffuses with the A.I.S. and I.C.D.-9 codes, these are listed alongside the respective O.I.S. Both the currently used A.I.S. 85 and proposed A.I.S. 90 are provided because of the obligatory transition period. Indeed, A.I.S. 90 contains the identical descriptive text as the current O.I.S.'s. The Abdominal Trauma Index and other similar indices using organ injury scoring can be easily modified by replacing older scores with the O.I.S.'s.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

As stated in the introduction to this monograph, much has changed in the management of major hepatic injuries during the past 5 to 10 years. The major changes are summarized as follows: 1. Computed tomographic scanning is now the mainstay of diagnosis for hepatic injuries after blunt trauma and allows for nonoperative therapy in many patients with lacerations, intrahepatic hematomas, or subcapsular hematomas; 2. Realization that the time limit for application of the Pringle maneuver can be extended. 3. Recognition that fibrin glue appears to be a useful topical agent in preliminary clinical studies; 4. Use of hepatotomy with selective vascular ligation instead of mattress sutures for deep lacerations or to control hemorrhage from tracts of penetrating wounds; 5. Use of resectional debridement of devitalized tissue and selective vascular ligation instead of formal anatomical resection; 6. Use of an 'omental pack' as a filler of deep cracks or hepatotomy sites instead of closure with mattress sutures; 7. Use of perihepatic packing in selected patients instead of resection when a coagulopathy or major subcapsular hematoma is present; 8. Discontinued use of perihepatic drains for minor or moderate hepatic injuries as long as discrete methods of selective vascular and biliary ligation have been used

The etiology, radiographic diagnosis, and surgical management of small bowel intussusception in adults have been well documented in the literature. It has been shown that unlike the intussusceptions seen in infants, the adult variety is in most cases associated with a focal pathological process and that surgical reductions and often segmental resections are indicated. We have recently examined a patient with acquired immune deficiency syndrome presenting with small bowel intussusception who at surgery showed no evidence of a leading pathological cause. The purpose herein is to underline the potential development of transitory intussusceptions in patients with acquired immune deficiency syndrome, based on the common association of diffuse enteritis. In these patients, a correct interpretation of the radiographic findings may prevent unnecessary surgical explorations

Juxtahepatic venous injuries are usually fatal. The optimal method of dealing with these injuries remains controversial, but most experience has been with the insertion of an atriocaval shunt. However, the mortality rate with atriocaval shunting remains prohibitively high (60% to 100%). The experience at the Bellevue Hospital Trauma and Shock Unit during a 9-year period revealed a 50% mortality rate in four consecutive patients who underwent atriocaval shunting. As such, a different approach was used in the following five patients, all of whom survived. One additional patient died in the operating room before any definitive repair could be undertaken. Four steps are considered essential to the successful management of these patients: (1) compression of the injury site until adequate resuscitation has been achieved; (2) early recognition that a juxtahepatic venous injury exists, as indicated by failure of the Pringle maneuver to adequately arrest hemorrhage; (3) prolonged portal triad occlusion with hepatocyte protection by means of large doses of steroids and topical hypothermia (portal triad occlusion time in the nonshunted group ranged from 20 to 64 minutes with a mean occlusion time of 46 minutes; although a transient rise in liver function test results seemed to correlate with the length of ischemia time, neither hepatic dysfunction nor hepatic necrosis occurred; and (4) extensive finger fracture of the liver to the site of vascular injury for primary repair or ligation; the extent of the finger fracture varied from 15 to 30 cm in length and from 5 to 15 cm in depth. The successful results achieved in five consecutive patients who sustained juxtahepatic venous injuries treated without a shunt serve as a basis for recommending this operative approach

The results of a retrospective and prospective study of patients with penetrating wounds of the back and flank showed that physical examination alone was accurate in 72 and 83 per cent, respectively. The inaccuracy was primarily due to false-negative examinations. The most commonly injured organs were the liver and kidney. The presence of gross hematuria and intravenous pyelography proved to have an accuracy rate of 95 per cent in patients studied prospectively. Peritoneal lavage, although similarly accurate (95 per cent), was associated with a 10 per cent false-negative result when the wound was located in the back. Guidelines for the management of these patients include hospital admission, careful physical examination, urinalysis by dipstick and cell count, intravenous pyelography and peritoneal lavage. Initial hypotension usually is associated with visceral injury and is an indication for exploratory laparotomy. Strict adherence to these guidelines was associated with a negative exploration rate of less than 10 per cent and a decrease in the number of patients observed with visceral injury from 50 to 6 per cent

To determine the best antibiotic regimen to employ in patients undergoing laparotomy for trauma, a randomized prospective study was designed comparing cefoxitin alone with a triple-drug regime of an aminoglycoside, ampicillin, and clindamycin. One hundred nineteen consecutive patients sustaining abdominal trauma (97 penetrating; 22 blunt) were divided by date of admission to a 24-hour course of antibiotics. The overall infection rate was 16.0%, with 14.5% of the cefoxitin-treated patients, and 18.0% of the triple-drug-treated patients developing an infectious complication. Excluding remote site infections, the abdominal wound and intraperitoneal infection rates were 13.0% for cefoxitin-treated patients, and 12.0% for triple-drug-treated patients. There was one instance of oliguric renal failure questionably related to an aminoglycoside. It is concluded that a 24-hour course of cefoxitin is a safe and effective prophylactic antibiotic regime in patients undergoing laparotomy for trauma

The most important concept emerging from the management of complex hepatic trauma is that direct suture ligation of severed blood vessels and bile ducts is the most effective treatment. Three essential maneuvers are necessary: (1) the use of the finger fracture technique to expose the laceration widely, so that individual ligation of severed blood vessels and bile ducts can be accomplished under direct vision; (2) occluding the portal triad for 20 to 60 minutes; (3) closure of the hepatic incision over a viable omental pedicle. Two hundred consecutive patients with hepatic injuries were treated at the Trauma and Shock Unit of Bellevue Hospital between July 1976 and January 1982. One hundred and twenty-five injuries (63%) could be managed by superficial suture and drainage alone; 75 (37%) more extensive injuries required additional therapy; 47 of the 75 injuries required inflow occlusion for periods of up to 60 minutes, with the mean occlusion time of 30 minutes. All patients were pretreated with 30 to 40 mg/kg of Solu-Medrol prior to cross-clamping the portal triad. In addition, the liver was cooled to 27-32 degrees C topically by pouring 1 liter of iced Ringer's lactate directly on the liver surface, monitoring the temperature with an intra-hepatic probe. Ischemia time exceeded 20 minutes in 70%, 30 minutes in 40% and 60 minutes in 7% of patients. This approach, with complex hepatic trauma, has been dramatically effective. There were only four deaths (5.3%). One (1.3%) patient required reoperation for bleeding; three patients (4%) developed perihepatic abscesses; and two patients (3%) developed biliary fistulae that spontaneously closed. An extended right hepatectomy was necessary in the one patient who required reoperation for bleeding. This represents the only case of a formal hepatic resection in this series. Hepatic artery ligation was not employed in any case. These experiences strongly endorse the direct approach to the treatment of major hepatic lacerations by opening a lacerated liver sufficiently to ligate lacerated blood vessels and bile ducts, followed by closure over an omental pedicle. The wide-spread adoption of this technique will probably lower the mortality from massive liver injuries to 5-10%