Faculty Bibliography

Background: Pediatric transplant candidates have historically been disadvantaged on the transplant waitlist, with nearly half of pediatric deceased donor organs allocated to adult recipients (Hsu, Gastroenterology, 2017), and allocation pediatric end-stage liver disease (PELD) scores that underestimate children's expected 3-month mortality compared to that of adult patients (Chang, JAMA Pediatrics, 2018). Disparities in organ distribution prompted revision of the liver allocation policy in 2020 from donation services areas (DSA) to a series of distance-based concentric circles called acuity circles (AC) before being offered nationally (US GAO, 2022), which was designed to minimize geographic inequity in liver transplant. Prior to implementation of the new liver allocation policy, analysis using the Liver Simulated Allocation Model projected that AC allocation would decrease disparities for pediatric liver transplant candidates and recipients by increasing transplants and decreasing waitlist mortality (Mogul, Transplantation, 2020). In this study, we evaluate differences in pediatric whole liver transplants performed before and after the implementation of acuity circle liver allocation policy.
Study Design: We evaluated patient characteristics, adjusted MELD/PELD at time of transplant, calculated donor age at time of transplant among pediatric whole liver transplant recipients in low versus high-volume pediatric liver transplant centers performed before and after implementation of AC-based liver allocation policy using the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients.
Result(s): Before and after the implementation of ACs, differences in pediatric liver transplants by age group (<2 years, 2-5 years old, 5-12 years old, and 12-18 years old) remained significantly different between low and high-volume pediatric transplant centers. Under DSA allocation policy, the median MELD/PELD at transplant was 37.0 (IQR 30.0-41.0) in low-volume centers and 40.0 (IQR 30.0-41.0) in high-volume centers. After the implementation of acuity circles, median MELD/PELD at transplant decreased to 35.0 (IQR 21.0-41.0) in low-volume centers and 35.0 (IQR 25.0-41.0) in high-volume centers. Finally, donor age at time of transplant increased from 8.0 (IQR 2.00-18.0) to 13.5 (IQR 4.5-21.0) at low-volume centers, and from 3.0 (IQR 1.0-14.0) to 4.0 (IQR 1.0-14.0) at high-volume centers before and after the implementation of ACs.
Conclusion(s): The change from DSAs to ACs in allocation policy and the shift from regional to national review boards have affected the characteristics of organ recipients, adjusted MELD/PELD at time of transplant, and donor age at time of transplant differentially between whole liver transplant recipients at low-and high-volume pediatric liver transplant centers

BACKGROUND:Early post-kidney transplantation (KT) changes in physiology, medications, and health stressors likely impact body mass index (BMI) and likely impact all-cause graft loss and mortality. METHODS:/month) using adjusted Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS:), BMI increase was associated with higher all-cause mortality (aHR = 1.09, 95% CI: 1.05-1.14), all-cause graft loss (aHR = 1.05, 95% CI: 1.01-1.09), and mortality with functioning graft (aHR = 1.10, 95% CI: 1.05-1.15) risks, but not death-censored graft loss risks, relative to stable weight. Among individuals without obesity, BMI increase was associated with lower all-cause graft loss (aHR = .97, 95% CI: .95-.99) and death-censored graft loss (aHR = .93, 95% CI: .90-.96) risks, but not all-cause mortality or mortality with functioning graft risks. CONCLUSIONS:BMI increases in the 3 years post-KT, then decreases in years 3-5. BMI loss in all adult KT recipients and BMI gain in those with obesity should be carefully monitored post-KT.

Neighborhood socioeconomic deprivation may have important implications on disparities in liver transplant (LT) evaluation. In this retrospective cohort study, we constructed a novel dataset by linking individual patient-level data with the highly granular Area Deprivation Index (ADI), which is advantageous over other neighborhood measures due to: specificity of Census Block-Group (versus Census Tract, Zip code), scoring, and robust variables. Our cohort included 1377 adults referred to our center for LT evaluation 8/1/2016-12/31/2019. Using modified Poisson regression, we tested for effect measure modification of the association between neighborhood socioeconomic status (nSES) and LT evaluation outcomes (listing, initiating evaluation, and death) by race and ethnicity. Compared to patients with high nSES, those with low nSES were at higher risk of not being listed (aRR = 1.14; 95%CI 1.05-1.22; p < .001), of not initiating evaluation post-referral (aRR = 1.20; 95%CI 1.01-1.42; p = .03) and of dying without initiating evaluation (aRR = 1.55; 95%CI 1.09-2.2; p = .01). While White patients with low nSES had similar rates of listing compared to White patients with high nSES (aRR = 1.06; 95%CI .96-1.17; p = .25), Underrepresented patients from neighborhoods with low nSES incurred 31% higher risk of not being listed compared to Underrepresented patients from neighborhoods with high nSES (aRR = 1.31; 95%CI 1.12-1.5; p < .001). Interventions addressing neighborhood deprivation may not only benefit patients with low nSES but may address racial and ethnic inequities.

Antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination are reduced in solid organ transplant recipients (SOTRs). We report that increased levels of pre-existing antibodies to seasonal coronaviruses are associated with decreased antibody response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in SOTRs, supporting that antigenic imprinting modulates vaccine responses in this immunosuppressed population.

IMPORTANCE/UNASSIGNED:Frailty has been recognized as a risk factor for mortality after liver transplant (LT) but little is known of its association with functional status and health-related quality of life (HRQL), termed global functional health, in LT recipients. OBJECTIVE/UNASSIGNED:To evaluate the association between pre-LT and post-LT frailty with post-LT global functional health. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS/UNASSIGNED:This prospective cohort study was conducted at 8 US LT centers and included adults who underwent LT from October 2016 to February 2020. EXPOSURES/UNASSIGNED:Frail was defined by a pre-LT Liver Frailty Index (LFI) score of 4.5 or greater. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES/UNASSIGNED:Global functional health at 1 year after LT, assessed using surveys (Short Form-36 [SF-36; summarized by physical component scores (PFC) and mental component summary scores (MCS)], Instrumental Activities of Daily Living scale) and performance-based tests (LFI, Fried Frailty Phenotype, and Short Physical Performance Battery). RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:Of 358 LT recipients (median [IQR] age, 60 [53-65] years; 115 women [32%]; 25 [7%] Asian/Pacific Islander, 21 [6%] Black, 54 [15%] Hispanic White, and 243 [68%] non-Hispanic White individuals), 68 (19%) had frailty pre-LT. At 1 year post-LT, the median (IQR) PCS was lower in recipients who had frailty vs those without frailty pre-LT (42 [31-53] vs 50 [38-56]; P = .002), but the median MCS was similar. In multivariable regression, pre-LT frailty was associated with a -5.3-unit lower post-LT PCS (P < .001), but not MCS. The proportion who had difficulty with 1 or more Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (21% vs 10%) or who were unemployed/receiving disability (38% vs 29%) was higher in recipients with vs without frailty. In a subgroup of 210 recipients with LFI assessments 1 year post-LT, 13% had frailty at 1 year post-LT. Recipients who had frailty post-LT reported lower adjusted SF-36-PCS scores (coefficient, -11.4; P < .001) but not SF-36-MCS scores. Recipients of LT who had frailty vs those without frailty 1 year post-LT also had worse median (IQR) Fried Frailty Phenotype scores (1 [1-2] vs 1 [0-1]) and higher rates of functional impairment by a Short Physical Performance Battery of 9 or less (42% vs 20%; P = .01). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE/UNASSIGNED:In this cohort study, pre-LT frailty was associated with worse global functional health 1 year after LT. The presence of frailty after LT was also associated with worse HRQL in physical, but not mental, subdomains. These data suggest that interventions and therapeutics that target frailty that are administered before and/or early post-LT may help to improve the health and well-being of LT recipients.

BACKGROUND:Tixagevimab and Cilgavimab (T + C) is authorized for pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) against Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in solid organ transplant recipients (SOTRs), yet patient-reported outcomes after injection are not well described. Furthermore, changes in risk tolerance after T + C PrEP have not been reported, of interest given uncertain activity against emerging Omicron sublineages. METHODS:Within a national prospective observational study, SOTRs who reported receiving T + C were surveyed for 3 months to ascertain: (1) local and systemic reactogenicity, (2) severe adverse events with focus on cardiovascular and alloimmune complications, and (3) breakthrough COVID-19, contextualized through (4) changes in attitudes regarding COVID-19 risk and behaviors. RESULTS:At 7 days postinjection, the most common reactions were mild fatigue (29%), headache (20%), and pain at injection sites (18%). Severe adverse events were uncommon; over 3 months of follow-up, 4/392 (1%) reported acute rejection and one (.3%) reported a myocardial infarction. Breakthrough COVID-19 occurred in 9%, 16-129 days after receiving full dose (300/300 mg) T + C, including two non-ICU hospitalizations. Most surveyed SOTRs (65%) felt T + C PrEP was likely to reduce their COVID-19 risk, and 70% reported increased willingness to engage in social activities such as visiting friends. However, few felt safe to return to in-person work (20%) or cease public mask-wearing (15%). CONCLUSIONS:In this prospective study of patient-reported outcomes, T + C was well tolerated with few serious events. Several COVID-19 breakthroughs were reported, notable as most SOTRs reported changes in risk tolerance after T + C. These results aid counseling of SOTRs regarding real-world safety and effectiveness of T + C.

BACKGROUND:Gabapentinoids, commonly used for treating neuropathic pain, may be misused and coprescribed with opioid and benzodiazepine, increasing the risk of mortality and dependency among kidney transplant recipients. METHODS:We identified adult kidney transplant recipients who enrolled in Medicare Part D in 2006-2017 using the United States Renal Data System/Medicare claims database. We characterized recipients' post-transplant concomitant prescription of gabapentinoids, opioids, and benzodiazepine stratified by transplant year and recipient factors (age, sex, race, and diabetes). We investigated whether concomitant prescriptions were associated with postkidney transplant mortality using Cox regression. Models incorporated inverse probability weighting to adjust for confounders. RESULTS:Among 63,359 eligible recipients, 13% of recipients filled at least one gabapentinoid prescription within 1 year after kidney transplant. The prevalence of gabapentinoid prescriptions increased by 70% over the study period (16% in 2017 versus 10% in 2006). Compared with nonusers, gabapentinoids users were more likely to have diabetes (55% versus 37%) and obesity (46% versus 34%). Of the 8509 recipients with gabapentinoid prescriptions, 45% were coprescribed opioids, 7% were coprescribed benzodiazepines, and 3% were coprescribed both opioids and benzodiazepines. Compared with no study prescriptions, gabapentinoid monotherapy (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]=1.25; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.16 to 1.32) and combination therapy (gabapentinoids and opioids [aHR=1.49; 95% CI, 1.39 to 1.60], gabapentinoids and benzodiazepines [aHR=1.46; 95% CI, 1.03 to 2.08], and coprescribing all three [aHR=1.88; 95% CI, 1.18 to 2.98]) were all associated with a higher risk of postkidney transplant mortality. CONCLUSIONS:Gabapentinoid coprescription with both benzodiazepines and opioids among kidney transplant recipients increased over time. Kidney transplant recipients prescribed gabapentinoids had a higher risk of post-transplant mortality, and the risk was higher with opioids or benzodiazepine coprescription.

Purpose of Review: Delirium has been recognized as an important complication and a risk factor for poor outcomes in community-dwelling older adults, general surgery patients, and kidney transplant recipients. Recently, there has been increased recognition of this prevalent issue and its association with poor outcomes among both adult and pediatric liver transplant recipients. Recent Findings: Post-transplant delirium occurs in up to 47% of liver transplant recipients. Numerous risk factors predispose these patients to delirium, including a history of alcoholic liver disease, older age, and higher model for end-stage liver disease score. Liver transplant recipients who experience delirium have inferior in-hospital outcomes and, in some studies, higher mortality. Summary: Early, single-center studies suggest that delirium is a prevalent problem in liver transplant recipients and is associated with poor outcomes. Larger studies and more consistent terminology and classification are needed to improve the characterization of and evaluate prevention strategies for delirium.