Faculty Bibliography

Although olfactory associative conditioning in newborn rats produces marked structural and functional changes in the olfactory bulb, recent evidence suggests that extrabulbar circuits must be involved in storing these early memories. The present experiments examined the role of the amygdala complex on early olfactory learning. Bilateral amygdala lesions or sham lesions were performed on Postnatal Day (PN) 5. On PN6, pups were trained in a standard classical conditioning paradigm associating odor with tactile stimulation. Behavioral testing on PN7 revealed that amygdala lesions blocked odor preferences but had no effect on conditioned behavioral activation. Similar sized neocortical lesions did not impair odor preferences. Importantly, amygdala lesion effects on learned odor preferences could be reversed by extensive overtraining. These results suggest that the amygdala complex plays a critical role in modulating associative learning as early as the first postnatal week in the rat

Wistar rat pups were implanted with bilateral olfactory bulb cannulas on postnatal day 5 (PN5). On PN6, pups were trained in an olfactory classical conditioning task with peppermint odor as the CS and tactile stimulation/stroking as the UCS. Pups were randomly assigned to either PAIRED, BACKWARD or ODOR-only conditions. Half the pups in each group received intrabulbar infusions of 100 microM propranolol and half received intrabulbar infusions of saline during the training session. Propranolol infusions blocked acquisition of the learned odor preference expressed by PAIRED saline-infused pups. Diffusion of the infusate was checked in additional pups by infusing [3H]NE and performing LSC analysis. Infusate concentration did not significantly differ between the anterior and posterior halves of the bulb, but were sharply lower in the olfactory peduncle and more posterior areas. The results suggest that olfactory bulb NE is critical for early olfactory learning

Association of odor and reward during the early postnatal period modifies rat pup behavioral responses and olfactory bulb neural responses to subsequent presentations of that odor. Recent evidence has shown that olfactory bulb output neurons, mitral/tufted cells, receive convergent odor and reward inputs. The present report demonstrates that contiguous odor-reward pairings prevent mitral/tufted cell habituation to the odor that normally occurs to repeated odor-only stimulation. It is hypothesized that the maintenance of olfactory bulb responses to conditioned odors during training may allow for activation of long-term memory mechanisms

One of the circuits modified by early olfactory learning is in the olfactory bulb. Specifically, response patterns of mitral-tufted cells are modified by associative conditioning during the early postnatal period. In addition, previous work has demonstrated that mitral-tufted cell single units respond to both olfactory conditioned stimuli and rewarding stimulation of the medial forebrain bundle-lateral hypothalamus (MFB-LH). The present study suggests that norepinephrine beta-receptor activation is required for early olfactory learning using MFB-LH stimulation as reward. Propranolol injected before odor-MFB-LH pairings blocks the acquisition of conditioned behavioral responses and their neural correlates to the conditioned odor. Furthermore, propranolol blocks a specific class of the mitral-tufted cell responses to MFB-LH reward stimulation. The relationship of this response to reward and early learning is discussed

The influence of norepinephrine (NE) on the acquisition of a conditioned odor preference and enhanced focal uptake of [14C]2-deoxyglucose (2-DG) within the olfactory bulb was assessed in neonatal rat pups. On postnatal day (PN) 6, pups were injected with either an NE receptor agonist (isoproterenol), NE receptor antagonist (propranolol or timolol), or saline before one-trial odor conditioning. The experimental conditioning group received a 10-min exposure to an odor (peppermint) and reinforcing tactile stimulation similar to that received from the dam. Control groups received only the odor, only the tactile stimulation, backwards presentation of the odor and tactile stimulation or neither of these stimuli. The next day, pups were either tested for an olfactory preference (Expts. 1 and 2) or assessed for differential olfactory bulb activity using the 2-DG technique (Expt. 3). The results indicate that early odor experience with either tactile stimulation or isoproterenol is sufficient to produce a learned behavioral preference and enhanced focal 2-DG uptake within the olfactory bulb. Moreover, an NE receptor blocker injected prior to training with odor and tactile stimulation blocks the acquisition of both behavioral preference and the enhanced 2-DG uptake. In Expt. 4, the effects of tactile stimulation and isoproterenol were further assessed. An odor paired with a moderate level of either of these stimuli produces learning. However, the simultaneous presentation of a moderate level of these stimuli paired with an odor does not result in an odor preference. An odor preference may be reinstated by simultaneous presentation of these stimuli, provided the level of each of these stimuli is too low to produce an odor preference when presented alone with an odor. These data suggest that exogenous NE and tactile stimulation are additive in their effect on learning. These results are discussed in terms of the neural mechanisms underlying reinforcement in infant rats.

Newborn rat pups can learn to either approach or avoid odor cues through associative conditioning. The present results demonstrate that preference conditioning and avoidance conditioning both modify olfactory bulb responses (focal 2-deoxyglucose uptake and mitral-tufted cell single unit responses) to the conditioned odor. Despite opposing behavioral responses to the conditioned odor, however, olfactory bulb neural responses did not detectably differ between learned odor cues signaling approach and those signaling avoidance. Control pups exhibited neither the behavioral nor neural changes. Furthermore, both the behavioral and neural changes to these odor cues could be extinguished. These results suggest that the olfactory bulb in neonates may code learned odor importance, but specific information attached to that importance may require processing in other brain regions

In neonatal rats, norepinephrine (NE) is necessary and sufficient for the acquisition of an olfactory preference and its associated olfactory bulb neural modifications as assessed by [(14)C] 2-deoxyglucose (2-DG) and electrophysiology. In the present studies, we assessed the influence of NE on the expression of a conditioned odor preference and its associated olfactory bulb neural modifications in neonatal rats. On Postnatal Day 5 (PN 5), pups were trained to prefer an odor in a 1-h classical conditioning paradigm. Experimental paired odor-stroke pups received 20 forward pairings of a 10-sec peppermint odor and a 9-sec reinforcing tactile stimulation (stroking). Control pups received either random stroke-odor pairings or were naive (received neither the odor nor stroking). The next day (PN 6), the pups were injected with either an NE beta-receptor antagonist, (propranolol or timolol) or saline, 1 h prior to testing. The pups were tested for a behavioral olfactory preference and assessed for differential olfactory bulb activity with [(14)C] 2-DG autoradiography. The results indicate that NE is not necessary for the expression of the learned neurobehavioral response

In Experiment 1, infant rats were implanted with a stimulating electrode in the medial forebrain bundle/lateral hypothalamus (MFB/LH) on postnatal day 12 (PN12). Four to 6 hours later, the pups underwent associative olfactory conditioning, with half of the pups trained with 30 temporal pairings of odor (5 s) and MFB/LH stimulation (200 Hz, 300 ms), and the other half trained with random presentations of odor and MFB/LH stimulation. On PN13, pups were tested for: (1) behavioral preference for the conditioned odor; (2) focal glomerular layer 2-DG uptake to the odor; or (3) mitral/tufted cell single-unit response pattern to the odor. Odor-MFB/LH pairings produced a relative behavioral preference, enhanced focal 2-DG uptake and a modified mitral/tufted cell response pattern to the conditioned odor. Random training resulted in none of these changes. In Experiment 2, PN12 pups were anesthetized with urethane and single-unit responses of mitral/tufted cells to MFB/LH stimulation were examined. MFB/LH stimulation produced a brief suppression of mitral/tufted cell activity followed either by a prolonged excitation (18/30 cells; 8-10 s duration) or a prolonged suppression (12/30 cells; 10-30 s). These results suggest that pairing olfactory nerve input with MFB/LH stimulation modifies subsequent behavioral and physiological responses to olfactory nerve input alone. Furthermore, the prolonged olfactory bulb response to MFB/LH stimulation may be critical in this modification

Rat pups acquire an attraction for maternal odors, which can vary with maternal diet. In the two experiments reported here, maternal diet was modified and both pup behavioral responses and pup olfactory bulb neural responses [( 14C]2-DG uptake) to maternal odors were examined. In experiment 1, pups were reared from birth to postnatal day 19 with either a dam fed normal rat chow or a dam fed a sucrose-based diet which suppressed her normal maternal odor. In experiment 2, pups were raised from birth to postnatal day 19 with either a dam fed the sucrose-based diet adulterated with peppermint, or the non-scented sucrose-based diet. Pups selectively expressed both a behavioral attraction and an enhanced olfactory bulb neural response to odors that they experienced in the nest