Try a new search

Format these results:

Searched for:

in-biosketch:yes

person:ak41

Total Results:

250


BASELINE ASSESSMENT OF INCOMING MEDICAL STUDENTS COMMUNICATION SKILLS: THE NYU CURRICULUM FOR THE 21ST CENTURY BASELINE OSCE [Meeting Abstract]

Gillespie, C; Hanley, K; Adams, J; Zabar, S; Kalet, A
ISI:000277282300062
ISSN: 0884-8734
CID: 111908

PATIENT ACTIVATION: HOW ARE PATIENT ACTIVATING SKILLS RELATED TO OTHER CORE CLINICAL SKILLS? [Meeting Abstract]

Gillespie, C; Hanley, K; Kalet, A; Zabar, S; Porter, B
ISI:000277282300295
ISSN: 0884-8734
CID: 111914

STUDENTS WHO DEVELOP SELF-ASSESSMENT SKILLS IN A STRUCTURED VIDEOTAPE REVIEW IMPROVE THEIR INTERVIEWING SKILLS WITH STANDARDIZED PATIENTS [Meeting Abstract]

Hanley, K; Zabar, S; Disney, L; Kalet, A; Gillespie, C
ISI:000277282300415
ISSN: 0884-8734
CID: 111917

WHAT THEY BRING WITH THEM TO MEDICAL SCHO [Meeting Abstract]

Mercuri, J; Gillespie, C; Hanley, K; Zabar, S; Kalet, A
ISI:000277282300494
ISSN: 0884-8734
CID: 111920

WHO FAILS CLINICAL SKILLS EXAMS? DESCRIPTIVE EPIDEMIOLOGY TO INFORM CLINICAL SKILLS REMEDIATION [Meeting Abstract]

Kalet, A; Tewksbury, L; Bruno, JH; Taffel, L
ISI:000277282300547
ISSN: 0884-8734
CID: 111921

UNANNOUNCED STANDARDIZED PATIENTS: A NOVEL METHOD OF ASSESSING THE CLINICAL CARE TEAM [Meeting Abstract]

Zabar, S; Murphy, J; Hanley, K; Stevens, D; Burgess, A; Bruno, JH; Kalet, A; Gillespie, C
ISI:000277282300590
ISSN: 0884-8734
CID: 111922

She Fell Off The Cliff And Survived! Stereotype Threat As A Treatable Cause For Clinical Incompetence In Non-traditional Medical StudentS [Meeting Abstract]

Kalet, A; Taffel, L; Bruno, JH; Tewksbury, L
ISI:000277282300781
ISSN: 0884-8734
CID: 111925

New measures to establish the evidence base for medical education: identifying educationally sensitive patient outcomes

Kalet, Adina L; Gillespie, Colleen C; Schwartz, Mark D; Holmboe, Eric S; Ark, Tavinder K; Jay, Melanie; Paik, Steve; Truncali, Andrea; Hyland Bruno, Julia; Zabar, Sondra R; Gourevitch, Marc N
Researchers lack the rich evidence base and benchmark patient outcomes needed to evaluate the effectiveness of medical education practice and guide policy. The authors offer a framework for medical education research that focuses on physician-influenced patient outcomes that are potentially sensitive to medical education. Adapting the concept of ambulatory care sensitive conditions, which provided traction to health services research by defining benchmark patient outcomes to measure health system performance, the authors introduce the concept and propose the adoption of educationally sensitive patient outcomes and suggest two measures: patient activation and clinical microsystem activation. They assert that the ultimate goal of medical education is to ensure that measurement of future physicians' competence and skills is based not only on biomedical knowledge and critical clinical skills but also on the ability to translate these competencies into effective patient- and systems-level outcomes. The authors consider methodological approaches and challenges to measuring such outcomes and argue for large, multiinstitutional, prospective cohort studies and the development of a national Database for Research in Education in Academic Medicine to provide the needed infrastructure. They advocate taking the next steps to establish an educational evidence base to guide the academic medical centers of the 21st century in aligning medical education practice with health care delivery that meets the needs of individuals and populations
PMID: 20520038
ISSN: 1938-808x
CID: 110111

From the patient's perspective: the impact of training on resident physician's obesity counseling

Jay, Melanie; Schlair, Sheira; Caldwell, Rob; Kalet, Adina; Sherman, Scott; Gillespie, Colleen
BACKGROUND: It is uncertain whether training improves physicians' obesity counseling. OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of an obesity counseling curriculum for residents. DESIGN: A non-randomized, wait-list/control design. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-three primary care internal medicine residents; 12 were assigned to the curriculum group, and 11 were assigned to the no-curriculum group. Over a 7-month period (1-8 months post-intervention) 163 of the residents' obese patients were interviewed after their medical visits. INTERVENTION: A 5-hour, multi-modal obesity counseling curriculum based on the 5As (Assess, Advise, Agree, Assist, Arrange) using didactics, role-playing, and standardized patients. MAIN MEASURES: Patient-report of physicians' use of the 5As was assessed using a structured interview survey. Main outcomes were whether obese patients were counseled about diet, exercise, or weight loss (rate of counseling) and the quality of counseling provided (percentage of 5As skills performed during the visit). Univariate statistics (t-tests) were used to compare the rate and quality of counseling in the two resident groups. Logistic and linear regression was used to isolate the impact of the curriculum after controlling for patient, physician, and visit characteristics. KEY RESULTS: A large percentage of patients seen by both groups of residents received counseling about their weight, diet, and/or exercise (over 70%), but the quality of counseling was low in both the curriculum and no curriculum groups (mean 36.6% vs. 31.2% of 19 possible 5As counseling strategies, p = 0.21). This difference was not significant. However, after controlling for patient, physician and visit characteristics, residents in the curriculum group appeared to provide significantly higher quality counseling than those in the control group (std beta = 0.18; R(2) change = 2.9%, P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Residents who received an obesity counseling curriculum were not more likely to counsel obese patients than residents who did not. Training, however, is associated with higher quality of counseling when patient, physician, and visit characteristics are taken into account
PMCID:2855014
PMID: 20217268
ISSN: 1525-1497
CID: 130962

Can professionalism be taught? Encouraging evidence

Hochberg, Mark S; Kalet, Adina; Zabar, Sondra; Kachur, Elizabeth; Gillespie, Colleen; Berman, Russell S
BACKGROUND: Teaching and assessing the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) competencies of Professionalism and Communication have proven to be a challenge for surgical residency training programs. This study used innovative pedagogic approaches and tools in teaching these two competencies. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the learners actually are assimilating and using the concepts and values communicated through this curriculum. METHODS: A six-station Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) was designed using standardized patients to create varying Professionalism and Communication scenarios. The surgical resident learners were evaluated using these OSCEs as a baseline. The faculty then facilitated a specially designed curriculum consisting of six interactive sessions focusing on information gathering, rapport building, patient education, delivering bad news, responding to emotion, and interdisciplinary respect. At the conclusion of this curriculum, the surgical resident learners took the same six-station OSCE to determine if their professionalism and communication skills had improved. RESULTS: The surgical resident learners were rated by the standardized patients according to a strict task checklist of criteria at both the precurricular and postcurricular OSCEs. Improvement in the competencies of Professionalism and Communication did achieve statistical significance (P = .029 and P = .011, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that the Communication and Professionalism ACGME competencies can be taught to surgical resident learners through a carefully crafted curriculum. Furthermore, these newly learned competencies can affect surgical resident interactions with their patients positively
PMID: 20103071
ISSN: 1879-1883
CID: 106382