Try a new search

Format these results:

Searched for:

in-biosketch:yes

person:alm5

Total Results:

193


Immunization status as determined by patients' hand-held cards vs medical records

Fierman AH; Rosen CM; Legano LA; Lim SW; Mendelsohn AL; Dreyer BP
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether patients' hand-held immunization cards provide accurate assessments of immunization status when compared with their corresponding medical records. SETTING: Urban hospital emergency department immunization program. DESIGN: Comparison of 2 criterion standards. PATIENTS: Children aged 4 months to 6 years who presented consecutively with their immunization cards and received routine care in the hospital's pediatric clinic. SELECTION: Of 673 eligible patients seen in the immunization program from November 1992 to October 1993, 140 were randomly selected for comparison of immunization card and medical record immunization dates; in addition, all 123 eligible patients seen between August and October 1994 were selected. Of the total of 263 children, medical records for 257 (98%) were available for review. The dates of diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis, polio, measles-mumps-rubella, and Haemophilus influenzae type b immunization from immunization cards and medical records were recorded, as were patient age, sex, and ethnicity. Immunization card-medical record immunization date pairs were compared. Each immunization card and medical record was categorized as up to date, due for immunization, or delayed 2 months or more for any immunization at the time of the visit. RESULTS: In 218 (85%) of 257 cases, the immunization card and medical record immunization dates were identical (McNemar test, P = .63). The immunization card and medical record agreed that patients were due for immunization in 91 cases and agreed that patients were not due for immunization in 138 cases (kappa = 0.77; 95% confidence interval, 0.70-0.85). The immunization card and medical record agreed that patients were delayed for 1 or more immunizations in 51 cases and agreed that patients were not delayed in 187 cases (kappa = 0.79; 95% confidence interval, 0.71-0.88). CONCLUSION: The hand-held immunization card is a suitable alternative to the medical record when the need for immunization is assessed or when rates of immunization delay in populations are determined
PMID: 8704895
ISSN: 1072-4710
CID: 12577

Assessing the child's cognitive home environment through parental report: Reliability and validity

Dreyer, BP; Mendelsohn, AL; TamisLeMonda, CS
In a series of investigations with poor minority families, we examined the reliability and validity of the StimQ, an office-based interview of children's cognitive home environment. Researchers and practitioners alike recognize the importance of assessing meaningful dimensions of children's early experiences, particularly in families where children may be at risk for later cognitive delay. To date, methodological approaches to the study of parenting have most often relied on home visits and/or labour-intensive observations and coding. Our findings suggest that valid and reliable data about the cognitive environments of poor children can be obtained through maternal report, thereby offering applied scientists a useful alternative to assessing children's early experiences. (C)1996 by John Wiley and Sons, Ltd.
ISI:A1996XF00600009
ISSN: 1057-3593
CID: 1855282

Surgical results for mitral regurgitation from coronary artery disease

Connolly, M W; Gelbfish, J S; Jacobowitz, I J; Rose, D M; Mendelsohn, A; Cappabianca, P M; Acinapura, A J; Cunningham, J N Jr
Results of coronary artery bypass grafting with and without mitral valve replacement were analyzed retrospectively in 101 patients with preoperative ischemic mitral regurgitation to determine the effects of severity and surgical treatment of mitral regurgitation on survival. Between 1980 and 1984, a total of 1,475 patients (mean age 59, 77% male) underwent coronary bypass. These patients were divided into three groups: (1) patients without ischemic mitral regurgitation who underwent isolated coronary bypass (1,374; 93%), (2) patients with ischemic mitral regurgitation who underwent isolated coronary bypass without valve replacement (85; 6%), and (3) patients with ischemic mitral regurgitation who underwent combined mitral valve replacement and coronary bypass (16; 1%). Preoperatively, patients with ischemic mitral regurgitation compared to those without regurgitation were significantly older (+6 years, p less than 0.001), had more severe coronary artery disease (p less than 0.001), a higher incidence of congestive heart failure (24% versus 5%, p less than 0.001) and recent myocardial infarction (16% versus 8%, p less than 0.01), and a lower mean ejection fraction (45% versus 61%, p less than 0.001). Operative mortality was significantly increased in patients with ischemic mitral regurgitation who underwent coronary bypass alone (p less than 0.01) and in those who underwent coronary bypass and mitral valve replacement (p less than 0.01)--11% and 19%, respectively--than in the coronary bypass patients without ischemic mitral regurgitation (3.7%). The severity of mitral regurgitation (0 to 4+) proved to be the most significant predictor of operative mortality. The actuarial survival rate at 5 years for the coronary bypass patients without ischemic mitral regurgitation was 85% compared to 91% (p less than 0.05) for the coronary bypass patients without ischemic mitral regurgitation. These results indicate that patients with ischemic mitral regurgitation have a higher prevalence of cardiac risk factors and are at an increased risk of operative mortality. Although the severity of the ischemic mitral regurgitation was strongly predictive of early survival, it proved to have an unexpectedly modest effect on long-term survival after surgical treatment
PMID: 3485221
ISSN: 0022-5223
CID: 126731