Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND:To evaluate efficacy, pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics of single-agent everolimus in pediatric patients with radiographically progressive low-grade glioma (LGG). METHODS:once daily as a tablet or liquid for a planned 48-week duration or until unacceptable toxicity or disease progression. Patients with neurofibromatosis type 1 were excluded. PK and pharmacodynamic endpoints were assessed in consenting patients. RESULTS:Twenty-three eligible patients (median age 9.2 years) were enrolled. All patients received prior chemotherapy (median number of prior regimens two) and/or radiotherapy (two patients). By week 48, two patients had a partial response, 10 stable disease, and 11 clinical or radiographic progression; two discontinued study prior to 1 year (toxicity: 1, physician determination: 1). With a median follow up of 1.8 years (range 0.2-6.7 years), the 2-, 3-, and 5-year progression-free survivals (PFS) were 39 ± 11%, 26 ± 11%, and 26 ± 11%, respectively; two patients died of disease. The 2-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival (OS) were all 93 ± 6%. Grade 1 and 2 toxicities predominated; two definitively related grade 3 toxicities (mucositis and neutropenia) occurred. Grade 4 elevation of liver enzymes was possibly related in one patient. Predose blood levels showed substantial variability between patients with 45.5% below and 18.2% above the target range of 5-15 ng/mL. Pharmacodynamic analysis demonstrated significant inhibition in phospho-S6, 4E-BP1, and modulation of c-Myc expression. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Daily oral everolimus provides a well-tolerated, alternative treatment for multiple recurrent, radiographically progressive pediatric LGG. Based on these results, everolimus is being investigated further for this patient population.

BACKGROUND:Activation of the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway is observed in neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) associated low-grade gliomas (LGGs), but agents that inhibit this pathway, including mTOR inhibitors, have not been studied in this population. We evaluate the efficacy of the orally administered mTOR inhibitor everolimus for radiographically progressive NF1-associated pediatric LGGs. METHODS:Children with radiologic-progressive, NF1-associated LGG and prior treatment with a carboplatin-containing chemotherapy were prospectively enrolled on this phase II clinical trial to receive daily everolimus. Whole blood was analyzed for everolimus and markers of phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase (PI3K)/mTOR pathway inhibition. Serial MRIs were obtained during treatment. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival at 48 weeks. RESULTS:Twenty-three participants (median age, 9.4 y; range, 3.2-21.6 y) were enrolled. All participants were initially evaluable for response; 1 patient was removed from study after development of a malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor. Fifteen of 22 participants (68%) demonstrated a response, defined as either shrinkage (1 complete response, 2 partial response) or arrest of tumor growth (12 stable disease). Of these, 10/15 remained free of progression (median follow-up, 33 mo). All remaining 22 participants were alive at completion of therapy. Treatment was well tolerated; no patient discontinued therapy due to toxicity. Pharmacokinetic parameters and pre-dose concentrations showed substantial between-subject variability. PI3K/mTOR pathway inhibition markers demonstrating blood mononuclear cell mTOR pathway inactivation was achieved in most participants. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Individuals with recurrent/progressive NF1-associated LGG demonstrate significant disease stability/shrinkage during treatment with oral everolimus with a well-tolerated toxicity profile. Everolimus is well suited for future consideration as upfront or combination therapy in this patient population.

We report a case of a slow-growing, diffuse, infiltrating glioma in the right brainstem of an 9 year-old boy. The tumor was negative by immunohistochemical staining for histone H3 K27M, BRAF V600E, and IDH1 R132H mutations. Fluorescence in situ hybridization did not reveal a BRAF duplication. Genomic profiling of the tumor, by DNA methylation array and cancer whole exome and transcriptome sequencing, was performed. This analysis showed copy number alterations, including gains of several chromosomes. In addition, a novel fusion involving the first 17 exons of FGFR2 fused to exon 2 of VPS35 was identified. This novel fusion is predicted to result in activation of FGFR signaling, and is potentially targetable using FGFR inhibitors. This tumor expands the spectrum of pediatric diffuse gliomas.

Pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma (PXA) is a rare type of brain tumor that affects children and young adults. Molecular prognostic markers of PXAs remain poorly established. Similar to gangliogliomas, PXAs show prominent immune cell infiltrate, but its composition also remains unknown. In this study, we correlated DNA methylation and BRAF status with clinical outcome and explored the tumor microenvironment. We performed DNA methylation in 21 tumor samples from 18 subjects with a histological diagnosis of PXA. MethylCIBERSORT was used to deconvolute the PXA microenvironment by analyzing the associated immune cell-types. Median age at diagnosis was 16 years (range 7-32). At median follow-up of 30 months, 3-year and 5-year overall survival was 73% and 71%, respectively. Overall survival ranged from 1 to 139 months. Eleven out of 18 subjects (61%) showed disease progression. Progression-free survival ranged from 1 to 89 months. Trisomy 7 and CDKN2A/B (p16) homozygous deletion did not show any association with overall survival (p = 0.67 and p = 0.74, respectively). Decreased overall survival was observed for subjects with tumors lacking the BRAF V600E mutation (p = 0.02). PXAs had significantly increased CD8 T-cell epigenetic signatures compared with previously profiled gangliogliomas (p = 0.0019). The characterization of immune cell-types in PXAs may have implications for future development of immunotherapy.

BACKGROUND:"Head Start" III, was a prospective clinical trial using intensive induction followed by myeloablative chemotherapy and autologous hematopoietic cell rescue (AuHCR) to either avoid or reduce the dose/volume of irradiation in young children with medulloblastoma. METHODS:Following surgery, patients received five cycles of induction followed by myeloablative chemotherapy using carboplatin, thiotepa, and etoposide with AuHCR. Irradiation was reserved for children >6 years old at diagnosis or with residual tumor post-induction. RESULTS:Between 2003 and 2009, 92 children <10 years old with medulloblastoma were enrolled. 5-year event-free survival (EFS) and overall-survival (OS) rates (±SE) were 46±5% and 62±5% for all patients, 61±8% and 77±7% for localized medulloblastoma, and 35±7% and 52±7% for disseminated patients. Nodular/desmoplastic (ND) medulloblastoma patients had 5-year EFS and OS (±SE) rates of 89±6% and 89±6% compared to 26±6% and 53±7% for classic and 38±13% and 46±14% for large-cell/anaplastic (LCA) medulloblastoma, respectively. In multivariate Cox regression analysis, histology was the only significant independent predictor of EFS after adjusting for stage, extent of resection, regimen, age and sex (p<0.0001). 5-year irradiation-free EFS was 78±8% for ND and 21±5% for classic/LCA medulloblastoma patients. Myelosuppression was the most common toxicity with two toxic deaths. Twenty-four survivors completed neurocognitive evaluation at a mean of 4.9 years post-diagnosis.IQ and memory scores were within average range overall whereas processing speed and adaptive functioning were low-average. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:We report excellent survival and preservation of mean IQ and memory for young children with ND medulloblastoma using high-dose chemotherapy with most patients surviving without irradiation.

The rapid development of immuno-oncology (I-O) therapies for multiple types of cancer has transformed the cancer treatment landscape and brightened the long-term outlook for many patients with advanced cancer. Responding to ongoing efforts to generate value assessments for novel therapies, multiple stakeholders have been considering the question of "What makes I-O transformative?" Evaluating the distinct features and attributes of these therapies, and better characterizing how patients experience them, will inform such assessments. This paper defines ways in which treatment with I-O is different from other therapies. It also proposes key aspects and attributes of I-O therapies that should be considered in any assessment of their value and seeks to address evidence gaps in existing value frameworks given the unique properties of patient outcomes with I-O therapy. The paper concludes with a "data needs catalogue" (DNC) predicated on the belief that multiple key, unique elements that are necessary to fully characterize the value of I-O therapies are not routinely or robustly measured in current clinical practice or reimbursement databases and are infrequently captured in existing research studies. A better characterization of the benefit of I-O treatment will allow a more thorough assessment of its benefits and provide a template for the design and prioritization of future clinical trials and a roadmap for healthcare insurers to optimize coverage for patients with cancers eligible for I-O therapy.