Faculty Bibliography

Wistar rat pups were implanted with bilateral olfactory bulb cannulas on postnatal day 5 (PN5). On PN6, pups were trained in an olfactory classical conditioning task with peppermint odor as the CS and tactile stimulation/stroking as the UCS. Pups were randomly assigned to either PAIRED, BACKWARD or ODOR-only conditions. Half the pups in each group received intrabulbar infusions of 100 microM propranolol and half received intrabulbar infusions of saline during the training session. Propranolol infusions blocked acquisition of the learned odor preference expressed by PAIRED saline-infused pups. Diffusion of the infusate was checked in additional pups by infusing [3H]NE and performing LSC analysis. Infusate concentration did not significantly differ between the anterior and posterior halves of the bulb, but were sharply lower in the olfactory peduncle and more posterior areas. The results suggest that olfactory bulb NE is critical for early olfactory learning

Association of odor and reward during the early postnatal period modifies rat pup behavioral responses and olfactory bulb neural responses to subsequent presentations of that odor. Recent evidence has shown that olfactory bulb output neurons, mitral/tufted cells, receive convergent odor and reward inputs. The present report demonstrates that contiguous odor-reward pairings prevent mitral/tufted cell habituation to the odor that normally occurs to repeated odor-only stimulation. It is hypothesized that the maintenance of olfactory bulb responses to conditioned odors during training may allow for activation of long-term memory mechanisms

One of the circuits modified by early olfactory learning is in the olfactory bulb. Specifically, response patterns of mitral-tufted cells are modified by associative conditioning during the early postnatal period. In addition, previous work has demonstrated that mitral-tufted cell single units respond to both olfactory conditioned stimuli and rewarding stimulation of the medial forebrain bundle-lateral hypothalamus (MFB-LH). The present study suggests that norepinephrine beta-receptor activation is required for early olfactory learning using MFB-LH stimulation as reward. Propranolol injected before odor-MFB-LH pairings blocks the acquisition of conditioned behavioral responses and their neural correlates to the conditioned odor. Furthermore, propranolol blocks a specific class of the mitral-tufted cell responses to MFB-LH reward stimulation. The relationship of this response to reward and early learning is discussed

Newborn rat pups can learn to either approach or avoid odor cues through associative conditioning. The present results demonstrate that preference conditioning and avoidance conditioning both modify olfactory bulb responses (focal 2-deoxyglucose uptake and mitral-tufted cell single unit responses) to the conditioned odor. Despite opposing behavioral responses to the conditioned odor, however, olfactory bulb neural responses did not detectably differ between learned odor cues signaling approach and those signaling avoidance. Control pups exhibited neither the behavioral nor neural changes. Furthermore, both the behavioral and neural changes to these odor cues could be extinguished. These results suggest that the olfactory bulb in neonates may code learned odor importance, but specific information attached to that importance may require processing in other brain regions

In neonatal rats, norepinephrine (NE) is necessary and sufficient for the acquisition of an olfactory preference and its associated olfactory bulb neural modifications as assessed by [(14)C] 2-deoxyglucose (2-DG) and electrophysiology. In the present studies, we assessed the influence of NE on the expression of a conditioned odor preference and its associated olfactory bulb neural modifications in neonatal rats. On Postnatal Day 5 (PN 5), pups were trained to prefer an odor in a 1-h classical conditioning paradigm. Experimental paired odor-stroke pups received 20 forward pairings of a 10-sec peppermint odor and a 9-sec reinforcing tactile stimulation (stroking). Control pups received either random stroke-odor pairings or were naive (received neither the odor nor stroking). The next day (PN 6), the pups were injected with either an NE beta-receptor antagonist, (propranolol or timolol) or saline, 1 h prior to testing. The pups were tested for a behavioral olfactory preference and assessed for differential olfactory bulb activity with [(14)C] 2-DG autoradiography. The results indicate that NE is not necessary for the expression of the learned neurobehavioral response

In Experiment 1, infant rats were implanted with a stimulating electrode in the medial forebrain bundle/lateral hypothalamus (MFB/LH) on postnatal day 12 (PN12). Four to 6 hours later, the pups underwent associative olfactory conditioning, with half of the pups trained with 30 temporal pairings of odor (5 s) and MFB/LH stimulation (200 Hz, 300 ms), and the other half trained with random presentations of odor and MFB/LH stimulation. On PN13, pups were tested for: (1) behavioral preference for the conditioned odor; (2) focal glomerular layer 2-DG uptake to the odor; or (3) mitral/tufted cell single-unit response pattern to the odor. Odor-MFB/LH pairings produced a relative behavioral preference, enhanced focal 2-DG uptake and a modified mitral/tufted cell response pattern to the conditioned odor. Random training resulted in none of these changes. In Experiment 2, PN12 pups were anesthetized with urethane and single-unit responses of mitral/tufted cells to MFB/LH stimulation were examined. MFB/LH stimulation produced a brief suppression of mitral/tufted cell activity followed either by a prolonged excitation (18/30 cells; 8-10 s duration) or a prolonged suppression (12/30 cells; 10-30 s). These results suggest that pairing olfactory nerve input with MFB/LH stimulation modifies subsequent behavioral and physiological responses to olfactory nerve input alone. Furthermore, the prolonged olfactory bulb response to MFB/LH stimulation may be critical in this modification

Rat pups acquire an attraction for maternal odors, which can vary with maternal diet. In the two experiments reported here, maternal diet was modified and both pup behavioral responses and pup olfactory bulb neural responses [( 14C]2-DG uptake) to maternal odors were examined. In experiment 1, pups were reared from birth to postnatal day 19 with either a dam fed normal rat chow or a dam fed a sucrose-based diet which suppressed her normal maternal odor. In experiment 2, pups were raised from birth to postnatal day 19 with either a dam fed the sucrose-based diet adulterated with peppermint, or the non-scented sucrose-based diet. Pups selectively expressed both a behavioral attraction and an enhanced olfactory bulb neural response to odors that they experienced in the nest

Postnatal olfactory learning produces both a conditioned behavioral response and a modified olfactory bulb neural response to the learned odor. The present report describes the role of norepinephrine (NE) on both of these learned responses in neonatal rat pups. Pups received olfactory classical conditioning training from postnatal days (PN) 1-18. Training consisted of 18 trials with an intertrial interval of 24 hr. For the experimental group, a trial consisted of a pairing of unconditioned stimulus (UCS, stroking/tactile stimulation) and the conditioned stimulus (CS, odor). Control groups received either only the CS (Odor only) or only the UCS (Stroke only). Within each training condition, pups were injected with either the NE beta-receptor agonist isoproterenol (1, 20, or 4 mg/kg), the NE beta-receptor antagonist propranolol (10, 20, 40 mg/kg), or saline 30 min prior to training. On day 20, pups received one of the following tests: (1) behavioral conditioned responding, (2) injection with 14C-2-deoxyglucose (2-DG) and exposed to the CS odor, or (3) tested for olfactory bulb mitral/tufted cell single-unit responses to the CS odor. The results indicated that training with either: (1) Odor-Stroke-Saline, (2) Odor-Stroke-Isoproterenol-Propranolol, or (3) Odor only-Isoproterenol (2 mg/kg) was sufficient to produce a learned behavioral odor preference, enhanced uptake of 14C-2-DG in the odor-specific foci within the bulb, and a modified output signal from the bulb as measured by single-cell recordings of mitral/tufted cells. Moreover, propranolol injected prior to Odor-Stroke training blocked the acquisition of both the learned behavior and olfactory bulb responses. Thus, NE is sufficient and may be necessary for the acquisition of both learned olfactory behavior and olfactory bulb responses

Acquisition of behavioral conditioned responding and learned odor preferences during olfactory classical conditioning in rat pups requires forward or simultaneous pairings of the conditioned stimulus (CS) and the unconditioned stimulus (US). Other temporal relationships between the CS and US do not usually result in learning. The present study examined the influence of this CS-US relationship upon the neural olfactory bulb modifications that are acquired during early classical conditioning. Wistar rat pups were trained from Postnatal Days (PN) 1-18 with either forward (odor overlapping temporally with reinforcing stroking) or backward (stroking followed by odor) CS-US pairings. On PN 19, pups received either a behavioral odor preference test to the odor CS or an injection of (14)C 2-DG and exposure to the odor CS, or olfactory bulb single unit responses were recorded in response to exposure to the odor CS. Only pups that received forward presentations of the CS and US exhibited both a preference for the CS and modified olfactory bulb neural responses to the CS. These results, then, suggest that the modified olfactory bulb neural responses acquired during classical conditioning are guided by the same temporal constraints as those which govern the acquisition of behavioral conditioned responses