Faculty Bibliography

Positron emission tomography (PET) is a relatively noninvasive neuroimaging method by means of which a large variety of human brain functions can be assessed. Localized neurochemical abnormalities detected by PET were found in patients with partial epilepsy and suggested the use of this modality for localizing epileptogenic regions of the brain. The clinical usefulness of PET is determined by its sensitivity and specificity for identifying epileptogenic areas as defined by ictal surface and intracranial EEG recordings. The findings obtained from comparative EEG and glucose PET data are reviewed with special emphasis on patients undergoing presurgical evaluation because of medically intractable temporal and extratemporal lobe epilepsy. The utility of glucose PET studies for identifying regions of seizure onset is presented, and the limited specificity of glucose metabolic abnormalities for the detection of various EEG patterns in clinical epilepsy is discussed. The authors review the available intracranial EEG and PET comparisons using [11C]flumazenil (FMZ) PET, a tracer for the assessment of tau-amino-butyric acid/benzodiazepine receptor function. They also summarize their experience with [11C]flumazenil PET in identifying cortical regions that show various ictal and interictal cortical EEG abnormalities in patients with extratemporal seizure origin. Finally, the authors demonstrate that further development of new PET tracers, such as alpha-[11C]methyl-L-tryptophan, is feasible and clinically useful and may increase the number of patients in whom PET studies can replace invasive EEG monitoring.

OBJECTIVE:To compare abnormalities determined in 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-D-glucose (FDG) and [11C]flumazenil (FMZ) PET images with intracranial EEG data in patients with extratemporal lobe epilepsy. BACKGROUND:Although PET studies with FDG and FMZ are being used clinically to localize epileptogenic regions in patients with refractory epilepsy, the electrophysiologic significance of the identified PET abnormalities remains poorly understood. METHODS:We studied 10 patients, mostly children (4 boys, 6 girls, aged 2 to 19 years; mean age, 11 years), who underwent FDG and FMZ PET scans, intracranial EEG monitoring, and cortical resection for intractable epilepsy. EEG electrode positions relative to the brain surface were determined from MRI image volumes. Cortical areas of abnormal glucose metabolism or FMZ binding were determined objectively based on asymmetry measures derived from homotopic cortical areas at three asymmetry thresholds. PET data were then coregistered with the MRI and overlaid on the MRI surface. A receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis was performed to determine the specificity and sensitivity of PET-defined abnormalities against the gold standard of intracranial EEG data. RESULTS:FMZ PET detected at least part of the seizure onset zone in all subjects, whereas FDG PET failed to detect the seizure onset region in two of 10 patients. The area under the ROC curves was higher for FMZ than FDG PET for both seizure onset (p = 0.01) and frequent interictal spiking (p = 0.04). Both FMZ and FDG PET showed poor performance for detection of rapid seizure spread (area under the ROC curve not significantly different from 0.5). CONCLUSIONS:[11C]flumazenil (FMZ) PET is significantly more sensitive than 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-D-glucose (FDG) PET for the detection of cortical regions of seizure onset and frequent spiking in patients with extratemporal lobe epilepsy, whereas both FDG and FMZ PET show low sensitivity in the detection of cortical areas of rapid seizure spread. The application of PET, in particular FMZ PET, in guiding subdural electrode placement in refractory extratemporal lobe epilepsy will enhance coverage of the epileptogenic zone.