Faculty Bibliography

OBJECTIVE: To develop a measure of renal activity in systemic lupus erythematosus and use it to develop a renal response index. METHODS: Abstracted data from the medical records of 215 patients with lupus nephritis were sent to 8 nephrologists and 29 rheumatologists for rating. Seven nephrologists and 22 rheumatologists completed the ratings. Each physician rated each patient visit with respect to renal disease activity (none, mild, moderate, or severe). Using the most commonly selected rating for each patient as the gold standard, stepwise regression modeling was performed to identify the variables most related to renal disease activity, and these variables were then used to create an activity score. This activity score could then be applied to 2 consecutive visits to define a renal response index. RESULTS: The renal activity score was computed as follows: proteinuria 0.5-1 gm/day (3 points), proteinuria >1-3 gm/day (5 points), proteinuria >3 gm/day (11 points), urine red blood cell count >10/high-power field (3 points), and urine white blood cell count >10/high-power field (1 point). The chance-adjusted agreement between the renal response index derived from the activity score applied to the paired visits and the plurality physician response rating was 0.69 (95% confidence interval 0.59-0.79). CONCLUSION: Ratings derived from this index for rating of renal response showed reasonable agreement with physician ratings in a pilot study. The index will require further refinement, testing, and validation. A data-driven approach to create renal activity and renal response indices will be useful in both clinical care and research settings

OBJECTIVE: To assess the degree to which physicians agree with each other and with ratings obtained with 3 existing responder indices, in rating the response to treatment of lupus nephritis. METHODS: Lupus nephritis patient medical records from 125 pairs of visits (6 months apart) were used to create renal response scenarios. Seven nephrologists and 22 rheumatologists rated each scenario as demonstrating complete response, partial response, same, or worsening. The plurality (most frequent) rating of renal response by the physicians was compared with the calculated score from the renal component of the British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) index (original and updated [2004] version) and of the Responder Index for Lupus Erythematosus (RIFLE). The degree of agreement among the physicians was assessed by calculating intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). The degree of agreement between the plurality physician rating and ratings obtained with the established response indices was assessed using the kappa statistic. RESULTS: The ICC among all physicians was 0.64 (0.62 for nephrologists and 0.67 for rheumatologists). The chance-adjusted measure of agreement (kappa coefficient) between the plurality physician rating and the calculated score obtained using established indexes was 0.50 (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.38-0.61) for the RIFLE, 0.14 (95% CI 0.03-0.25) for the original BILAG, and 0.23 (95% CI 0.21-0.44) for the BILAG 2004. CONCLUSION: These findings indicate that rheumatologists as a group and nephrologists as a group have equal agreement in their rating of renal response. There was moderate agreement between plurality physician ratings and ratings obtained using the renal component of the RIFLE. Ratings of response using an index based on the original BILAG did not have good agreement with the plurality physician rating

Approved treatment options for moderate-to-severe systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and lupus nephritis (LN) are presently very limited. Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), an immunosuppressive agent indicated for acute transplant rejection prophylaxis, has been increasingly used to treat these conditions. The best evidence-based information on the use of MMF in SLE comes from studies of LN. Randomized, controlled trials of MMF have been conducted only in this subset of lupus patients. The data suggest that the drug is well tolerated, effective and should be considered a useful alternative to standard immunosuppressants for the treatment of LN. The aim of this article is to examine the available evidence concerning MMF in lupus and LN

This article provides a review of the various types of antiphospholipid (aPL) antibodies and antiphospholipid syndromes, their prevalence, presumed origin, relationship to autoimmunity in general, and their role in the body's defenses and apoptosis. New hypotheses such as the role of antibodies to beta2 glycoprotein I (beta2GPI) and the signaling of toll-like receptors are also discussed, as is the spectrum of clinical manifestations associated with the demonstration of these antibodies, now assumed to be 'pathogenic.' A distinction is made between antibodies present in sera of patients with a variety of microangiopathic syndromes (MAPS; e.g., HELLP syndrome, thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura, and thrombotic microangiopathic syndromes). In these conditions, the antibodies might not be 'pathogenic' but, alternatively, generated by small vessel endothelial damage. These conditions are differentially referred to as microangiopathic antiphospholipid-associated syndromes, and they should be differentiated from the microvascular occlusions that are seen in the antiphospholipid syndrome. Current treatments of the antiphospholipid syndrome are briefly reviewed

OBJECTIVE:The aetiology of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is incompletely understood. Both genetic and environmental factors are implicated in the pathogenesis of the disease. Herein, we describe genetic association between SLE and polymorphisms in the interleukin (IL)-21 gene. The reported effect of IL-21 on B-cell differentiation into plasma cells and its effect on dendritic cell maturation and T-cell responses make IL-21 an attractive candidate gene for SLE. METHODS:Three single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the IL-21 gene were genotyped in a total of 2636 individuals (1318 cases and 1318 controls matched for age, sex and race). Population-based case-control association analyses were performed. RESULTS:We found a genetic association with SLE and two SNPs located within the IL-21 gene (rs907715: chi(2) = 11.55, p<0.001; rs2221903: chi(2) = 5.49, p = 0.019). Furthermore, genotypes homozygous for the risk alleles were more frequent than genotypes homozygous for the non-risk alleles in European-American patients as compared to controls (rs907715 (GG versus AA): odds ratio (OR) = 1.66, p = 0.0049; rs2221903 (GG versus AA): OR = 1.60, p = 0.025). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Our findings indicate that IL-21 polymorphism is a candidate association with SLE. The functional effects of this association, when revealed, might improve our understanding of the disease and provide new therapeutic targets.