Faculty Bibliography

Background: Skp2, a known oncogene, is overexpressed in several types of tumors and is associated with worse recurrence rate and overall survival in primary melanoma patients. Moreover, the anti-proliferative effects of Skp2 siRNA on various tumor cell lines have prompted the preclinical testing of Skp2 small molecule inhibitors. In this study, we assessed the clinical relevance and molecular mechanism(s) underlying Skp2 overexpression in metastatic melanoma patients. Methods: Skp2 protein levels were measured in 122 metastatic melanoma specimens using immunohistochemistry (IHC), and the association between Skp2 overexpression and post-recurrence survival was examined. Moreover, 22 cell lines (2 normal primary melanocytes, 2 primary immortal melanocytes, 4 primary melanoma cell lines, and 18 metastatic melanoma cell lines) were evaluated for Skp2 genomic amplification using Single Nucleotide Polymorphism (SNP) arrays (Affymetrix 6.0) and Skp2 gene expression using mRNA arrays (Affymetrix U133A 2.0) and quantitative RT-PCR. We also screened 18 cell lines for Skp2 mutation by sequencing. Results: Skp2 overexpression, defined as >25% tumor cells, was associated with shorter 3-yr post-recurrence survival (37%) compared to Skp2 expression <= 25% (55%) (HR=1.89, 95%, CI= 1.04, 3.42, p=0.04). Skp2 overexpression was significantly associated with the site of melanoma metastasis: visceral (n= 12; 89%), lymph node (n=49; 36%), brain (n=15; 14%), and soft-tissue (n=36; 6%) (p<0.001). SNP array revealed genomic amplification at the Skp2 locus in 6 (33%) metastatic cell lines and one primary melanoma cell line. Skp2 genomic amplification was associated with increased transcript expression. No Skp2 mutations were identified. Conclusions: Skp2 protein overexpression is associated with worse prognosis in metastasis in melanoma. Our results also support that gene amplification, rather than a Skp2 gene mutation, may be the major mechanism responsible for Skp2 aberrant expression in metastatic melanoma

Background: Several studies have provided evidence that solid tumors are polyclonal malignancies, an observation which may contribute to difficulties in achieving durable treatment responses. In some patients, molecularly targeted therapies may be compromised due to heterogeneity among tumor subclones. In this study we compared conventional DNA sequencing with a fluorescent-based mutant-specific PCR (MS-PCR) assay to detect the BRAF hotspot mutation V600E in a large panel of patient tumors, including paired primary and metastatic tumors from individual patients. Methods: BRAF MS-PCR and conventional sequencing were performed on DNA from 304 tumors (112 melanoma, 110 ovarian, 82 prostate) to determine the presence of the BRAFV600E hot-spot mutation. Among the melanomas were 18 matched primary and metastatic specimens, and 40 metastatic specimens from 19 patients, each of whom had 2 or more metastases. Results: DNA sequencing detected mutations in 5/110 (4.5%) ovarian tumors, 1/82 (1.2%) prostate tumors, and 36/112 (32%) melanomas. In contrast, the MS-PCR assay detected mutations in 12/110 (11%) ovarian tumors, 15/82 (18%) prostate tumors and 85/112 (76%) melanomas. The presence of contaminating normal tissue was scored for each melanoma sample, but excess normal tissue did not influence the results using either methodology. In all cases mutations detected by sequencing were also detected by MSPCR. Among 18 patients with matched primary and metastatic melanoma, 8/18 (44%) had discordant results including 2 patients with mutant primary tumors and wild-type metastases; among the 19 patients with multiple metastases 5/19 (26%) had discordant (both wild-type and mutant) tumors. Conclusions: Using a highly sensitive BRAF mutation detection method, we observed substantial evidence for heterogeneity within clinical tumor specimens. This was especially true in melanoma samples, where multiple specimens from individual patients differed with respect to the presence of the mutant BRAF allele. These results suggest that failures of molecularly targeted therapies, such as those directed against mutant BRAF, may be due in part to a lack of clonality among the tumors under treatment

Most metastatic melanoma patients fail to respond to available therapy, underscoring the need to develop more effective treatments. We screened 2,000 compounds from the Spectrum Library in human melanoma cell lines to identify compounds that enhanced the cytotoxic effect of temozolomide, a drug used to treat metastatic melanoma. Screening was done with the temozolomide-resistant melanoma cell line SK-MEL-19, and six compounds were identified that had little or no inherent cytotoxicity but significantly enhanced growth-inhibition by temozolomide. These compounds were tested in five additional melanoma cell lines. Cell proliferation and death assays were used to compare the efficacy of single agent temozolomide versus combination treatments. Effects of combination treatment on levels of DNA double-strand breaks, the DNA repair protein O(6)-methylguanine-DNA-methyltransferase, apoptosis [measured by cleaved caspase-3 and poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase], and cell cycle were examined. Pyrimethamine, an antiparasitic, sensitized melanoma cells to temozolomide. Temozolomide combined with Pyrimethamine synergistically inhibited cell proliferation in melanoma cells with combination index values of 0.7 or less. In addition, combination treatment induced cell cycle arrest and increased both DNA damage and apoptosis. The increase in cell death due to combination treatment was rescued by leucovorin. Other folate antagonists were also effective enhancers of temozolomide-induced cytotoxicity, and the effects of antifolates were also evident in gliomas. Our screening approach led to the identification of Pyrimethamine, an orally available drug that efficiently crosses the blood-brain barrier, as a potent enhancer of the efficacy of temozolomide as an antineoplastic agent via inhibition of folate metabolism

African American (AA) men with prostate cancer (PCa) have worse disease, with a higher incidence, younger age and more advanced disease at diagnosis, and a worse prognosis, compared to Caucasian (CA) men. In addition to socioeconomic factors and lifestyle differences, molecular alterations contribute to this discrepancy. In this review, we summarize molecular genetics research results interrelated with the biology of PCa racial disparity. Androgen and androgen receptor (AR) pathways have long been associated with prostate growth. Racial differences have also been found among variants of the genes of the enzymes involved in androgen biosynthesis and metabolism, such as SRD5A2, CYP17, and CYP3A4. The levels of expression and CAG repeat length of AR also show racial divergence and may be critical molecular alterations for racial disparity. Growth factors and their receptors, which promote cancer cell growth, are another potential cause of the disparity; both EGFR and EPHB2, two of the most studied receptors, show interethnic differences. Differences have also been found among genes regulating cell apoptosis, such as BCL2, which is increased in PCa in the AA population. Recent developments in genetics, proteomics, and genomics, among other molecular biotechnologies, will greatly aid the advancement of translational research on PCa racial disparity, hopefully culminating in the discovery of novel mechanisms of disease, in addition to prognostic markers and novel therapeutic approaches