Try a new search

Format these results:

Searched for:

in-biosketch:yes

person:cerdam01

Total Results:

248


Trends in Opioid Use Disorder in the Veterans Health Administration, 2005-2022

Gorfinkel, Lauren R; Malte, Carol A; Fink, David S; Mannes, Zachary L; Wall, Melanie M; Olfson, Mark; Livne, Ofir; Keyhani, Salomeh; Keyes, Katherine M; Martins, Silvia S; Cerdá, Magdalena; Gutkind, Sarah; Maynard, Charles C; Saxon, Andrew J; Simpson, Tracy; Gonsalves, Gregg; Lu, Haidong; McDowell, Yoanna; Hasin, Deborah S
IMPORTANCE/UNASSIGNED:Given the personal and social burdens of opioid use disorder (OUD), understanding time trends in OUD prevalence in large patient populations is key to planning prevention and treatment services. OBJECTIVE/UNASSIGNED:To examine trends in the prevalence of OUD from 2005 to 2022 overall and by age, sex, and race and ethnicity. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS/UNASSIGNED:This serial cross-sectional study included national Veterans Health Administration (VHA) electronic medical record data from the VHA Corporate Data Warehouse. Adult patients (age ≥18 years) with a current OUD diagnosis (using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification [ICD-9-CM] and International Statistical Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification [ICD-10-CM] codes) who received outpatient care at VHA facilities from January 1, 2005, to December 31, 2022, were eligible for inclusion in the analysis. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES/UNASSIGNED:The main outcome was OUD diagnoses. To test for changes in prevalence of OUD over time, multivariable logistic regression models were run that included categorical study year and were adjusted for sex, race and ethnicity, and categorical age. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:The final sample size ranged from 4 332 165 to 5 962 564 per year; most were men (89.3%-95.0%). Overall, the annual percentage of VHA patients diagnosed with OUD almost doubled from 2005 to 2017 (0.60% [95% CI, 0.60%-0.61%] to 1.16% [95% CI, 1.15%-1.17%]; adjusted difference, 0.55 [95% CI, 0.54-0.57] percentage points) and declined thereafter (2022: 0.97% [95% CI, 0.97%-0.98%]; adjusted difference from 2017 to 2022, -0.18 [95% CI, -0.19 to -0.17] percentage points). This trend was similar among men (0.64% [95% CI, 0.63%-0.64%] in 2005 vs 1.22% [95% CI, 1.21%-1.23%] in 2017 vs 1.03% [95% CI, 1.02%-1.04%] in 2022), women (0.34% [95% CI, 0.32%-0.36%] in 2005 vs 0.68% [95% CI, 0.66%-0.69%] in 2017 vs 0.53% [95% CI, 0.52%-0.55%] in 2022), those younger than 35 years (0.62% [95% CI, 0.59%-0.66%] in 2005 vs 2.22% [95% CI, 2.18%-2.26%] in 2017 vs 1.00% [95% CI, 0.97%-1.03%] in 2022), those aged 35 to 64 years (1.21% [95% CI, 1.19%-1.22%] in 2005 vs 1.80% [95% CI, 1.78%-1.82%] in 2017 vs 1.41% [95% CI, 1.39%-1.42%] in 2022), and non-Hispanic White patients (0.44% [95% CI, 0.43%-0.45%] in 2005 vs 1.28% [95% CI, 1.27%-1.29%] in 2017 vs 1.13% [95% CI, 1.11%-1.14%] in 2022). Among VHA patients aged 65 years or older, OUD diagnoses increased from 2005 to 2022 (0.06% [95% CI, 0.06%-0.06%] to 0.61% [95% CI, 0.60%-0.62%]), whereas among Hispanic or Latino and non-Hispanic Black patients, OUD diagnoses decreased from 2005 (0.93% [95% CI, 0.88%-0.97%] and 1.26% [95% CI, 1.23%-1.28%], respectively) to 2022 (0.61% [95% CI, 0.59%-0.63%] and 0.82% [95% CI, 0.80%-0.83%], respectively). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE/UNASSIGNED:This serial cross-sectional study of national VHA electronic health record data found that the prevalence of OUD diagnoses increased from 2005 to 2017, peaked in 2017, and declined thereafter, a trend primarily attributable to changes among non-Hispanic White patients and those younger than 65 years. Continued public health efforts aimed at recognizing, treating, and preventing OUD are warranted.
PMCID:11662256
PMID: 39705031
ISSN: 2574-3805
CID: 5764912

Pain Management Treatments and Opioid Use Disorder Risk in Medicaid Patients

Rudolph, Kara E; Williams, Nicholas T; Diaz, Ivan; Forrest, Sarah; Hoffman, Katherine L; Samples, Hillary; Olfson, Mark; Doan, Lisa; Cerda, Magdalena; Ross, Rachael K
INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:People with chronic pain are at increased risk of opioid misuse. Less is known about the unique risk conferred by each pain management treatment, as treatments are typically implemented together, confounding their independent effects. This study estimated the extent to which pain management treatments were associated with risk of opioid use disorder (OUD) for those with chronic pain, controlling for baseline demographic and clinical confounding variables and holding other pain management treatments at their observed levels. METHODS:Data were analyzed in 2024 from 2 chronic pain subgroups within a cohort of non-pregnant Medicaid patients aged 35-64 years, 2016-2019, from 25 states: those with (1) chronic pain and physical disability (CPPD) (N=6,133) or (2) chronic pain without disability (CP) (N=67,438). Nine pain management treatments were considered: prescription opioid (1) dose and (2) duration; (3) number of opioid prescribers; opioid co-prescription with (4) benzo- diazepines, (5) muscle relaxants, and (6) gabapentinoids; (7) nonopioid pain prescription, (8) physical therapy, and (9) other pain treatment modality. The outcome was OUD risk. RESULTS:Having opioids co-prescribed with gabapentin or benzodiazepine was statistically significantly associated with a 37-45% increased OUD risk for the CP subgroup. Opioid dose and duration also were significantly associated with increased OUD risk in this subgroup. Physical therapy was significantly associated with an 18% decreased risk of OUD in the CP subgroup. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSIONS:Coprescription of opioids with either gabapentin or benzodiazepines may substantially increase OUD risk. More positively, physical therapy may be a relatively accessible and safe pain management strategy.
PMID: 39025248
ISSN: 1873-2607
CID: 5695952

Trends in Nonfatal Overdose Rates Due to Alcohol and Prescription and Illegal Substances in Colombia, 2010-2021

Santaella-Tenorio, Julian; Zapata-López, Jhoan S; Fidalgo, Thiago M; Tardelli, Vítor S; Segura, Luis E; Cerda, Magdalena; Martins, Silvia S
PMID: 39265125
ISSN: 1541-0048
CID: 5690602

Correction to: Scaling Interventions to Manage Chronic Disease: Innovative Methods at the Intersection of Health Policy Research and Implementation Science

McGinty, Emma E; Seewald, Nicholas J; Bandara, Sachini; Cerdá, Magdalena; Daumit, Gail L; Eisenberg, Matthew D; Griffin, Beth Ann; Igusa, Tak; Jackson, John W; Kennedy-Hendricks, Alene; Marsteller, Jill; Miech, Edward J; Purtle, Jonathan; Schmid, Ian; Schuler, Megan S; Yuan, Christina T; Stuart, Elizabeth A
PMID: 37395869
ISSN: 1573-6695
CID: 5524552

Estimation of the prevalence of opioid misuse in New York State counties, 2007-2018: a bayesian spatiotemporal abundance model approach

Santaella-Tenorio, Julian; Hepler, Staci A; Rivera-Aguirre, Ariadne; Kline, David M; Cerda, Magdalena
An important challenge to addressing the opioid overdose crisis is the lack of information on the size of the population of people who misuse opioids (PWMO) in local areas. This estimate is needed for better resource allocation, estimation of treatment and overdose outcome rates using appropriate denominators (ie, the population at risk), and proper evaluation of intervention effects. In this study, we used a bayesian hierarchical spatiotemporal integrated abundance model that integrates multiple types of county-level surveillance outcome data, state-level information on opioid misuse, and covariates to estimate the latent (hidden) numbers of PWMO and latent prevalence of opioid misuse across New York State counties (2007-2018). The model assumes that each opioid-related outcome reflects a partial count of the number of PWMO, and it leverages these multiple sources of data to circumvent limitations of parameter estimation associated with other types of abundance models. Model estimates showed a reduction in the prevalence of PWMO during the study period, with important spatial and temporal variability. The model also provided county-level estimates of rates of treatment and opioid overdose using the numbers of PWMO as denominators. This modeling approach can identify the sizes of hidden populations to guide public health efforts in confronting the opioid overdose crisis across local areas. This article is part of a Special Collection on Mental Health.
PMCID:11228848
PMID: 38456752
ISSN: 1476-6256
CID: 5697472

Spatiotemporal analysis of the association between residential eviction and fatal overdose in Rhode Island

Skinner, Alexandra; Li, Yu; Jent, Victoria; Goedel, William C; Hallowell, Benjamin D; Allen, Bennett; Leifheit, Kathryn M; Cartus, Abigail R; Macmadu, Alexandria; Pratty, Claire; Samuels, Elizabeth A; Ahern, Jennifer; Cerdá, Magdalena; Marshall, Brandon Dl
OBJECTIVE/UNASSIGNED:Policy ramifications of the COVID-19 pandemic shape the concurrent housing and overdose crises in the USA. Housing insecurity is a known risk factor for overdose, yet how residential eviction may influence fatal overdose risk is understudied. We sought to evaluate the spatiotemporal relationship between neighbourhood-level residential eviction rates and overdose mortality in Rhode Island (RI) before and during a statewide eviction moratorium in response to COVID-19. METHODS/UNASSIGNED:We conducted an ecological study at the census tract level in RI (N=240) by modelling the association between quintiles of eviction rates and fatal overdose rates from 2016 to 2021. We applied a Bayesian spatiotemporal approach using an integrated nested Laplace approximation and adjusted for an a priori determined set of time-varying demographic and policy covariates. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:Descriptively, we observed a direct, dose-response relationship between quintiles of eviction incidence rates over the full study period and fatal overdose. Prior to the implementation of a statewide eviction moratorium, census tracts in the highest eviction quintile had increased rates of overdose mortality, relative to those in the lowest quintile (posterior mean relative rate = 1.49, 95% credible interval: 1.05 to 2.13). Associations during the periods of eviction moratorium were non-significant. CONCLUSION/UNASSIGNED:This work highlights the neighbourhood-level relationship between residential eviction and fatal overdose risk in the absence of an eviction moratorium. Enhanced investment in eviction prevention policies, such as rent relief and limitations to the circumstances under which landlords can file for eviction, may complement harm reduction efforts to reduce neighbourhood-level overdose inequalities.
PMCID:11812863
PMID: 40018241
ISSN: 2753-4294
CID: 5801342

Scaling Interventions to Manage Chronic Disease: Innovative Methods at the Intersection of Health Policy Research and Implementation Science

McGinty, Emma E; Seewald, Nicholas J; Bandara, Sachini; Cerdá, Magdalena; Daumit, Gail L; Eisenberg, Matthew D; Griffin, Beth Ann; Igusa, Tak; Jackson, John W; Kennedy-Hendricks, Alene; Marsteller, Jill; Miech, Edward J; Purtle, Jonathan; Schmid, Ian; Schuler, Megan S; Yuan, Christina T; Stuart, Elizabeth A
Policy implementation is a key component of scaling effective chronic disease prevention and management interventions. Policy can support scale-up by mandating or incentivizing intervention adoption, but enacting a policy is only the first step. Fully implementing a policy designed to facilitate implementation of health interventions often requires a range of accompanying implementation structures, like health IT systems, and implementation strategies, like training. Decision makers need to know what policies can support intervention adoption and how to implement those policies, but to date research on policy implementation is limited and innovative methodological approaches are needed. In December 2021, the Johns Hopkins ALACRITY Center for Health and Longevity in Mental Illness and the Johns Hopkins Center for Mental Health and Addiction Policy convened a forum of research experts to discuss approaches for studying policy implementation. In this report, we summarize the ideas that came out of the forum. First, we describe a motivating example focused on an Affordable Care Act Medicaid health home waiver policy used by some US states to support scale-up of an evidence-based integrated care model shown in clinical trials to improve cardiovascular care for people with serious mental illness. Second, we define key policy implementation components including structures, strategies, and outcomes. Third, we provide an overview of descriptive, predictive and associational, and causal approaches that can be used to study policy implementation. We conclude with discussion of priorities for methodological innovations in policy implementation research, with three key areas identified by forum experts: effect modification methods for making causal inferences about how policies' effects on outcomes vary based on implementation structures/strategies; causal mediation approaches for studying policy implementation mechanisms; and characterizing uncertainty in systems science models. We conclude with discussion of overarching methods considerations for studying policy implementation, including measurement of policy implementation, strategies for studying the role of context in policy implementation, and the importance of considering when establishing causality is the goal of policy implementation research.
PMID: 36048400
ISSN: 1573-6695
CID: 5337802

Characterizing opioid overdose hotspots for place-based overdose prevention and treatment interventions: A geo-spatial analysis of Rhode Island, USA

Samuels, Elizabeth A; Goedel, William C; Jent, Victoria; Conkey, Lauren; Hallowell, Benjamin D; Karim, Sarah; Koziol, Jennifer; Becker, Sara; Yorlets, Rachel R; Merchant, Roland; Keeler, Lee Ann Jordison; Reddy, Neha; McDonald, James; Alexander-Scott, Nicole; Cerda, Magdalena; Marshall, Brandon D L
OBJECTIVE:Examine differences in neighborhood characteristics and services between overdose hotspot and non-hotspot neighborhoods and identify neighborhood-level population factors associated with increased overdose incidence. METHODS:We conducted a population-based retrospective analysis of Rhode Island, USA residents who had a fatal or non-fatal overdose from 2016 to 2020 using an environmental scan and data from Rhode Island emergency medical services, State Unintentional Drug Overdose Reporting System, and the American Community Survey. We conducted a spatial scan via SaTScan to identify non-fatal and fatal overdose hotspots and compared the characteristics of hotspot and non-hotspot neighborhoods. We identified associations between census block group-level characteristics using a Besag-York-Mollié model specification with a conditional autoregressive spatial random effect. RESULTS:We identified 7 non-fatal and 3 fatal overdose hotspots in Rhode Island during the study period. Hotspot neighborhoods had higher proportions of Black and Latino/a residents, renter-occupied housing, vacant housing, unemployment, and cost-burdened households. A higher proportion of hotspot neighborhoods had a religious organization, a health center, or a police station. Non-fatal overdose risk increased in a dose responsive manner with increasing proportions of residents living in poverty. There was increased relative risk of non-fatal and fatal overdoses in neighborhoods with crowded housing above the mean (RR 1.19 [95 % CI 1.05, 1.34]; RR 1.21 [95 % CI 1.18, 1.38], respectively). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Neighborhoods with increased prevalence of housing instability and poverty are at highest risk of overdose. The high availability of social services in overdose hotspots presents an opportunity to work with established organizations to prevent overdose deaths.
PMID: 38245914
ISSN: 1873-4758
CID: 5624482

Demonstrating Agreement between Radio and Fluorescence Measurements of the Depth of Maximum of Extensive Air Showers at the Pierre Auger Observatory

Abdul Halim, A; Abreu, P; Aglietta, M; Allekotte, I; Cheminant, K Almeida; Almela, A; Aloisio, R; Alvarez-Muñiz, J; Yebra, J Ammerman; Anastasi, G A; Anchordoqui, L; Andrada, B; Andringa, S; Anukriti,; Apollonio, L; Aramo, C; Ferreira, P R Araújo; Arnone, E; Velázquez, J C Arteaga; Assis, P; Avila, G; Avocone, E; Bakalova, A; Barbato, F; Mocellin, A Bartz; Bellido, J A; Berat, C; Bertaina, M E; Bhatta, G; Bianciotto, M; Biermann, P L; Binet, V; Bismark, K; Bister, T; Biteau, J; Blazek, J; Bleve, C; Blümer, J; Boháčová, M; Boncioli, D; Bonifazi, C; Arbeletche, L Bonneau; Borodai, N; Brack, J; Orchera, P G Brichetto; Briechle, F L; Bueno, A; Buitink, S; Buscemi, M; Büsken, M; Bwembya, A; Caballero-Mora, K S; Cabana-Freire, S; Caccianiga, L; Caruso, R; Castellina, A; Catalani, F; Cataldi, G; Cazon, L; Cerda, M; Cermenati, A; Chinellato, J A; Chudoba, J; Chytka, L; Clay, R W; Cerutti, A C Cobos; Colalillo, R; Coleman, A; Coluccia, M R; Conceição, R; Condorelli, A; Consolati, G; Conte, M; Convenga, F; Dos Santos, D Correia; Costa, P J; Covault, C E; Cristinziani, M; Sanchez, C S Cruz; Dasso, S; Daumiller, K; Dawson, B R; de Almeida, R M; de Jesús, J; de Jong, S J; Neto, J R T de Mello; De Mitri, I; de Oliveira, J; Franco, D de Oliveira; de Palma, F; de Souza, V; de Errico, B P de Souza; De Vito, E; Del Popolo, A; Deligny, O; Denner, N; Deval, L; di Matteo, A; Dobre, M; Dobrigkeit, C; D'Olivo, J C; Mendes, L M Domingues; Dorosti, Q; Dos Anjos, J C; Dos Anjos, R C; Ebr, J; Ellwanger, F; Emam, M; Engel, R; Epicoco, I; Erdmann, M; Etchegoyen, A; Evoli, C; Falcke, H; Farmer, J; Farrar, G; Fauth, A C; Fazzini, N; Feldbusch, F; Fenu, F; Fernandes, A; Fick, B; Figueira, J M; Filipčič, A; Fitoussi, T; Flaggs, B; Fodran, T; Fujii, T; Fuster, A; Galea, C; Galelli, C; García, B; Gaudu, C; Gemmeke, H; Gesualdi, F; Gherghel-Lascu, A; Ghia, P L; Giaccari, U; Glombitza, J; Gobbi, F; Gollan, F; Golup, G; Berisso, M Gómez; Vitale, P F Gómez; Gongora, J P; González, J M; González, N; Goos, I; Góra, D; Gorgi, A; Gottowik, M; Grubb, T D; Guarino, F; Guedes, G P; Guido, E; Gülzow, L; Hahn, S; Hamal, P; Hampel, M R; Hansen, P; Harari, D; Harvey, V M; Haungs, A; Hebbeker, T; Hojvat, C; Hörandel, J R; Horvath, P; Hrabovský, M; Huege, T; Insolia, A; Isar, P G; Janecek, P; Jilek, V; Johnsen, J A; Jurysek, J; Kampert, K-H; Keilhauer, B; Khakurdikar, A; Covilakam, V V Kizakke; Klages, H O; Kleifges, M; Knapp, F; Köhler, J; Kunka, N; Lago, B L; Langner, N; de Oliveira, M A Leigui; Lema-Capeans, Y; Letessier-Selvon, A; Lhenry-Yvon, I; Lopes, L; Lu, L; Luce, Q; Lundquist, J P; Payeras, A Machado; Majercakova, M; Mandat, D; Manning, B C; Mantsch, P; Marafico, S; Mariani, F M; Mariazzi, A G; Mariş, I C; Marsella, G; Martello, D; Martinelli, S; Bravo, O Martínez; Martins, M A; Mathes, H-J; Matthews, J; Matthiae, G; Mayotte, E; Mayotte, S; Mazur, P O; Medina-Tanco, G; Meinert, J; Melo, D; Menshikov, A; Merx, C; Michal, S; Micheletti, M I; Miramonti, L; Mollerach, S; Montanet, F; Morejon, L; Morello, C; Mulrey, K; Mussa, R; Namasaka, W M; Negi, S; Nellen, L; Nguyen, K; Nicora, G; Niechciol, M; Nitz, D; Nosek, D; Novotny, V; Nožka, L; Nucita, A; Núñez, L A; Oliveira, C; Palatka, M; Pallotta, J; Panja, S; Parente, G; Paulsen, T; Pawlowsky, J; Pech, M; Pękala, J; Pelayo, R; Pereira, L A S; Martins, E E Pereira; Armand, J Perez; Bertolli, C Pérez; Perrone, L; Petrera, S; Petrucci, C; Pierog, T; Pimenta, M; Platino, M; Pont, B; Pothast, M; Shahvar, M Pourmohammad; Privitera, P; Prouza, M; Puyleart, A; Querchfeld, S; Rautenberg, J; Ravignani, D; Akim, J V Reginatto; Reininghaus, M; Ridky, J; Riehn, F; Risse, M; Rizi, V; de Carvalho, W Rodrigues; Rodriguez, E; Rojo, J Rodriguez; Roncoroni, M J; Rossoni, S; Roth, M; Roulet, E; Rovero, A C; Ruehl, P; Saftoiu, A; Saharan, M; Salamida, F; Salazar, H; Salina, G; Gomez, J D Sanabria; Sánchez, F; Santos, E M; Santos, E; Sarazin, F; Sarmento, R; Sato, R; Savina, P; Schäfer, C M; Scherini, V; Schieler, H; Schimassek, M; Schimp, M; Schmidt, D; Scholten, O; Schoorlemmer, H; Schovánek, P; Schröder, F G; Schulte, J; Schulz, T; Sciutto, S J; Scornavacche, M; Segreto, A; Sehgal, S; Shivashankara, S U; Sigl, G; Silli, G; Sima, O; Simkova, K; Simon, F; Smau, R; Šmída, R; Sommers, P; Soriano, J F; Squartini, R; Stadelmaier, M; Stanič, S; Stasielak, J; Stassi, P; Strähnz, S; Straub, M; Suomijärvi, T; Supanitsky, A D; Svozilikova, Z; Szadkowski, Z; Tairli, F; Tapia, A; Taricco, C; Timmermans, C; Tkachenko, O; Tobiska, P; Peixoto, C J Todero; Tomé, B; Torrès, Z; Travaini, A; Travnicek, P; Trimarelli, C; Tueros, M; Unger, M; Vaclavek, L; Vacula, M; Galicia, J F Valdés; Valore, L; Varela, E; Vásquez-Ramírez, A; Veberič, D; Ventura, C; Quispe, I D Vergara; Verzi, V; Vicha, J; Vink, J; Vorobiov, S; Watanabe, C; Watson, A A; Weindl, A; Wiencke, L; Wilczyński, H; Wittkowski, D; Wundheiler, B; Yue, B; Yushkov, A; Zapparrata, O; Zas, E; Zavrtanik, D; Zavrtanik, M; ,
We show, for the first time, radio measurements of the depth of shower maximum (X_{max}) of air showers induced by cosmic rays that are compared to measurements of the established fluorescence method at the same location. Using measurements at the Pierre Auger Observatory we show full compatibility between our radio and the previously published fluorescence dataset, and between a subset of air showers observed simultaneously with both radio and fluorescence techniques, a measurement setup unique to the Pierre Auger Observatory. Furthermore, we show radio X_{max} resolution as a function of energy and demonstrate the ability to make competitive high-resolution X_{max} measurements with even a sparse radio array. With this, we show that the radio technique is capable of cosmic-ray mass composition studies, both at Auger and at other experiments.
PMID: 38277596
ISSN: 1079-7114
CID: 5911672

Are you thinking what I'm thinking? Defining what we mean by "polysubstance use."

Bunting, Amanda M; Shearer, Riley; Linden-Carmichael, Ashley N; Williams, Arthur Robin; Comer, Sandra D; Cerdá, Magdalena; Lorvick, Jennifer
The rise in drug overdoses and harms associated with the use of more than one substance has led to increased use of the term "polysubstance use" among researchers, clinicians, and public health officials. However, the term retains no consistent definition across contexts. The current authors convened from disciplines including sociology, epidemiology, neuroscience, and addiction psychiatry to propose a recommended definition of polysubstance use. An iterative process considered authors' formal and informal conversations, insights from relevant symposia, talks, and conferences, as well as their own research and clinical experiences to propose the current definition. Three key concepts were identified as necessary to define polysubstance use: (1) substances involved, (2) timing, and (3) intent. Substances involved include clarifying either (1) the number and type of substances used, (2) presence of more than one substance use disorder, or (3) primary and secondary substance use. The concept of timing is recommended to use clear terms such as simultaneous, sequential, and same-day polysubstance use to describe short-term behaviors (e.g., 30-day windows). Finally, the concept of intent refers to clarifying unintentional use or exposure when possible, and greater attention to motivations of polysubstance use. These three components should be clearly defined in research on polysubstance use to improve consistency across disciplines. Consistent definitions of polysubstance use can aid in the synthesis of evidence to better address an overdose crisis that increasingly involves multiple substances.
PMCID:10939915
PMID: 37734160
ISSN: 1097-9891
CID: 5645542